/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.55890864]

It's been a long time since /biz/ was conceded to the gibbering retards whose job, or hobby, it is to fud Chainlink (both are equally pathetic and subhuman).
But I know there are a lot of OG linkies out there and I do have a permanent and warm sense of gratitude and bond to the other autists who breadcrumbed, memed and shitposted with me in the early days.
If you're despairing about the loss of that vibe, then I will say just wait until we have zk/DECO gated spaces to talk. When you need 1k LINK to be in the chat and you can prove that without revealing any other information.
When that time comes, in the next couple of years, we'll be able to reconvene in a semi-private space. We will have lots of resources at that point. I personally am already working on an app-layer crypto product that I think is extremely exciting, and I'll be glad to bounce off, collaborate and organize with other OG linkies once we have a space to ourselves again. I will absolutely preference my old frens in terms of opportunities, because I will be forever grateful to anon for our shared work in figuring this crazy shit out. I trust the judgment of the OG anons, because I know the level of conviction it takes to hold for as long as we have.
It's only a matter of time, bros, it will be very sweet when it happens. The retards can have this board all to themselves.

[Anonymous No.55890923]

>>55890864
I don't mind the FUD cucks personally
It's just background noise, and easy candidates for when we need third worlders to use as prey in bohemian grove style hunting rituals later.

[Anonymous No.55890937]

Make the limit to join 10000 LINK in your account at ALL times.

[Anonymous No.55890942]

>>55890864
OG anons are the ones coordinating the FUD in an attempt to make Sergey care about the holders. There’s been talks of Sergey actively shitting on holders and being fine if the token dumps for the next couple of decades as he has billions in the company’s treasury, enough runway for a couple of decades of operations

I guess if you don’t care about waiting for a couple of decades until Chainlink has an IPO, it’s good to be a fanboy. Most people care about the token’s price though

[Anonymous No.55890958]

>>55890937
As soon as we have zk gated fora you can have any settings you want. "Held 10k LINK since 2017" would be an interesting group of people.

[Anonymous No.55890962]

Also what does kek mean by giving me a "1 piece v1" ID

[Anonymous No.55890977]

>>55890942
>OG anons are the ones coordinating the FUD in an attempt to make Sergey care about the holders.
"We were OGs the whole time, honest! We just thought that Sergey would start catering to retarded moonboys instead of banks if we flooded a dead basket weaving forum with spam 24/7!"
Uh huh. Nothing says OG like 4-5 obvious outsiders here since 2021 that don't understand any of the old shitposts or references and are just permanently angry, right? Yeah nah.

[Anonymous No.55891003]

>let's all go somewhere private where people won't laugh at the worst investment in the known universe since covid, and chat about how we're still going to make it

[Anonymous No.55891155]

sounds good OP! I looked forward to it.

[Anonymous No.55891403]

Heh, how's that for timing. Chainlink just released a video on NFT gating. So you could have a system which automatically issues a non-transferable NFT to anyone with a qualifying wallet (say, 1k LINK held for 3 years), and then uses that NFT as a pass to get onto the website/into the chat.
Powered by Chainlink, of course.

[Anonymous No.55891405]

>>55890864
based. I'm glad to know others out there are thinking about zk chats. the future of secret conversation is a game changer for the world. glowniggers are going to be pissed. expect to see more hardware/software 0days drop as they try to crack comms.
RISC-V or bust.

[Anonymous No.55891418]

Op in massive loser denial. You could have literally bought any other alt and had better gains

[Anonymous No.55891423]

>>55891405
I would fully expect the glowies to have a highly funded OG LINK wallet so that they could keep an eye on things in a zk gated LINK OG chat.
But I'd take one glowie lurker over the fud retards any day.

[Anonymous No.55891462]

>>55890864
Anon i know about the chat, but im too scared to connect my wallet. How do i make sure it is not a trap?

[Anonymous No.55891470]

>>55891462
learn to read code

[Anonymous No.55891482]

>>55891470
Ok. See you in the space.

[Anonymous No.55891672]

Fudders mad. Can't wait to leave them behind in this cesspool. We should leave them a few bots to argue and fud with 24/7 when we leave.

[Anonymous No.55891878]

>>55891672
The paid community advocates will never leave regardless, because the SergeyPonzi requires endless new blood for another 500million in token dumps, but enjoy the company of all four /biz/ roundtrip OG bag holders and dozens of desperate 2021 newfag top buyers!

[Anonymous No.55891944]

>>55891003
I hear Jonestown is up for sale. Forget the Cayman Islands we can all LINK up in Guyana

[Anonymous No.55892380]

>>55890864
>If you're despairing about the loss of that vibe, then I will say just wait until we have zk/DECO gated spaces to talk. When you need 1k LINK to be in the chat and you can prove that without revealing any other information.

ok we do that and then... nothing changes
the gay FUD was link holders the whole time

[Anonymous No.55892416]

>>55890864
>>55890958
>>55891403
>>55891423
This you?

