Base CCIP

[Anonymous No.55893481]

Lane pages have not been fully updated. I've been seeing base transactions to other chains (such as Avalanche) and also from other chains.

So Base now has its own lane and I'm assuming BNB does as well, not just from ETH to Base/BNB but to and from at the very least AVAX if not all other lanes connected.

Wonder when they'll announce.

How is it the entire cryptosphere has no fucking idea that Chainlink has now inter-connected all of the most important blockchain protocols and it's all happening out in the open? How is it that multiple countries are testing their CBDCs on CCIP and it's all out in the open and literally no one has any fucking idea?

How did they pull this off? And is it because they hate us or it's really just Eric's hiding strategy fine arts masters degree at work?

[Anonymous No.55893494]

>>55893481
I shart on your chart

[Anonymous No.55893501]

>>55893481
I’ll believe it when the price actually goes up

[Anonymous No.55893505]

>>55893481
>And is it because they hate us
Yes you fucker VC’s will never let you succeed

[Anonymous No.55893664]

>>55893481
>How is it the entire cryptosphere has no fucking idea that Chainlink has now inter-connected all of the most important blockchain protocols and it's all happening out in the open? How is it that multiple countries are testing their CBDCs on CCIP and it's all out in the open and literally no one has any fucking idea?
humanity really is like 95% retards dude
and that includes rich investors, most of em just got lucky. they aren't smart

[Anonymous No.55893680]

>>55893494
Thats cool and all but I’m just not gonna sell.

[Anonymous No.55893862]

>>55893481
It will be like this until stuff actually gets built with CCIP and users actually need to use the link token for gas. It's not retail facing enough.

[Anonymous No.55893887]

>>55893862
This
Retail money is all that matters. Just look at doge or shib

[Anonymous No.55894066]

>>55893494
>I soiled my own monitor haha!

[Anonymous No.55894247]

>>55893481
>is it because they really hate us.
Yes, they really do hate us.

[Anonymous No.55894738]

>>55893862
this sums up why we are at $7
retail will never "use" link, the projects they do, on the backend
if there's one thing i've learnt in this space is how fucking stupid most people are

[Anonymous No.55895196]

So this logo is for their new BBCa chain isnt it... I can see the symbology

[Anonymous No.55895244]

>>55893481
The ideological consequences of being blackpilled on LINK are profound.
As you pointed out, if Chainlink can be:
>openly hiring AAA+ talent
>openly solving immense computer science problems
>openly deploying game changing technological solutions
>openly advertising connections with nothing short of the biggest names in banking and capital markets, while openly discussing the ongoing work with them
And yet NOBODY, out of all the VCs, talking heads, crypto "identities", investment influencers, etc etc etc is paying any attention, then what is actually going on?
It's like a jedi mind trick where they have waved their hand and told the entire planet that there's nothing to see here, and the only people that aren't under the spell are, like, 200 turbo autists who are now all in various stages of insanity as a result.
And if they can do this for Chainlink, if they can completely invert fiction and reality in the minds of 99.9% of people, what else are they doing it for?

[Anonymous No.55895276]

>>55893494
>lil donnie posting in anno domini 2023

[Anonymous No.55895297]

>>55893501
This literally EVERYTHING ELSE is noise

[Anonymous No.55895311]

>>55893481
PROTIP for all newfags.

Here's how the LINK scam works:

You buy tokens from Sergey and he uses the proceeds to maintain his operation and market his price checking service to blockchain dapps that nobody uses.

A significant portion of the sale proceeds are used to keep 15 threads, both fud and shill, on this board at all times through the community advocate program. The compensated agents rapidly cycle through airplane mode id changes to spoof organic engagement in discussion

[Anonymous No.55895314]

>>55893481
>is it because they hate us or it's really just Eric's hiding strategy
Yes. What I wanna know is how long can they postpone it just to keep like 2k hermits on a nostalgia enthusiast's forum from making a couple million and living out their days in peace.

[Anonymous No.55895427]

>>55894738
What? Retail will have the ability to directly interact with CCIP In the future and either use the link token for gas, or use any other token for an extra fee that will convert to link automatically.

[Anonymous No.55897121]

>>55893481
>now inter-connected
there are tons of bridges already. even if you use a ton of money to build the most unnecessarily robust bridge the world has ever seen, if nobody cares, it was a waste of money. chainlink doesn't feel any pressure from their mistakes though, as it's not their money

[Anonymous No.55897162]

>>55895196
The intern got it backwards. Currently it's two BWCs fucking those black squares. Should probably fire that one for being a nazi incel.

