/biz/ - Business & Finance

File: 3.21 MB, 473x473, 1514498377724.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 09:09:25 2017 No.5597749 [Reply] [Original]

So Ripple is worth $70 billion. Let's not forget that ChainLink is going to utterly annihilate Ripple once the SWIFT partnership goes live. Ripple is only this high because it in theory can compete with Swift. Link is actually the real fucking deal. Basically, it is becoming more and more likely that people with even 5k Link are going to be millionaires.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 09:11:51 2017 No.5597807 File: 17 KB, 604x340, 1512101963617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5597749

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 09:12:12 2017 No.5597812 >>5597749 Every fucking day. Give it up stinkylinky no one wants your shit ass bags

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 09:42:56 2017 No.5598594 >>5597812 Too bad you can't thumbs up posts

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 09:57:38 2017 No.5599001 >>5598594 Too bad you came from reddit

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:01:10 2017 No.5599098

>>5597749
LINK and XRP don't even do the same thing. This post is retarded. It's more likely that Ripple's tech will be incorporated into Swift's infrastructure than anything. There will probably be a Swift/Ripple partnership, and if not Swift will just buyout Ripple.

And guess what? If that happens, LINK and XRP can still coexist, because they serve entirely different purposes. Do you even know what LINK does, or did you just see "BANKS XD XD XD" and think it was the same thing as XRP?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:04:12 2017 No.5599194
File: 1.40 MB, 942x628, foite.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5597749
Read my lips: everyone and everything will use mainstream smart contracts in the future.
Smart contracts will utterly transform the way we think about business.

It's almost not even hyperbole to say that the internet was a necessary stepping stone towards mainstream smart contracts.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:07:29 2017 No.5599288 >>5599098 >Swift will buy Ripple Did you just buy at $2

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:09:52 2017 No.5599352 The absolute state of linkies.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:14:07 2017 No.5599456 Sergay cashed out, just sell your bags linkies and buy a good coin.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:19:43 2017 No.5599627
File: 2 KB, 125x93, 134531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Ripple bros don't even say XRP has a higher potential ROI at this point.
Link is still at its floor, XRP is pumped to shit
For that reason alone I swapped all my XRP to LINK today
Also disagree with XRP ideologically and technologically, they cut corners, centralize everything and it isnt a true crypto

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:21:34 2017 No.5599684 >>5597749 Is there a good pairing with this token?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:21:41 2017 No.5599689

what is even the point of "investing" in ripple? They control enough of the supply to basically set the price so, when playtime is over and it's time to use it for it's intended purpose are these normalos just praying ripple takes mercy on them and sets it higher than what they paid for it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:25:30 2017 No.5599801 >>5599627 Yeah, what is the absolute maximum best case scenario for ripple in few years? 10x, maybe 20x. What is the absolute maximum best case scenario for link in few years? 100x-500x depending on adoption and partnerships.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:29:57 2017 No.5599953

I don't get it is LINK a meme? I was invested in it at some point but then I looked at the subreddit, it was dead. I looked at the website, last update was about the ico. I sold with 100% profit but everyday there is a thread about it here? Is this a troll trap?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:30:55 2017 No.5599979 >>5599953 yea it's just a meme

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:32:35 2017 No.5600023 >>5599953 I think it is, anon. It not performing well. Their dev are 2 literally whos but /biz/ would defend them for some reason

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:32:38 2017 No.5600026 >>5597749 hey guys, newfag here is chainlink a good investment?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:33:33 2017 No.5600061 >>5597807 I really, really, really like this image. Care if I download it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:33:53 2017 No.5600069 >>5600026 Look at the chart ? Performing well ? No

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:34:39 2017 No.5600092 >>5600026 When news comes around. Sergey's communication is absolute shit so there's no real telling when the bass will drop.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:36:40 2017 No.5600151

>>5600026
this is stale piece of shit which slowly falling into zero value
People just shilling that "rumor" about SWIFT but basically either devs are just lying about that to get hype or they rewrite their token in Swift programming language. Don't buy their bags, anon. They'll pinkpost in a week or so.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:37:06 2017 No.5600167 >>5600026 no, dont listen to these bagholders

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:38:01 2017 No.5600190 >>5597749 >Ripple is only this high because it in theory can compete with Swift no, it's only this high because normies are braindead and think it'll go to $1000 "just like eth!" and also because jews manipulated it

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:38:24 2017 No.5600203 >>5600167 >>5600151 >>5600069 At this point, I'm not sure whether you fudders are legit faggots, or if you're doing god's work by increasing the average buy-in price of Link holders.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:39:19 2017 No.5600226 >>5600203 I was literally just wondering the same thing. It's bizarre. Real talk, LINK will be $1 easily end of Q1.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:40:37 2017 No.5600257

>>5599953
Link, if working and implemented, will be huge
Do some research, this is not another shitcoin that tries to be the next BTC
this goes beyond cryptocurrencies

The reason why it's a dead and people are just memeing about it
is beacuse they give little to no information,
in the last 2 months not much happend and people even suspected it to be a scam

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:40:48 2017 No.5600267 >>5599098 >LINK and XRP don't even do the same thing. you're right they don't do the same thing, but LINK can do everything ripple can do and more. plus it does it cheaper.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:47:56 2017 No.5600442 This is a long hold but will be a top 10 coin in the close future. There's huge potential for this one if you've looked into it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:48:43 2017 No.5600459 >implying Sergey is not bound by NDAs There is only so much news they can deliver without getting into trouble. Read the latest blog post for some hints.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:50:45 2017 No.5600516 >>5600442 Yup and when it hits top 10 that would put it at $17 minimum. We'll see that valuation by Q3 2018

