Institutional anon here, Bloomberg is 100% bought and paid for

[Anonymous No.56004071]

It has become apparent that Bloomberg is being paid by Pyth and VC's, and Jump, but anons pay attention. As I've said in my last thread, I work for a multibillion dollar firm and was surprised at the lack of media attention for Chainlink. Now I have my confirmation, they're being paid. Let's take a look at the latest example.

In the latest Bloomberg Crypto newsletter, after SWIFT admitted to working with Chainlink, Bloomberg failed to mention anything about it. Zero articles. They did mention this article though, see next post

[Anonymous No.56004084]

>>56004071
post link to last thread you stupid cock sucking nigger

[Anonymous No.56004096]

This is a screenshot from the Bloomberg Crypto newsletter. It's about how crypto guys at Jump, who famously were anti-Chainlink, left to form Douro Labs. The same Douro Labs that are backing Pyth, Chainlink's chief rival. Pyth works with Cboe, Virtu, etc. If you don't know who these entities are, they're giants here in the financial world.

Bloomberg has been given what's called a gag order on Chainlink, courtesy Pyth and Jump. Now my team understands why Jump was shorting Chainlink recently, and creating bash fests on twitter.

Here is the article by the way: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-31/jump-crypto-s-specialists-depart-for-startup-that-will-work-with-pyth-network

[Anonymous No.56004104]

>>56004071
Smart contracts are just a meme. But what if there needs to be a objective way for people to agree on something. LAMO business doesn't work that way, everything is in contracts

[Anonymous No.56004115]

>>56004096
>>56004071
How many Link to make it? Is your institution accoomulating

[Anonymous No.56004122]

Chainlink success depends on tradfi connections. The problem is, tradfi seems to be backpedaling on crypto lately.

[Anonymous No.56004123]

>>56004096
is Pyth any good?

[Anonymous No.56004127]

>>56004096
wtf is this then?
https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2023-08-31/swift-unlocks-potential-of-tokenisation-with-successful-blockchain-experiments

[Anonymous No.56004131]

>>56004122
Backpedaling to what, your whore mom?

[Anonymous No.56004146]

>>56004127
Kek
/thread

[Anonymous No.56004147]

>>56004115
he said in the last thread that his company did the math and 1k should be enough to make it in the long run

[Anonymous No.56004157]

>>56004127
This is merely a press release, not a journalist promoting a story

>>56004115
I've said in the past we are, still accumulating

>>56004123
We are not fans of their architecture, and prefer to avoid the dude bro dynamics of crypto VC's

>>56004084
Don't have it, you may have to check the archives from a month or two back

[Anonymous No.56004160]

The hedge fund market maker psychopath special.

[Anonymous No.56004189]

>>56004157
what are your bosses saying about this blackballing from the media and general price suppression ?

[Anonymous No.56004194]

>>56004160
Sergey has every right to loathe these people. As Eric Schmidt put it last year, he hasn't killed anybody yet.

>>56004147
Yes, and preferably staking that amount long term, only selling rewards.

>>56004122
Tradfi is doing the very opposite, see the SWIFT experiments. The problem is, they don't have clear regulations yet due to a rat taking up the SEC post. The rat must be dealt with first

[Anonymous No.56004195]

>>56004071
Anon, I believe that 100%. I posted a thread a few days ago about this crypto hag who has a show and always features Jump projects and never once Chainlink.

>Here's why Pyth is better than Chainlink!
>According to this VC dog who works at Pyth!
>He reiterates the same lies he's been saying for years that's been corrected multiple times.
>Hag gets called out
>Oh I'm sorry I was """sick""" so I didn't do my research
She obviously was paid.

https://twitter.com/laurashin/status/1696606644921307240

[Anonymous No.56004205]

>>56004195
We also have a few crypto news websites omitting Chainlink when covering Swift's latest report.

