I'M GOING INSANE!!

[Anonymous No.55209035]

WHY??!!! WHY IS IT NOT PUMPING??????
https://dailyhodl.com/2023/06/06/swift-using-chainlink-link-in-new-experiment-with-citi-bny-mellon-bnp-paribas-and-others/

[Anonymous No.55209053]

Sergey LITERALLY said a LINK token should be about the price of a cup of coffee. You should be thankful it's the price of a large latte at starbucks and not a $1 cup of black trash from dunkin.

[Anonymous No.55209064]

>>55209035
Maybe if you make 8 more threads about it the price will move

[Anonymous No.55209073]

>>55209035
V.1 staking and ccip, if it doesnt pump then, you have my permission to go insane

[Anonymous No.55209075]

vcs said no

[Anonymous No.55209093]

its literally just a JSON parser

[Anonymous No.55209108]

Literally ANY OTHER fucking coing would skyrocket on this news, prove me wrong

[Anonymous No.55209135]

>>55209108
you're probably right, ANKR went up more than 50% on a microsoft announcement.

[Anonymous No.55209149]

this was the real icp all along. I CAN'T PUMP

[Anonymous No.55209382]

Tokennotneededretard

[Anonymous No.55209393]

>>55209035
God hates you.

[Anonymous No.55209410]

>>55209093
jason parser is dead, we tom lee now

[Anonymous No.55209413]

>>55209053
this, Chainlink could secure 10 trillion dollars and the token could still trade at $5.

TNN

[Anonymous No.55209523]

>>55209035
If it wasn't already obvious, the market is literally retarded when it comes to reacting to stuff like this.

The good news is that this is yet another confirmation that those of us who hold link are going to be very very fucking rich very very soon.
What most people are glossing over is the "private blockchain" part of the pic.
Now it's all starting to make sense on why there wasn't very much accumulation of the link token that we could see.
The Link token being worth thousands of USD is going to be small potatoes compared to the hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of assets being tokenized on private blockchain.
Holy shit.
These companies are gearing up for the greatest transfer of wealth in all of human history, and it was right under our noses all along.
HOLY SHIT!!

[Anonymous No.55209533]

>>55209035
LINK had its big run already, time for others

[Anonymous No.55209570]

>>55209035
we keep telling you but you won't listen because you've convinced yourself it's fud or a joke

TOKEN IS NOT NEEDED

stop dismissing this simple fact and use your brain cells. If it was needed price would fluctuate with use, instead there is no correlation whatsoever

[Anonymous No.55209573]

>>55209523
This puts to bed all the cope that CCIP doesn't allow interoperability between private chains

[Anonymous No.55209574]

>>55209523
its right out there for everyone to see and you are the only one who gets it anon! the markets are retarded, not you!

[Anonymous No.55209578]

https://vocaroo.com/b1aQoUBrxki

[Anonymous No.55209593]

>>55209035
>new experiment
it means the previous experiments were failures. it wasn't communicated, again, so the market prices in a lot of uncertainty

[Anonymous No.55209647]

>>55209035
retards still aren't convinced because of the overwhelming fud so they aren't buying yet

[Anonymous No.55209692]

>>55209593
>it means the previous experiments were failures
I agree, legacy finance was a complete failure.

[Anonymous No.55209743]

>>55209523
>very very soon
at what point is it safe to assume that it won't happen? a year? two?

[Anonymous No.55209864]

>>55209593
>it means the previous experiments were failures
SWIFT literally says in their report that the previous 2022 trials were successful and that this experiment is built as a result of that success lol

[Anonymous No.55209881]

>>55209864
Give the guy credit that was desperate but innovative fud

[Anonymous No.55209889]

Token not needed cope. Crypto collectively declared war on globohomo chainlink.
Crypto is decentralized money and stands for liberty and freedom. Chainlink is the antithesis to crypto. Crypto was made to kick the bankers out of finance, chainlink wants to bring these same bankers into ceypto and turn it back into banker globohomo.
Crypto is supposed to be a breakaway financial system. Chainlink is trying to turn it into CBDC smart contract WEF controlled dystopia, something tradfi couldnt even dream of achieving. Can it be any less obvious?
You are aligned with saturn and the devil

[Anonymous No.55209926]

>>55209889
It’s happening either way

[Anonymous No.55209935]

>>55209864
what else should they say? "after years of trials we are still not confident this thing works, but we'd still like to look trendy, so let's have another go"?

[Anonymous No.55209973]

>>55209073
10 more years then

[Anonymous No.55209994]

>>55209889
>You are aligned with saturn and the devil
all of tech is kiddo

[Anonymous No.55210027]

>>55209574
Evidence is mounting up that linkies were right all along, and the market has been retarded. Yet people are still coping by thinking the current price action vindicates their bet against link. They have everything to lose and nothing to gain by standing firm by their point that LINK is going to 0, and its looking more and more like they are going to lose this bet. What is the incentive for being this sure about betting against LINK?

[Anonymous No.55210042]

Have you guys ever looked at swifts revenue? It’s literally nothing, it’s smaller than a billion dollars. Of course other coins pump, they partner with real companies that actually make money

[Anonymous No.55210049]

>>55210027
>linkies were right all along
This doesn't matter if the price doesn't move. Any other crypto with news of this magnitude would have done 10x minimum.

[Anonymous No.55210051]

>>55209935
yeah bro Chainlink is very trendy and SWIFT is expanding to test this experiment with financial institutions like BNY Mellon, Citi and DTCC just because they are embarrassed to say that it actually doesn't work, you are 100% right

[Anonymous No.55210073]

>>55210027
>test
>experiment
>sergey believes
Swift will go the way of blockbuster, but only after the blind have been milked dry

[Anonymous No.55210113]

>>55209035
Your boring use case crypto is going to d.o b.oring use case things like become a $5 stable coin. It pumps on rumors and speculation then dumps and crabs once the hype is gone. You should not be bag holding a 2017 coin this late.
>inb4 muh bit corn is older
And it has no use case. It's pure hype driven speculation (and that's a good thing).

[Anonymous No.55210141]

>>55210042
have you looked at the revenue of any of the other institutions involved?

[Anonymous No.55210156]

>>55209889
Don't you see by now that your entire cryptobro scam ecosystem is going away?
tradfi is going to use blockchain to tokenize assets and allow the rest of this idiotic crypto market to continue to scam itself out of existence.
Chainlink and a handful of others see this happening and are the only ones doing anything to make sure they have a place in this new financial ecosystem that will be taken over by BNY Mellon, Chase, State Street, etc
Most of the cryptobros who think that all these behemoths will simply step aside because people like Bitboy tell them their scam rugpulls are the future are going to learn a very tough lesson soon.

The word is delusional
Private blockchains that tokenize all assets are what will transform the financial world, not a bunch of dipshits that think something like XRP will replace SWIFT.
The dream of crypto died with BTC and the sooner you accept this, the sooner you can stop acting like a baby who cries about things not being fair.

[Anonymous No.55210163]

>>55210049
>>55210073
I realize it's hard to put in perspective for you newfags, but when we bough Chainlink, the mere concept that mainstream media or legitimate institutions would ever mention crypto was preposterous. The fact that these very same institutions are naming LINK by name and sending their VPs to smartcon does not faze you one bit says enough about how insanely high the standard is for LINK. Insurmountable. For anyone that has been here since 2017, it's both insane and unbelievable how little the crypto space seems to care about these accolades when it concerns Chainlink, instead of "le L1 flavor of the month" or "le epic meme coin of the month".

[Anonymous No.55210254]

>>55210163
>insane and unbelievable how little the crypto space seems to care
A casino attracts gamblers, how shocking.

[Anonymous No.55210274]

>>55209035
old news retard

[Anonymous No.55210275]

>>55209035
TNN

[Anonymous No.55210281]

>>55210163
Yea yea so when moon?

[Anonymous No.55210357]

>>55210281
TONIGHT

[Anonymous No.55210412]

Most likely because the token is not needed. It’s either a form of currency. A gas token for a side chain or a defi governance pump and dump or some art or it’s comeplete out dated bullshit. Your link coin does not secure shit even when staked kek. Can always be negated

[Anonymous No.55210429]

>>55209926
>>55209994
>>55210156
Cope link shills. Satoshi was a master of game theory. The elites cant do shit against it or stop it. So instead they made a bunch of shitcoins to distract people from bitcoin and paid dev trannies to slow down its scaling.

Have fun with your link "gains" when you sell for 1k digital cbdc bucks and have your chainlink powered smart contracts automatically tax you at 99%. Since in the glorious post 4IR world, private property will be abolished when the new smart englightened policities are in place.

