Most of the fud doesn't bother me

[Anonymous No.55904408]

But why the fuck do they have 500+ employees? I've built tech companies with way more revenue than they have had with less than 50 people. What are they doing with 500? That's insane. They had a fucking ESG person? SERIOUSLY? FOR FUCKING WHAT?

[Anonymous No.55904415]

>>55904408
500 is far too many for a 2 man team.

[Anonymous No.55904428]

>>55904408
What tech companies have you build mr Elon?

[Anonymous No.55904433]

Employ yourself some friends, fag.

[Anonymous No.55904557]

>>55904408
>I've built tech companies
And yet here you are crying on 4chan

[Anonymous No.55904568]

>I've built tech companies with way more revenue than they have had with less than 50 people.
it's much better to minimize obvious lies when fudding

[Anonymous No.55904623]

>>55904408
why don't you?

[Anonymous No.55904654]

It’s incredible no one can answer OP’s question. This blind defense mechanism is why I soured on the project, no one can criticize the project

[Anonymous No.55904696]

>>55904408
sergey is larping as a successful cult of personality tech ceo. I say this as someone who is unfortunately all in chainlink

[Anonymous No.55904743]

>>55904408
More employees gives illusion company is big as to scam investors out of money to fund Sergey Big Mac fund

[Anonymous No.55904778]

>>55904408
Sergey is a man with good foresight and he seems to be patient as fuck. It's very well possible that he ignores all the current FUD, drama and community outcries because he sees a real chance for his project to become the backbone of industries worth trillions. The Chainlink team doesn't owe you anything, especially when you're ready to switch loyalties easily. If you see the same value as the team just hold whatever you think you can hold and don't look at the current situation.

[Anonymous No.55904806]

>>55904408
>They had a fucking ESG person? SERIOUSLY? FOR FUCKING WHAT?
>he doesn't know that this is WEF speak.

[Anonymous No.55904934]

>>55904408
Seriously, how many fucking lawyers are on their staff?
Besides that, every company is at least 50% women who aren't doing anything of value.

[Anonymous No.55904963]

>>55904408
Idk anon, but we better find out soon because I’m tired of paying for all of these fucks to do jack shit.

I better see every fucking one of these employees scheduled to help implement ccip into every bank across the nation soon.

[Anonymous No.55905066]

Because Chainlink is going to experience extremely rapid growth and they are setting themselves up for that.
Fail to prepare, prepare to fail. You can find out more about this sort of thing on this video. It is Eric Schmidt speaking about how to rapidly grow a company, he calls it 'blitzscaling'. He works for Sergey.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcRxFRgNpns

[Anonymous No.55905215]

>>55905066
>He works for Sergey
Kek I'm not so sure these days

[Anonymous No.55905458]

$POND is easily x10 times more revolutionary compared to Chainlink and they are like 5 friends working on it, tops. Pretty sure Monero is maintained by like two guys. DOGE, the strongest shitcoin in history, was made by one single guy. LINK has no reason to have as many diversity hires as they have right now. Bunch of money being wasted.

[Anonymous No.55905490]

>>55905066
>Because Chainlink is going to experience extremely rapid growth
good for the baggies that are still holding, then. i am *done* with waiting. no regrets even if link goes to $1,000 in two years, i'm done. this much wait is not worth it.

>>55905458
the best projects start with two autists and exactly two laptops.

[Anonymous No.55905495]

Sergey likes his niggress harem, bro. Can't say I don't envy him.

[Anonymous No.55905497]

>>55904568
why do linkies minimize other peoples' successes?

[Anonymous No.55905520]

>>55905458
>>55905490
Wow almost like the best projects in the history of crypto have been made by actually passionate people with an actual vision and real skills. Weird, right?!

[Anonymous No.55905602]

>>55904778

[Anonymous No.55905622]

>>55904654
The sad truth. One of the replies said “loyalty” hahaha. Theyve confused sportsball with investing

[Anonymous No.55905747]

>>55904408
it's just to launder money. sell now otherwise you'll lose everything. listen to us. we care about you

[Anonymous No.55905857]

>>55904408
What kind of copium is this? You have all these obvious red flags, yet you refuse to acknowledge them? You have to come here and whine and beg for someone to explain away the glaring truth? You clearly recognize that the structure of this organization and its behavior is very deceitful. Otherwise you wouldn't make this post. All you can do now is accept the next logical step. Accept that this organization is a scam. Accept that they fucked you over. Realize that they are selling and dumping and they will run far far away with all the profits while you hold the bag. There is nothing anyone can say to convince you to do this. You have to accept it for yourself.