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:55:12 2017 No.5600657 >>5600442 You made a typo that zero shouldn't be next to the 1. Just leave the 1.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 10:57:35 2017 No.5600722 File: 486 KB, 4000x2250, 1514506745133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Kek, swift will be lucky if chainlink even decides to use them. Chainlink has so many use cases It's rediculous. They will put lawyers out of business.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:01:00 2017 No.5600827 >>5599098 Why would SWIFT want anything to do with xrp? You obviously have no clue as to how these things work.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:02:33 2017 No.5600863 File: 2.29 MB, 1248x780, 1514154671324.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Everyone saying that link is worthless is just fudding for a lower buy in price. Just jealous you didn't buy enough when it was 17 cents.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:05:25 2017 No.5600931

>>5600827
Hurrr durrr how do business competitors and partnerships work

Swift's crusty old dinosaur tech from the 1970's is obviously being threatened right now. They will have to adapt. It will be a lot easier to partner with Ripple than it would be to develop their own tech.

You have no idea how anything works. You probably don't even know what Swift does.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:06:52 2017 No.5600968 >>5600931 >a lot easier to partner with Ripple You're misinformed -- read about how Ripple works vs LINK. LINK is much, much easier to implement for SWIFT and others.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:07:39 2017 No.5600990
File: 609 KB, 640x621, Image-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

The fudders are pic related. I know because I can't even find someone who can even give a coherent reason why link is worthless. There is no evidence link is a scam. Allk they can do is shut on the coin of the future in hopes they can buy some at a lower price.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:13:58 2017 No.5601144
File: 358 KB, 1280x720, 1513155270133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5600931
Ripple will put swift out of business. Banks currently use swift. When ripple came banks were hesitant because it requires an entire overhaul of their systems to uyse the ripple ledger. When they change their systems to work with ripple swift will be out of a job. Chainlink can work within existing systems and allows banks to function without altering anything

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:21:50 2017 No.5601360 >>5600990 What if sergey releases the rest of the supply??? He even wrote in the white paper that he disagrees with using the tokens as an investment

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:23:05 2017 No.5601392 File: 277 KB, 570x444, 56824686423794268554268542.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] pee pee poo poo stinky linkies

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:27:55 2017 No.5601514 >>5601360 so what did he ask everyone for 32 millions dollars for then? just support his stupid project for fun? why doesnt he give us shares of smartcontract.com

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:30:31 2017 No.5601585

>>5601360
If more people use link which has a huge function the price will increase. You can even staker the tokens in nodes and make passive income. Even if all the tokens get added no one will be selling and the price will still increase. A third of all tokens are already in circulation.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:31:53 2017 No.5601634 >>5601360 I think you're misunderstanding what he said. Like most crypto inventors, he's saying the coin's purpose is not as an investment -- he sees it as having real utility.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:32:02 2017 No.5601638 Chainlink has fallen to Rank 108. It's time to say goodbye to this dead shitcoin. You had a good run linkies. Market sell all Chainlink (LINK) tokens on the crypto currency exchange Binance, immediately.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:32:12 2017 No.5601644 File: 74 KB, 640x621, IMG951053.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5601392 I can do it too stinky linky

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:32:55 2017 No.5601674 >>5600931 Except LINK is ten times easier to implement and use than ripple you fucking idiot

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:34:51 2017 No.5601727

>>5600968
>>5601144
LINK doesn't do the same thing as XRP. You clearly don't even know what your own shitcoin does.

XRP and RippleNet: A distributed ledger technology for moving value

LINK: An oracle that allows smart contracts to communicate with one another

Did you guys just see the word "banks" and think it must be the same thing? That's sad.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:34:51 2017 No.5601729 Link is decentralized and trustless. Ripple is a centralized piece of shit.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:35:22 2017 No.5601745 >>5601674 see>>5601727 you fucking retard.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:36:54 2017 No.5601782 >>5599194 i can't see your lips

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:37:51 2017 No.5601811 Holy shit at Ripple's valuation my ChainLink will be worth nearly $10 million.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:38:16 2017 No.5601823 File: 8 KB, 153x162, 1512229425286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5601727 >>5601745 Hey samefag tagging their own post. You think smart contracts can't do what ripple does and More? You have some mental problems.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:39:01 2017 No.5601848 >>5601729 >muh centrulizayyshun You don't even know what that word means, and it's false anyways. XRP is more decentralized than bitcoin. I bet you didn't know that, you sad stinky linky.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:39:28 2017 No.5601853 File: 1.83 MB, 275x154, 1513588000611.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5601585 >>5601634 >what is supply&demand?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:39:52 2017 No.5601862 >>5601823 Imagine being so retarded that you don't understand I was tagging my own post so I didn't have to type it out again. So this is the power of the stinky linky brainlet. Amazing

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:41:07 2017 No.5601900 File: 210 KB, 1313x1014, 1513359815727.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5601862

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:42:33 2017 No.5601942 >>5601900 I unironically made the toilet meme in the top right corner. I made it krita, I still have the source file saved on my home computer. Funny story. I love LINK, but I don't think you boys understand what it does.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:42:38 2017 No.5601945 >>5601644 I hope your folder full of those memes would supply your point for another 2 month of literally nothing

>>	pumping this soon Fri Dec 29 11:43:08 2017 No.5601957 it's a bitcoin pump and dump group https://discord.gg/Yx8gxCH :) :)

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:43:29 2017 No.5601971 >>5601957 die pajeet fuck

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:43:33 2017 No.5601973 >>5601853 You must think minable coins are all worthless then

