/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.55349106]

There's only one crypto project that's being run as a real tech startup with a focus on mass enterprise adoption. It has the biggest computer scientists onboard. It's growing exponentially on all levels. The biggest financial enterprises on earth are now confirming integration with it. The main products haven't even launched yet but they are willing to get busy on it.

But the price keeps dropping...

99% of retail gets a burnout from such disconnect.

It happened with the (to be biggest) internet stocks from 2001 onwards for years.

Amazon dropped from $113 to $8 and Bezos got clubbed by shareholders because he wasn't paying dividends but he reinvested every penny into his basement-run company. TV interviewers and stock analysts critiqued him harshly and called his business a failure.

There's nothing new under the sun...

[Anonymous No.55349120]

Yep it’ll be huge in 15 years

[Anonymous No.55349131]

>7 years and still a start up

[Anonymous No.55349143]

>>55349131
Chainlink quickly became an absolute juggernaut in the world of crypto, but everyone seems to make it their personal business to forget about that.

[Anonymous No.55349144]

We’ve been through this all before:
>https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/story?id=87393&page=1

[Anonymous No.55349153]

>>55349143
>an absolute juggernaut
funded by handouts from people they tricked into believing that they could make a profit by buying their token. would you call Cloud Imperium Games a juggernaut of gaming as well?

[Anonymous No.55349159]

>>55349153
Funded or not, the system itself is actually superior.
And by that logic, BTC is equally "funded by handouts", since 90+% of miner rewards are inflationary.

[Anonymous No.55349160]

>>55349106
>Amazon dropped from $113 to $8 and Bezos got clubbed by shareholders because he wasn't paying dividends but he reinvested every penny into his basement-run company.

NIGGER BEZOS DIDN'T PULL AN EQUITY DILUTION OF 14% RIGHT AFTER LOSING 90%

[Anonymous No.55349166]

>>55349160
Bitcoin dumped 90+% a bunch of times while its annual inflation rate was mid-double digits.

[Anonymous No.55349169]

>>55349166
Ah yes, the infamous Satoshi dumps to fund his team of overpaid former FAGMAN-devs

[Anonymous No.55349174]

>>55349169
You just moved the goalposts from "muh equity dilution dumps" to "muh funding dumps".

[Anonymous No.55349186]

>>55349174
No, you compare Chainlink, a company paying salaries and run by a CEO, to a decentralized protocol that has neither salaried devs nor a CEO.

You are the retard who compares apples to oranges.

[Anonymous No.55349191]

>>55349186
>you compare Chainlink, a company paying salaries and run by a CEO, to a decentralized protocol that has neither salaried devs nor a CEO.
This is part of your "muh funding dumps" argument.

I was responding to your original argument, which was "muh equity dilution dumps".

[Anonymous No.55349193]

>>55349186
Yep. Compare kyc centralized nodes racket to pure decentralized anyone can compute inflation. Its sickening the brainwarps the shills use.

[Anonymous No.55349196]

>>55349159
let's not bring other projects into this, you were specifically calling a 7 year old startup that's still relying on handouts a "juggernaut", which is clearly ridiculous. whataboutism doesn't look very convincing in an argument nowadys, you're 10 years too late

[Anonymous No.55349197]

>>55349193
>kyc centralized nodes
hey, that's no way to talk about Bitcoin

>>55349196
>let's not bring other projects into this
kek

>you were specifically calling a 7 year old startup that's still relying on handouts a "juggernaut"
Bitcoin is 14 years old and still relying on handouts. Would you not call Bitcoin a juggernaut?

[Anonymous No.55349202]

>>55349191
Fuck u , funding sergey and friends without disclosure comparing with pow inflation. Insulting analogy thought up by scammers in the Chainlink ambassador discord. Horribly disingenuous and incorrect.

[Anonymous No.55349205]

>>55349202
I was addressing a point about "inflation bad".

[Anonymous No.55349207]

>>55349197
The fact that you compare decentralized mining rewards with CEO-mandated salary funding dumps is embarassing but expected from a LINK shill.

