Check CCIP

[Anonymous No.55875302]

Theres a transaction from BNB testnet

[Anonymous No.55875319]

>>55875302


Transaction hash

0x1b365ab71ca3a5ebedbb967a9fcec3b929e4849361947460fd7fbd8b8b5829c9

[Anonymous No.55875341]

>>55875302
Hmmm let’s see
The price of Link

[Anonymous No.55875401]

>BNB testnet
omg what a massive development!
rope yourself OP

[Anonymous No.55875462]

BNB logo is on the ccip explorer page from day 1
this was obviously coming
priced in

[Anonymous No.55875505]

Base testnet has been added too:

https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x1901303aec599686205d22f688126c15829e59521dfc3e0bb1037d7038f43c21

[Anonymous No.55875510]

>>55875505
>>55875462
>>55875401
>>55875341
>>55875319
>>55875302

[Anonymous No.55875512]

>>55875505
based

[Anonymous No.55875621]

>>55875302
one by one, day by day, but wen btc on ccip?

[Anonymous No.55875632]

>>55875621
asking the real questions

I'm guessing tainted BTCs is an obstacle

[Anonymous No.55875643]

>>55875510
this

[Anonymous No.55875661]

>>55875462
was it though?
https://web.archive.org/web/20230720070909/https://ccip.chain.link/status

[Anonymous No.55875683]

>>55875632
>tainted BTCs
?

[Anonymous No.55876206]

>>55875510
I don't like this chart

[Anonymous No.55876227]

>>55875510
Yep. The cult considered this guy an “idiot” for selling in the high $7s

[Anonymous No.55876243]

>>55875302
There's not only a BNB lane now, there's also a Base lane?
I don't remember seeing this on launch
Nice find OP
https://ccip.chain.link/status

[Anonymous No.55876251]

>>55876243
>>55875510

[Anonymous No.55876255]

>>55876243
eth -> Base tx
0x456fe379544285733452511e445cbd607590ba1b09b0ea489085e30f653f163f

[Anonymous No.55876518]

>>55876227
You dare mock your shadow masters? High ranking cultist Severus Severini will sever your corporeal form as soon as the contract finalizes on the ethereum network for this insolence. Remember, the cult of chainlink sees all! The cult of fud writhes in their grasp.

[Anonymous No.55876673]

base and hexagram pilled.

[Anonymous No.55876810]

>>55876243
>>55876255
well god damn
What is Coinbase going to use Base for?
Id assume maybe they're going to rebuild their whole exchange on it?

[Anonymous No.55876890]

>>55875302
Nice to see my pic posted

[Anonymous No.55877006]

>>55875302
Did they really implode the market to suppress link or least hide pivotal developments like this?

[Anonymous No.55877052]

>>55875683
BTCs acquired through hacks and dark web trade (cp, drugs, gun, terrorism, etc)

BTCs that have been flagged because of this stuff are basically in limbo. Can’t cash them out as all exchanges flag them, hold them and say sorry we’re holding them to protect you.

[Anonymous No.55877081]

>>55876810
Well right now they’re just shilling shitty nfts for “onchain summer” which is incredibly disappointing. However even BSC took around 6 months before anything real started happening on that shit chain, so there is still hope.

[Anonymous No.55877135]

slow and steady

[Anonymous No.55877152]

Gullible Sergey is once again falling for the chink scheme. Once they have access to CCIP, they'll reverse engineer it and will use their own version bypassing Link

[Anonymous No.55877210]

I didn't have confidence LINK was the way to make anything happen in a few months but that is an interesting find. It's cheaper today than when I was originally considering buying in.

[Anonymous No.55877240]

>>55875632
>tainted BTCs
implying there arent plenty of tainted eths too
for instance almost all eths that went into any variety of mixer

[Anonymous No.55877256]

>>55877152
>just fork Chainlink bro
lmao we're back at 2018 fud

[Anonymous No.55877264]

Many message IDs are 404ing:

https://ccip.chain.link/address/0x852eb3ae1d95e90c5f6b55d6559f58495c669468

[Anonymous No.55877276]

>>55875302
Why does CCIP even matter anymore. Nobody has any money to buy our bags and pump up the price. Institutions already have massive Chainlink bags that are big enough for them and won’t be buying more. Nobody will buy, there is no demand for the link token. It’s over until retail has lots of money to buy stuff again which I don’t feel will be in a very long time….