[Anonymous No.55897461]

>when you see fud spammers, understand that they are braindead third worlders sent here specifically to lie and derail all discussion as well as killing threads by shitting up the catalog
>do not give them (you)s because this is probably how they are paid

[Anonymous No.55898077]

>>55893481
I have no idea what this "lane" stuff is. Where can I participate in legit LINK discussions? Twitter is extremely gay and biz has been a cesspool for years now.

[Anonymous No.55898460]

>>55897121
>bridges
Cool, anon. Please feel free to come back to this thread when you understand what Chainlink CCIP does. Thanks for trying to participate!

[Anonymous No.55898754]

>>55895244
CHECKED

[Anonymous No.55898894]

>>55898460
Lanes are just CCIP "routes"
https://ccip.chain.link/status

[Anonymous No.55898907]

>>55898894
I quoted the wrong post
Meant to quote this >>55898077

[Anonymous No.55899867]

>>55895244
every time I see a noteable crypto figure spout retarded takes on Chainlink, I am left to wonder if they are really this dumb, or simply playing a part.
Vance Spencer of Framework is literally the only VC guy I know of who has publicly understood chainlink

[Anonymous No.55899932]

>>55895244
They did this for every concept in the world.
Doctors now kill and poison you.
Lawyers steal from you.
Police murders you.
Priests poison your soul and mind.

Everything has been inverted.
Do you know how the world feels to someone born with the ability to perceive truth?

[Anonymous No.55899956]

>>55899932
>Do you know how the world feels to someone born with the ability to perceive truth?
yes

[Anonymous No.55900010]

not pumping your bags

[Anonymous No.55900915]

>>55898894
Thanks anon

[Anonymous No.55901031]

>>55893481
>How is it the entire cryptosphere has no fucking idea that Chainlink has now inter-connected all of the most important blockchain protocols and it's all happening out in the open? How is it that multiple countries are testing their CBDCs on CCIP and it's all out in the open and literally no one has any fucking idea?
because its pretty much on test right now. Post smartcon you will see a bunch of shit live and ccip open to everyone

[Anonymous No.55901190]

>>55901031
>Post smartcon you will see a bunch of shit
for example, the chart

[Anonymous No.55902010]

Bros we got a mainnet transaction between avalanche and eth, 0.16 LINK

WGMI
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x3dbbfbdd7be5c2dc7a1a8271e106701143558457e2335aed9b98a70d24ea42f7

[Anonymous No.55902021]

>>55902010
Optimism*
and 0.16 link fee including gas

[Anonymous No.55902050]

>>55893481
>How is it the entire cryptosphere has no fucking idea that Chainlink has now inter-connected all of the most important blockchain protocols and it's all happening out in the open?
They know. They just don't care.

[Anonymous No.55902204]

>>55902050
The "cryptosphere" is literally just scammers trying to 10-100x their shitcoins. They all hold link too mind you, but they're not going to pump it because they, like you, are waiting for actual adoption. They don't want to sell you their link, they want to selll you their shitcoins so they can get their 10-100x's and not be stuck sitting on their hands.

You, as retail, do not have the capital, connections, or luxury of being able to both dump shitcoins with insider connections on retail, AND hold 6-7 figures of link. They win no matter what. That's what I think probably infuriates anons here the most, they know this, the same bad actors that contribute to link being hidden, will also still win whenever it does finally run.

The only silver lining is, if you can ignore all the noise, you'll still /makeit/ with link and can gtfo of society within the next decade.

[Anonymous No.55902273]

>>55902204
>but they're not going to pump it because they, like you, are waiting for actual adoption
Adoption beyond ape pictures and scam pump and dumps is currently beyond depressing. I hold link, yes, but the entire goddamn industry is garbage. All of it. Holding the sweetest smelling garbage of all isn't much of an achievement.
Demoralized? Yes, entirely. But maybe we should be.

[Anonymous No.55902341]

>>55902273
Adoption is a funny thing, it feels like its never coming, and then all it takes is one domino to fall and then its seemingly all at once. I know "flip the switch" is meme'd to death, and it won't be that sudden, but once the larger entities start relying on smart contracts to do business, they're all going to feel pressured to do so or be left behind. I think what adds to the demoralization is the constant comparisons to eth, but the very same things that allowed eth to pump to the levels its at, are what will ultimately doom it moving forward, as the #1 factor was it creating the original shitcoin casino. Binance/BNB literally copy pasted that strategy, and outperformed eth for an entire cycle with zero fundamentals and just a cheaper casino.