[Anonymous No.55349211]

>>55349197
Wrong oracle nodes are centralized. The big guy prob gets a cut from many of them too. Bitcoin pools are anyone can join yield stabilizers. again, die in a grease fire shill

[Anonymous No.55349213]

>>55349202
Bezos sold many billions worth of Amazon stock to fund his personal space project.

[Anonymous No.55349218]

>>55349211
>Wrong oracle nodes are centralized
So are Bitcoin miners, see pic >>55349197

>>55349207
Mining rewards, node rewards, stock sales, ... all create "equity dilution".

[Anonymous No.55349221]

>>55349213
Stop comparing scammers that do some fun schoolwork with friends while they overpay everyone that works on it and the friends that copy paste coingecko data on the chain. Talk in crazy in superlatives to gullible retards like you with fucking amazon. Muh quadrillions bro, gtfo. Theres no easier way to confirm your grift. Get better talking points, disgusting shill

[Anonymous No.55349236]

>>55349197
you keep falling back on whataboutism as an "argument", don't you notice it yourself? try to stay on topic this time: a company dependent on tricking retail into giving them millions in funding by making vague allusions about future returns to skirt securities regulations, that's not a juggernaut, is it?

[Anonymous No.55349243]

this really riled up

[Anonymous No.55349246]

>>55349221
Selling for a personal pet project is infinitely worse than selling to fund the actual business.

[Anonymous No.55349258]

>>55349236
>you keep falling back on whataboutism

>>55349196
>let's not bring other projects into this

>>55349221
>Stop comparing

kek this is just like when you bring up black crime and murder rates in response to muh police killing muh poor black honor students.

[Anonymous No.55349259]

>>55349144
man that article was great. find it crazy that you can have a news article from 2006 archived online now.

[Anonymous No.55349266]

Other than laughing at the LINK shills for shilling LINK which is just a fraction of the threads compared to other shitcoins, why is there Chainlink being FUDmaxxed? It's being FUDed moreso in the last few weeks than in the last few years.

[Anonymous No.55349271]

>>55349258
>9 seething pbtid
DO YOUR FUCKING JOB AVOCADO

[Anonymous No.55349291]

>>55349144
nice find
another recent example is tesla being flat for four years while everyone now saying how obvious it was

[Sergey Nazarov No.55349299]

>>55349106
Well said! I will give my life to save Sergey's project! No more chains, just links.

[Anonymous No.55349305]

>>55349106
This is a demon.
Dysgenic freaks who succumb to shilling and hyper-hopium addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Shilling on demand accompanied by fake hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Chainlink is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real humanity.
We have to exorcise them all.


https://youtu.be/TXxcaXfnoXE

[Anonymous No.55349351]

>>55349258
Exactly what I was thinking

[Anonymous No.55349353]

>>55349106
Nothing beat DePIN atm, Ranjeet. Peaq stands out for its dedication to empower EoT, and brings it and DePIN to the ecosystem.

[Anonymous No.55349358]

>>55349291
Yup. People who bought TSLA at $17 in August 2014 were at a loss in September 2019.
I wonder if TSLA forums then were full of the same histrionic nonsense as we see here now.

[Anonymous No.55349370]

>>55349358
linkbaggies are incredibly low IQ

[Anonymous No.55349379]

>>55349271
>DO YOUR FUCKING JOB
What's my job?

[Anonymous No.55349391]

>>55349258
>what about this other scenario where i could defend my argument, isn't that like this one?
if you evade the topic, it looks like you don't have an argument. once again: would a "juggernaut" in a space be reliant on ill gotten handouts?

[Anonymous No.55349396]

>>55349391
>it's not a juggernaut if there are handouts
Then BTC isn't a juggernaut either, since 90+% of its node rewards are handouts.

[Anonymous No.55349406]

>>55349396
holy shit you have to be larping as a subhuman link baggie and not actually serious.