[Anonymous No.55877292]

And here's Base.
Neat!

[Anonymous No.55877294]

>>55877276

[Anonymous No.55877318]

>>55877256
>BNB smart chain is a fork of Ethereum
>Binance Oracle is a fork of Chainlink
I wouldn't be surprised if he just forks CCIP and centraliz it.

[Anonymous No.55877326]

>>55875510
>>55875643
Are you saying Chainlink should only expand and develop when the price is high?

[Anonymous No.55877329]

it's basically a given that ccip will support all evm chains. when non evm chains like ada? or are those basically not worth linking.

[Anonymous No.55877348]

>>55877294
better than expected to be fair
imagine what this fee will be like during the mania phase of the market, most people havent yet figured out that eth gas going skyhigh again will in this instance result in direct buying pressure for link that will scale with eths craziness
i just hope some of that will result value capture for token holders, they cant keep dumping btc forever

[Anonymous No.55877414]

>>55877210
Link is always at its local "top". So 6 months from now, you'll back at now and be thankful you didn't buy. Rinse, repeat until it hits $0

[Anonymous No.55877421]

>>55877326
lmfao... Linkies can't make up their minds on whether this should be viewed as an investment or a nondeductible donation to a technology cult

[Anonymous No.55877426]

>>55877414
Possibly. If I get enough small gains from everything else I might put that into LINK.

[Anonymous No.55877437]

>>55877421
I love how retards like you think the only variable that impacts price is price.

[Anonymous No.55877517]

>>55877437
Price is all that matters. To quote Gordon Gecko, it's all about bucks kid.

[Anonymous No.55877533]

>>55877294
Yes but at end of the day if nobody is using blockchain then there is still no demand. People only use blockchain to buy tokens in hopes of getting rich and so when nobody has money nobody will use blockchain.

[Anonymous No.55877549]

>>55877533
>Chainlink bad because crypto bad

The absolute state of Link fud.

[Anonymous No.55877570]

>>55877294
Token Not Needed

[Anonymous No.55877581]

>>55877517
Gordon Gecko bought and sold on underlying fundamentals. Like corporate pension funds and internal union dealings.

[Anonymous No.55877594]

>>55877549
Dude it’s over. Everything is a fkn scam. And nobody will buy into the ponzi now. Every single run up in the history of our world is from retail having money and getting fomo. Retail is wiped, it is over forever until money printer turns back on again

[Anonymous No.55877625]

>>55877594
What crypto has needed since the beginning is mass adoption.
And nobody is closer to making that finally happen than chainlink.

[Anonymous No.55877636]

>>55877625
Chart>>55875510

[Anonymous No.55877661]

>>55877636
If that's your only argument, then you were all argued out a long time ago.
Because the price has been shit for years now.
Yet you're still here.

[Anonymous No.55877684]

>>55877625
Coinbase?

[Anonymous No.55877686]

>>55877594
I actually think a recession or a downturn in the business cycle is what is needed to push banks and institutions into utilizing blockchain and smart contracts to cut costs and erase middlemen. Sure your dog shit coin might go to zero and your “ground breaking” vaporware might go to zero, but real blockchain technology projects LIKE CHAINLINK will flourish.

[Anonymous No.55877693]

>>55877686
I’ve thought about this too. It’s bearish short term though.

[Anonymous No.55877738]

>>55877686
It doesn’t matter if it gets used by mega corps, usage doesn’t generate enough revenue and as token holders the revenue generated is not reflected in token price as it is in traditional stocks, all revenue will just go to Sergey. What only matters for us as token holders is that retail buys and pumps our bags

[Anonymous No.55877781]

>>55877738
If mega corps use Link they will need to buy Link. Holy shit this is not rocket appliances. Fudders really aren’t sending their best.

[Anonymous No.55877799]

>>55877738
Wrong. You don’t even know what the purpose of staking link is, do you?

[Anonymous No.55877910]

>>55877799
Chart>>55875510

[Anonymous No.55877911]

>>55877581
Take sergeys dick out of your mouth kid

[Anonymous No.55877930]

>>55877684

[Anonymous No.55877932]

>>55875302
the price is down 90% scammer

[Anonymous No.55877950]

>>55877910
Separate issue.
>>55877930
Your point?