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:43:54 2017 No.5601981 >>5601745 Why would I need to see that? Are you delirious? Take some aspirin.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:44:28 2017 No.5602001 >>5599953 Link is a meme. Don't buy it. Tell everyone you know that knows how to crypto to stay the Fuck away from that shitcoin. The white paper is literally toilet paper and the Devs are exit scamming as soon as they can.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:45:16 2017 No.5602033 >>5601981 Because I'm smarter than you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:46:22 2017 No.5602071 I just market sold all 10k of my chainlink, fuck this shit coin. Sandbagged while everything else is mooning. I went all in on real moon mission. bazinga.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:46:22 2017 No.5602073 File: 284 KB, 700x906, 1512120321888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5602033 Deluded

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:46:55 2017 No.5602090 >>5599689 Basically they have to. They are like dogs fighting over a few scraps that have fallen off the table while the big boys continue eating their prime rib.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:46:58 2017 No.5602093 >>5602033 You're free to believe that if it'll make you feel better. I hope you have a good day.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:47:00 2017 No.5602094 File: 52 KB, 640x480, 1510272166807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5602073 That's my line.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:47:25 2017 No.5602111 >>5601973 1/3 in circulation. I want to buy 1 LINK and it is at 50c. Sergey releases 2/3 remaining LINK. Now the pressure of the 1/3 owners is waaay smaller than before, thus LINKS price tanks

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:51:23 2017 No.5602210
File: 220 KB, 400x267, 1513727362346.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5602111
Then I guess all tokens where the entire supply isn't already releaded are crap. T. Bitcoin, every minable Coin, ripple. Almost every coin available. Truth is when the crypto bubble crashes the only coins that will survive are ones that have utility.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:51:59 2017 No.5602229

>>5602111
>Sergey releases 2/3 remaining LINK
1/3 of the link is meant for node operators and big institutions as freebies to incentivise using the network, it will not enter any exchanges and when it starts to be given out it will be given out in small chunks over the years, not all at once
the other 1/3 is for sergey personally and to pay the team members with, a small, small portion of it will enter exchanges

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:53:05 2017 No.5602267 >>5600069 But... But the chart /is/ performing well. Its going up.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:53:56 2017 No.5602291 >>5600069 He means compared to ripple or coins currently mooning.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:54:01 2017 No.5602293 >>5598594 upboat

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:54:27 2017 No.5602309 >>5602267 >/is/ baby boy, that is not how slashes work. my poor sweet baby bothered boy.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:54:45 2017 No.5602317

>>5601514
SirGay is a sperg lord like Vitalik. He believes in the blockchain for a "greater good". He most likely held an ico not to raise money but to give average biztards a fighting chance against the major players. If the token wasn't released to the public until after the main net gone live and the Swift partnership announcement we would be buying Link at 50 bucks a token. Most likely big players are annoyed of the whole ico affair and that's probably the reason of Sergey ghosting the whole community.
I don't believe the swift partnership will ever happen but I do believe that Link has such a massive use case that it will be a good coin in the future regardless of Swift

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:55:31 2017 No.5602347 >>5602229 Why isn't he just letting the free market form the node operator's? Why should he personally name the operators? Why does he have 1/3 of the whole fucking supply?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:57:18 2017 No.5602402

>>5602347
He doesn't name the operators, but if AXA or Swift wants to set up their own node or use the smart contract network they'll need LINK to either stake it or pay us normal people operating the nodes. They're 10x more likely to use the network when Sergey tells them "we'll give you 100 million dollars for free if you do it" and then convinces them that using it will not only get them free money it'll also save them money in the long run due to the nature of smart contracts.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:57:42 2017 No.5602413 File: 5 KB, 298x169, images (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5597749

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:58:24 2017 No.5602436 >sergey eats 30 million worth of hambergers and pizza. >no money left to hire devs It's a shame really.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 11:58:27 2017 No.5602439 >>5602402 and he has 1/3 of the whole supply because he's the founder and he decided so. Don't worry though he's not retarded, he won't dump his stack instantly tanking the price, he's not dumb.

>>	WojakWhale Fri Dec 29 11:58:45 2017 No.5602447 >>5597749 Stinky linky go back to pajeetia

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:00:09 2017 No.5602482

>>5602111
That logic is so wrong.
As if Sergey will suddenly release every single token into the market at the same time and magically create this pressure that would kill the price.

That's not how things work, even Ripple has the exact same circulating supply ratio as Chainlink and they are also releasing the reserve into the circulating supply over time.
But I don't see anyone talking about Ripple that is currently worth $70 billion, everyone is concerned with Chainlink that has the same exact approach.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:00:44 2017 No.5602503

>>5600151

look, lets be fair lol. In the real software world, making a product actually takes more than 3 months. I know it's shocking but it's true.
So LINK can absolutely be legit but if it's going to be fast enough to cope with all kinds of competitors who come? who knows.
I have 1500 LINK

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:00:44 2017 No.5602504 This is the most pathetic coin ever

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:01:49 2017 No.5602535 A reminder of why we are all in LINK https://medium.com/@signal_capital/https-medium-com-signal-capital-our-investment-in-chainlink-15ab90ee9c02

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:01:58 2017 No.5602540 >>5602402 >SirGay gives swift 350 million chainlinks >SirGay hopes this is the beginning of a successful partnership >Swift market sells the whole stack >Buys Ripple with the gains. >pink wojaks for a month Please make it happen Kek

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:03:34 2017 No.5602587 >>5602535 why do you faggots keep posting this fake write up as an ethos based argument? Its not fucking real. Its well written but not a real investment group you fucking faggots. Makes us look bad posting that horseshit.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:04:04 2017 No.5602605 >>5602535 Who is signal capital though? A real estate company in London? They don't have any other posts on that profile

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:04:04 2017 No.5602606 >>5601900 that is the funniest pic i have ever seen on this subreddit. Can i have save it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:04:14 2017 No.5602612 File: 20 KB, 547x433, 1510360228309.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5602033 >Because I'm smarter than you