[Anonymous No.56004211]

>>56004189
Speak of the devil, I'm being called into a meeting about our portfolio. They are pissed that there haven't been any honest reporters spreading the message about CCIP, and the price suppression is even worse. Especially what amounts to theft from the Bitcoin flash crashes after a Chainlink milestone, it's happened after CCIP mainnet, staking v0.2 infodump and now SWIFT experimentation infodump. SIBOS and SmartCon will be exciting, my team will be attending both

[Anonymous No.56004213]

>>56004195
youtube link to this absolute shitshow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL4_MoVdzQ8

>All the worlds financial data goes through Pyth
lmao

[Anonymous No.56004228]

>>56004195
Running into meeting but yes, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-31/jump-crypto-s-specialists-depart-for-startup-that-will-work-with-pyth-network

He is in this article. He is part of who is paying Bloomberg and this crypto journo for publicity

[Anonymous No.56004243]

>>56004157
>>56004096
Why are they doing this though?
It’s becoming more and and more clear that, for whatever reason, a faction of anti chainlink crypto enthusiasts exists.
And they continue to play an active role in in trying to discredit Sergey’s relevance.

This is politically motivated. It’s the only explanation that makes any sense. There is no gatekeeper for investing in chainlink. Any sensibly minded person would participate in Chainlink’s investment opportunity rather than settling for scraps from some desperate competitor.

[Anonymous No.56004269]

>>56004243
like everything else, $ retard
they were late seeing it coming and now they "see it", if they can get a slice of the pie even while losing long term then it's worth it
imagine how much money will be made as this tech is actually adopted
in internet terms we're in the early 90s

[Anonymous No.56004275]

>>56004213
He has one of the most punchable faces I've ever seem.

>>56004228
I can't wait for Chainlink to release their low latency pull-based price feeds to finally end these fuckers' whole careers.

[Anonymous No.56004305]

>>56004071
Why should anyone buy a shorted crypto like link?

[Anonymous No.56004323]

>>56004243
BECAUSE LINK KILLS THE GRIFT IT IS ENDGAME CRYPTO THE ONLY ONE THAT IS TRULY NEEDED DATA IS OIL

[Anonymous No.56004331]

>>56004071
>multimillion dollar firm
>just fucking buys chainlink on spot because of the same narrative that us retail plebes have bought into
>no mention of quantitative analysis, strategy, hedging, etc literally their plan is to just buy spot ad hodl like some guy on 4chan

I'm imagining the execs of multibillion dollar fund sitting around and trying to piece together the same breadcrumbs we are and i am just not buying it

[Anonymous No.56004332]

>>56004084
>>/biz/thread/55757589
I think this was him

[Anonymous No.56004335]

>>56004195
to be fair that is one sickly looking bitch

[Anonymous No.56004338]

>>56004228
i wonder if they also put some distance from jump to get away from them controlling the feeds talk
sergey called it out openly at consensus which was very unlike him
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7u355iyDTf0

[Anonymous No.56004352]

>>56004331
is this a failed bot script? nothing you are saying is relevant to the OP

[Anonymous No.56004370]

>>56004352
is this triple posting fag a bot or an actual autist? I can perfectly understand who that post is relevant to the OP

[Anonymous No.56004400]

damn link niggers are desperate af larping like a mfer

[Anonymous No.56004406]

>>56004352
his backstory is that this multibillion shekel firm he works for is accumulating link. but the story lacks any halfway compelling details or nuance that would signal working experience at such an institution. It reads like it was written by one of us.

I agree with the main point though, that LINK is being suppressed by some faction of the powers that be within crypto (VCs, eth trannies, MEV cartel)

[Anonymous No.56006383]

>>56004071
>guys insider here, corporate media is bought and paid for!
wow thanks for the revelation anon

[Anonymous No.56006419]

>>56004071
Well, there certainly has to be a reason why fud is on here literally 24/7. If it’s so unknown why keep fudding it?

[Anonymous No.56006434]

>>56004205
>Chainlink advocates caught lying again

https://cointelegraph.com/news/chainlink-launches-cross-chain-protocol-ccip-ethereum-blockchain-mainnet

https://blockworks.co/news/swift-tests-chainlink-ccip

[Anonymous No.56006442]

>>56004071
>SWIFT admitted to working with Chainlink
they merely are testing with chainlink. the actual solution which is production-ready and deploying soon is XRP. they want to gobble up as many XRP tokens as they can before going live and ascending to godhood

[Anonymous No.56006452]

>>56006419
Because it’s funny
The fact that you think there’s some big organized campaign to fud link is hilarious
You and link aren’t that important

[Anonymous No.56006470]

>>56006442

[Anonymous No.56006523]

>>56006442
>XRP
GOOD ONE, HOLY FUCK IM WHEEEZING

[Anonymous No.56006530]

Are chainlink the good guys here bc all the 4chan incels bought it? Is this just jew v jew

[Anonymous No.56006552]

>>56006530
Chainlink is what gives an anon his power. It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds biz together.