[Anonymous No.55877955]

>>55877738
>hurrr stocks directly reflect revenue
You're a full-blown retard.

[Anonymous No.55877962]

>>55877950
You asked me if I was talking about Coinbase when I mentioned mass adoption. I wasn't.

[Anonymous No.55878012]

>>55877962
Oh my bad. Thought you were responding to the other post too.

[Anonymous No.55878051]

so basically three possible outcomes over the next couple of years
1) shitcoin casino again, market still doesn't mature. link wins because its universal gas for casino now, new paradigm is multichain casino.
2) actual fundamental adoption, link wins by being the spearhead
3) crypto finally dies forever, or at least the idea of cycle theory brought on by btc halving dies.

so if crypto survives, link wins. if it dies, none of it matters anyways.

[Anonymous No.55878074]

>>55877955
Chainlink, the Toyota of crypto. Vitalik was right.

[Anonymous No.55878225]

>>55875510
Bullish

[Anonymous No.55879625]

>>55877326
>expand and develop
into what? more shit nobody nobody needs? kek all they do is dump on bagholders to pay salaries

[Anonymous No.55879639]

>>55878074
Toyota is one of the best, they make working products that last, they don't make you poor. chainlink will make you poor

[Anonymous No.55880608]

>>55877686
Most people here still don't get why we bought LINK at all and think that LINK is the same as a shitcoin.
The people here are extremely risk averse and don't want to buy into something that means nothing. LINK is THE utility blockchain that will drive institutional adoption of smart contracts.

We all know that automation is coming.
We all know that a massive financial collapse is coming that will drive the institutions to automation both to save money and to provide better guarantees for investment in the future.

This is not an if scenario but a when scenario and Chainlink are the only viable solution to a myriad of problems.

[Anonymous No.55880641]

>>55875510

[Anonymous No.55880658]

>>55880608
>says chainlink is good for the world
>doesn't mention anything about the price pumping

Subtle doublespeak by omission chainlink employee. The reality is that Sergey is obese and the token is $7, and for that reason, I’m out

[Anonymous No.55880664]

>>55880608
Chart

[Anonymous No.55880672]

>>55877955
Imagine being genuinely this much of a brainless cunt and having zero understanding of how a Chainlink token doesn't have anything to do with the value of stocks.
Chainlink won't be speculative asset you smooth brained fucking nigger retard, every time someone uses the blockchain they will use Chainlink to do it.
Scarcity will eventually drive the price of the token higher, banking institutions trading tokenised assets and currencies will do it via Chainlink.
Staking when it is fully released will lock up the tokens and further drive scarcity.

[Anonymous No.55880687]

>>55880658
>>55880664
I couldn't give a fuck if retail is out, retail is irrelevant and the institutions are all that matters and are what will drive the price of the token.

Take your 20 LINK and sell them to buy your next six months Disney Plus subscription and then end yourself.

[Anonymous No.55880693]

>>55875302
I don’t get it, help out a hardworking wastewater treatment fella and retard it up for me
Me want to understand you

[Anonymous No.55880716]

>>55880687
>>55880672
This you? Fatass linkcel

[Anonymous No.55880784]

>>55877686
Thats a really good post. Now they will have to make 50 fud threads to offset it. Also I think they get paid when they get you’s so don’t directly respond to them.

[Anonymous No.55880802]

>>55880716

[Anonymous No.55880813]

>>55877686
Except for baggies because the price coffee

[Anonymous No.55880837]

>>55880802
Check the chart and report back with your findings marine!

[Anonymous No.55880861]

>55880837
No you for you kekekekek

[Anonymous No.55880959]

>>55880687
>I couldn't give a fuck if retail is out, retail is irrelevant
Chainlink employee detected x 2


>the institutions are all that matters and are what will drive the price of the token
>$6.18
Great job institutions!

[Anonymous No.55881332]

>>55880959
The product is still in the testing phase. What part of this are you struggling to understand smooth brain?

[Anonymous No.55881462]

>>55881332
the part where its been 6 years

[Anonymous No.55881531]

>>55881332
Kek bagcel

[Anonymous No.55881566]

>>55881332
Oh, why you mad bro. Gonna cry?