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:04:25 2017 No.5602620 >>5602482 Doesn't change the fact that the price won't be anywhere near the predicted numbers because we will have to share the cake big time

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:05:11 2017 No.5602644 >>5602612 wow owned XD How does it feel to only be able to argue with ms paint drawings?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:05:22 2017 No.5602650

>>5602317
I'm sceptical about the whole "angry about the ico" thing, I think Sergey is just traveling around the world making business connections and attending meetings. Remember he's not a programmer, he's just the founder and CEO. The past few months hes been giving presentations and talking to business owners, in february he's speaking at superbitcoin conference and in march on the docusign conference. Sergey is convincing everyone everyday to use his system.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:06:54 2017 No.5602702 >>5602620 Not true. Business owners or Sergey owning LINK doesn't affect the public exchange price. Demand for LINK from normies and other individuals will stay the same.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:07:10 2017 No.5602708
File: 56 KB, 892x751, 1514414091945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5602267
They've been crapping on the coin since it was 40 cents way back in October before sibos The shit posts increased tremendously when if fell to 15 cents. I recommend people dfo some research on the coin and get in before it takes off.
https://youtu.be/6kEwNq7Xx50

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:08:31 2017 No.5602741 >>5602702 Who stops him from selling his LINKS?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:09:06 2017 No.5602755 File: 132 KB, 698x400, 90E10375-F631-4114-9371-FE06A9A73267.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5598594 Back to plebbit faggot

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:10:32 2017 No.5602806

>>5602741
Nobody. But why do you think he would do that? He's an intelligent individual, he understands that doing that would tank the price and sabotage his product. He also knows that if LINK takes off it's only going to grow so selling it would resign his future gains. There's also zero point to selling everything you own immediately.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:10:55 2017 No.5602816

>>5602620
And what are the predicted numbers?
Ripple's total market cap would now be very close to Bitcoin's.
Looking at this movement, it could have a market cap of a trillion in a few years.
Even if LINK is worth 1/10 of that, it's a $100/LINK in the future.

Why do you even care, if you think it's not a good hold then you don't have to buy.

>>5602741
What stops every single coin/token CEO out there to sell their shares?
Your questions are so retarded, funny how nobody has these kinds of question for the other coins, only for LINK hahahaha.
Lurk more faggot, sell your LINK if you have any or if you're planning to buy, just don't.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:10:57 2017 No.5602818 File: 38 KB, 645x729, 1506099476321.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5602644 >He is too stupid to realise I'm not arguing and that is the first post I've made in this thread

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:13:50 2017 No.5602909 https://discord.gg/Yx8gxCH

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:15:09 2017 No.5602954 https://discord.gg/Yx8gxCH peep this out son

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:15:13 2017 No.5602957 >>5602816 >100$ I bought it at 0.15 and believe in the tech. It is just that people like you personalize LINK so hard that you can't even handle mild criticism.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:15:24 2017 No.5602961 >>5602741 >t. Newfag who never heard of devs holding their own coin before

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:16:26 2017 No.5602992 >>5602818 >I'm not arguing, just shit posting. So there!!!

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:16:50 2017 No.5603008 >>5602818 >he is too stupid to mouthful of words greentext ooga bogga brainletwojak.png

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:18:19 2017 No.5603060 >>5602033 damn you sure showed that guy

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:18:52 2017 No.5603081 >>5603060 thanks

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:21:24 2017 No.5603159 >>5600931 >swift will partner with ripple nigga, why would banks even want to stay with swift if they can use ripple themselves?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:22:34 2017 No.5603203
File: 97 KB, 923x836, 1514416463420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5602957
What's with the stupid questions then if you believe in the tech?
Crypto and smart contracts will explode as they become more mainstream by 2020.
$100 might be a bit of a stretch but it's not like it's impossible if everything goes well and Chainlink becomes the industry standard.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:23:12 2017 No.5603223
File: 98 KB, 960x960, huzko90o51lx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5597749
>>5601823
>>5600267

LINK is literally a fucking ERC20 token. Its only use is to pay oracles per API access. Whereas Ripple is for settlements. They tackle two different problems. Dear god man if you're gonna invest in something at least learn what it actually is.

t. LINK holder

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:23:17 2017 No.5603228 File: 122 KB, 600x801, 1513706316486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5603159 Even without swift chainlink is massive and will be needed for the future of crypto and smart contracts to function. They have zero competitors

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:24:04 2017 No.5603255

>>5602503
>real software world
In real software world weekly blogposts and hired PR person is a good practice used EVERYWHERE
You may say Sergei spending money only on servers and devs and tech and
>he's working in his basement all this 2 months
(real quote from /biz/)
but let's be real: it's too delusional to think that.

If you forced to BELIEVE in that tale that Sergei is too busy all these months and still can't write anything good then you probably not belong in "real market world".
People here taking risk but they operating on real facts and their own research.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:24:51 2017 No.5603280 >>5603223 see >>5600267

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:26:39 2017 No.5603338 File: 53 KB, 571x618, 1513929778447.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5598594 >THIS is the type of people that are fudding link You don't deserve to make it

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:26:47 2017 No.5603342 >>5603280 >tell him to see a false post Why would you link him to a blatant lie?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:27:15 2017 No.5603360 File: 106 KB, 470x719, 1513778477176.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5603255 https://medium.com/@sergeynazarov/chainlink-an-overview-and-our-focus-14f03335b803

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:28:52 2017 No.5603418 File: 29 KB, 502x219, 1513778338257.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:29:52 2017 No.5603454 File: 106 KB, 980x742, 1503187691769.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5603342 >not taking aspirin anon, calm down.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:29:55 2017 No.5603455 File: 45 KB, 485x334, 1513778539716.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:30:12 2017 No.5603463 >>5603360 That's a good news to hear. >16 posts by this ID Sergey should hire you indeed

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:30:44 2017 No.5603482 >>5603454 >ooga booga post lie now take aspirin Your low IQ posts don't work on me!