>congratulations global citizen #66600003736252, for your benevolent charity in helping the globohomo control grid chainlink recieve its starter funding. Thanks to your exemplary service to the WEF and for fighting for our cause, we have awarded you with twice the normal ration of smart cricket protein substitute, along with a full hour of extra outdoor time!

[Anonymous No.55210461]

>>55209035
I look at the Link chart as soon as I got the email from the team about this and I said "of course"

[Anonymous No.55210464]

>>55210429
What game theory? What is actually going to attract more adoption besides the whole "number go up, me want to ride too!" narrative?

[Anonymous No.55210478]

>>55209053
Fuck you I like Dunkin

[Anonymous No.55210501]

>>55210163
I wish you the best of luck. May I suggest making a general where you pioneers of finance can talk about how you figured everything out before the markets? Or are the 30 link threads a day to attract the attention of institutional investors?

[Anonymous No.55210512]

i hope someone beats the shit out of SN
i want my fucking money!

[Anonymous No.55210516]

>>55210501
boards.4channel.org/biz/ is the chainlink general thread already though

[Anonymous No.55210547]

>>55209064
Oh it's moving alright!

[Anonymous No.55210578]

Linkies are about to celebrate the 12th consecutive week of dumping against Ethereum kek

[Anonymous No.55210602]

This was supposed to be the news that made us pump. It's fucking ogre. If CCIP doesn't do it- if we truly don't see a slow and steady rise to the moon like when mainnet launched, I will officially divorce myself emotionally from LINK. I will no longer see i as my guaranteed ticket. I bought this shit day 1, and felt like I had actually made it two years ago. Now it's worth nearly nothing and I wanna kms.

DO SOMETHING GOD DAMNIT I'M GETTING OLD, I WAS 22 WHEN I BOUGHT YOU AND NOW IM ALMOST FUCKING 30. HURRY THE FUCK UP ITS BEEN ALMOST 6 FUCKING YEARS

[Anonymous No.55210615]

>>55210464
Yes, fiat will always inflate, so well every stable coin and CBDC. Bitcoin is mathematically guaranteed to go up against fiat garbage. It is the achilles heel of the bankers. Each time they print more money bitcoin goes up and gains more users and popularity. The price action attracts more money, including these greedy bankers. They are now scheming around bitcoin trying to slither their way in with chainlink and eth.

Bitcoin is the thesis, chainlink the antithesis. They are trying to form a synthesis of these two. So instead of scamming and jewing you in tradfi, they will simply move into scamming and jewing you in blockchain. Since they cannot beat bitcoin they have To try to hijack blockchain for themselves.
Instead of being your own bank and master with bitcoin, you will use smart contract cbdcs powered by chainlink, where they can automatically steal your blockchain assets after you fail to pay your 50% apy home. Now your tokenized smart house and smart car will lock themselves automatically when the bankers repo your digital house token. Congrats chainlink you just made global monetary tyranny more efficient and automated!

[Anonymous No.55210639]

>>55210051
it's just risk mitigation, it would be stupid for large companies to ignore this. if executives get asked "what's your strategy regarding distributed ledger technology? how do you mitigate the risk that their advent poses to your industry?" they can simply answer "actually, we are exploring the possibility to work in tandem with these technologies and are working together with leading (journalists don't know about crypto market cap rankings, lol) companies in the field". that's why these big companies enter those retarded "partnerships"

[Anonymous No.55210729]

>>55210163
>sending their VPs to smartcon

>be me, VP
>boss sends me to retarded crypto conference, hate that guy
>well, maybe there are at least some hot chicks around
>nope, all neckbeards
>conference starts, some weird mixed race dudes enter the stage
>they begin banging on trash cans and just don't stop for what feels like an eternity
>neckbeard audience is stunned and looks like they want to die
>tell boss that he should go ahead and do that fifth proof of concept
>quit and start at competitor

[Anonymous No.55210746]

>>55210639
>>55210729
Cope

[Anonymous No.55210777]

I’m curious, other than bitcoin with a store of value/property, is there really another cryptocurrency that is more useful than chainlink is becoming. Talking about bringing a new market worth billions/trillions onto the blockchain, who else is close to doing this?

[Anonymous No.55210807]

>>55210777
no, but did you see the latest dog coin?

[Anonymous No.55210824]

>>55210807
No but did you see those digits

[Anonymous No.55210825]

>>55210777
checked and just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.55210830]

>>55210777
Impressive, very nice

[Anonymous No.55210840]

>>55210777
Checked and no their isn't. If this news doesn't make normies or new fags want to buy at these clown world prices, then they don't deserve to make it.

[Anonymous No.55210847]

>>55210156
That can’t be! Random anonymous people on the internet told me that Link token was not needed, so it MUST be true!

[Anonymous No.55210849]

>>55210615
But what does the Eth/Link subversion really matter if the idea is that people are to reject the tyranny and adopt BTC instead?
Do Eth and Link prevent BTC adoption? If anything, their "more efficient and automated" tyranny is also much more obvious and people will be more likely to reject it. Or am I wrong about this?

[Anonymous No.55210858]

>>55210830

[Anonymous No.55210865]

>>55209035
I'm afraid the token is not really needed sir.

[Anonymous No.55210871]

>>55210840
>then they don't deserve to make it
Lol nobody /madeit/ with Chainlink apart from Sergey since he owns 35% of the total supply

[Anonymous No.55210876]

>>55210849

[Anonymous No.55210894]

>>55210615
>banks inflate supply only during bitcoin's lifetime
false banks always inflate to strip value away from the individual and concentrate supply of the shitcoin USD in the hands of the few
Central bankers will continue to orchestrate enemies to validate their printing sprees.
>The price action attracts more money
every time they print people have less buying power vs BTC but BTC is worth the same amount that it was before printing started why? and this is not accounting for inflation I assume price in fiat now vs before printing is the same in your mind? lmao mORe mOnEY
>Bitcoin is the thesis, chainlink the antithesis. They are trying to form a synthesis of these two.
Chainlink is bridging tradfi and crypto. All cryptos benefit but like I said people have less buying power as time goes on because of the distribution of the supply of the given unit of value (USD)
>Instead of being your own bank and master with bitcoin
worked well for those Canadian Truckers didn't it? kek

[Anonymous No.55210922]

>>55210849
>But what does the Eth/Link subversion really matter if the idea is that people are to reject the tyranny and adopt BTC instead?
>Do Eth and Link prevent BTC adoption? If anything, their "more efficient and automated" tyranny is also much more obvious and people will be more likely to reject it. Or am I wrong about this?
Its the same reason goldfags hate bitcoin so much, it steals the show from them. The elites will bury attention on bitcoin. They will parade their banker controlled shitcoins as the "bitcoin 2.0" and divert all the attention to "blockchain" or centralized government cbdc bucks. Where they can confiscate all of your assets with the click of a button.

[Anonymous No.55210932]

wtf is going to take to pump this
hardly any reaction on r/cc

[Anonymous No.55210934]

>>55210274
Its from 6 HOURS AGO

[Anonymous No.55210949]

>>55209035
Because we're in a platypus market.

[Anonymous No.55210961]

>>55210922
>people adopt btc enmass
>governments work together covid 19 Antarctican Penguins style to switch off the internet and blackout electronic comms
>in the meantime though large mining firms are sovereign entities so they do not pay tax on keeping the bitcoin network running
>as time goes on the governments continue to seeth at all the tax they are not receiving because btc miners are all self sovereign decentralized businesses incapable of being taxed
>government loses because they do not receive tax for bitcoin mining and all purchases and speculation on btc is tax free
bitcoiners really have the governments of the world by the balls bro! two more weeks until satoshi ends the fed and stops bank bail outs as promised!

[Anonymous No.55211052]

>>55210894
>banks inflate supply only during bitcoin's lifetime
Literally never said that. Gold would have the same price action as Bitcoin, if it didnt have its ancient flaw, where 100x more paper gold is sold.
Bitcoin is simply an upgraded digital gold which has solved this problem. Nobody can sell paper bitcoin that doesnt exist. So a globally accessible free market of digital gold is much more efficient then physical gold.


>Central bankers will continue to orchestrate enemies to validate their printing sprees.
>The price action attracts more money
>every time they print people have less buying power vs BTC but BTC is worth the same amount that it was before printing started why?
Wrong. Look at any Bitcoin/house Bitcoin/gold chart. It has steadily increased in buying power, because its true value is yet to be discovered.

>Chainlink is bridging tradfi and crypto. All cryptos benefit but like I said people have less buying power as time goes on because of the distribution of the supply of the given unit of value (USD)
Wrong again. The people dont benefit at all from tradfi coming into crypto. Which is why its become harder to make money from crypto as an average joe. Before the institutional bankers and osychopath wallstreet sharks came, everyone was making money. Now its full of blatant manipulation, insider trading VCs, bankers pumping and dumping bitcoin. Wallstreet high frequency quant algorithms. All make it hard for an average person to compete. As time goes by it will become exactly like the stock market, where the 1% elite jews fleece the normie plebs.