>$6.1799

*Dabs on you
*Proceeds to dip my testicles in your beverage

[Anonymous No.55881735]

>>55877264
>https://ccip.chain.link/address/0x852eb3ae1d95e90c5f6b55d6559f58495c669468
lgtm

[Anonymous No.55882889]

>>55875621
you bridge and get btc on avalanche and then move those avax tokens on ccip

[Anonymous No.55883162]

>>55875505
>>55875302
nice

[Anonymous No.55883209]

it will be interesting when a permissioned blockchain is spotted for the first time:
>The first use case will involve the transfer of tokenised assets between two wallets on the same public blockchain network (Ethereum Sepolia testnet). The second involves the transfer of tokenised assets from a public blockchain (Ethereum) to a permissioned blockchain. And a third use case will test the transfer of tokenised assets from Ethereum to another public blockchain. Chainlink will be used as an enterprise abstraction layer to securely connect the Swift network to the Ethereum Sepolia network, while Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) will enable complete interoperability between the source and destination blockchains.

[Anonymous No.55883230]

>>55877625
that's the wrong way around though. without crypto adoption, link is useless

[Anonymous No.55883308]

>>55883230
this is who you are countertrading

[Anonymous No.55883398]

>>55880672
Nothing you're saying is in any way refuting the fact that stocks DO NOT directly reflect revenue, like that retard I replied to said.
What is wrong with you?

>Chainlink won't be speculative asset
Oh yes it will.

>Staking will pump Chainlink
Sure, that and speculation.

>>55883230
Chainlink is the key to the next wave of crypto adoption.

[Anonymous No.55883405]

>>55875302
test

[Anonymous No.55883408]

>>55883209
It's amazing how with only 6 years and billions of dollars they're managed to testnet send a token from one wallet to another, same chain.

[Anonymous No.55883442]

>>55883209
Does that mean Chainlink oracles will have access to this permissioned blockchain?
How do they get paid for their operations when they come from a chain without a monetized token?
Will Chainlink move a part of their token supply to this chain from ETH using CCIP?

Is this how the liquidity will move to thousands of blockchains?

This could lock up liquidity even more than staking.
You may use WBTC on ETH to gamble with BTC, but imagine using a CCIP enabled bridged LINK token on every existing blockchain in the world.
It would really become the ultimate currency of the world and completely surpass BTC because Chainlink services would be needed on every blockchain.

[Anonymous No.55883482]

>>55883398
>crypto adoption
i mean, they are spending a lot of money on putting sergey next to influencers, let's hope he doesn't behave like in the schmidt interview

[Anonymous No.55883515]

>>55883482
>let's hope he doesn't behave like in the schmidt interview
Imagine trying to put a negative spin on Eric fucking Schmidt admiring Chainlink at Sergey's own event.

[Anonymous No.55883623]

fuddies are absolutely FURIOUS over this thread
great work, OP
bump

[Anonymous No.55883682]

cz will just fork it and slap a new token on it

[Anonymous No.55883905]

>>55883398
Chainlink tokens are the product, they aren't shares.
The product is currently in BETA.
When the product is released, we can gauge how successful it is.

[Anonymous No.55883910]

>>55883905
Again, nothing you're saying refutes the simple fact that shares don't reflect revenue.

>When the product is released, we can gauge how successful it is.
A bunch of products have been out for a long time. Four years for the price feeds.
And they're largely a massive success. And they all require the token.

[Anonymous No.55883920]

reminder: this board spits on new tokens having 20% VC+team allocation trying to provide utility (EXD, MKR, ...) But Chainlink team has 50% and this board remains bullish no matter what. All is fine.

[Anonymous No.55883944]

>>55883920
>this board spits on new tokens having 20% VC+team allocation
No it doesn't.

>this board remains bullish no matter wha
No it doesn't.
No coin has been fudded more than Chainlink on here.

[Anonymous No.55883954]

>>55883944
>No it doesn't.
everytime a new thread is posted on something nice like Cqt, Exorde EXD, etc... Actual Data/infra tokens
Threads are either ignored or fudded/spat on. Every single time. 100%.

[Anonymous No.55883959]

>>55883910
The majority of the use cases of the token aren't released, so the demand for the token is still low. When LINK usage is on a per transaction basis the value of the token will hopefully increase due to heavy use and scarcity, this is simple supply and demand.