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:30:57 2017 No.5603493 File: 30 KB, 476x235, 1513778601650.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:31:10 2017 No.5603502 >>5599953 Yep it's a meme. Don't buy it

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:32:36 2017 No.5603557 File: 78 KB, 460x486, 1513778663609.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:32:47 2017 No.5603563 File: 149 KB, 800x820, 14586755672331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5603482

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:33:39 2017 No.5603588 >>5603563 huehue muh rbbit meme FUNNY haha poopy poopy rddit PEE PEE POO POO GO BAK HUEHUEHUEEH

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:34:10 2017 No.5603606 >>5603588 I don't expect any of you sore losers to to check those digits, so I guess I'll just have to do it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:35:49 2017 No.5603673 >>5603493 kek

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:35:57 2017 No.5603677 >>5603588 16 posts by this I'd. The competition should hire this guy >>5603588

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:37:13 2017 No.5603717 >>5597749 >shill chainlink 24/7 >never goes up Why can’t you move on to another coin?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:37:15 2017 No.5603718 >>5603677 Not just one, but two (You)'s. How generous of you

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:37:57 2017 No.5603743 >>5603606 16 posts by this I'd. The competition should hire this guy >>5603463

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:39:32 2017 No.5603799 >>5603717 if i didn't fall for the "dude hahaha stinky linkies" meme some weeks ago i would have made 3x gains, so fuck off. give arguments of why you believe that it is underperforming or i'm buying. i am NOT missing another moonmission.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:40:27 2017 No.5603828 >>5603743 how did you do that? did you just warp through time? this post>>5603718 used to link to this>>5603743

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:40:44 2017 No.5603834 >>5603799 >3x Could have made 10x buying Sumokoin.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:43:16 2017 No.5603920
File: 11 KB, 194x259, download (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5603834
These are the best arguments that people have. Thanks captain hindsight. And you should have bought bitcoin in 2010. If j could predict the market is be a trillionaire

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:44:17 2017 No.5603951 File: 33 KB, 645x773, 1506790860195.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5603920 >If j could predict the market is be a trillionaire

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:44:41 2017 No.5603966 >>5603834 Do you retards really think like that? You are meant to have a long term stack that will bring you fortunes and short term fuck around stack for lottery moon missions. You don't switch your shit around back and forth.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:45:41 2017 No.5603996 I am holding 500 LINK. Not trying to be a millionair, but buying a Honda Civic would be nice.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:45:58 2017 No.5604005 >>5597749 LMAO so much delusion in this thread "once the SWIFT partnership... bla bla" you sound like those Core cucks "once LN goes live it will annihilate all your shitcoins!" Yeah, too bad that's never going to happen. Keep on bagholding, losers.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:46:00 2017 No.5604006

>>5601360

>What if sergey releases the rest of the supply??? He even wrote in the white paper that he disagrees with using the tokens as an investment

no one pointed it out, but every single ico or token sale has to say this for legal reasons to not get nailed for being a security.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:46:10 2017 No.5604011 File: 14 KB, 757x107, moni.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] rdy to the moon mission

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:46:41 2017 No.5604033 >>5603996 hey that's my car. '07 and still reliable. me, i want a nice gaming computer. my family could always only afford crappy computers that can only run older games, and at lowest graphics settings.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:47:00 2017 No.5604045 >>5603996 I'd hold at least 5k link and never let go. It could be worth over a million.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:47:22 2017 No.5604055 >>5604005 The problem is that there already IS a swift partnership. It's priced in. It's the entire reason for this price. If the partnership was suddenly cancelled, it would tank down to $0.10

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:47:42 2017 No.5604070 >>5603228 I agree, but what I was saying was if swift was to partner with ripple why would the banks keep using swift instead of going directly for ripple, for banks it's either swift + chainlink or ripple

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:48:08 2017 No.5604084 >>5603966 This. I have 12k LINK in cold storage and 1563 on binance to daytrade with. Already up 160 link today so pretty good for little risk.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:49:16 2017 No.5604112 >>5603966 >Sumokoin >shitcoin

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:51:33 2017 No.5604193 >>5603743 >competiton >chainlink

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:51:43 2017 No.5604202 >>5603455 you heard what the man said you fools? >Working from morning until late at night F R O M M O R N I N G U N T I L L A T E A T N I G H T

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:52:25 2017 No.5604238 >>5604045 I don't have the money to buy another 4.5k LINK right now. Should have done so when the price tanked, no I just can't.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:52:53 2017 No.5604246 File: 320 KB, 1341x1252, 1511667759390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5603828 That's LINK magic, baby.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:53:43 2017 No.5604269 >>5603673 320IQ Sergey got away answering without an answer

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:53:45 2017 No.5604271 >>5604246 how much LINK do I have to buy to do that

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:53:45 2017 No.5604274 File: 766 KB, 773x676, 1514515677855.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5604070 If swift has chainlink they will be able to compete with ripple and banks won't have to gut their systems to work through link.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:58:01 2017 No.5604398 >>5604271 About three fiddy thousand >>5604274 >Not "A LINK BETWEEN COINS" I hope someone has the layered source for this.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 12:59:05 2017 No.5604433 >>5604398 It's a link between worlds because it links us poorfags to our future millionaire selves