Chainlink could have sacrificed security and a potential monopoly on the market and gone the eth route, and a few anons would have gotten rich and sold that top, but it would be dead in the water moving forward. Shitcoins like API3 and whatever paradigm is backing would be eating link's marketshare right now, instead of shouting in vain.

[Anonymous No.55902430]

>>55898077
wait for zk chats, where you prove you have 1000+ link (or 10000+, etc)

[Anonymous No.55902461]

>>55893481
cool, its now gonna be easier and cheaper to trade shitcoins.


NO ONE CARES. and thanks chainlink! next bull run will be cheaper to trade and more secure.


all linkies are waiting for singularity and according to sergey he says he sees himself working on chainlink for the next 10 years...

t. og ink fag s

[Anonymous No.55902506]

>>55902461
To be fair, these developments are still positive even if they are clearly not part of the singularity. There's two potential outcomes for the next bullrun, assuming we don't just skip a cycle due to worldwide recession (definitely a possibility)...

1) Shitcoin casino remains the dominant narrative, fundamental adoption still lags behind. Except now, link has enabled the multichain casino. They won't be the biggest winner, but they will rise heavily with the tide, enough so that anons smart enough to realize actual adoption isn't here yet, will be able to take profits and be comfily retired.

2) Fundamental adoption. In this scenario, link is the big winner, and shitcoins begin a death spiral. This could happen this cycle, or it might not happen until closer to 2030. Regardless, of course link wins if this happens.

Essentially, assuming crypto has another bull run this cycle, link wins no matter what, the only question is by how much.

[Anonymous No.55902690]

>>55895244
>what else are they doing it for?
How about the poison shots that literally change your DNA that billions of people just took multiple times.

[Anonymous No.55902750]

>>55902341
>but once the larger entities start relying on smart contracts to do business, they're all going to feel pressured to do so or be left behind
Point is, this should already be happening with the current state of development. Features like CCIP should certainly help but in 2023 there should already be lots of on-chain settlement taking place. Stablecoin transactions wouldn't even need Chainlink in many cases but we don't see them happening beyond PoCs. Smart legal contracts should be well underway.

[Anonymous No.55902913]

>>55902750
>should
opinion discarded

[Anonymous No.55902937]

>>55902913
>opinion discarded
You make a good point. No one should be using Chainlink if it's ever going to be successful.

[Anonymous No.55902952]

USDC just went multi chain with Coinbase buying in. OP 10/10 took two hours for an announcement

[Anonymous No.55902964]

>>55902506
I honestly don't have this kind of blind faith, though I appreciate yours. Until I see the activity happening on CCIP I will remain skeptical. It's good to see other chains being added and tested but we don't know if it's the team testing or real use cases.

Right now it's only doing like 150-200 LINK/day in revenue on 3 products. That's pretty bad (~$400-500k annually). What I am hoping for is that when main net opens for all there is a flood and we see that instantly 10-20x+, but I honestly don't get why they're staying in test mode so long.

[Anonymous No.55902990]

>>55902952
Weird, they give no details about how in their blog

[Anonymous No.55903015]

>>55902937
it's obviously not happening right now, why bring an extra layer of "should" into it?

[Anonymous No.55903025]

>>55902990
I thought the same. Bitcoin dump incoming

[Anonymous No.55903032]

>>55902952
based. and if you just try to google Coinbase, you just get frontloaded with articles about how vitalik sent ONE MILLION DOLLARS worth of eth to coinbase. Hiding strategy in full effect, despite, as mentioned, nothing in the blog saying how it will work (chainlink of course)

[Anonymous No.55903081]

>>55903015
>why bring an extra layer of "should" into it?
Pic related

[Anonymous No.55903100]

>>55903032
Just now I searched this in a few places, kek. You’re right

[Anonymous No.55903107]

>>55902952
>>55902990
https://www.circle.com/en/cross-chain-transfer-protocol

[Anonymous No.55903120]

>>55903032
>>55903100
so where is the news that USDC went multichain?

[Anonymous No.55903182]

>>55903120

>>55902952
Yeah props to op holy fuck

[Anonymous No.55903190]

>>55903120
nitter.net/circle/status/1693722450541121742?s=19
yw pay it forward jesus loves you

[Anonymous No.55903213]

>>55903190
>nitter.net/circle/status/1693722450541121742?s=19
https://www.circle.com/blog/ushering-in-the-next-chapter-for-usdc
ctrl f 0 chainlink.. why? why are they hiding?