Crypto was made by genius libertarian cypher punk programmers as a way to escape the corrupt banker system. Now short term midwits have taken over and are openly inviting the same bankers which fuck every one with open arms.

>worked well for those Canadian Truckers didn't it? kek
?? Didnt the government force exchanges to steal their money? Not btcs systems fault. You can send them bitcoin

[Anonymous No.55211072]

>>55209073
To late friend.

[Anonymous No.55211091]

>>55210961
You must not know how bitcoin works. The government can raid every mining farm on earth. All that would happen is the difficulty will drop and normal people will be able to mine on their pc again.
Then random guys in mongolia and nigeria can mine bitcoin on their phones and the network will run as usual.
You literally cannot defeat bitcoin unless you turn off all the electricity on earth, which globohomo cannot do. Thats the beauty of PoW.

[Anonymous No.55211142]

>>55211052
exchanges are not buying and selling real bitcoin network evidence does not support this. they stockpile and use tether and other stables to collateralize wrapped btc or some other paper asset. basically they are all like ftx and 99% of people will never be their own bank despite all your shilling
>Wrong. Look at any Bitcoin/house Bitcoin/gold chart. It has steadily increased in buying power, because its true value is yet to be discovered
incorrect fiat value is your referent in all cases and it has decreased in buying power and costs have risen around the assets you are comparing. unfortunately you cannot compare gold/btc because there is no market for physical gold to be directly traded for btc without some intermediary like fiat facilitating the trade. maybe if you could show up to a crypto exchange in person to trade your physical gold to btc and have it transferred to your ledger or accredited to your account you could make this comparison but there is always fiat present in the trade so they are directly incomparable and you are a retard.
>Which is why its become harder to make money from crypto as an average joe
ah no you already said that everyone important was already in btc and they made it why would you care about latefags trying to make it from cool new tech like LINK or ETH or whatever BTC is doing with taproot?
>Crypto was made by genius libertarian cypher punk programmers
So you have been tricked by some fairy tale an imagined reality that ended when BTC became a massive source of tax revenue for governments around the globe. And as we found out with covid lockdowns and mandatory vaccines governments can cooperate


>Now short term midwits have taken over
>Now its full of blatant manipulation, insider trading VCs, bankers pumping and dumping bitcoin. Wallstreet high frequency quant algorithms. All make it hard for an average person to compete
all of this because value is centralized in BTC and BTC follow NASDAQ. it has been coopted

[Anonymous No.55211167]

>>55211091
If they did that why haven't they
maybe it is not in their interests anon
they did target physical money (cash) during covid lockdowns to trick people into electronic payments
does not sound like cash in it their interests and they want more people into electronic payments stores of value like btc
the same btc that is at a lower price adjusted for inflation than it was in 2017 peak lmao

[Anonymous No.55211176]

While the Link token has its purpose within the Chainlink ecosystem, it is not a requirement for banks or institutions to use the Chainlink blockchain or its services. Banks can leverage Chainlink's oracle network to connect their smart contracts with external data sources, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of their operations. The decision to use Chainlink or any other blockchain solution ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the bank or institution.

[Anonymous No.55211207]

>>55211176
and they all pay in link tokens at the end of the day. maybe they might construct a paper link market to control the price when btc eth lose their touch anon
they already have paper markets for btc. most trade volume is paper btc
if exchanges ran out of btc and were forced to find more to top up their reserves we might see some gains for all cryptos but whales give their btc to act as reserves to exchanges for a fee
break that relationship and we might see some shit but whales are very conservative with their capital and they are happy to lend their btc for % gains on their asset over time

[Anonymous No.55211260]

>>55211176
> While the World Wide Web has its purpose within the internet ecosystem, it is not a requirement for banks or institutions to use the internet or its services. Banks can leverage the internet to connect their assets with external sources, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of their operations. The decision to use the World Wide Web or any other internet solution ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the bank or institution.

[Anonymous No.55211262]

My concern is with the supply. They distributed some to anons, more to nodes, more to exchanges, and hold most still probably earmarked for counter parties to achieve trust so all these banks have hold non circulating link and this link will never be traded.

The tradable market for link would be small especially with steaking locking things up. A locked asset is not a smart asset it must be doing something like exchanges do with your tokens you hold on the exchange. Paper markets do not interact with blockchains. Thats the most bullish part of this swift news is that they will bypass existing exchanges and trade through ccip directly with various blockchains.
notice they kneecapped cz right before this announcement

no more paper market bullshit

[Anonymous No.55211298]

>>55209053
Sweet. With the way inflation is going should be $200 by 2030

[Anonymous No.55211303]

node wars are coming

[Anonymous No.55211427]

>>55211303
im not convinced that nodes need to be at war with each other even with staking because they are in a walled garden its not they will easily lose access to their walled position of privilege because of lack of stake lmao you cannot easily replace trusted node ops guys like the lpl guys kek
when staking with slashing goes live and they have potentially new node ops reading to come in to replace those that lost their stake then we can talk wars

but there is no demand for the ancillary services like vrf to warrant positions opening up for new nodes

[Anonymous No.55211480]

>>55211303
>DRNS
based

[Anonymous No.55211485]

In the heart of Bulgaria, a group of individuals known as the Bulgarian FUDDERS patrolled the online forums, including 4chan, searching for projects that raised red flags and threatening the financial security of unsuspecting investors.
One fateful day, the Bulgarian FUDDERS stumbled upon a cryptocurrency called Chainlink. Intrigued by its promises and soaring popularity, they delved deep into its whitepaper, dissecting its intricacies with meticulous precision. As they peeled back the layers, they noticed something amiss.

Their instincts proved right. The Bulgarian FUDDERS unraveled the hidden truth behind Chainlink, discovering a well-crafted Ponzi scheme cleverly disguised as a revolutionary project. Armed with evidence and a mission, the Bulgarian FUDDERS began to spread their findings across the online community. Their messages served as beacons of caution, warning others about the dangers of investing in LINK tokens, which they believed were rendered useless within the broader market.

Their words echoed through the digital landscape, catching the attention of countless fanatical Link investors who had been captivated by Chainlink's seemingly promising prospects. Doubt began to creep into the minds of those who had initially considered investing, thanks to the relentless efforts of the Bulgarian FUDDERS. As the truth gained momentum, the 4chan investors opened their eyes to the grim reality. They realized they had narrowly escaped financial ruin, thanks to the vigilant efforts of the Bulgarian FUDDERS. Gratitude filled their hearts as they turned away from Chainlink, avoiding the potential devastation that awaited those caught in its web. Recognizing the significance of the Bulgarian FUDDERS' heroic actions, the online community rallied behind them. Their courage and selflessness had saved many from losing their hard-earned money to a deceitful scheme.

[Anonymous No.55211874]

>>55209035
maybe a sign you should buy CITI stock the blue chip instead of the unnecessary token

[Anonymous No.55211919]

>>55211485
Based
Buy a real coin next time faggots

[Anonymous No.55212025]

Bullish for XRP.

[Anonymous No.55212030]

Token not needed, simple OP.

[Anonymous No.55212281]

>>55211260
Yes and the 'internet' doesn't make money. ISPs do. And they don't make a lot.

[Anonymous No.55212295]

>WE ARE FUCKING SUPPRESSED BY BT-ACK

[Anonymous No.55212479]

>experiment
>testing
>may
>could
>token not needed
>these digits

[Anonymous No.55212508]

>>55212479
Digits and all kekfuddies livestream an hero

[Anonymous No.55212595]

>>55210777
Checked and witnessed.

I stack Bitcoin and chainlink only.

[Anonymous No.55212666]

Chainlink fell into such irrelevance that even the SEC is not giving a fuck about it. I finally pulled the trigger and sold my last link, at this stage I don't see any hope for it.

[Anonymous No.55212718]

>>55211303
ADOLF HITLER DIDNT READ NEVER SELLING

[Anonymous No.55212745]

>>55210602
I thought that when attending Smartcon in NYC. Even though it was under double digits, it felt like things were happening. Now I am convinced there's enough black swans and VC enemies to make this a 10 year war. Nothing will get this thing to $10

[Anonymous No.55212749]

>>55209035
Because it's mid 2023 and it's still an experiment

[Anonymous No.55212766]

>>55209578

holy kek I almost forgot this pasta

[Anonymous No.55212821]

Chudstink kek baggies
Sirgay Nastyslob needs to dump so open wide, kekolds

[Anonymous No.55212985]

>>55210042
>Have you guys ever looked at http's revenue? It’s literally nothing

[Anonymous No.55213038]

>>55209035
>why isn't some random fake architecture diagram that will never be used or implemented pumping my pre-mined shitcoin
gee i dunno, retard

[Anonymous No.55213083]

>>55212985
You think that mongoloid read enough to realize SWIFT is a co-op (meaning owned and operated BY its members) comprised of virtually every financial institution under the sun? Ha! Wasting your time even giving a (you), anon.