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:02:22 2017 No.5604549 File: 77 KB, 900x900, pepe_baller.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5604433 Alright, I'll buy that, but only because of those persuasive digits. >tfw we're going to make it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:04:04 2017 No.5604604 What is links price in 2020 summer?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:05:41 2017 No.5604656 >>5604604 $1.5k/Link

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:06:12 2017 No.5604667 >>5604656 but muh market cap

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:07:00 2017 No.5604698 >>5604656 I'll buy 2 houses HAHA

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:10:27 2017 No.5604836 here we go

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:10:45 2017 No.5604846 >>5604055 Except that is not priced in because it was never announced. Ripple sayed silent forever and then exploded to 25 cents when they released 2 bank partnerships. Here they are at 2 dollars on no news

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:11:11 2017 No.5604862 >>5604667 im assuming BTC will be worth $2-3 trillion by then. so 300-500 bill isnt much.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:12:25 2017 No.5604898 >>5604862 Amazon is 500 billion

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:12:50 2017 No.5604916 >>5604055 >Swift partnership is priced in >Not a top 100 coin I was suspecting before you were just pretending to be retarded. Now I'm sure of it. Nobody is actually that dumb.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:13:49 2017 No.5604950 >>5604916 Except it is. It's the only reason anyone bought this coin. Everyone who cares about that partnership already bought it.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:14:33 2017 No.5604979

>>5599098
Actually the other day I was thinking of this:
Moving money is just moving data
around
Even if they chose ripple to be the value storage and move funds with it, a smart contract powered by CL would make it more powerful and trusted
Remember the SWIFT presentation where they talked about "collaboration makes is stronger" when mentioning ripple?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:16:24 2017 No.5605048 >>5604898 Yeah, so?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:18:02 2017 No.5605103

>>5604979
>Remember the SWIFT presentation where they talked about "collaboration makes is stronger" when mentioning ripple?
Source? If true, a Swift/Ripple partnership is practically certain with as big as Ripple is getting (working with AMEX, seriously?)

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:18:33 2017 No.5605123

>>5604950
Link aims to be the solution to the Oracle problem with no competition and you think one partnership will make it or break it?

How can you hang around these threads and not learn a single thing? EVERYONE using smart contracts can and probably will benefit from Link. Axa, REQ, Zeppelin all have shown strong interest.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:18:46 2017 No.5605132 >>5597749 >once the SWIFT partnership goes live. B-but that will not happen SWIFT already announced they are looking for other partners and LINK was not on the list >stop the fud sell, sell, sell while you can

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:19:18 2017 No.5605160 >>5605132 >SWIFT already announced they are looking for other partners and LINK was not on the list this. SWIFT already said they think sergey is a dumb poopoo head as well.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:20:39 2017 No.5605213

>>5605123
Yes yes I know all of that, unfortunately it's just speculation, or worse really, wishful thinking. The only reason I'm in on LINK is because they're working with Swift. I expect some announcements from Swift eventually. It's the only thing that'll make this move.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:22:04 2017 No.5605259 >>5605213 is that why it went from 15 cents to 50 cents on news from zeppelin OS, not swift?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:22:07 2017 No.5605263 >>5605132 really? Shit, I didn't know. That's actually really concerning. You got a source on this?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:22:43 2017 No.5605293 >>5605132 damn, you know your shit. I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:23:07 2017 No.5605305 >>5599194 Those two dogs are playing together while the frog is cucked away?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:24:12 2017 No.5605338 >>5599194 So basically I should just keep holding my 10 ETH and 20k Chainlink forever?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:24:54 2017 No.5605369

>>5605259
No one knows or cares what zeppelin OS is. It's started moving from 0.15 before that was even announced. It's been moving for a while based on various factors like supply/demand, market health due to bitcoin price swings, bots on binance, etc etc

Of course it obviously dumped hard after the 0.70's range. If zeppelin OS was important, it would have maintained some of that growth.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:25:03 2017 No.5605373 File: 9 KB, 207x250, 1514571639052s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5605293 Hurry up and sell, sell, sell I need some heavier bags

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:26:36 2017 No.5605426 File: 521 KB, 589x583, 1513025637861.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5605263 He doesn't because it's fud

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:26:41 2017 No.5605431 >>5605132 source on the swift thing? oh right, none. the only source is you, mr. faggot

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:27:32 2017 No.5605456 >>5605369 just because you don't know what zeppelin OS is, don't assume the entire crypto market is as big a brainlet as you

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:27:58 2017 No.5605461 >>5597749 It is not that good of a coin guys. Inb4 did you read the whitepaper, yes I did, this will have a very narrow usecase guys.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:28:17 2017 No.5605468

>>5605213
Okay, so you're in Link only because of Swift. That's cool, but don't speak for others. You think 4chan controls the price of Link? Whales hold most of Link. You know why they're whales? Because they actually do their research.

They know that getting a partnership with Swift is the hardest part of Link's roadmap. They know they should not bet everything on that. But they're still holding because they know that Mainnet will push the price up, with or without Swift.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:28:26 2017 No.5605472 >>5605456 Just because you know what zeppelin OS is, don't assume anyone else is autistic as you.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:29:15 2017 No.5605498

>>5605431
Why would they confirm anything or be in a position to confirm if ChainLink had a partnership with SWIFT? In my opinion, this isn't a "confirmation" of a partnership.