Again, tokens aren't shares, you don't use shares in Toyota to pay for a new car. you don't lend them to people so they can hire a car.

[Anonymous No.55883978]

>TrPy2PCx
this guy is a paid avocado, you can tell from his posting style which he uses every time, arguing with him is entirely pointless, as he aims to silence every criticism by exhausting you through repetitive nuances while he pretends he doesn't get the overarching point
it's best to ignore him, he can do this all day

[Anonymous No.55884009]

Is 10k enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.55884016]

>>55884009
Always has been

[Anonymous No.55884044]

>>55883978
I love it when fuddies recognize people from their years of obsessing over a coin they hate.

[Anonymous No.55884050]

>>55883954
>everytime a new thread is posted on something nice like Cqt, Exorde EXD, etc... Actual Data/infra tokens
>Threads are either ignored or fudded/spat on. Every single time. 100%.
Same with Link

[Anonymous No.55884062]

>>55876206
>>55875510

this is the most bullish chart ive seen since 2017.
massive accumulation and when its gonna pop it will do atleast 50-100x

[Anonymous No.55884097]

>>55883910
>A bunch of products have been out for a long time. Four years for the price feeds. And they're largely a massive success. And they all require the token.
Except for the 200+ price feeds that have been deprecated over the last 2 years. How many tens / hundreds of millions was spent bootstrapping all of those that was essentially wasted?

[Anonymous No.55884128]

>>55884097
about three fifty?

[Anonymous No.55884165]

Anyone have the transaction hashes for the digital currencies?

[Anonymous No.55884191]

>>55883959
>tokens aren't shares
The guy I replied to said revenue is reflected in stock price.
Which is a very blatant fallacy. Get it through your thick skull.

[Anonymous No.55884212]

>>55884097
kek this is like leftards whining about how "Trump went bankrupt X amount of times".

>>55884044
It always makes me laugh.

[Anonymous No.55884227]

>>55884191
How does it feel to have Senior Chainlink shills educating less educated Jr Chainlunk Avocados in every fucking Chainshit thread for what the last two fucking years?

I mean as if paying disenfranchised hodlers to appear to be sad losers on Twitter, where all the good posters left for and /biz/ unironically, to spurn interaction wasn't low enough

[Anonymous No.55884231]

>>55884044
"fuddies" are mostly ex-holders, believe it or not

[Anonymous No.55884252]

>>55884231
>"fuddies" are mostly ex-holders
No they aren't. Most of the same fud you see now was getting spammed just as hard back in the years when Link kept beating the entire market.

[Anonymous No.55884277]

>>55884227
I think I need to sit down

[Anonymous No.55884294]

>>55877955
stocks are forward looking and the market ascribing that valuation to TSLA is not so much on their current revenues as it is the market's expectation for the future revenues

[Anonymous No.55884382]

>>55884294
Exactly.

[Anonymous No.55884403]

nothing makes sense both in stocks and crypto


You can be a genius and launch a nice utility token, decentralized, operational and you will struggle to go beyond 50m$ market cap.
Even if your token generates revenue (something unheard of in the top 100-200).

But if you are a famoso jew or son of a bitch likr Sam Altman, you can launch the most pathetic shitcoin like WLD and keep it above 10 billion fully diluted while it's not even an IOU or anything valuable.

Retards are making this world possible, and I suffer from it. Fucking hell

[Anonymous No.55884407]

>>55884403
I see myself in this post and I dislike

[Anonymous No.55884411]

>>55884062
Literally every shitcoins look like this dumbass

[Anonymous No.55884429]

>>55884403
Crypto is supposed to be decentralized. It’s not supposed to make any revenue at the protocol level because that would imply that there is a centralized force with a monopoly on extracting money from protocol use.

>>55884411
Surely you meant to quote >>55875510

[Anonymous No.55884455]

>>55884227
Anyone saying “Chainlink needs staking 1.0 to capture value” is not a shill, they’re part of the “we must keep retail out of Link because Link is pure” crowd.
Basically a bunch of self-sabotaging betas with severe one-itis.

[Anonymous No.55884509]

>>55884429
stupid. it can generate revenue from many clients, at the protocol level. Revenue = Actual tokens being consumed to use the platform/infrastructure/service.

