DECO LINK

[Anonymous No.55761228]

>proof of account ownership without revealing username
>proof of location without revealing address
>proof of funds without revealing balance
>proof of token holdings without revealing wallet
DECO is a lot closer than people realize. Tick tock, fuddies.

[Anonymous No.55761235]

>>55761228
LIGMA

[Anonymous No.55761257]

I hope 1500 Link is enough. I’ll keep stacking but that is all I have at the moment.

[Anonymous No.55761267]

>>55761228
>proof of poor investment choice without revealing disappointed parents

[Anonymous No.55761271]

>>55761228
Everest ID already solves this

[Anonymous No.55761287]

There's already zero-knowledge solutions available on ETH.

[Anonymous No.55761292]

>>55761228
I thought link being a dead coin is a meme, but this is just fucking pathetic.

[Anonymous No.55761392]

>>55761267
>proof that you are not poor in order to reply to link threads
it's coming, what will you do when link threads are gated to anyone with less than 5k tokens? Guess you'll just have to transition

[Anonymous No.55761440]

>>55761228
it's called zkproofs, many solutions out there

[Anonymous No.55761457]

>>55761440
yes jeet and there are many oracles out there lmfao

[Anonymous No.55761459]

>>55761228
>closer than people think
why don't you back and chart the dates of all the ccip posts

[Anonymous No.55761464]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfqW1wYV0q4

[Anonymous No.55761476]

there's about a 0% chance they release deco anytime soon they have their hands full with ccip, functions, and low latency

[Anonymous No.55761486]

>>55761228
yeah ok but guess what
we'll have ALL that stuff and link will be $7.50

[Anonymous No.55761502]

>>55761476
Yes, it would really scupper things for you kekfuddies, and no mistake.

[Anonymous No.55761506]

>>55761476
But Fan Zhang was productizing DECO eight years ago already.

[Anonymous No.55761519]

They’ll time the release to compete with a competitor.

[Anonymous No.55761523]

>>55761519
yeah they'll do that cuz that makes sense :^)

[Anonymous No.55761550]

>>55761502
deco has terrible product-market fit right now. there's no serious builders to implement it and unless it's a big name like a bank, nobody is going to trust it. functions, ccip, and llo are much more important. not to mention deco isn't even on a public testnet yet.

[Anonymous No.55761566]

>>55761228
>we're proud to announce DECO going into alpha testnet in 2024
>in order to fund the development of this technology we're intending to move another 70million tokens into the circulating supply
>we really appreciate our paypigs.....I mean our community

[Anonymous No.55761568]

>>55761519
They'll release shit when the markets not in the gutter

[Anonymous No.55761675]

>>55761550
I would use it right now for every thread I make on this shit-hole just to keep your faggot ass from ever replying to my threads again

[Anonymous No.55761768]

SPARKSbros? how do we respond?

[Anonymous No.55761830]

>>55761675
nigga half the board was scared of connecting their wallet to the official staking site ain't nobody connecting their shit to your shitty threads

[Anonymous No.55762033]

>>55761830
You already lost because you will never own link at an average price of .30c per token, now run along and try to find salvation for your poor ass elsewhere since you can't afford a suicide stack

[Anonymous No.55762110]

>>55762033
Checked
>>55761830
Get fucked faggot

[Anonymous No.55762208]

>>55761506
ccip was supposed to have been worked on for two years also. all we have are testnets

[Anonymous No.55762234]

>>55762208
You’re a gigantic faggot

[Anonymous No.55762250]

i give up. you nulinkers are delusional. you'll learn after the next cycle.

[Anonymous No.55762264]

>>55761228
>prove that you've taken your latest mRNA injection without revealing whatever!

[Anonymous No.55762289]

>>55762264
>prove that you own link to reply to this thread
what are you going to do when the day comes? start sucking cock?

[Anonymous No.55762306]

>>55761830
just signing to prove you own an address is a pretty risk-free transaction

[Anonymous No.55762334]

>>55762234
why?