[Anonymous No.55213098]

every pump is being supressed by owners
love this coin

[Anonymous No.55213122]

>>55213038
>if I say it will never be used or implemented, that means it won’t!

Cope harder

[Anonymous No.55213296]

>>55209523
>very very soon
Indeed. Just in 2 weeks.

[Anonymous No.55213341]

Token non requiro

[Anonymous No.55213381]

>>55209593
>it means the previous experiments were failures
The opposite, actually

[Anonymous No.55213388]

>>55210777
Big fat check, and no, nobody elsle comes close.

[Anonymous No.55213401]

Didn't read never buying

[Anonymous No.55213427]

>>55213388
Checked

[Anonymous No.55213431]

>>55209523
Lol linkie delusion.

I hold because I can't cum without being humiliated

[Anonymous No.55213465]

Its entirely possible that the market is fraudulent

[Anonymous No.55213526]

>>55213465
Atm the SEC is fucking over Binance and coinbase. Imo all these are false allegations. Crypto is here to stay. We just need to believe and continue to buy more of our gems including with link, UTK, EGLD, ATOM and METIS

[Anonymous No.55213543]

>>55209035
Priced-in!

[Anonymous No.55213545]

>>55213526
>Crypto is here to stay.
Functional crypto, yes.
But judging by the reaction to this Swift news, 99.99999% of crypto "investors" and everything they touch are going to get absolutely demolished.

[Anonymous No.55213558]

>>55213545
The SEC wants us to get rekt. But I say we crypto bros have to stand together and start using crypto for mainstream purposes. If the adoption increases, and if people starts using crypto for day to day needs they can't do jack shit. But I am not sure if this will happen, rather if this happens I'll happily embrace it.

[Anonymous No.55213568]

>>55213558
Looking at the reaction to this Swift news, the SEC is absolutely right: crypto is nothing but speculative gambling.

I say burn the market to the ground, and let actual functionality grow.

[Anonymous No.55213584]

>>55209533
This. Link is a fucking dinosaur coin.... 2020 was its gigamoon, you fags are too late. Keep buying high

[Anonymous No.55213592]

>>55213568
I agree to disagree. With the current development during this bear market project have learned to utilize the time wisely. If the whole market is burned down all of the production, money and development will go to the dogs. For instance I have been following a payment platform that has developed well during this whole market and now offers payments with Fiat and crypto in real life and in metaverse. Just an example from my knowledge. Is it OK to let go of all here resources, convenience, development and experience? I don't think its worth it to let go of this advancement. But anyways we have our own perspectives. Healthy conversations are hard to be found in this place.kek

[Anonymous No.55213596]

>>55210163
Desu

[Anonymous No.55213599]

>>55213584
you can same thing about eth though, it's still 50% down against its 2017 high
but it's more about the passive income for eth and link which is important for retail, btc holders just sit there waiting for usd blowoff tops every four years

[Anonymous No.55213601]

>>55213592
>If the whole market is burned down all of the production, money and development will go to the dogs
Production and development mean nothing to this market.

[Anonymous No.55213630]

Where the fuck is this relentless selling coming from even at these levels...not even a 10% pump on this news like nobody cares

[Anonymous No.55213653]

>>55213630
Entire market is fake, you have no idea the the level of bots they now have to suppress ir prop up the price, this is not a free market, the price stays low because someone wants it that way

[Anonymous No.55213661]

>>55209035
Literally nothing. Swift is a nothing burger. Like who cares about banks communicating? Crypto is suppose to kill banks CHUD

[Anonymous No.55213711]

legit tiresome but reality is their marketing is dogshit, they really need to pay off vcs and influencooors if they want to pump it, there's no liquidity in crypto anymore, retail cant move shit, there's no new money anywhere

[Anonymous No.55213714]

>>55213661
what are we to make of such obviously retarded talking points?

[Anonymous No.55213755]

>>55213122
where is town crier dear linkie? i ca't seem to find it on main net, what's that? cries i hear? maybe that's what happens when you defend a team that delivers nothing but empty promises. now go buy some HEX or doge if you want to be someone in this life, playa.

[Anonymous No.55213779]

>>55213653
So there is no entity which can buy few mil links after news like this? Not even ONE VC with deep pockets? I know most of them are scumbags but there are few that aren't pure evil like jumpfags...

If ccip release doesn't make it pump at all then I am done with link, no point in holding it desu...Will be only left with 7k staked

[Anonymous No.55213805]

>>55213779
They buy, but get countered by bot sells

[Anonymous No.55213827]

*chuckles*

[Anonymous No.55213871]

>>55209593
Damn this new COPE is delicious. Keep at it, fuddie

[Anonymous No.55213934]

>>55210777
Why is bitcoin needed as le store of value if Chainlink also has a max token supply and fundamental demand for the token. LINK will act as better money than Bitfucks

[Anonymous No.55214014]

>>55209035
Anyone seriously involved with Chainlink does not want it to pump because the crypto market is a joke ponzi scheme and a certain degree of seperation from that is necessary. The price will go up once the market is cleansed of retards and scams and Chainlink has all the pieces in place to become a behemoth. By that I mean with real world applications.

[Anonymous No.55214025]

>>55214014
>Anyone seriously involved with Chainlink does not want it to pump
We really do want this to happen, obviously.

>the crypto market is a joke ponzi scheme
Yes, and Link pumping on this news would go a long way towards rectifying that.

[Anonymous No.55214048]

>>55214025
By seriously involved, I mean top level staff or financial institution. The hiding strategy works.

[Anonymous No.55214049]

>>55214048
Why would they not want it to pump?

[Anonymous No.55214087]

>>55214049
Why did google stay low key until their success was unavoidable?

[Anonymous No.55214095]

>>55214087
But Swift just publicly announced the CCIP integration trial yesterday.

[Anonymous No.55214099]

>>55214087
According to the Talmud is their traditional method of infiltration and subversion.

[Anonymous No.55214105]

>>55209035
Wow very cool, tell me again how much $Link has Swift bought? Oh they didn't buy any? Oh Swift does not need to buy any $Link to use Chainlink?
Good to know the token isn't needed and will not pump irrespective of what Chainlink accomplishes.

[Anonymous No.55214198]

>why is the price not pumping
do linkies realky? *chuckles*

[Anonymous No.55214293]

>>55212508
Rolling

[Anonymous No.55214344]

>>55213805
Who do you think is behind these bots?

[Anonymous No.55214348]

I thought they where already using link all this time!!! SSOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDD

[Anonymous No.55214437]

It's like linkies and link fudders haven't even read the whitepaper. Just go read it and you'll figure out why it's not pumping.

[Anonymous No.55214528]

>>55214437
spoonfeed me plz

[Anonymous No.55214543]

>>55214198
Because chainlink is held to much higher standards than any other crypto project. If it was Band that was announced in this article it would have pumped 100% minimum

[Anonymous No.55214553]

>>55214528
In summary, token not needed. But in reality, it's a bit more complicated. The token economics are circular in nature, meaning there is no upward price pressure outside of people fomoing into buying and holding link, the actual use of the token doesn't cause any upward price pressure.

[Anonymous No.55214675]

>>55214553
>actual use of the token doesn't cause any upward price pressure
spastic take

[Anonymous No.55214808]

>>55210615
I agree. So 98% of my portfolio is BTC. 1% is BCH and the remainder is ETC and some true shitcoins. My only question is why haven't BCH done anything except bleed? It's literally just bitcoin with lower fees. The only reason I don't put anything in it is because it seems to be... well dying. It was taken off Coinbase wallet due to lack of inactivity. But it's supply is just as limited as bitcoin and it has lower fees. Is there any reason to think it'd be worth putting anything in to? I'd hold more, but I don't see any point in doing so unless there is reason to think it would increase.

[Anonymous No.55215246]

>>55209035
The Great Reset has come early for linkies.

[Anonymous No.55216005]

>>55209035
They are willing to bring the world to the brink of WW3 just to keep the price of Chainlink suppressed

[Anonymous No.55216014]

>>55214675
cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug

[Anonymous No.55216048]

>>55214553
>the actual use of the token doesn't cause any upward price pressure
Same with ETH.
Gas fees absolutely explode whenever ETH shits the bed. So that's the inverse of the usage=pump causation.