[Anonymous No.56006560]

>>56006470
>>56006523
we'll see who gets the last laugh. (hint: it's me)

[Anonymous No.56006566]

>>56006523
kek, watch some unknown shitcoin be chosen by swift to completely btfo stinkies and XRP baggies

[Anonymous No.56006629]

>>56006452
It’s not funny at all to be late to the right investment when a bunch of midwits made it before you, so I get it

[Anonymous No.56006636]

>>56006552
This but unironically

[Anonymous No.56006659]

I get the cryptocompare mailout and it's always good for some keks, too. Making it not the first story so it's not the headline (which is maybe justifiable, the BTC ETF delay was pretty big news) but then how's the wording:
>SWIFT, the international financial messaging service, and Chainlink, a leading Web3 services platform, have embarked on a series of experiments. These experiments aim to streamline the transfer of tokenized assets across a variety of blockchain networks.
Way to report the news while simultaneously burying it behind boring as fuck copy.

[Anonymous No.56006679]

Larp thread made by seething bag holders who take turns freding eachother hopium to escape reality.
Are the "jump vcs" in the room with us right now kiddo?

[Anonymous No.56006691]

>adem saying kiddo to try and pass the blame onto michael
fucking kek

[Anonymous No.56006693]

>>56006659
i honestly think it's because they're retarded rather than malicious

[Anonymous No.56006701]

>>56006693
I think they're both. Fundamentally retarded, but what limited comprehension they have is channeled through malice.
Maltarded? Relicious?

[Anonymous No.56006760]

Old fag from /pol/ then /biz/
I mined BTC early and bought drugs with it because I was a fuming junky at 1 point in my life.
When ETH was in start up phase, I was fucking mesmerized by Vitalik but watched endless memes being made him and video game and Skelly $ and just weird shit about him and hard fudding what ETH was attempting . both topics was throttled hard. Until LINK came along.
While I did contribute to early days toilet fud and such,
I’m ready to say LINK is now more fudded then early unproven ETH.
If you was here then, someone chime in. Im not fucking crazy.
>55K link bag

[Anonymous No.56006786]

This threads fucking retarded. Fuck the jannies, fuck chainlink, dumbasses should’ve backed /biz/ all the way instead of half assed if you wanted moral support

[Anonymous No.56006787]

They are here.

[Anonymous No.56006789]

>>56004071
Is Pyth big?
I didn't hear too much about it

[Anonymous No.56006793]

>>56006787

[Anonymous No.56006800]

>>56006793

[Anonymous No.56006804]

>>56006800

[Anonymous No.56006809]

>>56006804

[Anonymous No.56006814]

>>56006809

[Anonymous No.56006816]

why the bloody fuck is anyone even remotely interested in anything related to sam bankman's solana

[Anonymous No.56006832]

>>56006787
>>56006793
>>56006800
>>56006804
>>56006809
>>56006814
>P…Pwease bail out my oracle company b-biz…
>I’m sowwy I was mean :( I’ll be nicer if you help me, promise
How about no and fuck off and buy an advertisement

[Anonymous No.56006863]

its september what went wrong?

[Anonymous No.56006873]

>>56006863
it's september 2nd, ADHD zoomie. try this thing called patience

[Anonymous No.56006882]

>>56004071
>cha*nstink
Into the trash it goes

[Anonymous No.56006935]

>>56006442
What the fuck is this ironic shitposting or are you retarded? Why do you think they’re coming to SmartCon?

[Anonymous No.56006986]

>>56006452
Important enough for us to dedicated ourselves to buying more Link at these crazy low prices, despite your best efforts. I'm telling everyone I know to buy Link, and am having success

[Anonymous No.56006991]

>>56006935
because it's a red herring

[Anonymous No.56007016]

>>56004071
>Chainlink completely brought to their knees by institutional fuddies.
So based. I'm buying PYTH

[Anonymous No.56007051]

>>56006991
You can’t be serious. You think Nick Kerigan and Jonathan Ehrenfeld give a damn about xrp? lmao

[Anonymous No.56007331]

>>56006787
>>56006793
>>56006800
>>56006804
>>56006809
>>56006814
Legendary posts. It says a lot that /biz/ is literally the only place on the internet that holds these parasites to account at all.

