crosschain assets are here guys, devs are waking up to chainlink CCIP

[popo !z5VQY4IkhY No.55937080]

>https://twitter.com/duimane/status/1694759063924433386?t=DZyWcq5oquWAJ1XDHPDgUg&s=19

devs started building crosschain token standards ontop of ccip, and these guys are gonna break all of crypto with their protocol, i highly suggest you guys follow these guys closely.

no more needs for wrapped assets here, everything is managed by the token itself and through ccip.

this is poetry

once ccip usage will ramp up, ccip willl propulse chainlink into rank 1, this is what we have been waiting on since 2017, chainlink being used as infrastructure for the internet of crypto

[Anonymous No.55937089]

>>55937080
Oof linkies I have very bad news for you guys, mr sirgay nazurov died in a massive boat explosion last night

[Anonymous No.55937140]

[Anonymous No.55937150]

>>55937089
Holy fuck thats it im selling right now!

[sage No.55937152]

>erc-20

sage and hide

[Anonymous No.55937160]

>>55937080
It's nice.
Do you have data on the current income of the existing concurrent bridges and use cases this replaces?

It's sad that we don't get to experience this adoption in a sea of hype and positivity and get mass paid fud instead.

[popo !z5VQY4IkhY No.55937310]

>>55937160
implying fud has any impact on adoption, i mean any project that is going crosschain will have no choice but to use this kind of protocol, it removes alot of headaches, especially since crosschain is hard to implement, and thats coming from a dev who tried it before ccip

[Anonymous No.55937327]

>>55937080
yasss xister this will for sure stop sergey dumps and make our worthless shitcoin pump!
>-4.65%

[Anonymous No.55937355]

https://twitter.com/PatrickAlphaC/status/1694407218316132487
patrick collins absolutely seething lmao

[Anonymous No.55937384]

>>55937080
That guy claims to be the CEO of "retard.finance". Will a project associated with that actually become highly successful?

[popo !z5VQY4IkhY No.55937409]

>>55937384
thz only retard i see here is you. those guys actually released code , and it's quality. listen i don't spend my time fantacizing on the shape/color of a logo, or the looks and wits of a crypto ceo like you fags, i look at code and fundamentals, im sorry youre not used to that kind of content of biz, since it has been overren by dimb fucks like you

[Anonymous No.55937412]

Doesn’t layer zero do the same?

[Anonymous No.55937421]

>>55937310
This deserves to be celebrated, not shat on by VCs.
How fucked is society when we don't celebrate meaningful difficult achievements which will forever change society?

At least the dark times are going to end sooner rather than later.

I would like to see an asset manager finally use this technology to tokenize a small fraction of their portfolio.
We are getting the test experiments, but banks are incredibly slow.

[Anonymous No.55937441]

>>55937409
You can relax, anon. Obviously these guys are building something valuable. Now my question is will their project actually become successful, or will we have to wait for a more well-known / professional (ie. not the "CEO of retard.finance") to steal the tech and release their own product?

[Anonymous No.55937467]

Then why are we dumping the most right now? This isn’t comfy at all

[Anonymous No.55937497]

>>55937080
>sepolia
>written by a balkanshit
into the trash it goes, DOA

[Anonymous No.55937506]

>>55937080
that project was literally made by a chainlink advocate because he wants to get access to chainlink build
t. insider

[Anonymous No.55937535]

>>55937506
I don't disbelieve it, but the important thing here is that this kind of idea is starting to spread, not specifically that the guy in OP is creating this specific project.

[Anonymous No.55937539]

>>55937080
Check the price, kek baggies

[Anonymous No.55937772]

>>55937080
when btc on ccip

[Anonymous No.55937784]

>>55937506
Got anymore breadcrumbs

[Anonymous No.55938570]

>>55937506
either larp or jealous
there is a literal nft horse breeding game in the build program https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1692154755647152311
why hate the project that is actually using ccip for something useful?

[Anonymous No.55938616]

>>55938570
That looks so retarded holy shit

[Anonymous No.55939074]

>>55937080
Isn't Sepolia the Ethereum testnet though?
So they still haven't done such a multi-chain transfer "for reals?"

[Anonymous No.55939178]

Wait till you see their protocol they will be presenting on at smartcon.

[Anonymous No.55939378]

>>55937310
I wonder if the FUD actually does have an effect on scraper based bots.

[Anonymous No.55939450]

>>55937080
You just can't stop disappointing yourselves, don't you? This will never amount to anything. CCIP is a failure, no self respecting dev is touching that thing.
Even Chainlink ex dev is surprised >>55937355 Just admit that you will never change the current crypto space because guess what? People love the current system it's just profitable to everyone except retards.

[Anonymous No.55939667]

>>55937355
I don't have a Twitter-
What does he go on to say are his top five million dollar CCIP ideas?
Also where do you get "seething" out of that? That post says there's a ton of potential for the tech.

[Anonymous No.55939706]

>>55937080
so if you don't guess the target chain exchange fee correctly, you lost the bridge toll. future of finance

[Anonymous No.55939899]

chart

[Anonymous No.55939990]

>>55939706
pay up faggot

[Anonymous No.55940081]

>>55937089
Holy fuck thank god im buying right now!

[Anonymous No.55940194]

>>55937080
does this make gloryholes obsolete?

[Anonymous No.55940249]

>You just can't stop disappointing yourselves, don't you?
Holy ESL fudder batman!

[Anonymous No.55940263]

>>55940249
Why not reply to me? Too pussy?

[Anonymous No.55940358]

You get paid with (yous) and Im sorry, we don't give those out for free anymore :)

[Anonymous No.55940384]

>>55940358
We're not but just admit you afraid :)

[Anonymous No.55940530]

>too pussy?
verification not required

[Anonymous No.55940566]

I’ll guess I’ll probably be seeing you all at the yacht party. Not much longer now.

[Anonymous No.55940620]

fuddies seething
linkies not selling
linkies not giving out (You)'s
all is good
we are rich
we are content
they are losing
they are seething
they are mad

[Anonymous No.55940637]

>>55940620
>fuddies seething
>linkies not selling
>linkies not giving out (You)'s
>all is good
>we are rich
>we are content
>they are losing
>they are seething
>they are mad

[Anonymous No.55941635]

>>55940566
probably exactly 2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.55941679]

>>55937080
Nice. Just bought more AVAX.

[Anonymous No.55941746]

>>55940637
The chart

[Anonymous No.55941759]

Why would you spend billions building something no one wants to use, and not only that, you hire an entire 500 person company before you have a single user. This is the worst business of all time

[popo !z5VQY4IkhY No.55943098]

>>55939450
cccip isnt released yet retard

[Anonymous No.55943329]

Question: Would the tokens have to have permissions to be able to use CCIP? Like what if USDT didn't want people using CCIP to move the token cross chain? Or does it not matter and could CCIP work with any ERC-20 token for example?

[Anonymous No.55943516]

>>55943329
>what is game theory

If a token contract explicitly bans the use of CCIP. People just don’t use it. Which means to stay relevant to the crypto space the assets/project/protocol must use CCIP IF it becomes the revolutionary technology that it promises itself to be. There will be no point in using a dated project chain that doesn’t implement CCIP as it exponentially increases the risk to hacks. And why wouldn’t you want to keep your chain secure? Unless you want to it to rug for some reason. Which then puts the spotlight on every project - if you’re not using this mechanism you are potential a back actor in the space.