And it happens every time, and for extended periods.

[Anonymous No.55216110]

>>55214344
3 letter word

[Anonymous No.55216162]

>>55209523
You really do live in some kind of retarded fantasy land

[Anonymous No.55216368]

>>55209035
I would be more than happy to buy any coin I think is going to go up.
I've spent a lot of time reading and learning about Chainlink.
I absolutely understand what everyone here saw in it from 2018-2020. Especially during defi summer. One could easily imagine it would monopolize defi oracles. And of course it did that, spectacularly.
Despite liking Chainlink, I honestly have no idea what the actual argument here for value. I understood that charging for price feeds and such is a viable business model for defi. So if the same argument applies here for these banks or whatever, what are the specifics?
In what sense is it undervalued based on some information that the market doesn't know, or some future narrative that will induce fomo from random people?
Presumably the price is going up because I'm not alone with my general confusion about what situation is supposed to unfold in the future that will enable me to dump bags on people buying into hype(since of course that's where the edge is), and realistically there are probably tens of thousands of people like me that are either missing something about future hype, or missing something about some genuine economic value proposition wrt to the token. 'Fundamentals' are often bs in crypto since it's so speculative that the values always massively eclipse any fundamental value that is generated from protocol revenue and whatnot. But perhaps link is going to have some insane deluge of protocol revenue and the market is somehow vastly undervaluing it at the moment(and all these big players who know what they're willing to pay and such since they have intimate knowledge of the industry are simply not buying this value for some reason..). But if that's true, then it needs to actually be spelled out somehow because obviously me(and apparently others aka the market) are too dumb to see it(quite possible, but ultimately this game is about getting dumber people to buy your bags...greater fool and all...so...)...

[Anonymous No.55216382]

>>55216368
>Presumably the price is going up because
I meant to type the price is NOT going up...
in case that wasn't obvious

[Anonymous No.55216530]

>>55216368
>In what sense is it undervalued
In the sense that it's rank 20+ while having 1000x the functionality, use, innovation, and token needfulness of every coin above it save for Bitcoin and Ethereum.

[Anonymous No.55216542]

how the fuck is it continuously dumping? this is insane.

[Anonymous No.55216593]

>>55209035
Because I haven't sold yet.

[Anonymous No.55216619]

>>55216542
Link/ETH is going back to ICO levels

Sorry marines, that's what happens when you marry your bags and shut down any type of discussion

[Anonymous No.55216668]

>>55211298
>7 more years guys!

I'm so glad I'm not a white manlet chud otherwise I would have bought this coin

[Anonymous No.55216676]

>>55216530
these things don't matter though, the only thing that matters is speculation and hype
you still don't get it

[Anonymous No.55216689]

>>55216676
I'm just saying in what ways it's undervalued.
As for hype, there has never been anything in all of crypto's history as hype as the very real potential for adoption by 11,000 banks.

[Anonymous No.55216739]

>>55210602
don't worry your fellow link cucks will come up with a new cope, you were stupid enough to think you are part of a club of chosen ones (you are the definition of a normie) and you are paying for it with your future and your capital, I say Its a lesson that most linkies will not learn from and no one gives a shit anyway get fucked link chuds

[Anonymous No.55216749]

>>55216368
>In what sense is it undervalued based on some information that the market doesn't know, or some future narrative that will induce fomo from random people?

These things have not been priced in. Its only been dumping since before they were announced/confirmed:
Staking and BUILD airdrops
CCIP
swift

We're still waiting for shit to actually come out which I guess is the biggest issue (but that didn't seem to hurt cardano so who knows). CCIP and swift will not induce fomo in retail but they signal a massive uptick in DON usage for anyone paying attention. The more the network is used, the more fees are collected and by extension token price will rise. Read the economics section of the whitepaper, as sergey would say.
Staking is the one thing that will potentially induce fomo from retail once they clue into BUILD airdrops but the current pool is full so this won't happen until they can fomo in. We should see v1 with 6 months or so barring any further betrays. Still might not open up enough to really drive fomo, I'm not sure.

[Anonymous No.55216760]

>>55216749
>but that didn't seem to hurt cardano
Or ETH.

[Anonymous No.55216767]

>>55216689
you don't seem to understand what hype is

[Anonymous No.55216783]

>>55216767
The very real potential for adoption by 11,000 banks isn't hype?
This oughta be good

[Anonymous No.55216782]

>>55216542
Look at the volume. There is no retail hype/buy in so jewish manipulation psychologists (also known as "market makers") are able to do what they want.

[Anonymous No.55216806]

>>55216783
yes, you don't
you might be hyped for this, but the rest of the market isn't. Now you can argue that the market is dumb and you're a genius, but that won't change the fact that the rest of the market participants are not hyped at all, nobody cares

[Anonymous No.55216815]

>>55216806
>you might be hyped for this, but the rest of the market isn't
Clearly.
Doesn't change the fact that adoption by 11,000 banks is THE most bullish and therefore most hypeworthy thing to ever happen in crypto, ever.

[Anonymous No.55216830]

>>55216815
unless others agree with your sentiment, no

[Anonymous No.55216832]

>>55216530
That very well may be true.
But to me that sounds similar to what people said about Tesla a while back. All of it very well may be true, and I personally wouldn't even argue the point at all. But when everyone already knows that and buys it up to a certain point, there needs to me something beyond that.
Like a literal meme that isn't too hard to understand for the average person about why they'll make money buying it. Like the old meme magic and hopium but redone for something far bigger than defi/crypto since it's already gg there.
It's like people(and obviously myself as well) want to make money and want to buy something they think is going to go up. But the whole thing is predicated on thinking other people are going to be buying more of it after you for some specific reasons(whether they're legit or not, doesn't really matter too much but a plausible narrative is always nice).
It's kind of hard to articulate exactly, but it's like Chainlink is almost too legit and good. As stupid as that may sound, vague bullshit is what drives specualtion. Especially in crypto. I wouldn't give a fuck if there were a bunch of bullshit memes that people were buying into and the price was going up...or if I thought there was some kinda bullshit meme/narrative in the future that I could get ahead of(and there very well might be still who knows). I'd happy buy into memes. But for now the memes are just lacking I guess. Hard to explain. But I mean things can and do change and it's not hard for me to click the buy button. Same goes for everyone else.

[Anonymous No.55216854]

>>55216830
It's not an opinion, it's not a sentiment, it's a very clear-cut fact.
Show me a singular crypto event more bullish than adoption by 11,000 banks.

>>55216832
You're overthinking it. Clearly.

[Anonymous No.55216866]

token not needed

[Anonymous No.55216874]

>>55216854
>It's not an opinion, it's not a sentiment, it's a very clear-cut fact.
that's your opinion, not a fact
"bullish" literally means "number go up", and all this "bullish potential" isn't doing anything for the price
your statement is literally illogical, but I now recognize your posting style and I know you're capable of repeating the same argument for hours, so have fun arguing with reality instead

[Anonymous No.55216890]

>>55216749
BUILD airdrops are potentially very good news for all of you who are staking and such. But neither positive nor negative to randos like me who are just going to potentially buy. Last I heard staking was full anyway.
A good situation would be a nice airdrop to stakers, and then the staking cap gets increased and people rush in to get in for more airdrops. That's worked a few times with shit like ATOM last bull run iirc.
So I'll definitely keep an eye on that.
Basically if you guys do get a fat airdrop, you'll likely gain more from the base token appreciation if/when staking is expanding(I think anyway).
Other two things need spoonfeeding/specifics/memes whatever. Maybe it's still too early and there's not enough info.

[Anonymous No.55216900]

>>55216874
>"bullish" literally means "number go up"
no

[Anonymous No.55216918]

>>55216749
I got distracted on another screen and only replied to the first half of your post and forgot to read the other half until after I finished typing. Basically I just said the same thing you did more or less kek

[Anonymous No.55216919]

>>55209108
>>55209135
LOOK AT ME I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT MARKET CAP IS WHY NUMBER NO GO UP THE PAPER SAY GOOD NEWS WHY NUMBER NO GO UP???

[Anonymous No.55216928]

>>55216815
>adoption by 11,000 banks is THE most bullish and therefore most hypeworthy thing to ever happen in crypto, ever

This is clearly not a fact lol. Loopring went up 500% on GME NFT rumors. Since the swift release yesterday LINK is up -3.4%.

If LINK was an L1 this would be a true hype-worthy event but LINK has always had this problem of being the middle man and retail can't grasp what it means. I do think CCIP makes it much easier to explain than when it was just price feeds though so I do have hope they will catch on eventually.

[Anonymous No.55216936]

>>55216919
Link's market cap puts it at rank 21, showing massive upside potential.

>>55216928
>Loopring went up 500% on GME NFT rumors. Since the swift release yesterday LINK is up -3.4%.

