[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

File: 140 KB, 964x964, btc-jun-2023-bitcoinmonthlyreturn.com.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

55678931

Just gonna leave this here.... Anonymous Thu Jul 27 14:45:28 2023 No.55678931 [Reply] [Original]

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:00:10 2023 No.55679100 You can clearly see the 4 year cycle.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:01:02 2023 No.55679107 >>55678931 I was looking for a chart like this yesterday. Thanks bro

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:02:38 2023 No.55679125 >>55678931 Looks like we’re due a red july

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:04:11 2023 No.55679140 >>55678931 What the fuck is Septembers problem?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:05:37 2023 No.55679147 >>55679125 a red august is more likely

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:06:40 2023 No.55679155 February, March, July, and October have been the best months for Bitcoin. September and December are likely gonna suck.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:19:09 2023 No.55679253 >NA

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:22:20 2023 No.55679284 File: 172 KB, 772x1228, 1619402544963.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>55679100 Yep. We're in 2019 and 2016 right now. You have 8 more months to buy at least 1.0 BTC.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:23:21 2023 No.55679289 >>55679147 Red August and September. If you look at 2016 and 2019, which are equivalent to 2023 in the 4-year halving/bullrun cycle.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:24:41 2023 No.55679301 This is retarded

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:35:27 2023 No.55679392 >>55678931 So based on this chart, I think I'lll selll in Jully and rebuy the llows in spetember.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:42:07 2023 No.55679446 File: 218 KB, 1017x1280, 1628816088759.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>55679392 It's pretty obvious, isn't it?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 27 15:43:23 2023 No.55679464 File: 380 KB, 457x539, 1670697014141785.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>55679301 Lmao, what is it about a record of the historical record that is confusing you, my dear retard?