here is the twatter thread
https://twitter.com/delitzer/status/1661755779240841222
fav big brain moments
>Oracles introduce external data & w it all dependencies required to deliver that data.
feature or bug?
>Yes, lending does require oracles… but, as with DEXes, they can be moved outside the protocol.
so like chainshit?
>Real financial institutions will never (and should never) put billions of dollars into a protocol whose safety is *wholly* dependent on @chainlink for security.
>(Stand down, LINK Marines. Keep reading.)
>There are a LOT of complexities in bringing offchain data reliably onchain, especially w a requirement of operating in a decentralized, censorship-resistant manner.
>@chainlink addresses these constraints, but has become a potential single point of failure across all of DeFi
BUUUUTT CHAINSHIT IS EVIL BECAUSE WE CANT CONTROL IT
>Many users of oracle-free protocols will still rely on @chainlink to help manage their lending/borrowing positions. But they’ll also be able to transact w users who rely on prices from @PythNetwork, zk-based oracles, Bloomberg APIs, or even their own internal price calculations.
translation we need space to scam you as usual and we cant do that with FUCKING CHAINSHIT REEEE
>oracles in this piece are really the way to frame up a broader discussion around dependencies and robustness-via-diversity
its just "framing" bro lol
and also note that uniswap released some twap oracle but its unneeded lol according to the dude above
https://twitter.com/omeragoldberg/status/1661776602697482240