[Anonymous No.55892891]

Didnt read + youre down 90% LOL
>6 years later
>$6.15
Kek baggies

[Anonymous No.55893891]

>>55890864
i like your ideas op. see you in the chat. until then, i'll see you around the little fudsters. we're still here.

[Anonymous No.55895901]

>>55890864
It doesn't have to be done in such a high tech way.
You can already do it without this just by using an id systems and inviting people into the group then properly filtering and moderating it.
Think of twitter with semi anonymous identities specialized for a community group.

They did this in older times without internet.
We should be able to do it too, but the reason we didn't was laziness.

[Anonymous No.55896739]

>>55890864
i want deco for gaming, no more non whites - this is what will fix online gaming

[Anonymous No.55896825]

>>55895901
But how do you filter reasonable criticism from fud so as to not become an echo chamber like current telegram groups for instance? Some of the recent fud points about subsidising the network and Chainlink Labs not caring about the token price are true and should be discussed. The 10k pass makes more sense as you know people with criticism do care for their own investments and are not just fudding.

[Anonymous No.55896902]

>>55890942
>billions in the company’s treasury
if that's true, why the continued dumps?

[Anonymous No.55896906]

>>55896825
Imagine if you need 10k link to get into the chat and most people there still complain about the shit price action and Sergey not caring about holders. Because that’s really what’s going to happen lmao, I can’t wait for this chat to be implemented and caps to be leaked to biz everyday

[Anonymous No.55897021]

>>55896906
That would be tolerable. I would have more patience for a 10k+ OG whining than a bunch of latefags and paid posters.

[Anonymous No.55897023]

>>55896906
this
it's going to be exactly the same as biz, no matter what restrictions you choose
it's fucking ogre for online discourse

[Anonymous No.55897025]

>>55897021
You still don't understand it's mostly 10k+ holders angry about Sergey acting like he's not funded by them and looking upon any price discussion?

[Anonymous No.55897028]

>>55897023
Only one way to find out. Honestly looking at the Chainlink video about NFT gating it would insanely easy for an existing service like Discord to bolt it on as a feature, and very easy to customize it so that when you're starting a new discord room you could just have simple settings for (users must hold 1 BTC or users must hold 1ETH Paris POAP etc).

[Anonymous No.55897035]

>>55897025
>funded by them
I gave Sergey 7 ETH in 2017 and have pulled out much, much more than that. Anyone who bought in 2017/2018 is up multiples. Who is funding who?
And the good thing about a group like that is that we'd actually know. We'd know if it actually was OGs seething or not. And if it was back to the old ways, and people were actually sharing and building together, then awesome. The fudders can have /biz/ all to themselves.

[Anonymous No.55897059]

>>55897035
All Chainlink treasury is generated from selling tokens, so yes it is token buyers who are funding Chainlink. This is a fact, how can you be arguing against this? Also I agree I can't wait for this room to happen so the fact that it's mostly holders being pissed off is proven right.

[Anonymous No.55897061]

>>55897021
>I would have more patience for a 10k+ OG whining
Nigger, who do you think is shitting up the board with FUD daily?

[Anonymous No.55897069]

>>55897061
THIS
every single FUD post is a guy with a fat stinky stack of delicious chainlink cubes.

[Anonymous No.55897072]

>>55890923
Kek. We all know where it's going in the end. Sensible investors have moved on to better things. Chads are trading and earning index returns on AstraDAO. What do you have to say about that?

[Anonymous No.55897082]

>>55897061
Brokefags, including people who went way too hard on LinkPool specifically and got absolutely fucked.
They were intolerable before they got rekt, I'm sure losing everything didn't make them any less annoying.

[Anonymous No.55897101]

>>55897082
nothin sweeter than linkpool fags gettin rekt

[Anonymous No.55897111]

>>55897082
Lol, brokefags would never buy chainlink anon, they’d rather buy stuff like XRP and Doge. Do you ever see people that bought other shitcoins complain about the price action like linkies do? NO! Brokefags just go away and do something else.

OGs are extremely invested into Chainlink and genuinely care about the project. OGs are like the overbearing mother that tells her daughter she’s gaining weight for her own good, good intentions, doesn’t work. In this case they’re complaining (wouldn’t even call it fudding) because Sergey really doesn’t give a shit about holders.

OGs are the ones fudding, once this chat is implemented you’ll get to see it

[Anonymous No.55897196]

I’m looking forward to connecting with my fellow Link hermanos

[Anonymous No.55897212]

>>55897111
Checked. I guess we'll all get our answers soon enough.

[Anonymous No.55897485]

>>55890864
extremely based, except for the 1k link entry
for ogs (pre 2020) turn that up to 10k maybe even 100k just to be sure

[Anonymous No.55898519]

>>55897111
>genuinely care about the project
i don't think it's humanly possible to care about anything a b2b company does. stockholm syndrome is real though

[Anonymous No.55899384]

>>55897485
Pls let newfags play, every week I add 100 to my stack

[Anonymous No.55899449]

>>55897485
most OGs never had 100k

[Anonymous No.55899478]

Why would there need to be coordinated FUD for a project that has plummeted? The chart is tragic

[Anonymous No.55899534]

>>55899478
stop it, adem