And "NFT rumors" are more bullish than adoption by 11,000 banks?

[Anonymous No.55216975]

>>55216936
>And "NFT rumors" are more bullish than adoption by 11,000 banks?
I agree that logically it should be the other way around, but this is the clown world we live in.

[Anonymous No.55217271]

>>55209578
fun times

[Anonymous No.55217293]

>>55209035
Read this >>55216744

[Anonymous No.55217312]

>>55216830
>others
Didn’t he just say 11,000 banks numbskull? You’re obviously arguing in bad faith but you’re too obvious.

[Anonymous No.55217335]

>>55217312
those 11,000 banks haven't even heard of LINK before, I guarantee you that

[Anonymous No.55217427]

>>55213083
this has nothing to do with a random altcoin's price though

[Anonymous No.55217496]

>>55209523
The market will only react when the token begins being used at high volumes which will happen when this all goes live.

We literally just have to be patient.

Tried to buy another 1000 the other day but my bank in the UK decided that people aren't allowed to use their own money to buy crypto anymore and have put a £1000 limit on buys.

Will get my wife to buy some tonight as the dip looks great.

Why is it dipping? Who knows.

[Anonymous No.55217738]

Riiiiiight. How many times have we heard about some token doing a “test” or “partnership” with “insert massive financial institution here” that ends up being overhyped nothing that gets dropped like a hooker’s diseased panties never to be spoken about again…

If this was truly a big deal reputable sources in fintech would be all over it. This is just the latest crypto grifter bs. Happy to be corrected whenever this turns out to be the next big thing.

[Anonymous No.55218111]

>>55209523
The Storm is coming.
5 more years.
Trust the Plan.
~Q

[Anonymous No.55218122]

>>55209035

Because LINKIES are stinky!

[Anonymous No.55218136]

Why aren't we pumping?

[Anonymous No.55218175]

>>55217738
The front page of Swift's website has an article that literally says
>Chainlink will be used
It is truly evil and despicable what you people are doing on this board. Correct the Record/Shareblue tier damaging to your soul.

[Anonymous No.55218203]

>>55217335
>those 11,000 banks haven't even heard of LINK before, I guarantee you that
Okay now I know you’re being sarcastic. You hold Link, don’t you NRtB

[Anonymous No.55218208]

>>55218175
If this was any other coin we would do a 10x by now I don't understand this PA

[Anonymous No.55218264]

>>55218203
get a computer for shitposting on 4chinz, shill

[Anonymous No.55218311]

>>55217335
Are these guarantees in the room with us right now?

[Anonymous No.55218344]

>>55217335
You and no one else on this board know jack shit, I can guarantee you that

[Anonymous No.55218385]

>>55218264
Im at work. Something you have never heard of.

[Anonymous No.55218452]

>>55218208
It's obviously being suppressed because of us.

[Anonymous No.55218617]

>>55218175
Okay so now remind me how many tests XRP and QNT had with Swift and point me to all the actual use that came out of those.

[Anonymous No.55218785]

>>55218617
What the fuck are you talking about? Since when has Swift had an article of the front page of their website that said either of those were being used? What the fuck does that have to do with anything?
Are you not worried about negative karma? About the damage you are doing to your soul with the needless shit you are spreading?

[Anonymous No.55218983]

>>55218617
Goddamn son, do your parents know you’re retarded?

[Anonymous No.55219014]

>>55218785
>either of those were being used

an "experiment" is not chainlink being used. It's filling out a form on their website.

[Anonymous No.55219154]

>>55210163
Crypto has been about a soap opera enriching CEXes, VCs, and miners. All of that stands in the way of LINK because once it goes primetime the bar gets raised from exciting vaporware and washtrading to needing at least a proof of concept and a business case.

The soap opera still controls the price action and their last hope has been to price anchor LINK and starve it of operational funds. The bullshit part of it is that they still let it swirl around in the top 25 because they probably hold a fuck ton of it themselves for when the day finally comes. Or maybe they worry that they push it out of the top 100 and it gets too easy for it to 10X and gain momentum. So it swirls the toilet in purgatory until it's adopted.

[Anonymous No.55219234]

>>55209035
https://youtu.be/VZP5lIzGNT8

In your fear and uncertainty it will be tempting to put your trust in some person or group who emerges and claims to have a "way out", which will involve sacrificing some of your liberty. You must resist this urge. These self‑proclaimed saviors may appear in many forms, under any number of banners: "intellectuals", "influential people", "progressive thinkers", "billionaires", "the UN", "the EU", "self‑selected multinational coalition", "global leaders", "world governments", "radicals", "revolutionaries" or some combination of these. They may appear charismatic. They may appear to have your best interests at heart. They may stand united, arm‑in‑arm, proclaiming "We know the way forward", advancing some form of "people's revolution" or "Global Reset" where "you will be in charge", hawking various "‑isms" and promises of a better tomorrow. These people are not your friends. They are not to be trusted. They are the same global banking elites using the same fear tactics, shilling the same magic potions and snake oils as always. They want only one thing: power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cieu5nDDssc

[Anonymous No.55219257]

>>55219014
kill yourself you literal jew

[Anonymous No.55219656]

Retail does not and has never moved the price of crypto. Things that pump do so because insiders specifically are coordinating dumps. If link is thought to have long term value, it will not pump, because nobody wants to actually sell it. You are being distracted by musical chairs, link is the only long term investment play in this market outside of bitcoin and MAYBE ethereum. But it doesn't matter because 99% of retail will literally never buy until they see giant green dildos.

[Anonymous No.55219827]

>>55216619
Markets bottom on apathy. We are there. Look at everyone's favorite crypto jew benjamin COHEN whining about no views/new subs. There are more eyes than before simply due to adoption, but this is more or less the same atmosphere as 2019. That said I wouldn't be surprised for one more market nuke that pushes link to the 3-4 dollar range and if you have cash on hand buy orders there could be very lucrative.

But at that point nobody will buy anyways (wrt retail), anyone who has held link that long probably bought below a dollar and has trouble stomaching buying at these prices, and anyone else has watched it bleed eternally and believes the gme/xrp schizo narrative. You don't have to do anything special to keep retail out, just keep price low/stagnant for significantly long periods, psychologically they will capitulate with time.

[Anonymous No.55219832]

>>55219656
Right because dogecoin, shib, and gme were pumped by institutions that knew they were undervalued

[Anonymous No.55219852]

Just bought another 1000, best dip in ages.

[Anonymous No.55219867]

>>55219832
>>55219827
>and anyone else has watched it bleed eternally and believes the gme/xrp schizo narrative
and no obviously not, they were pumped by vc's/exchanges/insiders who understood they would be able to dump on retail in a bull market, gme is an entirely separate issue but the tl;dr is it was a one off event that created eternal bagholders because jews convinced them the squeeze wasn't squoze.

[Anonymous No.55219918]

>>55216936
>And "NFT rumors" are more bullish than adoption by 11,000 banks?
in short, yes.
bullishness has to do with the relationship between MM's who pnd on news, and the pool of retail liquidity who buy into it. there are no MM's who pump link on news, and barely any retail who buy Link, so Link news can't really be bullish.

[Anonymous No.55219974]

>>55218452
This is unironically the correct answer, and anyone in this thread would be wise to understand this. As long as we are holding this, they will not allow a run. They do not want us in their club, they do not want us to become millionaires and billionaires. It will be sent to $0 so we capitulate before they run it up

[Anonymous No.55219981]

>>55219867
There is no real world value entering blockchain atm. When there is, link stands to be the biggest winner right now. What's unique about that is if link wins, it directly competes against the interests of those who profit off the current state of the market, so it is directly in their interest to see link fail until that happens. The entire point of crypto right now is to dump on someone else, and if that ever changes, you have less people to dump on, which directly impacts your profits.

Some will say, "well why don't they just buy link?" To which I'd say, first, they have, I promise every major entity already owns a sizeable bag. But second, and more importantly, why would they pump it for a 5x or 10x and have retail holding something they deem valuable long term, when they can continue to hide it, and pump meme coins, VC L1's and other garbage, making 100x's routinely and dumping something they never wanted to hold in the first place? Until tradfi money actually enters crypto en masse, the game is to maximize profits on dumping, and link will never win that game.

That said you can bet on it never happening, or still being years away. You probably won't win the casino as you have no edge, but you might see better returns in the short/medium term.

[Anonymous No.55220543]

>>55209743
it's been in production since 2012 and they're only just now getting around to confirming swift. it's obviously dead in the water. they probably did all this youtube content years ago with the billions of dollars they scammed from token holders and just have a script uploading it on a schedule. i'd short this shit if i had any idea how

[Anonymous No.55220560]

>>55209053
This. Did you even read the whitepaper OP?