[Anonymous No.55903220]

>>55903182
holy shit
we fucking won

[Anonymous No.55903222]

The good news is that CCIP and CCRP are the exact same thing and we're all going to be rich.

[Anonymous No.55903234]

>>55903182
>6 new blockchains
>>55903222
checked

[Anonymous No.55903246]

>>55902010
oh yes.

[Anonymous No.55903248]

>>55903220
>>55903234
>>55903222
Does the new circle integration actually utilize the link token though? I think the only way link goes interstellar is with actual utility, unlike other crypto tokens that moon with just simple hype and speculation.

[Anonymous No.55903249]

WE FUCKING WOOOON

[Anonymous No.55903257]

Blackrock own circle and have a lot of bitcoin. Really makes me think

[Anonymous No.55903261]

>>55903248
Look on the ccip explorer. It’s used for gas to transfer between chains.

[Anonymous No.55903263]

>>55903248
how else are the 6 fucking chains gonna connect to each other you stupid cunt
you think they're gonna use some complicated bridge for each combination of 2 chains?

[Anonymous No.55903262]

>>55903249
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xc9e1a83cdeac193551719f9a39dfc0cd600cee87215520a260d314da3ac1b36b
>8 minutes ago

[Anonymous No.55903274]

>>55903248
Usdc is gas free through Coinbase. I have questions

[Anonymous No.55903275]

>>55903263
Come to think of it, are you you anons sure the circle integration utilizes CCIP? How come it isn't even hinted at anywhere?

[Anonymous No.55903276]

message IDs are < 100
we are so early. ground floor, gentlemen.

[Anonymous No.55903285]

>>55903263
>how else are the 6 fucking chains gonna connect to each other you stupid cunt
We may never know
https://github.com/anyswap/CrossChain-Bridge

[Anonymous No.55903293]

>>55903275
It has. When based was announced, chainlink was weirdly pre hyping the announcement.

That being said we are still speculating. It’s possible they are using something else. But the shoe really fits here. There are even 6 lanes available to transfer out of eth.

[Anonymous No.55903302]

>>55902010
there's been lots of them: https://dune.com/ericwallach/chainlink-ccip-revenue

[Anonymous No.55903307]

>>55903293
>When based was announced
IIRC, Base confirmed to be utilizing Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.55903319]

>>55903302
How come token is still 6.20?! Why can't this thing just moon like eth did!?

[Anonymous No.55903328]

>>55903319
Because you're getting teabagged by Multichain and apparently no one in this thread has managed to figure that out.

[Anonymous No.55903329]

>>55903319
no moon get it through your thick skull

[Anonymous No.55903333]

what are people on about with usdc? they have their own solution, nothing to do with chainlink/ccip

[Anonymous No.55903338]

>>55903222
prove it

[Anonymous No.55903343]

>>55903307
Yes

[Anonymous No.55903349]

>>55903338
>prove it
I just did... negatively. See the rest of my posts in this thread.

[Anonymous No.55903352]

>>55903333
CHECKED

[Anonymous No.55903360]

Link is now the cross chain gas fee. Based

[Anonymous No.55903361]

>>55903349
I've read the whole thread
nothing has shown that circle's cross chain product is the same as chainlink's
I hold link but I like to inject a bit of sanity into these mouth frothing hopium sessions

[Anonymous No.55903377]

>>55903361
I'll let you decide if Multichain is Chainlink. Try not to rope.

[Anonymous No.55903388]

>>55903377
>Multichain is Chainlink
Do you think it is?

[Anonymous No.55903390]

>>55903361
Only thing injecting is your bowels into the Ganges.

[Anonymous No.55903392]

>>55903377
I just said I hold link
if you're right, why would I kill myself?

[Anonymous No.55903402]

>>55893481
>>55902952
I honestly don't really know what this means, but I'm so happy for you guys.
>t. 20k linker from 2018

[Anonymous No.55903528]

>>55903222
CHECKED

[Anonymous No.55903543]

Fuck I need to buy more.

[Anonymous No.55903553]

>>55903392
>I just said I hold link
Why? You could just use Multichain.

[Anonymous No.55903566]

>>55903553
look dude I'm not in the mood for riddles or games ok?