[Anonymous No.55762350]

>>55762334
you know why

[Anonymous No.55762379]

>>55762350
no i dont know why. Tell me why i'm wrong and we can talk about it

[Anonymous No.55762398]

>>55762379
The fact that you’re whining like a faggot and now demanding for an explanation cuz your feelings got hurt

[Anonymous No.55763200]

Hows this make you feel baggies?
>July 7, 2020
>LINK: $6.47
>BTC: $9,108
>ETH: $246
>BNB: $16.77
>ADA: $0.12
>SOL: $0.75
>DOGE: $0.003
>LTC: $43
>MATIC: $0.02
>TRX: $0.01
>XRP: $0.19

>July 7, 2023
>LINK: $6.16
>BTC: $30,342
>ETH: $1,868
>BNB: $236
>ADA: $0.28
>SOL: $21.90
>DOGE: $0.06
>LTC: $98
>MATIC: $0.68
>TRX: $0.079
>XRP: $0.47

[Anonymous No.55763229]

With DECO we can have ICOs again because you can prove you're not from North Korea without revealing any other details about yourself.
With bank stablecoins we can have stables with 0% rug risk.
Imagine an ICO mania where there is no meaningful line between "real money" and "crypto money". All global liquidity on the table.
That will be crypto's "dot com boom".
And we get closer to it every day.
And you'll look back from the top of the mountain and remember these times and the only thing you will ask yourself, over and over, is "Why didn't I buy more when I knew, but nobody else knew?"

[Anonymous No.55763242]

>>55763229
Americans are excluded from all icos lmao

[Anonymous No.55763244]

>>55761271
Yeah people will use a platform that does one thing that doesn't play well with others rather than one which solves the general problem and integrates with everything.

[Anonymous No.55763283]

>>55761271
>>55763244
DECO runs on Everest, Chainlink doesn't want to be liable for compliance they just want to be the credential sharing mechanism

https://developer.everest.org/#chainlink-access-to-everest-oracle

[Anonymous No.55763716]

>>55761440
>Oooooo sers we are having the zkproofs many good coin yes many X yes.

[Anonymous No.55763725]

>>55763229
American's can't into ICO's

[Anonymous No.55763884]

>>55761228
>DECO is a lot closer than people realize.
Unless you're an insider there's no way you can know if this is true or not. There's not any info on where they're up to aside from having a proof of concept at Smartcon 2022.

[Anonymous No.55763895]

>>55763884
DECO is years away. The last update we had was something to the effect of “turns out this problem is much more complicated than we thought”.
I don’t even remember which update that happened in but as far as chainlink goes that’s tantamount to saying “It’s years away “

[Anonymous No.55763901]

>>55763895
Personally I'm expecting it in 3-4 years - maybe sooner if they manage to get AI to help them out. Any longer than that and I'd be surprised, though.
I wonder what we're gonna have to keep us going in the meantime. Literally just looking forward to iterations of staking for the next few years?

[Anonymous No.55763909]

Neer really looked into deco, but who holds the information in the end?
Like who generates, with what, the zkrproof?

[Anonymous No.55763928]

>>55761271
>>55763244
>>55763283
Everest and DECO are complimentary, see what Bob said

[Anonymous No.55763953]

>>55763928
>pic
LMAO. I just know they're coping retards, like XRP-tier.
>Everest's zkKYC actually is accepted by financial institutions (DECO's is not)
You know he's a fucking scammer when he says this. No shit DECO isn't accepted, since it's literal years away from production. He's comparing his product to something which only has shown an alpha proof of concept, totally huckster behavior.

[Anonymous No.55763982]

>>55763953
ackchually I think when Bob mentioned Chainlink's zkKYC he was referring to this: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/907.pdf
>He's comparing his product to something which only has shown an alpha proof of concept
Everest has also only been shown in alpha.

