/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.55210636]

This BTC pump serves zero other purpose than to try to get LINK to break this support. They are spending literal billions of dollars to try to break this support before CCIP goes live. This is clownworld.

[Anonymous No.55210647]

>>55210636
If it looks like a shitcoin then it's very likely a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.55210652]

Meds. Also cope

[Anonymous No.55210671]

>>55210652
>>55210647
Search your feelings. You know it to be true.

[Anonymous No.55210698]

>>55210671
>You know it to be true.
I know you're either lying or you're denial mode because you're too emotionally attached to your bags

[Anonymous No.55210708]

>>55210636
Or maybe, JUST maybe, chainlink is just a worthless shitcoin. Have you ever thought of that? If the market doesn’t move there’s a reason for that. You and your shitcoin are not special

[Anonymous No.55210728]

>>55210671
No my objective analysis and logic has led me to conclude that the token is not needed. While you are stuck with hysterical deranged conspiracy theories, because you were groomed with a rags to riches fairy tale and have given way to purely emotion based thinking. You get your feelings upset whenever someone tries to help you see the truth

[Anonymous No.55210745]

no one other than baggies cares about link though
just another old alt that's been comprehensively cycled by the bear market.

[Anonymous No.55210752]

>>55210745
Most likely this. Link is the new xrp

[Anonymous No.55211435]

Once upon a time within the vast community of 4chan, a group of individuals emerged, calling themselves the Bulgarian FUDDERS. Driven by skepticism and a desire to protect fellow investors, they sought to warn the 4chan community about the potential dangers of investing in a cryptocurrency project called Chainlink. With fervor and conviction, the Bulgarian FUDDERS meticulously examined Chainlink's whitepaper, scrutinized its partnerships, and analyzed its real-world applications. Their warnings echoed through the virtual corridors of the forum, catching the attention of eager investors who were considering allocating their hard-earned money into LINK. The FUDDERS argued that Chainlink's promises were hollow, and its token had no real-world use. They believed that the project was an elaborate Ponzi scheme, designed to enrich its creators at the expense of unsuspecting investors. They highlighted the lack of adoption by banks and financial institutions, questioning the necessity of the LINK token in the grand scheme of things.

As their warnings spread, a sense of doubt and uncertainty washed over the fanatical Link community. Some investors became hesitant, questioning their initial enthusiasm for Chainlink. They pondered the validity of the project and wondered if the FUDDERS had uncovered something substantial. To the astonishment of everyone the FUDDERS uncovered evidence that supported their initial claims. The true utility of the LINK token was questioned. As the revelations unfolded, the once-skeptical investors on 4chan started to realize that the FUDDERS were right all along. Chainlink's lofty promises began to crumble under the weight of scrutiny, and doubts turned into convictions. The 4chan community came together, grateful for the FUDDERS' vigilance and dedication. The warnings had saved them from potential financial harm. It served as a powerful reminder that skepticism and critical thinking are crucial in the world of investments.

[Anonymous No.55212319]

>>55210652
/thread

[Anonymous No.55213017]

>>55210636
kek

If any billionaire got wind of this being a thing, they'd swoop in and buy up millions of tokens instantly. The fact that not one rogue elite has market bought a shitload tells you all you need to know about its prospects as a token

captcha ymj00
>j00

[Anonymous No.55213057]

>>55210652
Wait a minute.. you're a communist!?

[Anonymous No.55214026]

>>55210636
Chainlink Labs abstracted away the utility of the LINK token through bootstrapping. There is no reason at all to think that they won't subsidize the LINK paid to CCIP'd DONs, just like what they did with price feeds.

The ability of the LINK token to capture value has been rendered useless by their own creators.

[Anonymous No.55214033]

Do like cultists serious believe that the entire market is manipulated to suppress the price of a ERC-20 token or are we just funnin'?

[Anonymous No.55214046]

>BTC pumps = it's link suppression
>BTC dumps = it's link suppression
>BTC goes sideways = it's link suppression
>the universe exists = it's link suppression
So why do you hold this again if the entire fabric of reality is against you?

[Anonymous No.55214076]

>>55210708
>maybe, chainlink is just a worthless shitcoin
nah, that ain't it

[Anonymous No.55214123]

>>55214076
it was a 2017-era fundraising token, every attempt at shoehorning it into their system has failed. the entire ecosystem is reliant on the 60% of undistributed tokens being used as a carrot.

the money there was to be made has already been made.

[Anonymous No.55214130]

>>55214123
>every attempt at shoehorning it into their system has failed
The token has been an absolute requirement for every single action undertaken by nodes since day 1 lol

[Anonymous No.55214145]

>>55214046
/thread
bagholder delusion

[Anonymous No.55214166]

>>55214026
>Chainlink Labs abstracted away the utility of the LINK token through bootstrapping
Bitcoin miners were always bootstrapped, and will continue to be for another 100 years or so.

[Anonymous No.55214239]

>>55214166
Huge difference there:
>Bitcoin miners bootstrapped so miners don't operate at a loss = good
>Chainlink nodes bootstrapped so node operators don't operate at a loss instead of forcing stablished and well-capitalized users like Aave & Synthetix to either buy the token or cede a portion of their fees like GMX did = bad
Bagholders (me) are the ones paying for it.

[Anonymous No.55214248]

>>55214239
>Bitcoin miners bootstrapped so they don't operate at a loss = good
>Chainlink nodes bootstrapped so they don't operate at a loss = bad

You're a retard

[Anonymous No.55214264]

>>55214248
Nice strawman, my point is that there is an alternative to direct bootstrapping, specially when Chainlink Labs has a multiyear warchest after months of Binance dumping

[Anonymous No.55214268]

>>55214264
>direct bootstrapping
Bootstrapping is always direct.

[Anonymous No.55214332]

>>55214239
It’s the same fucking thing.
Without bootstrapped BTC block rewards, BTC users would have to pay more transaction fees.

[Anonymous No.55214583]

>>55210647
>>55210652
>>55210698
>>55210708
>>55210728
>>55210745
>>55210752
>>55213017
>>55214026
>>55214033
>>55214046
>>55214123
>>55214145
kek fuddies

[Anonymous No.55214606]

Just 7 more years marines. OORAH

[Anonymous No.55214608]

no one cares about your shitcoin