[Anonymous No.55905871]

>>55904778
>Sergey is a man with good foresight and he seems to be patient as fuck.
Just like he was with his prior project NXT?

[Anonymous No.55905901]

>>55905871
Lol exactly. What is the excuse the cult gives him NXT again? I think they said he wasnt the ceo so he was absolved of all accountability or something.

And you know he has zero, absolutely zero remorse for wrecking people. Hes actually annoyed they even complain. Pure sociopath

[Anonymous No.55905936]

>>55904408
They are building everything in Web3.0 and basically taking over the crypto space. Sergey wants Chainlink to be the Google of crypto.

[Anonymous No.55905954]

>>55904408
Remember that Eric Schmidt took Google from a search engine to a company that basically runs the internet. He is advising Sergey to do the same thing with Web3.0. Make sure you are the first one to develop everything that everyone will possibly need. Take over everything and make your products the default option for everything.

Chainlink doesn't have all these employees just to have them. They are all working on the products that will make blockchains a significant part of our world.

[Anonymous No.55905969]

>>55905901
What was Sergey's role with NXT?

[Anonymous No.55905977]

>>55905954
schmidt also tore sergey's asshole open on stage last smartcon to let all his friends know not to buy

[Anonymous No.55905987]

>>55905969
He was the founder

[Anonymous No.55905992]

>>55905954
>Remember that Eric Schmidt took Google from a search engine to a company that basically runs the internet.
Google unironically sucks now though. Both as a search engine and as a company. They killed the open web and Youtube. They destroyed RSS and newsgroups. They've killed every innovative project they've come up with in the last decade or longer. Our lives are much worse because of them at this point.
>Don't be evil

[Anonymous No.55905997]

>>55905987
Oof. You need to learn the basics before fudding here, anon. No point getting basic stuff wrong.

[Anonymous No.55906088]

>>55905992
Yeah, but it was good from 2001 to 2011 when Eric Schmidt was CEO. The internet didn't really start going downhill until 2015.

[Anonymous No.55906096]

>>55905954
So yesterday I went to the bank to get a couple rolls of quarters for the washing machine in my building. As I was standing there minding my own business, a very rude, very agitated man barged in and cut straight to the front of the line. He was in his sixties, sweating profusely, with mussed gray hair and little round glasses that were all steamed up. I'd guess he was about 5'10" tall and worth about $23 Billion.

"HAS MY FUCKING CHEQUE CLEARED YET?" the man roared, a vein now throbbing in his temple. "I DONT WANT A STAKE IN THE FUTURE OF FUCKING FINANCE, I WANT COLD HARD CASH"

The man was literally shaking from rage and his face was turning beet-red. He started taking his shirt off! Right in the crowded bank!

"WHEN I SAID YOU WERE ON SOMEBODY'S LIST IT WAS MINE YOU SANDWICH FUCKING RETARD"

Suddenly, the man snapped into a zen like state. He buttoned his shirt back up, fixed his hair, and wiped his glasses. He coolly walked towards the exit, but just before he left, he stopped and turned around to the stunned crowd and said,

"I just want to remind everyone that zoom calls will kill you."

[Anonymous No.55906187]

>>55904778
>Sergey is a man with good foresight
Why is he obese then? Doesn’t he know the negative long term health implications of obesity? You’re just a piece of shit liar

[Anonymous No.55906208]

>>55905954
Daily reminder that Schmidt drove one of the companies he was CEO of to bankruptcy

> But Novell's decline and loss of market share accelerated under Schmidt's leadership, with Novell experiencing an across-the-board decline in sales and purchases of NetWare and a drop in share price from US$40.00/share to US$7.00/share

>Novell’s stock went from $40 to $7

Sounds similar?

[Anonymous No.55906224]

>>55906208
No wonder he and sergey get along so well

[Anonymous No.55906239]

>>55906208
Lol that's not what happened. Novell was a sinking ship and Eric Schmidt was appointed as CEO to try to save it. It's not his fault that the company was fucked.

[Anonymous No.55906241]

>>55906239
Do you think you're making a point to someone who is communicating in good faith?

[Anonymous No.55906249]

>>55906239
...and he wasn't able to, and he won't be able to save chainlink either

[Anonymous No.55906254]

>>55905997
nxt fud is an old joke anon

[Anonymous No.55906277]

>>55906254
>its another rerun
>remember the golden days of LINK threads bro yeah like years ago ahh sip
you're getting to that age when new things are unappealing i get it

[Anonymous No.55906584]

>>55906254
Yeah but you need to know what Sergey actually built on NXT if you're going to have any credibility at criticising his time there.