Anyway like I said Everest and DECO are complimentary. I will forgive you for not knowing the difference between identity and identification(credential sharing). I know it's easy to get emotional about Chainlink these days, but Chainlink and Everest really do go well together, see pic related.

[Anonymous No.55763988]

[Anonymous No.55764007]

>>55763982
>>55763988
>incel manifestos
yea not reading all that, champ

[Anonymous No.55764019]

>>55764007
That's ok. There are a lot of hylics incapable of reading developer docs and whitepapers.

[Anonymous No.55764028]

>>55761267
tpbp

[Anonymous No.55764037]

>>55764019
Its literally just blatant advertising though, champ

[Anonymous No.55764119]

>>55764037
ok hylic

[Anonymous No.55764140]

Aint zero knowledge proofs what ROSE promised?

[Anonymous No.55764155]

>>55761228
>Prove you're a good goy with chainlink
Fuck off.

[Anonymous No.55764169]

https://youtu.be/gPMah3c7HP8

[Anonymous No.55764319]

https://youtu.be/Vey7SUx39AI

[Anonymous No.55764326]

>>55763982
>>55763988
Q: Hearing a LOT about Chainlink from the Everest-side, but nothing about Everest from the Chainlink-side, why?
A: Because Everest is just leeching off Chainlink's reputation.

[Anonymous No.55764329]

>>55763200
You will never get Link holders to sell. You can post this many times a day and it will continue to have zero sales of Link tokens. You appear to holders to be a very hurt person. Good luck in your ventures.

[Anonymous No.55764344]

>>55764326
https://chainlinktoday.com/everest-provides-identity-data-via-chainlink-network-to-support-new-web3-use-cases/
I imagine once Everchain is up and running, and Everwallet is out of beta we will be hearing a lot more.

[Anonymous No.55764384]

>>55764329
>July 7
it's over for fudders

[Anonymous No.55764624]

>>55764344
Ok, I was mistaken about Chainlink(today.com) not mentioning Everest. However, this still proves my point which is that Everest is relying on Link and not the other way around. The article is about how Everest is utilising Chainlink services, not the other way around... Yet the screenshots you posted earlier were saying that Link DECO would potentially be powered by Everest tech...

[Anonymous No.55764728]

>>55764624
Everest and DECO compliment each other because regulated institutions won't accept kyc that consists only of credential sharing, no matter how many layers of fancy zkp is wrapped around the credential.

[Anonymous No.55764740]

>>55764624
Link itself announced their partnership and to my knowledge no other similar project is utilised by Link.

[Anonymous No.55765147]

>>55763901
>if they manage to get AI to help them
this post is so low IQ that I feel dirty even replying to it. I'm going to go wash my hands after i hit Post.

[Anonymous No.55765156]

>>55764740
>>55764728
You guys like Everest ID

[Anonymous No.55765369]

>>55764329

>July 7, 2020
>LINK: $6.47
>BTC: $9,108
>ETH: $246
>BNB: $16.77
>ADA: $0.12
>SOL: $0.75
>DOGE: $0.003
>LTC: $43
>MATIC: $0.02
>TRX: $0.01
>XRP: $0.19

>July 7, 2023
>LINK: $6.16
>BTC: $30,342
>ETH: $1,868
>BNB: $236
>ADA: $0.28
>SOL: $21.90
>DOGE: $0.06
>LTC: $98
>MATIC: $0.68
>TRX: $0.079
>XRP: $0.47

[Anonymous No.55765641]

>>55765156
Yeah, it's the only other project that has the same mass ecosystem enabling potential as Chainlink does. I'm sure a few link maximalists will disagree, but they are midwits with tunnel vision.

[Anonymous No.55765679]

>>55764624
This is not the case, Chainlink won't be issuing anything identity related themselves, that carries an enormous amount of compliance risk. They will let someone else (Everest) assume that risk instead. Just because they don't talk about it 24/7 does not mean it isn't happening.