[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 64 KB, 931x600, gold.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55117440 No.55117440 [Reply] [Original]

The concept of "pactflation" is a neologism used to describe a unique phenomenon wherein the terms of a contract, as stipulated by the contract itself or as a result of the contract, exceed the typical dynamics of the market. In this scenario, wealth signals become anti-competitive and distortive, much like inflation, which obscures real wealth growth with superficial indicators.

This effect introduces a new resource class - contract resources. Just as inflation artificially inflates perceived wealth, pactflation artificially inflates the value of these contract resources. In the context of such contracts, wealth isn't necessarily a reflection of tangible assets or real value, but rather, an indicator that may not be in line with actual market dynamics.

An intriguing argument that arises from the concept of pactflation is that fiat currency, being a social construct, is inherently susceptible to pactflation. The argument posits that fiat currency, due to its lack of intrinsic value and dependence on societal agreement for its worth, is inherently less competitive and more susceptible to distortions like pactflation when compared to commodities like gold or silver, which have inherent value. The implications of this argument might lead one to question the solidity of a financial system that is primarily based on fiat currency, and its resistance to such distortions.

(feel free to steal my new theory in the name of the anti fiat argument)

>> No.55118979
File: 1.15 MB, 848x848, 1190e79103b06f6fce0cd2cf2ee4db2e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55118979

>>55117440
too large didnt read buy silber

>> No.55119120

>>55117440
How is this anti-fiat? Sounds like a turbo theft

>> No.55119641

>>55117440
Wow. That is a good theory. Financialization appears to be 'pactflation' as per your theory.
Screencapping.

>> No.55119874

>>55117440
>exceed the typical dynamics of the market
Can you explain what you mean by that?

>> No.55119901

>>55119641
that is true, that is one of the concusions that I have came to when I created this theory, I am very impressed that it is so intutive that someone picks up that conclusion when so implicit.

>> No.55119907

>>55117440
Explain more about contract resources econo-bitch

>> No.55119920

>>55119874
I say that something exceeds the typical dynamics of the market in the context of pactflation, I mean that the terms of a contract or the consequences of a contract deviate from what would be considered normal or expected within a functioning market.

>> No.55119928

>>55119920
>the consequences of a contract deviate from what would be considered normal or expected within a functioning market
"Consequences" in what sense? What I'm imagining is a contract that stipulates that you get e.g. shot dead if you don't make a mortgage payment.

>> No.55119966

>>55119928
While it is possible for contracts to include severe consequences for non-compliance, such as the example you provided, it is important to note that the concept of pactflation primarily focuses on the economic aspects of contracts and their impact on wealth signals.

>> No.55119974

>>55119966
Can you give an example of a specific consequence you have in mind?

>> No.55119999

>>55119974
fiat currency as a contract and inflation would be its consequences as under my theory inflation comes under the umbrella of pactflation

>> No.55120012

>>55119999
I'm just not a 100% what exactly you mean. Do you mean that futures contracts that promise, e.g. "I'll give you 10 ounces of silver in 6 months" are traded as if they themselves were 10 ounces of silver create inflation because they create "paper silver"?

>> No.55120022

>>55117440
>feel free to steal my theory
feel free to take your meds clinically narcissistic faggot

>> No.55120084

>>55120022
everyone can just figure out the theory on there own now, im out.

>> No.55120119

>>55120084
You're just explaining inefficiencies of bad book keeping

Historically keeping a theoretical number like fractional reserve or surgically putting fiat in specific areas of the economy would have made markets more efficient but we have computers and global access to everything now there's no need for it to be abused like it is.

>> No.55120143

is this the principle that the amount of stuff you have doesnt mean shit because even if you own a fancy house it can just be taken away by the government and used for communism.

>> No.55120181

it seems like nobody can accurately understand my theory, like I say making contracts of any sort does not ever create perfect wealth approximation, however, what it does do is expand resources, this is inflation and it damages the true wealth of the compititon and health of the system.

>> No.55120213

>>55120119
im explaining the negitive externalities of contracts

>> No.55120316

I get you mean and you are right. You found the root of why the world might very well have a 100 years of darkness. Because a solution requires the air being burned by the fire

>> No.55120680

>>55117440
>all that
Yeah, it's true, obviously. But the thing is, Fiat wasn't created to be a perfect reflection of real wealth, but rather as a market control mechanism. You are essentially criticizing fiat on a metric that it isn't concerned with, as governments don't give a flying fuck about how accurately wealth is represented, but rather about how much they can interfere with the market. Fiat was adopted preciously because it DOESN'T reflect real world wealth, and therefore allows the state unbounded opportunities to interfere with the market at will.

>> No.55120689

>>55120680
*precisely because

>> No.55120715

>>55120680
you are not the theory's target ordence, it is to be used as argument for your side. not as an a deep analyses over the system, that is what the first half is for

>> No.55121095

>>55120715
I don't know lad. The goal is clear, clean up Charles and Hitlers fuck ups and inspire the genocide on the jew; a real genocide.
BTC will help to kill the empire of lard and with it the loss of power of judeo-masonic doomsday cultists

the price is going to be a high one. For me, only my soul, for the world, suffering, cleaning fires that might bring a new spring