[Anonymous No.55903617]

>>55902952
USDC is already multichain, see Arbitrum, Polygon, Avalanche etc.
I think therefore this is a nothingburger
>2017 linkie who's staking

I want link to rip but this feels fake and gay until proven otherwise

[Anonymous No.55903639]

>>55903617
see >>55903343
https://decrypt.co/151738/coinbase-layer-2-chain-base-taps-chainlink-ahead-mainnet-launch

[Anonymous No.55903659]

>>55903639
Is says integration of price feeds linkcel can you read?

[Anonymous No.55903673]

>>55902461
nice post, when you're trading just make sure to pay up (to the tune of several tenths of a linkie per trade, plus a fixed rate on any tokens, plus tip)

[Anonymous No.55903678]

>>55903659
ccip is being integrated into base, that isn't in question

[Anonymous No.55903687]

>>55903678
It says test net linkcel why must you be so dumb

[Anonymous No.55903692]

>>55903678
several times ive clicked on a base tx and it 404s. weird

[Anonymous No.55903698]

>>55903678
Shitcoin holders on suicide watch kek. I hate to say I told them so

[Anonymous No.55903700]

>>55895427
Dumb user is dumb

[Anonymous No.55903705]

>>55903692
They are using their own multi chain solution

[Anonymous No.55903709]

>>55903687
and what comes after the test net?

[Anonymous No.55903725]

>>55903709
There is no guarantee they will go beyond a testnet

[Anonymous No.55903728]

>>55903678
3 of those chains already have USDC deployed to "natively" which flies counter to the Jeremy Allaire tweet hopium that some linkies are huffing.

Think about this why would they announce 6 "new" chains and of the 6 we're aware of on CCIP, 3 of which would be "old"

Unless Circle decentralizes and removes support for older chains that CCIP is currently not supporting I doubt the USDC/CCIP connection is real and thinking so is likely going to disappoint you in the near future. Truly wish what in saying is wrong but I think it's closer to the truth than the loose connection that's being pedaled

[Anonymous No.55903759]

>>55903725
yeah you're right. they're just testing for shits 'n' giggles

[Anonymous No.55903783]

>>55903709
They're slowly winding it back because blockchain is a scam. So they went from mainnet > test net, and after test net they'll release a few articles announcing a pilot study, then a research paper, and then they'll just cancel the whole thing and never mention it again.

[Anonymous No.55904148]

>>55903107
Ah so literally nothing to do with Chainlink then... this is just burn and mint. Too bad.

[Anonymous No.55904177]

>>55903213
>>55903220
>>55903248
>>55903263
>>55903275

Just pointing out this anons reply
>>55903107

Seems clear to me it won't utilize CCIP, as much as I love hopium. Circle has their own dumb burn/mint system.

[Anonymous No.55904199]

>>55904177
Checked and I genuinely believe it's just retarded no-life fuddies larping as hopium newfags.

[Anonymous No.55904205]

>>55904177
>https://www.circle.com/en/cross-chain-transfer-protocol
I CAN'T TAKE IT ANY MORE

[Anonymous No.55904226]

>>55904205
>hey bro do you like THE FUTURE except you want to expose yourself to HYPERINFLATION and only want to move one type of token around for literally no reason?

[Anonymous No.55904331]

>>55904177
>>55904199
checked and no, I'm looking for breadcrumbs.
I guess well find out the truth in 2 more weeks.

[Anonymous No.55904412]

>>55904205
CCIP BTFO?

Circle probably won't let you use CCIP to do cross-chain transfers of USDC?

[Anonymous No.55904457]

>>55903725
What is this piss poor attempt at fudding? Are you guys even trying anymore? Kek

[Anonymous No.55904487]

>>55904226
>>55904412
I WONDER IF SWIFT HAS MORE LIQUIDITY ON OFFER THROUGH CCIP THAN USDC DOES???!?!

[Anonymous No.55904829]

>>55893481
Quant makes Chainlink irrelevant is why. Cope

[Anonymous No.55905891]

>>55904205
so wait.. is CCIP kill?
now it's all about CCTP???

[Anonymous No.55905918]

>>55903293
These pretzels are making me thirsty.

[Anonymous No.55905964]

>>55903107
> Nothing to do with CCIP
What's our cope linksisters? We already started talking about the elites trying to suppress circle and now we look dumb?

[Anonymous No.55905965]

>>55905964
we look so fucking dumb right now...
i am... embarrassed beyond belief

[Anonymous No.55905972]

>>55905965
Yea better go back and talk about how btc is suppressing chinalink

[Anonymous No.55905996]

uh oh
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xc43b1e78adc5c61fdfc5d14ec187a4681686972647bdab7bee0628d9981ef8f7

[Anonymous No.55906018]

>>55905996
lmao this scam team can't do anything right

[Anonymous No.55906082]

>>55905996
an error calculating fees? after 6 years, we're getting errors about CALCULATING FEES??? isn't that just like a %?? I have a calculator that can do that....