[Anonymous No.55349420]

>>55349396
repeating the embarrassing attempt at moving away from a lost argument doesn't improve it. it's a yes or no question, you're grasping at straws

[Anonymous No.55349422]

>>55349379
>he doesn't know
Fire his Ass
t. based king Sergey

[Anonymous No.55349426]

>>55349420
>>55349406
>zero argument
we're done here

[Anonymous No.55349439]

>>55349426
it's an anonymous forum anon, you can admit to being wrong. fleeing from a lost argument makes you a lesser man

[Anonymous No.55349442]

>>55349426
>NNOOOO YOU MUST ARGUE WITH ME OVER MY DELUSIONAL BAGHOLDING
>on 4trans
>were done
holy r*ddit

[Anonymous No.55349443]

>>55349439
>zero argument again

[Anonymous No.55349468]

>>55349443
ok, i will repeat it once again since you weren't able to close the thread. feeling embarrassed about losing an argument is correct, it's the only way to get better at it. it was argued that chainlink is a "juggernaut" of crypto. in response, it was argued that a "juggernaut" relying on handouts skimmed from retail under false pretenses is no such thing. it is now your turn to say: "i'm not going to embarrassingly dance around anymore, you were right: chainlink is not a juggernaut at all. sorry for behaving like an angry teenager, i'm overly invested in this project". did you get it this time?

[Anonymous No.55349477]

>>55349468
>handouts skimmed from retail
You mean handouts skimmed from uncirculating supply. Which applies to both Link and BTC.

[Anonymous No.55349502]

>>55349477
>handouts skimmed from uncirculating supply. applies to BTC.
it might be best for you to flee this thread after all, you've embarrassed yourself enough here. or maybe switch ids? that way you can pretend the juggernaut thing didn't happen

[Anonymous No.55349522]

>>55349502
Back to zero arguments again.

[Anonymous No.55349526]

>>55349522
do your fucking job, avocado

[Anonymous No.55349529]

boring larp thread we know you own zero link

[Anonymous No.55349534]

>>55349468
>>55349502
He is too deep in the scamtoken. He can’t admit it as that would be admitting he is wrong and this was just another shitcoin instead of what saves him.

[Anonymous No.55349555]

>>55349534
I'm not the one who can't come up with a single argument lol

[Anonymous No.55349628]

>>55349522
>zero arguments
there is one which you have only dodged so far. i know you really don't want to talk about it, but you have to address the juggernaut if you want to save face

[Anonymous No.55349747]

>>55349628
>there is one which you have only dodged
which is?

[Anonymous No.55349787]

>>55349747
yes or no: independent of other projects, is tricking retail into giving them handouts something a "juggernaut" of an industry does?

[Anonymous No.55349798]

>>55349787
yes

[Anonymous No.55349926]

>>55349787
You mean an ICO? "Tricking retail into giving handouts" is a bit of a stretch here, I think. There's always a risk involved but I'd say most retail was more than happy to invest in ICOs to roll the dice and see if they could turn a profit.

[Anonymous No.55350539]

>>55349144
Checked and nice post

[Anonymous No.55351036]

>>55349106
The Amazon to Chainlink comparison is fucking pathetic. First off show me where Amazon did anything but constant up from like 2001 onwards, just 4 years after it launched. Second, this is crypto not boomer stocks. 6 years in the market with half of those being relentless dumping is absolutely morbid and in fact way shittier performance than any successful boomer stock you can find. Nothing that survived the dot com had 3 years of down. NOTHING.

[Anonymous No.55351038]

From 2 man team Jason parser ran in a nail salon to over engineered feature creep from a bloated 500 hr WEF corpo ran from luxurious new York penthouses, and Ico investors are still broke neets, kek

[Anonymous No.55351066]

They're taking broke Ico racist neet money and redistributing it to billionaires like schmidt and big banks like jp Morgan and the dtcc and funding diversity NFT trannies to hold blm LGBT galleries in NYC penthouses and paying out 500k a year to fagman roasties for code that never even leave audits and beta testnets
Kek scam of the century, reverse Robin hood
Neets unironically locked themselves for illiquid 4% while fat man is dumping 14% into no liquidity and high interest economy, kek

[Anonymous No.55351094]

>>55349477
Ceo salary pay so we can fund vapourware purchases, devs that do fuck all all day, horrific community ambassadors that kill any grassroot discussion, friendly kyc nodes that copy paste coingecko data and beg for link they can market sell from daddy sergey is not the same as an open network where anybody with computing power can join. One is targetted inflation to scam one group to enrich the other. Other is an open market. Stop making this ridiculous claim, you disgusting grifting scammer

[Anonymous No.55351129]

>>55349144

Good find. Thanks anon

[Anonymous No.55351313]

>>55351094
And yet his point about token inflation stands.