We know ChainLink and SWIFT have worked together on the PoC, but until SWIFT or ChainLink themselves confirm that it is anything more than that, then I don't think we can take it seriously.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:30:17 2017 No.5605523 >>5605498 forgot to post sell sell sell, link is stinky

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:30:25 2017 No.5605527 >>5605468 Nah. Swift will be what moves this up. This and marketing on ChainLink's end.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:30:47 2017 No.5605540 >>5605472 >29 posts

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:32:05 2017 No.5605589 >>5605498 >but until SWIFT or ChainLink themselves confirm that it is anything more than that, then I don't think we can take it seriously. but Rory confirmed it in the slack. I don't have the screenshot but he did.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:32:24 2017 No.5605601 >>5601811 How much link?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:32:45 2017 No.5605616 >>5605540 I like to talk

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:32:54 2017 No.5605626

>>5605461
Yeah no one needs to get their data on the blockchain. The only use case of the blockchain is market valueation on coins. The only use case for smart contracts is to trade coins. Datra is completely useless outside of markets buying and selling. That is the future of crypto.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:33:14 2017 No.5605635 File: 787 KB, 1045x1500, 01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5597749 > planing to fomo into link once it hits 1,20 USD My stack is already large but as soon as memenet goes online we will be huge

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:34:21 2017 No.5605671

>>5605468

The thing people often forget is that around 90% was sold in the presale before /biz/ and everyone else got to buy. People were very upset because so little was left and didn't get to get in.

Those 90% were supposed to be disclosed but never were. If anyone has a bigger brain than I do, surely there is a way to determine whether or not that 90% of the circulating LINK is on the market and how much of it moved. A substantial portion of it must have because over 100 million tokens are on binance, who bought in the presale is a very important question.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:34:47 2017 No.5605692 >>5605527 Thank you for your input. Since there are no arguments for me to counter, I suppose we can only agree to disagree.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:35:04 2017 No.5605701 File: 6 KB, 300x300, stellar-rocket-300.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5597749 sideway rocket is the real competition to cripple

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:36:51 2017 No.5605768

>>5605692
I'm sure you think I'm just trying to FUD LINK, but I'm really not. It won't take much to make this moon, ChainLink's team just needs to be a lot more vocal about the work they're doing with Swift. A lot of people know what Swift is. That's what'll make it move. Not some obscure "operating system for smart contracts"

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:36:51 2017 No.5605769 >>5597749 SWIFT will die eventually, making the toiletoken's so-called partnership moot

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:37:20 2017 No.5605797 File: 30 KB, 214x217, stinky.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5605589 Can you share the slack group?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:38:32 2017 No.5605831
File: 1.15 MB, 890x1333, whoishe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5605589
>>5605498

yea swift is a tough one. On the one hand sergey really doesn't seem like one to string people along if he knows swift is not moving into production with chainlink, and so far the team has kept bringing it up. Sergey namedropped them in his blog post. Rory said they "are working" with SWIFT, and when Datadash said the SWIFT deal was dead Rory responded immediately to say they that was not true.

On the other hand it was just a PoC and as most people know those are kind of a dime a dozen. However if you go back and look at how long smartcontract has been working with swift it stretches back to 2015 and at that time there seems to have been several other blockchain startups they were working with, and only smartcontract seems to still have an ongoing relationship.

I don't think swift is necessary to links success but I do think anything coming out about them not moving forward would devastate the price for some time.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:38:52 2017 No.5605842 >>5605797 You have to email Rory and ask for entrance

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:39:42 2017 No.5605880 >>5605601 50k+

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:40:39 2017 No.5605907 >>5599953 dont buy until i get my paycheck

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:41:53 2017 No.5605948 Reliable sources saying that coinbase will soon have card to ripple purchases

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:42:20 2017 No.5605966 File: 155 KB, 600x850, 1512391242014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5605701 Explain

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:42:42 2017 No.5605977 >>5602587 >>5602605 Who cares if it's LARP (or not), what is said is true Nothing interesting though, it's basically what DYOR looks like

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:44:45 2017 No.5606057 File: 119 KB, 800x764, Flat800x800075f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5605842 I'm a stinky whale!! They should have sent me the info asap

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:45:18 2017 No.5606080

>>5605977

yea it's not larp. The guy got on the slack and confirmed it was him and a partner with the moresignal tool. It's a guys garage fund, not some major institutional player so it's not a hugely important endorsement but it is a very good article that's all factual, if slightly unprofessional. thanking rory at the beginning was retarded though.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:45:51 2017 No.5606097 File: 171 KB, 600x606, 1512273324998.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5602535 And this 8s the absolute lowest valuation that anyone significant has given link as a long term goal

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:55:00 2017 No.5606418 >>5604033 >gaming computer Now I get it, you are indeed a brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 13:59:14 2017 No.5606554 >>5604862 300bill/ 350mill isnt 1.5 dude...

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:03:07 2017 No.5606668 >>5603228 >Aeternity >OracleChain >Corda No competitors

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:11:14 2017 No.5606896
File: 605 KB, 702x1222, 1512709204209.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5606668
Chainlink has no competitors for decentralized oracles. Every brand you mentions is centralized oracles. Chainlink provides an extra layer of security by being trustless. With chainlink you need to hack multiple oracles to access key data feeds meanwhile with centralized oracles you only need to hack one. Chainlink is also the closest to having a functioning product.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:21:21 2017 No.5607246 >>5606668 none of those are decentralized retard

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:44:49 2017 No.5608041 https://discord.gg/87nFsbA Finally a solid Crypto group Yall are missing out

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:47:33 2017 No.5608139 >>5602954 >>5602909 >>5608041 Your brothers already posted

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:47:55 2017 No.5608148 >>5597749 why wouldn't sergey hire more developers?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:49:15 2017 No.5608186 >>5608148 He did and is including a marketing director

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:49:47 2017 No.5608210 >>5606896 Stinky Linky doesn't even have an anime waifu avatar. This photoshop is so sad. Sad as stinky linkies. Just die already fat fucks.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:50:03 2017 No.5608221 >>5605635 >tfw masturbated to this twice earlier this morning Is this a sign from god?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:51:47 2017 No.5608274 >>5608148 >>5603418 >>5603360

