[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   

File: 361 KB, 1196x482, FORTUNELINK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55210687 No.55210687 [Reply] [Original]

This SWIFT connection is being shilled like a mother fucker. Is this the start of them actually creating market awareness now? The timing is so fucking suspect and weird given the SEC lawsuits.

>> No.55210704

We’re now on the long road up

>> No.55210709
File: 36 KB, 390x330, 435765.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>pumps the least
>dumps the most

>> No.55210713
File: 19 KB, 800x142, nomorethanfive.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>oh wait there 2 link threads scrolled off the front page now there are only 15
another hopeless spam larp get rekt baggie

>> No.55210731


That was an example which you conveniently cropped the part out that said that.

Also SWIFT is 100% confirmed to use CCIP. If I remember correctly they do something like 600 Billion in volume daily.

CCIP's internal code has shown that it requires LINK tokens to operate. I think I'll wait contently until that plays out.

>> No.55210761


meant to tag you but either way its over for the fuddies kek


>> No.55211000

They do $5T in volume daily.

>> No.55211019
File: 557 KB, 1440x1824, Victory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.55211028
File: 362 KB, 504x714, Link-ETH.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

nice victory bro

>> No.55211081

>linkies think some 3rd rate hack "magazine" shilling their ghostchain JSON parser scam is impressive

holy kek, the absolute delusion

>> No.55211152
File: 172 KB, 564x800, 1686096310575.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Token not needed

>> No.55211177
File: 65 KB, 728x546, 1680643305525175.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.55211223


Is it really that high? I thought it was much lower

>> No.55211231


This is why no one takes the FUD serious. LINK isn't even a blockchain

>> No.55211270
File: 615 KB, 540x788, 1686062750196109.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Within the vast online community of 4chan, a group of individuals emerged, calling themselves the Bulgarian FUDDERS. Driven by skepticism and a desire to protect fellow investors, they sought to warn the 4chan community about the potential dangers of investing in a cryptocurrency project called Chainlink. With fervor and conviction, the Bulgarian FUDDERS meticulously examined Chainlink's whitepaper, scrutinized its partnerships, and analyzed its real-world applications. Their warnings echoed through the virtual corridors of the forum, catching the attention of eager investors who were considering allocating their hard-earned money into Chainlink's token, LINK.

The FUDDERS argued that Chainlink's promises were hollow, and its token had no real-world use. They believed that the project was an elaborate Ponzi scheme, designed to enrich its creators at the expense of unsuspecting investors. They highlighted the lack of adoption by banks and financial institutions, questioning the necessity of the LINK token in the grand scheme of things.
As their warnings spread, a sense of doubt and uncertainty washed over the 4chan community. Some investors became hesitant, questioning their initial enthusiasm for Chainlink. They pondered the validity of the project and wondered if the FUDDERS had uncovered something substantial.

To the astonishment of everyone the FUDDERS uncovered evidence that supported their initial claims. The true utility of the LINK token was questioned. As the revelations unfolded, the once-skeptical investors on 4chan started to realize that the FUDDERS were right all along. Chainlink's lofty promises began to crumble under the weight of scrutiny, and doubts turned into convictions. The 4chan community came together, grateful for the FUDDERS' vigilance and dedication. The warnings had saved them from potential financial harm. It served as a powerful reminder that skepticism and critical thinking are crucial in the world of investments,

>> No.55211313

>LINK isn't even a blockchain
to be fair, you'd expect it to be more than an outdated erc20 contract that was copy pasted over 6 years ago

>> No.55211337
File: 5 KB, 300x168, C5EBFCB0-2792-4E54-8300-26B3BEE68B97.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

“The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as Displaced Persons as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog. Put an underdog on top and it makes no difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management, Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire. I’ve found very, very few who remember their past condition when prosperity comes.”

~ Harry S. Truman (33rd president of the United States of America)

>> No.55211384

>outdated erc20 contrac

Its blockchain agnostic. It can and does exist + operate on many chains. Its usecases have grown substantially in 6 years although it never set out to be a blockchain. Its a decentralized oracle network that has a massive monopoly

>> No.55211433

how come the token price has decreased while more contracts got copy pasted on other chains?

>> No.55211506

Checked. Speculation

>> No.55211538


Because crypto is cyclical? You already know these answers

>> No.55211578

>linkies finally capitulate and admits the value of link token comes from speculation
Lmao just another shitcoin

>> No.55211588

Sorry but i’m just not selling

>> No.55211648

>Lmao just another shitcoin

All of crypto is speculation right now what are you smoking? That being said, LINK has the best fundamentals if that ever changes.

>> No.55211869

Checked you're thinking of the DTCC. Swift is under a Trillion a day but still shitloads

>> No.55211986

No you're thinking of Sir Gay's daily big mac bill

>> No.55212047
File: 753 KB, 1024x1200, 1686103275342.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.55212059