[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 26 KB, 300x300, 92A700CB-791D-48B3-A251-4823FA8D6CA2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55369461 No.55369461 [Reply] [Original]

why isn’t there a central supply chain authority ensuring all items are shipped in the most efficient way possible?

>> No.55369468

inb4 absolute seeth

>> No.55369501

>>55369461
>Why isn't there a singular institution that controls all trade?
Fucking retard

>> No.55370083

>>55369461
Your wish is granted
https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2023e3.pdf

>> No.55370092
File: 42 KB, 412x351, 1686682055790254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55370092

>>55369461
>why isn’t there a central supply chain authority
Why every single person nowdays is either a cuck or a faggot to the point they need central authorities to feel like everything is going as planned?

>> No.55370155

>>55369461
maybe it's time go back to Plebbit

>> No.55370382

>>55369461
Sounds like that would be the post office. Of course they were so inept that it gave rise to decentralization and fragmentation of everything logistics related. Maybe if we militarized the past office, and gave postal carriers guns so they could privateer ups and fedex trucks, for your safety and security of course, we'd get centralized and regulated efficiency back on track.

>> No.55370473

corruptability
Now why isn't there a decentralized authority ensuring all governance is carried out in the most efficient way possible?

>> No.55371539
File: 53 KB, 639x639, CGX-HdlVIAEJw4j.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55371539

>>55370473

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo

>> No.55371559

>>55369461
because it's more efficient to let thousands of companies compete to re-invent the wheel, ensnare local governments in job creation tax cut gibs scams, permanently exhaust non-renewable resources, etc.

>> No.55371642

>>55370092
Those god damn Romans with their god damn aqueducts.

>> No.55371664

GUYS GUYS I HAVE AN IDEA.

Hear me out.

QUOTAS. We make quotas! For everything!

If someone misses their quota, we redistribute resources as needed. This will ensure that everyone hits their quotas, right?

>> No.55371684

>>55369461
Because central supply chain authority don't do that kind of shit. It makes it more inefficient.

>> No.55371726

The USPS is so dogshit that it has two direct competitors and the largest retailer controls their own shipping. You want the bureaucracy to have total control again? Are you retarded?

>> No.55371764

>>55371726
>The USPS is so dogshit that it has two direct competitors
it does? also you're a retarded if you want private entities handling mail. mail privacy laws apply to USPS shipments, not fedex, ups, dhl, etc.

>> No.55371788

>planned economy but on a global scale
because everyone (including me) is far too incompetent to make this happen without hiring more incompetents. Check back when we have proceeded further with automation/ai/eugenics, whatever

>> No.55371819

>>55371764
Mail is outdated boomer technology, 99% of mail is junk mail. I'm talking about package delivery.

>> No.55371896

>>55371819
privacy laws apply to packages as well, my little mulattoe zoomer. and no, mail isn't "outdated boomer technology." try getting a real job or engaging in real business.

>> No.55371956

>>55371819
USPS package delivery is the backbone of all package delivery in the US. If you want it entirely privatized go look at Canada where you can't get a package delivered for under $15 or the UK where it's the same with "Royal Mail". It's a public good currently and it's one of the only things the US government does vaguely right.