[Anonymous No.55906609]

>>55904408
>muh revenue
Chainlink is a decentralized network of independent actors. It’s not supposed to produce revenue at the protocol level any more than BTC or ETH.

[Anonymous No.55906652]

>>55906609
the nodes are not profitable either though

[Anonymous No.55906686]

>>55906652
Except of course they are.
Overhead is pretty low on oracles, especially compared to miners.

[Anonymous No.55906695]

>>55906686
Why does chainlink have 12% inflation then

[Anonymous No.55906703]

>>55904415
the presentation next to the toilets FUD was my absolute favorite. I don't think it was even FUD actually, i think they might have literally presented right next to the toilets, but i love it all the same.

[Anonymous No.55906705]

>>55906695
Why is 98% of Bitcoin mining rewards pure inflation right now?

[Anonymous No.55906715]

>>55906705
It's to reward miners for computation. The rewards for link nodes come from paying customers. Which apparently doesn't happen hence CL labs subsidizing the nodes

[Anonymous No.55906724]

>>55906715
>It's to reward miners for computation
Just like how Link inflation is to reward nodes for oracle responses.

>The rewards for link nodes come from paying customers
The same is meant to happen for Bitcoin miners too.
Which is why Bitcoin subsidies are halved every 4 years.

[Anonymous No.55906738]

>>55906724
So oracles don't need paying customers? CL labs should just reward them?

[Anonymous No.55906741]

>>55906738
So Bitcoin miners don't need paying customers? Satoshi should just reward them?

[Anonymous No.55906752]

>>55906715
are they still doing their 700k LINK dumps?

[Anonymous No.55906793]

>>55906752
>700k LINK dumps?
They are dumping, I'm stacking. It's either BTC, LINK and NXRA or I'm done with this crap market. Bring the cheap dildos let's buy them all...

[Anonymous No.55906893]

>ummm "fellow ogs" why would an international company scaling up to take on massive throughput have 500 employees?
>arent you feeling fear, uncertainty, and doubt fellow chainlinkers?
>proceeds to samefag obviously and post screenshots of it on twitter
brought to you by the best outsourced third world rapefugees and parasites that the netherlands has to offer

[Anonymous No.55907149]

>>55905977
did he really? wow.

[Anonymous No.55907235]

>>55907149
Oh yes, he said the Link token was needed, and basically asked the audience to applaud Sergey for being a visionary genius.
It was gruelling to watch.

[Anonymous No.55907263]

>>55907235
>Oh yes
confirmed! thank you

[Anonymous No.55907271]

>>55906893
The strongest argument against paid fudders is that nobody would pay real money for someone to do this bad of a job.

[Anonymous No.55907327]

It's better to have a team you don't need but can grow into, rather than suddenly needing all these teams and departments. Remember Sergey is all about future proofing, why'd it be different for his literal company?

[Anonymous No.55907999]

>>55904696
Why would you go all into LINK jeet? If you have some money in MATIC, NXRA, TRIAS etc, Sergey stupidity/smartness wouldn't have any effect on you...

[Jealous No.55908038]

This movie is about Sergei, his business model and ethics, and his six-sided blue jew token: Chainlink. He wants to leave me in Antarctica until the dogs tear me apart and he figured out some way to monetize that. They aren't tearing me apart, however, and his coin is not performing.

[Anonymous No.55908673]

>>55906703
I recall during sibos there was a couple times you could hear flushing over sergey's speech.

[Anonymous No.55908698]

>>55907999
Kill yourself currynigger

[Anonymous No.55909941]

>>55904654
I can criticize your blatant ESL niggerdom and your IP switching skills >>55905622

[Anonymous No.55911248]

>>55905066
I hadn't heard that term before, interesting. I'm not a huge fan of it with crypto given how volatile the markets are. I think they timed it wrong, and now have this huge payroll expense that they have to destroy the investors to fund.

To quote Eric Schmidt:

"I have seen the same cycle again and again — great products are created through small teams: with great leaders, who eliminate all non-critical features, while working under extreme pressure, and who produce a product that just barely works.

The correct answer is small teams can go off and change the world. Every successful project I have worked on within Google over the past 10 years has started off with 1-2 people working on an idea together.

For example Windows was started by one person, UNIX was 2 people, Java was started by 1 person, Gmail was started by 2 people, Android was small team, Linux was started by 1 person, and I could go on and on."

[Anonymous No.55911771]

>>55909941
You Link jeets are becoming so aggressive these days. Admit it, your coin is shit and you made a poor decision investing in a fatty