[Anonymous No.55220617]

>>55219974
No, this is foolish. There's millions of millionaires on the planet. Even if EVERY single link holder in existence suddenly became a millionaire absolutely nothing would matter. The amount of millionaires in the world would increase by 0.001%, damn.
You do not matter. There is comfort in this truth.

[Anonymous No.55220689]

>>55219656
wrong. insiders buy and the price doesn't move much until they flip the switch and make retail buy high price. they need the retail in the end

[Anonymous No.55220734]

>>55220617
Wrong. You matter. David Koresh even said this when the ATF and FBI set his church on fire.

[Anonymous No.55220748]

>>55219656
>retail doesn't matter
>and nothing matters because retail will never buy
so what ur saying is linkies literally cannot win

[Anonymous No.55220818]

>>55220689
They only need retail if the endgame is dumping. Which it is, as long as the paradigm in crypto is shitcoin ponzi casino. The entire endgame of link is to move beyond that, to a point where real world value and usecases enter the space.
>>55220748
linkies cannot win until there is real world adoption of crypto. The issue is nobody is going to shout it from the rooftops and make you feel good about it, people are only going to do that for scams they want to dump on you. 90% of the fud here is link holders who do not want newfags buying because they resent anyone who could have ignored link this long and get to buy at an opportune time. Its not bulgarians, or paradigm, or da jews, most of the time, its just autists who do not want to let people in their club, and suffer from existential imposter syndrome.

[Anonymous No.55221249]

>>55210602
If you really bought that long ago then you'd be up like 100x even still

[Anonymous No.55221312]

>>55221249
nah, even if you bought the ICO which was 9 cents you're only up 66x. And how many people bought ICO and still hold? not many, most people (like me) bought from etherdelta when it was 20-30 cents. if you bought pre-sibos you couldve bought as high as 70 cents before it dumped to 20

[Anonymous No.55221317]

>>55221249
>chainnigger can't do simple math
KEK
E
K

[Anonymous No.55221355]

Listen, I don’t care. We was right and we will be right. I’m holding and still buying and fudding the fuck out of link wherever I can. You heard me? Yes, I fud my own investment, because I just can’t get enough Link. So stinky mmmmmmm peepeepoopoo

[Anonymous No.55221401]

>>55221355
Checked, based and token not needed

[Anonymous No.55221412]

>>55221355
i need as many link as possible
as possible

[Anonymous No.55221459]

>>55220617
You're either being purposely obtuse or delusional. If LINK goes to $1000 or $2000, the neets here holding 100k tokens or even 50k tokens become pretty wealthy individuals. You're talking about 9 figure net worths. You're delusional if you think they will allow this to happen

[Anonymous No.55221513]

>>55221459
>You're either being purposely obtuse or delusional.

It already happened to people who bought and held ETH and BTC. Its happened with many early buyers of dozens of crypto as well. You are just wrong and retarded.

[Anonymous No.55221522]

>>55221459
Please anon, PLEASE think about what you're saying. Hitting 10 would be an achievement. 20? That's a massive rise. 50? Not guaranteed it will happen again. 3 figures?? Remote to not happening. 4 figures??? Lmao

[Anonymous No.55221635]

>>55221459
how much more clear can I be when I say YOU DONT MATTER.

[Anonymous No.55221655]

>>55209035
some things are not meant to be

[Anonymous No.55221745]

>>55221513
It would've happened before the purge, not after the public is aware the entire fucking financial infrastructure would switch over to this

>>55221522
Hence why it's not going to happen

>>55221635
There's a huge difference between people having $2-3 million and the /biz/ og's having $75-100 million, c'mon anon

[Anonymous No.55221799]

>>55209035
>WHY??!!! WHY IS IT NOT PUMPING??????

No its not. Liquidity precedes all price action. Whales and moneyed interests have all the liquidity. News DOESN'T move assets although sometimes those with the liquidity will use news as cover as to why an asset moved when it reality it was just their doing.

I've explained probably a dozen times and yet no one still gets it. Especially in the current market where its still considered a bear trend, 90%~ of retail only buys for 2 reasons.

There is a perceived authority figure (or multiple) telling them to buy and so they do.

The price is going up a lot to where it can't be ignored and so they make an emotional purchase.

These 2 factors legit make up 8 or 9 out of 10 buyers.

Almost no retail buys when hype is low, price is undervalued, can stomach and not second guess themselves while accumulating while price ranges which will sometimes put them at an unrealized loss temporarily, and patience is needed to wait for parabolic expansions to realize any significant profit.

4Chan (INTx personality types) were uniquely built for this. I fucking love this place honestly.

[Anonymous No.55221851]

>>55221745
>not after the public is aware

Videos and articles about LINK/SWIFT get like 1000 views. No one knows especially if you outside of /biz/ or Crypto Twitter. The only far reaching publication I've seen so far is FORTUNE mentioning the connection yesterday.

Most people don't even know what SWIFT is. They've never heard of it.

Refer to tag below for how retail operates.

>>55221799

[Anonymous No.55221861]

>>55221745
>There's a huge difference between people having $2-3 million and the /biz/ og's having $75-100 million
no there isn't. that 75 million becomes 50 million after taxes. and how many people would get this much? roughly 1000 people total hold enough LINK for that currently. how many of them will hold till the absolute top and sell there? even less. and that's just one country.
YOU DONT MATTER

[Anonymous No.55221906]

>>55221799
>>55221851

7 Million tweets kek

[Anonymous No.55221923]

>>55221906
those are all spam tweets from bots tagging every crypto tag in existence to show up on as many searches as they can

[Anonymous No.55221938]

>>55219918
>>55216900

[Anonymous No.55221946]

>>55221861
>YOU DONT MATTER

You do matter that is why the psychological operations here to convince you to sell, not accumulate, or just demoralized with current price action is happening.

That being said in regards to minting a bunch of people with 9 figures network is correct. It doesn't matter, can and will happen, and most people won't do anything with their newfound resources to rock the boat. A large majority will just engage in hedonism.

[Anonymous No.55221948]

>>55221923
>no they r real peps
>u jus a bulgarian traniy fudster!

[Anonymous No.55221951]

>>55221459
Lmao, this guy is delusional if things retards like this are getting into the country club anytime soon. Stinkies are so desperate that they wouldn't sell at 500, and some might even wait till 1000.

[Anonymous No.55221959]

>>55221923

Sure bots maybe but why now then and not all the time in the past?

[Anonymous No.55221997]

>>55221948
you do realize that it's better if they're spam tweets, right? it would be concerning if LINK had a shitton of twitter attention on it and was dumping. this is bullish.

[Anonymous No.55222019]

>you do realize that it's better if they're spam tweets, right? it would be concerning if LINK had a shitton of twitter attention on it and was dumping. this is bullish.

[Anonymous No.55222020]

>>55221959
dunno, twitter is just garbage. maybe the recent pepe shitcoin and the mania it has started off brought it on. but you can't open twitter currently without being spammed with OMG LE EPIC AIRDROP JUST CLICK THIS LINK

[Anonymous No.55222053]

>>55221946

networth*

[Anonymous No.55222080]

>>55220734
based

[Anonymous No.55222087]

>>55221951
Your pic is the type this price action is attempting to make capitulate

[Anonymous No.55222110]

>>55221951
why would you save an edited picture and try to pass it off as real?

[Anonymous No.55222124]

>>55210156
incredibly based

[Anonymous No.55222138]

>>55209053
Sergey's pegged each token to the Big Mac price index

[Anonymous No.55222150]

>>55209035
K

[Anonymous No.55222162]

>>55222110
It was a post in the SHIB subreddit and he deleted it btw

[Anonymous No.55222453]

>>55210602
Bro I’m 42 next week. Chill the fuck out faggot.

>I’m rich at 29 and not 25 oh noooo

Fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.55222467]

>>55210615
Yeah I mean I hear you on this… but that will be for the plebs. Not people who own big stacks of link

[Anonymous No.55222481]

>>55209035
Have you looked at the NYSE? You don't know shit do you. Guess where most of those dollaroos in stable coins sustaining crypto are.

Are all crypto bros this dumb? Serious question.

[Anonymous No.55222730]

>>55222481
Ok explain that to me like I'm a retard

[Anonymous No.55222777]

new ATL soon

[Anonymous No.55222793]

>>55222777
trips of truth

[Anonymous No.55222802]

You want to know the truth?
It's because retail is meant to be dumped on.
Retail doesn't get to do the dumping.
VCs will pour an infinite amount of money down the hole to hacks and failed oracles competitors, but they will NEVER spent a cent on retail bags.