[Anonymous No.56007388]

>>56004071
I come back after 6 years and you fags are still shilling LINK? Fuuuuuck. Glad those aren’t my bags…

[Anonymous No.56007393]

>>56007388
checked
imagine thinking all this link spam is organic

[Anonymous No.56007775]

>>56004195
I think you're spot on

[Anonymous No.56008177]

>>56004096
>Bloomberg has been given what's called a gag order on Chainlink, courtesy Pyth and Jump
implying this wasnt courtesy of swift and implying they even needed to pay money for it rather than simply demand it
this is how full dominance is achieved: you kill all sentiment or even mentioning at all in the media while in the meantime you onboard your own preselected partners and then all of a sudden out of nowhere all at once: here we present the new standard

[Anonymous No.56008242]

>>56004194
>The rat must be dealt with first
how can he be dealt with, does there exist some form of impeachment procedure or when is his term up, or is it maybe getting a phonecall in the evening and then declaring you are stepping down for health reasons and wishing the best to your successor
i have no idea how burger government stuff works

[Anonymous No.56008261]

>>56007393
I'm a Chainlink advocate and we welcome everyone's feedback so please let me know what you love and what you're not such a fan of about Chainlink and the team. Rest assured you are listened to and let's all work together to get 'a little bit of Chainlink' in everything we do!

[Anonymous No.56008421]

>>56008242
How daft do you have to be to seriously think that Gensler is the one in control here. He's just the gatekeeper stalling the crypto industry while TradFi gets their systems ready to take over DLT. And it seems abundantly clear based on the latest results from SWIFT that CCIP is going to be a crucial part of TradFi's takeover.

[Anonymous No.56008449]

>>56007388
Somehow I doubt you were here in 2017 and didnt come back for the 2020 run and only came back just now.

[Anonymous No.56008473]

>>56008449
He never checked the price and there was literally nothing in the news about it at all. Also nobody mentioned it in public in fact it was taboo. Also he lives in a forest in alaska with no electricity.

[Anonymous No.56008561]

>>56004071
Somebody post the last thread please. Cant find it

[Anonymous No.56008586]

>>56004243
because they didn't buy the ICO. they will not promote anything they didn't buy cheaper than you.

[Anonymous No.56008598]

>>56008586
Not just missing the ICO, they don't buy on secondary at all. If they are not printing the tokens themselves, or getting first dibs in seed rounds, they're not interested.
Why spend money on crypto tokens when they can make their own?
This is how deep the rot is.

[Anonymous No.56008608]

>>56008598
truth. simple as.

[Anonymous No.56008610]

>>56006679
>an useless loser
esl detected -isn't it time for your weekly rice feast?

[Anonymous No.56008714]

>>56004213
"thumbs down" on the video.

thanks

[Anonymous No.56008737]

>>56006787
I'm trying to understand this image. Who is "we", is "we" referring to Chainlink the company?

[Anonymous No.56008783]

>>56008737
if you give enough money to a company without seeing a return, you'd move on. but there are those that believe they are on their team now, when all they are is a source of liability free income for the company. that's the "we", their team they imagine to be a part of

[Anonymous No.56008793]

>>56006760
Sure, unfortunately ETH had a great early run un comparison to LINK. It should be at 100$ right now

[Anonymous No.56008797]

I just turned 30 and have never had sex, how do I develop my magical powers?

[Anonymous No.56008910]

>>56008421
i would have swallowed that line until the blackrock situation
one does not simply deny blackrock so something will have to give
and gary was clearly in the sammy camp so now he is out to smash and destroy as much as possible before someone else goes walking away with the price

[Anonymous No.56008916]

>>56004071
FUCK JANNYS

[Anonymous No.56008953]

>>56004071
Based

[Anonymous No.56008986]

>>56008714
thumbs down on your mom, dork

[Anonymous No.56008993]

>>56008783
bro don't tell me how I should invest my money. what if I told you I put more money into boost than you put into your "portfolio" of shitty blue chip stocks. there's no risk if I can afford to lose it. in fact I'm going to sell everything and buy more boost just out of spite. we do things differently here, you wouldn't understand. boost is the opportunity of a lifetime, don't be mad just because you missed the boat...