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:53:34 2017 No.5608336 >>5608148 He already did

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 14:55:44 2017 No.5608422

>>5608336

And almost more importantly, is in the process of hiring a marketing manager. This is one of the worst branded projects in crypto, which on one hand I can respect since I'd rather them spend their cycles playing to their strengths, but on the other hand can't wait to see some effort get put into communication. Regular blog posts + someone managing the Twitter account would push this through the roof overnight.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:01:19 2017 No.5608599 File: 22 KB, 306x240, uq0p3f2ccp501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] By the end of q1 this is what the posts on chainlink will look like

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:10:47 2017 No.5608906 File: 1.21 MB, 1991x3000, 1491945633185.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5597749 >tfw no SWIFT gf

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:20:09 2017 No.5609210 File: 254 KB, 1672x722, MSkANqC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5605831 Read the left side of this image very carefuly Memorize and process every word and its context

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:26:10 2017 No.5609463
File: 123 KB, 960x635, From-Wall-Street-to-Zuccoti-Park.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5606668
>>5606896
>muh decentralization

You can't be serious. It is not necessary to have a decentralized oracle. You guys are just grasping at straws. Hell, you don't even need an oracle for data feeds.

https://youtu.be/kVdw1TbyDV4?t=559

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:28:19 2017 No.5609541 >>5609463 >It is not necessary to have a decentralized oracle But it is better.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:36:39 2017 No.5609852

>>5609463
oh right, that explains why smart contracts are already mainstr... oh wait the data needs to be transfered in a TRUSTLESS way

of course you can get away without decentralised oracles, or even oracles at all if it's not something super important and it's just a ew things over and over like btc prices, but that doesn't apply to the big data/financial world

TLDR: Linkies will be filthy rich pretty fucking soon, and there is nothing you can do to stop that
buy now or cry later

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:39:15 2017 No.5609961 File: 53 KB, 640x625, dog-doll-house.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5609852 >Linkies will be filthy rich pretty fucking soon What's your prediction for EOY 2018, anon?

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:40:37 2017 No.5610026 Is it too late to buy LINK? I've just started getting into Crypto, and would like to put 500$ into it (and add more as I get more money). Will I be able to buy it on Binance for 48 cents, or will my orders not fill?

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:45:08 2017 No.5610176

>>5610026
If you want to hold for a few weeks and make a quick profit then I honestly have no idea if it is a good buy right now. What I do know is that in a few months to even possibly a few years, this will be a great investment whether you buy in at 50c or 15c.

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:45:39 2017 No.5610198
File: 391 KB, 467x582, 1513951314975.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5610026
I only just bought 1000 LINK today at 0.38 but I have high hopes for the coming year. Feels bad being late to the party but IDGAF if it makes me shitloads of money. Just do it anon, it's only $500

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:49:47 2017 No.5610339

Do you know what the best part is gonna be? When main net launches and every redditor and /nubiz/ is piling on after it has 20x already, they will all be saying "Oh yah, I knew about this project for ages. Oh yah, desensitised oracles, yup very important."
You stupid faggots don't get it and you're going to miss out. I can't wait.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:49:54 2017 No.5610346 >>5609463 name me ONE usage of a smart contracts outside of shitcoin to shitcoin trading oh wait there aren't any because decentralised oracles don't exist. well who would've thunk

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:50:51 2017 No.5610380 >>5609961 Stop fixating on x price at x time. Look at what ChainLink is doing and realise that this is literally going to change the world.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:51:47 2017 No.5610412 >>5610346 Letter of credit Search it if youre not familiar with it

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:54:53 2017 No.5610514 >>5610380 I appreciate the sentiment - it's probably the best way to look at things like this but let's not kid ourselves that we're in this crypto game for the philosophy of each dev team It's about the money at the end of the day

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:55:01 2017 No.5610522 File: 3 KB, 114x125, 1511093535277s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5610339 >muuuuuh oracles we'll see if bigboy sergey can deliver first until then, i'll be happily enjoying your pink wojaks pathetic linkies

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:55:26 2017 No.5610541
File: 3.17 MB, 2209x2921, 1510648701762.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5610339
Were you browsing /biz/ yesterday? People were posting their filters and I shit you not 90% of people had "LINK" filtered.
Imagine being this much of a braindead retard. Can't wait for all the pink wojaks.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:55:50 2017 No.5610553 the only thing ChainLink did was to scam some retards on /biz/

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 15:56:44 2017 No.5610584 >inb4 it gets added on coinbase out of fucking nowhere i know it won't happen, but people also "knew" that ltc wouldn't ever get past 10$

Anonymous Fri Dec 29 16:01:09 2017 No.5610751

>>5610522

The EOY announcement dispelled literally any doubt about that. ZeppelinOS, on its own, is massive fucking news. It means that ChainLink will be the default off-chain data provider for almost all dApp and smart contract development on the EVM. There are no pink wojaks. There is, at most, 6 months to stock up on this shit before the sheer massiveness of the project prevents people from ignoring it any longer.
But honestly at this point I love the FUD and the hate. The more /nubiz/ is scares off the better.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 16:01:32 2017 No.5610765 >>5610176 >>5610198 I definitely plan to hold long, I was just worried that I wouldn't be able to actually buy any. Thanks anons.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 16:02:23 2017 No.5610791 >>5610514 Sure but even in that case you can see that Link will be an absolute behemoth. What does it matter if you randomly guess $5 or $20? It's going to be insanely huge and constantly growing either way.

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 29 16:10:42 2017 No.5611099 >>5609961 I think around $4 when they launch the first implementation of the mainnet, and minimum $10 EO2018 >>5610026 the volume is very thin, so you can set up some low buy orders just in case

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]