[Anonymous No.55223058]

Remember the fake Walmart press release that pumped Litecoin 30%, adding ~$4 billion to its market cap almost instantly? Chainlink's market cap is currently right at about $3 billion and this news is actually real and much more significant. If you understand why a token is needed for Ethereum's proof-of-stake system, or Avax's proof-of-stake system, or for any other blockchain - then you should understand why a token is needed for a second layer proof-of-stake consensus which undergirds them all.

[Anonymous No.55223095]

>>55209574
This but unironically

[Anonymous No.55223100]

>>55221997
>Sirgay Nastyslob desperately tweeting at Elon for attention to his cashgrab

[Anonymous No.55223186]

>>55223095
Look at the price and laugh

[Anonymous No.55223190]

>>55222777
Hmmmmm stinkies~~~~~

[Anonymous No.55223222]

>>55223186
After the dot com bubble Amazon declined 95% only to then rise 700 times. Being emotional about short term price action is detrimental to success.

[Anonymous No.55223253]

its the ultimate shake
only delusional schizo iron hands at this point now

[Anonymous No.55223267]

>>55223222
>short term price action
>3 years of constant dumping against BTC and ETH
lol

[Anonymous No.55223309]

>>55223253
except this time we're not delusional because we have proof that everything was true

[Anonymous No.55223438]

>>55223309
except for the most important part

[Anonymous No.55223675]

>>55223222
>700 times
The crazy thing is that we're probably going to see much more than that.

[Anonymous No.55223706]

>>55221459
>le incel revenge fantasy

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH holy SHIT, I cant put into words how pathetic faggots like you are.

How…exactly do you see yourself? Are you some kind of “dangerous” man that society just CANT allow to have money? Hahahahaha god damn there is literally nothing on Biz more cringe in the last year than this. Its basically impossible to put into words how delusional you are

[Anonymous No.55223903]

>>55223095
When you look at the cycle of empires that ray dalio lays out, you see that the end of a superpower usually coincides with a manipulation of currency and the taking on of debt.
The US is at that stage right now, but it looks like the 4th industrial revolution is going to allow the extension of the cycle through CBDCs and tokenization.

When you listen to the Eric Schmidt talk at Smartcon, he talks a lot about tokenization and how revolutionary that it will be.
When they have the ability to tokenize assets, they're able to totally flip the script on the cycle of nations that usually ends with the world power succumbing to hyperinflation.
Now that they're able to switch to CBDCs and tokenize the spectrum of assets at their disposal, the financiers are able to maintain control of the population.
The US still enjoys a good position in the world when it comes to many things like military might, demographics, resources, and innovation.
If they're able to pull this off, we're looking at the 2nd coming of the Roman Empire that could last 500 years.
China is a hair away from collapse, and the europoors are totally dependent on trade with the middle east, russia and China for their survival, so there's not going to be anyone to disrupt the 4th industrial revolution being spearheaded by the US.
Barring a thermonuclear exchange, we're still barreling toward a globohomo cbdc controlled financial system, but at least we'll be rich enough for it to not matter to us.

[Anonymous No.55223946]

>>55222777
Please God no, I'll get liquidated at $5.3.

[Anonymous No.55223994]

ITT: rentseeking scum circle jerking each other

[Anonymous No.55224056]

On the bo~ard where we bought corn
Came a stu~dent of philosphy
And he to~ld us of his strife
And his pla~an for linkmarines
He unvei~led how he had won
And gave us blu~ue for bits of green
And we'll ho~ld until our graves
Like our fel~low linkmarine
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
And our fre~ns are all aboard
Buying mo~re of them to hold and store
And a gra~nd you'll have to pay
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
(Full steam ahead, Mister Juels, full steam ahead)
(Full steam ahead it is, Sergey)
(Keep it stable, keep it stable)
(Buy! buy sir! buy!)
As we li~ve a life off fees
Every one of us (Every one of us!)
Has all we need (Has all we need!)
Cubes of blue~ (Cubes of blue!)
We bought for green~ (bought for green!)
Us and fell~ow (Us and fellow)
Linkmarine (Linkmarine, Ha Ha!)
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine
We all love our fellow linkmarine
fellow linkmarine, fellow linkmarine

[Anonymous No.55224089]

>>55223946
>Gambling with the golden ticket

Why?

[Anonymous No.55224107]

>>55223946
Anon, youre manifesting failure right now
PMA always

[Anonymous No.55224216]

New NASDAQ Trade Talks with the BIG man

https://twitter.com/TradeTalks/status/1666513693499072514

I didn't finish it yet but her opening remarks were referring to the SWIFT announcement so lets see what he has to say

[Anonymous No.55226091]

>>55223706
>Says a bunch of nothing
>Gets no (You)

Ouch!

[Anonymous No.55226186]

>>55224107
pleasing for you to explain this pma, yes.

[Anonymous No.55226211]

>>55222777
Under 15c Link? Not possible. I would buy so many stinks

[Anonymous No.55226226]

so, what does the token do?

[Anonymous No.55226272]

>>55210932
R/cc's servers are based in Sofia.

[Anonymous No.55226290]

>>55226186
ok I looked it up on yelp.com,,, means pajeet mumbai attitude,,, now makes sense

[Anonymous No.55227006]

>>55221799
The future will tell however the current situation makes ti difficult to believe that "we were chosen".
It was more of a coincidence and luck when similar minds gathered together for a common goal.

>>55222777
Checked!

[Anonymous No.55227073]

https://twitter.com/ARiHBARi/status/1666236114389147649
dropping alpha here boys remember you heard it here first

[Anonymous No.55227079]

>>55209035
Wtf hahaha LINKBTC died

[Anonymous No.55227802]

>>55227073
Fuckoff incel, I'd better research with tools like cmc altcoinistdao apeoclock and DeFiLlama than follow scamcoin

[Anonymous No.55227819]

>>55211485
Thank you Dr. Fud.

[Anonymous No.55227962]

>>55216368
Chainlink is being used to link centralized systems to decentralized ones. In this process there's some necessary centralization on Link's side otherwise called delegation.
Just like when you are using BTC the transaction is insured by the electricity and hardware bills of all the miners involved in BTC's consensus mechanism, in Link's case it is insured by Link's consensus mechanism.
Contrary to every other L2 or blockchain efficiency algorithms, Link's potential improvements on the cost and efficiency of crypto transactions cannot be copied and slapped onto other chains. They are also orders of magnitude bigger.

Link's rise is not about its function as a price aggregator intermediary rather than it's potentially for a semi-centralized/semi-decentralized consensus mechanism that can bring immediate real world adoption IF it is successful.
Link's inherent centralization is also the reason that many anons call it globohomo coin.

[Anonymous No.55228104]

>>55227962
Chainlink gonna finna be a household name bruh

Just like 5G

[Anonymous No.55228142]

>>55227073
>"MUMBAI"
cant make it up

[Anonymous No.55228260]

I feel so bad I can only buy 200$ worth of this shit every month, I have only 1.5k links brehs

[Anonymous No.55228492]

>>55227962
I feel like there is some potential here with the ponzinomics between staking, revenue from all of the activity(or at least the idea of all the revenue going to stakers, the reality doesn't matter that much).
So I guess the biggest issue now is that it's hard sell for now since the whole thing sort of rests on the true 1.0 staking system.
It seems like that should come first here rather than the way its going. Perhaps that's why they threw out the 0.1 system because they sort of realize that.
The thing is it seems that 0.1 just locked in a bunch of people who weren't going to sell anyway, so it doesn't really move the needle much.
Basically it seems like they're putting the cart before the horse there by dropping this SWIFT stuff and CCIP before having the actual mechanism that's supposed to enable the feedback loop that people might decide they want in on.

[Anonymous No.55228613]

>>55213558
When you start listing these crazy desires, man, crypto is still too damn complicated for most people. We gotta step up the game and provide better user experiences, social logins, and slick wallet onboarding, just like Brillion does. Let's make this shit more accessible to everyone

[Anonymous No.55228686]

>>55216676
This. Boring use case coins become boring stable coins. Buy the rumor. Sell the news. Don't baghold for 5 fucking years, long after the hype is gone.

[Anonymous No.55228769]

chain-kink
dump it

[Anonymous No.55228828]

>>55209035
if this doesnt prove its a scam what does? fucking retards

[Anonymous No.55229102]

>>55228492
Nah.

You have to get the institutions hooked on the system before you turn the screws, this is why drug dealers hang around the school gates giving away freebies before they get them hooked on the product and start charging.

[Anonymous No.55229134]

>>55228613
Everyone is irrelevant.
Chainlink has always been about capturing the institutions and modernising the infrastructure for the digital age.
Normies have the Internet running on their mobile phones but they don't understand how the Internet works or how their mobile phones work, it might as well be running on magic.