[Anonymous No.55351320]

Even if chainlink 10x from here it still can't reach ath. Fuck
.

[Anonymous No.55351321]

>>55351313
Nope, you are retarded

[Anonymous No.55351344]

>>55349213
This is how it always turns out with centralized assets. Good thing we have crypto which gives users control over their assets and I take things further by using wallets like Wasabi and Brillion for top tier security.

[Anonymous No.55351405]

>>55349106

Sergey is no Jeff Bezos. He isn't working tirelessly on a lean budget to deliver the product and prove that his company works. He is wasting investor money on stupid bullshit and pretending to be a tech company that has already achieved success.

If he wants Chainlink to be like Amazon then he needs to fire all the useless employees draining their resources and hunker down and write the code. That's the only thing that matters.

[Anonymous No.55351436]

>>55351405
Sadly thats not the goal. Its a grift where sergey and friends get to do fun research things on your dime for as long as they can keep the scam going. When the token is near zero, chainlink labs will ipo or license out the patents that you cucks paid for. Thanks for playing

[Anonymous No.55351439]

Kek Fuddies incredibly riled up. I will buy more Chainlink tokens now.

[Anonymous No.55351459]

>>55351439
Keep being in denial lmfao

[Anonymous No.55352242]

>>55351038
Where did they go from nerds shipping code to a bloated scamming enterprise. Sigh.

[Anonymous No.55352328]

>>55351439
Hows that strategy working out for you?

Also a psa - the Amazon analogy ends with the word “reinvested”, which means Amazon actually made money which they then put back into growing the business. Chainlinks only source of revenue is diluting their own loyal investors. Disgusting.

[Anonymous No.55352416]

>>55352328
>which means Amazon actually made money
Except they didn't make money.
That's literally the point of the Amazon analogy.
Amazon was not profitable, and they were using investor money to grow the business instead of paying dividends to shareholders.

Did you miss the whole point of the Amazon analogy?

[Anonymous No.55352475]

>>55349106
You niggers WISH you had 1/4th of Ripples integrations. You are forever in my filters. Kys.

[Anonymous No.55352486]

>>55352475
If you keep buying XRP you will anon. 2017 called they want their shitcoin back.

[Anonymous No.55352499]

>>55349106
kek. Check the link-btc chart.

[Anonymous No.55352509]

>>55352416
Amazon didn't have a positive NET INCOME, they did make billions in REVENUE you dumb fucking ape

[Anonymous No.55352521]

>>55352486
the irony of this statement is thicker than Sergey's Big Macs

[Anonymous No.55352537]

>>55352521
This kek

[Anonymous No.55352625]

>>55351459
>>55352328
Pretty damn good strategy actually. Retards are selling so I can accumulate the God protocol for $5 a token. Last year when I started investing in crypto the possibility of hitting 1000 tokens was impossible. Now I’m actually going to make it happen and go over it. I also early staked so I’m going to be one of the OG’s in this system when it goes to $81,000. Feels fucking good not being a high time preference retard. Having both strong will and discipline makes me better cut out than 95% of you, and I did it myself.

[Anonymous No.55352629]

>>55352509
link makes a lot of revenue tho

[Anonymous No.55352924]

>>55352416
https://press.aboutamazon.com/2001/4/amazon-com-releases-2001-first-quarter-results-net-sales-up-22-strong-sales-in-electronics-and-international-gross-profit-up-43


By 2001 they were already doing $3B in gross rev, gross profit of $800M. Yes there was an overall net loss due to aforementioned costs of expanding the business but it was very clear via year over year revs and gross profit that the company was experiencing explosive financial growth.

Now what are Chainlink's numbers? A few TVL graphs saying "we may capture some of this one day" isn't going to cut it.

>>55352625
So you've been buying this past year? That means you're probably 50% down on your investment thus far. That is horrible. The idea here is to make money, not join cults

>>55352629
What do they make? Where can this be verified? You're not going to send me a twitter post of some guy's spreadsheet are you

[Anonymous No.55352935]

>>55351439
chainlink labs bot