Everest $ID

[Anonymous No.55449137]

Are you midwits really going to fade this project?

[Anonymous No.55449542]

I'm balls deep

[Anonymous No.55449545]

>>55449542
>>55449137
Kill yourself I lost 150k on this scam

[Anonymous No.55449594]

>24 hour trading volume: $9,082

[Anonymous No.55449596]

>>55449542
Doesn’t Link have another identity provider or am I missing something? Id like to say working with Link is a good sign but when you look at Linkpool, etc. I’m getting worried

[Anonymous No.55449720]

>>55449545
>price action means its a scam
ok
>>55449596
No. There is no other viable solution.

[Anonymous No.55449807]

MiCA passed and your shitcoin is still finding new lows, move on already

[Anonymous No.55449814]

>>55449807
posts like this are a good enough reason to keep holding

[Anonymous No.55449852]

>>55449720
>There is no other viable solution
why not?

[Anonymous No.55449903]

>>55449852
I guess because noone has thought about the problem as much as Bob?
Take a look at any "competitor". It's not even close. Literally Chainlink to Mobius, Oraclize, Shintaku, etc tier

[Anonymous No.55449931]

BRAINLETS WILL HATE THIS POST
>By the way in case anyone was curious; for a financial Institution to legally take or use KYC: these 4 attributes MUST be adhered to by law.

>1) The software entity is subject to the SAME obligations for data retention, customer due diligence, that the financial institution they are working with is. This would be according to the laws of each jurisdictional sector. i.e. The software provider must be licensed and regulated by the same laws that the Financial institutions they are working with are beholden to.

>2) Contract of data sharing

>3) Risk of transaction and customer due diligence still must be done by accepting financial institution

>4) Ongoing monitoring still must be done by accepting financial institution

>SOFTWARE SUPPLIERS OF KYC CANNOT DO THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE

>Everest empowers users, organizations, and projects to utilize True Identity, eKYC, and a full suite of financial services including on/off-ramps for fiat/crypto backed 1:1 by our legal and programmable stablecoin voucher.

>To put this in context, it means that DID and ZKP producers are potential partners, not competitors, of Everest.

>95% of other "KYC" solutions are DOA and are not going to pan out.
>Even if they do they will still need to be compliant and conform to regulations + have a license to Operate.
>And even if they get that far they will need to have a true identity system because a VC just doesn't cut it.
>The bank isn't going to take your reputation based VC.
>However Everest is already working with many financial institutions which not only allow for Everest's KYC -- but are an extension of the Everest Network with things like Bitso, Remittances, and our Stablecoin voucher.

>This enables many other markets like remit, loans, microloans, tokenized stocks, realty, TrueDaos and more.

[Anonymous No.55450027]

>It's built

[Anonymous No.55450757]

bump for den

[Anonymous No.55451448]

>>55449137
Scam and rugged

[Anonymous No.55451513]

>>55449596
LINK basically does everything. once they reveal their power level, shitcoins are over

[Anonymous No.55451530]

>>55451513
This but unironically

[Anonymous No.55451534]

[Anonymous No.55451596]

>>55449137
Just like you are probably fading Blackswan.

[Anonymous No.55451605]

>>55449137
>fade
I will never buy anything a dumb zoomer nigger, such as yourself, shills.

[Anonymous No.55451765]

>>55449137
-80%

[Anonymous No.55451803]

>the only fud against everest is price action
Nobody ever refutes the necessity of zkp based on chain biometric, sybil resistant, granular proof of humanity for defi/smart contracts

dont forget to delegate to my node