[Anonymous No.56009001]

>>56008797
step 1. acquire boost coin step 2. go outside step 3. touch grass

[Anonymous No.56009010]

>>56008910
Gary Gensler is a corrupt scum bag but we need to take our win where it's possible to do so. He has no choice but to give in to whatever congress wants. We can use this to our advantage...we need to push the narrative that we need laws that help crypto rather than impede its progress. We cant let this be a bad thing.

[Anonymous No.56009015]

>>56008916
jannies are mad because they didn't buy boost early. Now they are scared because if they fomo in, we can dump on them and make a couple grand per person easy. They should just buy in, trust in the boost, trust in boost chad.

[Anonymous No.56009026]

>>56004157
>I've said in the past we are, still accumulating
no you're not. This is a larp thread, you have had a year plus of floor prices on the chart to accumulate not to mention OTC buys straight from the chainlink team.

[Anonymous No.56009037]

>>56008737
Can't you read? The pyth shill is put straight by the link shill in terms of the date, then slips up and says 'we released it first', clearly a sign it was written by someone close to them.
>inb4 maybe it was just a pyth fan
yeh biz is really teeming with pyth diehards kek

[Anonymous No.56009068]

>>56009037
if buying tokens makes you this angry, maybe it's not for you?

[Anonymous No.56009079]

>>56004147
How do they intend to generate liquidity for that to be possible? Do they think liquidity is generated from thin air or what? It's high time we realized this and moved on instead.

[Anonymous No.56009092]

>>56009068
Same reason why I left link for other options precisely xtp for now.


Folks need to realize this.

[Anonymous No.56009460]

>>56006434
Nigger, how many people actusally read articles instead of just headlines? The overwhelming majority of normies just sit and scroll on the phone through their social media of choice, and all they see are tweets like the anon you responded to. *THAT* is the predominant form of dishonesty in the media, and it has been for 200 years -- lies by omission, understanding that the niggercattle absolutely refuse to educate themselves, relying instead on their "trusted expert" of choice

[Anonymous No.56009570]

>>56009068
What gave you the impression i was angry?

[Anonymous No.56009578]

>>56009068
Really sorry if i hurt your feelings. Are you new here? If you think i sounded angry you should read some of the other stuff people type on here

[Anonymous No.56009602]

>>56004323
Ive had multiple "I finally get it" moments since finding link quite late in q1 of 2021. But I finally get it. The casino will close. Eth will be nothing but a settlement layer. BTC hasnt and wont be used for anything when CBDCs roll out. I see why the BTC-maxis and libertarians hate link. It kills the dream and hands it to the banks. But we saw what the libertarians and cypher punks did (crypto casino and fleece retail with VCs). All of the coins and tokens will fade away. The entirety of the crypto marketcap will funnel into link. 10 link is ultimately going to be a make it stack. I cant promise or predict a timeline. None of us can. Regulators will have to greenlight banks to move all this money in. The SEC will need to separate the wheat from the chaff. Short of speculative pumps (in an environment where chainlink is currently brutally and mercilessly shorted) this will take a long time. More than any of us want to admit or entertain. But at the end of the long gard road is true and genuine financial freedom for EVERY single one of us.

[Anonymous No.56009689]

>>56006434
Are you retarded?
Those tweets are literally screenshots, that's actually how Cointelegraph and Blockworks worded that shit.

https://twitter.com/Cointelegraph/status/1697226751594901962
https://twitter.com/Blockworks_/status/1697230448563286420

It's CNN-tier manipulation.

[Anonymous No.56009702]

>>56008986
>>56008993
>>56009001
>>56009010
>>56009015
How do you switch IDs? VPN? I dont want to pay for one.

[Anonymous No.56009710]

>>56009570
>>56009578
You're replying to a bot.

[Anonymous No.56009738]

>>56008449
Had 2 kids in the last 6 years. It’s like a time warp. Maybe you’ll find that out for yourself… one day.