If a token doesn't generate revenue, or a valuable service that is directly or indirectly paid for then it is WORTHLESS.
ETH is so valuable today, in part because it is heavily USED and consuled for its utility.


Only coins are exempt from this rule. (BTC, XMR, ..)

[Anonymous No.55884581]

>>55884509
What you’re describing is revenue for protocol users. Like nodes, miners, DEXes, …
Not revenue for the protocol itself.

[Anonymous No.55884638]

>>55884581
yeah sure, the protocol+actors are the entity having an economy. My point still stands, the terminology is pretty irrelevant

[Anonymous No.55884639]

>>55884509
>coins are exempt from this rule. (BTC, XMR, ..)
lol so "crypto is worthless without revenue", but the absolute biggest crypto is exempt?

Schizo-tier logic.

[Anonymous No.55884692]

>>55884639
Well, Money is Money. Though I agree with XMR dudes saying BTC is a true ponzi and bound to change or die.

[Anonymous No.55884913]

I'm bullish on, and hold quite a lot of, Chainlink. More than most Americans have in their bank accounts. They'd probably think I'm crazy if they knew how much of my limited net worth as an average American is buried in this cryptographic coin, and that's why we will win

[Anonymous No.55884928]

>>55884913
This is a picture of you

[Anonymous No.55884973]

>>55884928
You have no idea anon. The team even sent me a t-shirt for defending their honor in the Public Discord against coordinated fuddies. I've got a CL shirt and 80x roi bag, what do you have fuddie?
>not mentioning the free rent
>or the free memes

[Anonymous No.55885332]

>>55884692
BTC has a set amount that can't be increased so it can't be a Ponzi as Ponzi's require constant growth and the ability to print more currency.
Just because some people already own a lot of BTC doesn't make it a Ponzi, that's like saying any limited resource is a Ponzi because people already own some of it, it's fucking retarded.

Western economies are Ponzi's that rely on constant growth and adding more people to the bottom of the pyramid to survive, they print fake money in order to devalue the worth of the currency in general and the people at the bottom with the least amount of negotiating power pay the highest price.

BTC is just a limited resource.

[Anonymous No.55885584]

This thread really angered the fuddies yeesh

[Anonymous No.55885703]

>>55875302
So when do I get rich?
How many more years do I wait?

[Anonymous No.55885891]

>>55877426
That's where GLW comes in, now listed on MEXC. You've got to dive in as it's showing positive signs of an imminent pump soon.

[Anonymous No.55886028]

>>55885332
Are miner's going to bother to keep mining and using precious electricity for it when the block rewards's approach 0?

[Anonymous No.55886115]

>>55884973
Didn't realise that they sent out t-shirts in your XXXL size.

[Anonymous No.55886187]

>>55886028
The idea is that block rewards should eventually be entirely comprised of transaction fees, at which point Bitcoin will be fully self-sustaining. This will happen when the last Bitcoin is mined in 100 years or so.
The new Bitcoins that miners mine are literally subsidies meant to bootstrap the Bitcoin network. That's why Satoshi also added the "halving", because the need for bootstrapping is highest in the beginning and miners need to be weaned off subsidies gradually.

[Anonymous No.55886555]

>>55877581
>fundamentals

Lol what movie were you watching

Imagine thinking fundamentals matter in crypto. The altcoin graveyard is littered with muhhhh fundamentals

[Anonymous No.55886584]

>>55883408
“The future of finance”>>55883442

[Anonymous No.55886611]

>>55886555
This is like an edgy teen going “love isn’t real, it’s all just chemicals in the brain maaaan”

[Anonymous No.55886642]

>>55884973
How could you be up 80x? Wasnt the lowest price like 11 cents?

[Anonymous No.55886656]

>>55885584
What about the chart

[Anonymous No.55886671]

>>55886611
Not a very good analogy. There isnt a single crypto properly valued for its “fundamentals”, so its more just pointing out a reality

[Anonymous No.55886780]

>>55886555
Checked, but the post you quoted is about Gordon Gecko.
Should've been obvious, that name is literally the first two words of the post.

[Anonymous No.55886788]

>>55886656
see >>55877661

[Anonymous No.55886899]

>>55884165
*central bank digital currencies