[Anonymous No.55906300]

that lane status page starting to expand
https://ccip.chain.link/status
be interesting in a few months, open for mainnet before end of year apparently

[Anonymous No.55906406]

>>55906300
>pic related

[Anonymous No.55906568]

>>55903377
Checked

[Anonymous No.55906611]

>>55893481
Just buy base tokens you're too late for link you retard

[Anonymous No.55906993]

>>55904148
>it's not CCIP because this is just burn and mint
CCIP includes burn and mint too, you know.

[Anonymous No.55907042]

>>55893481
>How is it the entire cryptosphere has no fucking idea that Chainlink has now inter-connected all of the most important blockchain protocols

There really is no cryptosphere. The initial institutional investors have either been temporarily scared away from the scene or they have partially transferred their investments to more immediately lucrative markets. The reality is that the retail investors who are still here and are holding on to their investment are just extremely early, they aren't full time investors who are constantly moving.their money from one market to the next to maximise profits, they're just normies who had a bit of spare money and fell into investing.

The world is moving in this direction regardless of what the paid fudders claim, it has no other choice because the USD hegemony is being phased out, and there is no alternative reserve currency candidate.

[Anonymous No.55907080]

>>55893887
What can they do with their Doge or Shib bit wait for the institutions who jumped in early based on memes to dump on them? If you think that shitcoins are a good investment opportunity and not just a total casino then you are a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.55907108]

>>55894738
>>55893862
>not retail facing enough
kek but Ripple is? Or ADA?

[Anonymous No.55907110]

>>55907080
>but what can you actually do with it
>2000+23
you have to be trolling

[Anonymous No.55907124]

>>55902341
Just 20 more years

[Anonymous No.55908522]

>>55902204
>They all hold link too
No they don't. They are NPCs and don't understand it

[Anonymous No.55908541]

>>55902461
>cheaper to trade shitcoins.
This is literally why bnb is worth anything.

[Anonymous No.55908685]

>>55893481
>How is it the entire cryptosphere has no fucking idea that Chainlink has now inter-connected all of the most important blockchain protocols and it's all happening out in the open? How is it that multiple countries are testing their CBDCs on CCIP and it's all out in the open and literally no one has any fucking idea?
It's already priced in. And bridging isn't that big of a deal. Like it's good they're doing it, should reduce the bridge hacks hopefully, but it's still just bridging, bridging already exists. It's not like some novel new feature that is going to change the way people trade. Most people just bridge their native tokens too, then buy the things they want on that chain, then just hold, then bridge back later after selling. I don't see why people would be bridging other kinds of tokens like shitcoins or anything

[Anonymous No.55908780]

>>55908685
>bridging isn't that big of a deal
>bridging already exists

L to the MAO

[Anonymous No.55908791]

>>55908780
please don't give the fuddies (you)'s

[Anonymous No.55909008]

>>55908780
I don't understand your point. People are still using those bridges, constantly. CCIP just makes it a bit safer, apparently. Lets see, wouldn't surprise me if CCIP itself gets hacked at some point

[Anonymous No.55909105]

[Anonymous No.55909123]

>>55909105
Who the fuck is gonna pay that outrageous fee CCIP is dead

[Anonymous No.55909168]

>>55909123
It's going to incentivize people to avoid doing transactions on Ethereum mainnet.

[Anonymous No.55909564]

>>55909123
nigger, would you rather use a bridge that costs the same amount and take the risk of losing your shit?

[Anonymous No.55910175]

>>55909008
yeah big corporations don't need safety when dealing with 9-10 figure sums

[Anonymous No.55910231]

>>55910175
Exactly why they'll keep using their own servers and databases for business and completely ignoring blockchain in general. But maybe now over a decade in we'll get a delivery company or something using crypto.

[Anonymous No.55910753]

>>55909105
based af. CCIP is going to be such a revenue cow

[Anonymous No.55911000]

>>55910231
this is the harsh reality... the business world doesn't need any of this

[Anonymous No.55911009]

>>55904457
Does the word mixicles ring a bell? How about deco? FSS?

Chainlink is the king of inventing bullshit testnets that keep the idiot proles buying in chunks of $250 at a time.

[Anonymous No.55911298]

Meanwhile us intellectuals are buying in at 4 figures at a time. B-}