I do wish I was paying attention during 2020 though. Would have much more BTC…

[Anonymous No.56009752]

>>56009738
cool story bro
next time involve some vampires

[Anonymous No.56009753]

>>56007393
What fucking spam?
99% of "spam" related to Link is fud.

>hurrr chart
>durrr token not needed
>murrr HR roasties
ad nauseam

Meanwhile OP wrote an original medium-effort media analysis.

[Anonymous No.56009861]

>>56008261
Is this bait

[Anonymous No.56009905]

>>56009092
>>56009079
No one cares what you think you cringey fag

[Anonymous No.56009981]

>>56009752
LOL I missed this place!

[Anonymous No.56010299]

>>56009710
>bots
share with us how they're supposed to solve the captcha

[Anonymous No.56010316]

>>56009905
Kek
Bag holder. You're among the retards I exist liquidity on twice. Keep holding on and feeding Sergey Nazarov's luxurious lifestyle.

[Anonymous No.56010319]

>>56009738
gj anon. I sat on here lurking biz threads to confim link ws the real deal. Literally wasted my life for the six years

[Anonymous No.56010336]

>>56009981
Its only been a day though, don't be so clingy.
We both know youve been checking the price daily for the past six years and accumulating more Link.

[Anonymous No.56010446]

>>56009602
the true cypher punk btc maxis never supported the shitcoin casino and were telling everyone to only stack btc
and they certainly never endorsed any vc's

that said even if the banks achieve full victory btc will always serve as a store of value with no counterparty risk where everyone can go into if they distrust the banks so in that case maxi gaol achieved
also having the mere option to effortlessly move your money will ensure a better standard among custodians

[Anonymous No.56010580]

Pyth is better then chainlink. Link is slow and outdated

[Anonymous No.56010582]

>>56009570
>>56009578
cool down. you don't have to get so defensive, it's just money. investments go sideways all the time

[Anonymous No.56010593]

>>56009602
If blockchain has any future this is true. But if not then they’re all the same tier scams really and by buying LINK we gimped ourselves because any of us could have been buying dog coins instead and probably done better short term.

[Anonymous No.56010716]

>>56010582
it's not just money though it's everything. my cat died and the washing machine blew up. today i slipped in dog shit on my way to the launderette and to cap it all you're shouting at me. it's just all becoming too much to bear and my barely adequate psychic defences are crumbling

[Anonymous No.56010742]

>>56010319
Only regret I have is totally missing out on < $5k BTC. Hope you accumulated.

[Anonymous No.56010751]

>>56010336
I’ve never checked the price of LINK.

[Anonymous No.56010821]

>>56004213
>>56004275
>negative canthal tilt

[Anonymous No.56010962]

>>56004189
How is link blackballed when sergey goes on msnbc and they have multiple forbes articles

[Anonymous No.56010975]

>>56010962
sergey goes to msnbc but he never talks about link or oracles or anything relevant they just ask him about bitcoin price lmao

[Anonymous No.56011007]

>>56009602
>sigh

Put me in the Twitter screencap

[Anonymous No.56011012]

>>56010975
So if they gave him a few minutes to do his buzzword ramble on oracles the price would be different?

[Anonymous No.56011047]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dOG8XU03UUY

12 minute mark sergey talks about CCIP. Muhhhhhh “blackball”…you conspiracy faggots are insufferable

[Anonymous No.56011080]

>>56004147
Link to the last thread?

[Anonymous No.56011173]

>>56010299
>he doesnt know captcha is AI training nor does he know they can learn from visual input

[Anonymous No.56011189]

>>56011173
So tell me, AI clever trousers, how are you able to determine that the posts i responded to were bots, and others not?

[Anonymous No.56011196]

>>56011173
In fact, how do you know i'm not a bot, and the irony is that YOU are the one responding to a bot?
Or perhaps we're both bots?
Maybe everyone is a bot?

[Anonymous No.56011218]

>>56011196
no need to get upset about not knowing how captchas work though, you can't know everything. it's the weekend, relax

[Anonymous No.56011262]

>>56011218
This is how I relax. You should see me at work, I'm ruthless. Have another toke, homeboy.

[Anonymous No.56011285]

>>56008714
The Son's of Belial are based in Antarctica.

[Anonymous No.56011291]

>>56011262
you relax by not knowing how captchas work?

[Anonymous No.56011301]

>>56011285
are you a flat earther?

[Anonymous No.56011321]

>>56011291
Does that freak you out?

[Anonymous No.56011335]

I have an old friend who recently started an internship at a big shot market making firm and I tried to get some insider scoops out of him over dinner and a couple bottles of wine the other night, and he basically told me it was an open secret in the industry how certain crypto teams just bribe firms like his to 'boost up' the price and such, so yeah it confirmed what I always suspected about price manipulation and hush hush 'pay 4 play' backroom deals. He revealed to me some minor anecdotes but that included some pretty big names that even I was kinda surprised by, like even some of the largest projects who you'd think would behave more subtly because of regulatory scrutiny half-openly engage in this type of practice through various backdoors and loopholes, like subsidiaries 'foundations' and the likes. But the weirdest thing was when I asked him about this one specific team that you may be overly familiar with here and he acted super weird and tensed up all of a sudden and then tried to cut the dinner short, telling me he had to head on home soon, etc. I really tried to get him to relax, and he just told me like 'yeah no, this project is not kosher, it's on the blacklist, because of... diverging interests' basically, and he wouldn't say more but his behavior alone said the whole story. I was very shocked to hear that but when I started thinking about it afterwards it started making a whole lot of sense. What a fucked up industry.

[Anonymous No.56011341]

>>56008561
>>56011080
>>/biz/thread/55757589

[Anonymous No.56011827]

>>56009689
Your implication was that they are trying to hide the Swift X Chainlink news. That anon provided direct evidence to refute your claim. Are you trying to tell me that because not every single article they have ever written is about Chainlink, that they are supressing it?

Shady fucking advocates.

[Anonymous No.56013661]

>>56011335
This is why cnbc and Bloomberg always ignore chainlink. I wonder why they’re on the black list. Any speculation?

Cnbc is on air everyday and tech check never talks about them, not once

[Anonymous No.56013768]

>>56011335
>blacklist
is that a good thing or is that a bad thing? It's obvious certain cryptos pay for coverage to get normies interested.

[Anonymous No.56013799]

>>56010316
Fuck you and go to hell.

[Anonymous No.56013843]

>>56013799
You sound so pathetic rn. Do yourself a big favor and leave, or keep being a loser, MF.


I'm always very selective with my choices, and I don't settle for less, down to the fintech I'm using for payment.

[Anonymous No.56013850]

cant wait for link to go to zero and end this

[Anonymous No.56013919]

>>56013850
then my real life can begin bros

[Anonymous No.56014060]

>>56011827
>the biggest single financial organization in the world releases a report on a product they're developing with Chainlink
>Cointelegraph doesn't mention Chainlink in their tweet

versus

>some faggot ramps up the wash trading of his XRP for a second
>Cointelegraph mentions "XRP" four times in the tweet. See pic.

That is insane news suppression.This is the level of kikery that Goebbels was talking about.
The fact that they reported on the launch of CCIP weeks ago doesn't change this at all, neck yoursefl you disingenuous snake.

[Anonymous No.56014093]

>>56014060
i have an old friend in the industry, he told me about the blacklist. it basically says "no moonboy fantasies". it makes a whole lot of sense

[Anonymous No.56014101]

>>56014093
>swift report
>a fantasy

>"XRP wash trading is bullish"
>not a fantasy

fucking lmao

[Anonymous No.56014113]

>>56014101
no need to get so angry about it, it's only money

[Anonymous No.56014123]

>>56014113
You've been telling people "don't be angry", "cool down", "don't be defensive", "don't be upset", "relax" all thread long.

Smells like projection to me.

[Anonymous No.56014219]

>>56014123
is that really how you want to spend your sunday? arguing on the internet that you aren't angry?

[Anonymous No.56014289]

>>56014219
this is REALLY gonna RILE EM UP

[Anonymous No.56014318]

>>56014219
Calm down bro.

[Anonymous No.56014573]

>>56014113
do you idiots really still think emotional appeals work here like we are some cramer watching normiecattle

>>56014219
here is another hint sundays or weekends in general dont mean anything here since the majority of frens dont wagie in the cagie by being on either side of that particular distribution