ICP is the ultimate IQ test

[Anonymous No.55060093]

what is your answer?

[Anonymous No.55060195]

>>55060093
It’s definitely an IQ test. On that we can agree.

[Anonymous No.55060239]

>>55060093
it's the ultimate midwit filter. Those that don't take heed will pay the price later on in the bullrun.

[Anonymous No.55060275]

Indeed, the Carnival is God and may all Juggalos find Him.

[Anonymous No.55060363]

>>55060239
It filters in midwits. Midwits think that the backwards tech is "revolutionary" and they think themselves geniuses for investing. Dumb people think the name is gay and smart people know that the project was a failure day 1, with inflation and the shitty CEO among some of the most obvious red flags.

[Anonymous No.55060396]

>>55060093
Its a scam for dumb retarded niggers like you. go look at the chart and kill yourself because you lost all your money and will never escape poverty.

[Anonymous No.55061135]

>>55060396
Seethe AVAX roach retard

[Anonymous No.55061158]

[Anonymous No.55061163]

>>55060363
So reddit was the smart ones all along they shit on ICP for the reasons you described

[Anonymous No.55061169]

>>55060093
>poor and not interested in the tech
I'd say most people who ignore these bullshit shills and just follow the price action and what the market says about the project are a lot richer than your average 4chan poster

[Anonymous No.55061245]

>>55061163
Yes, someone who browses reddit and said not to buy ICP when it was $700 dollars is definitely smarter than someone who browses 4chan and bought ICP at any price above 3c which is what VCs paid and all it is worth.

[Anonymous No.55061275]

>"IT'S A SCAM" said the Latino and the Indian
But still they can't stop thinking about it for a minute. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.55061326]

>>55060363
>It filters the retards from the geniuses. Midwits think that the alien tech is "too superior" and they think that the geniuses are brave for investing. Dumb people don't think at all and smart people know that the project is the crypto endgame since day 1. With a soon-to-be deflationary crypto after 2024, and based Dominic Williams in charge, AVAX cockroaches are absolutely seething and frothing at the sight of their middle school science fair disaster being blown to smithereens.
Fixed that for you

[Anonymous No.55061368]

>>55061163
/biz/ was shitting on ICP nonstop until moonman came along, now a bunch of low IQ retard think I SEE PEE is unironically good.

[Anonymous No.55061395]

>>55060363

[Anonymous No.55061442]

>>55061395
ICP is currently at a lower price than it was when that moonman shit was first posted, before it even launched on the popular exchanges. If you bought ICP on launch, you are in deep red right now.

[Anonymous No.55061473]

it was very sussy the way it popped up overnight and was instantly top 5 with a 700 dollar price tag

[Anonymous No.55061496]

>>55061442
ya man I'm not sure if you've heard but crypto is not doing too well

[Anonymous No.55061505]

>>55061275
And yet there is no possible way YOU made money investing in ICP. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.55061528]

>>55061505
>He doesn't know when i bought
Found the Latino/Indian guys

[Anonymous No.55061595]

>>55061505
Prove your white
Also it’s pretty funny how much icp lives rent free in these retards heads. I’m hoping this coin goes back to $100 just to see the reaction and the change of tone with these fags and Reddit fags

[Anonymous No.55061600]

>>55061528
Am I supposed to believe you went all-in at the bottom and are up a whopping 45%? Teach me your ways.

[Anonymous No.55061646]

>>55061600
I have been reading posts saying they bought "the bottom" since it was still three digits.

[Anonymous No.55061669]

>>55061600
>>55061646
Come on prove you’re white instead of sucking each others dicks

[Anonymous No.55061680]

>>55061646
An ICP baggie will never tell you his true buy in price.

[Anonymous No.55061703]

>>55061680
$10

[Anonymous No.55061707]

>>55061669

[Anonymous No.55061717]

>>55061669
The funny part is that they are dark but can't stop glowing

[Anonymous No.55061729]

>>55061680
Bought in at $40 sold around $38 right before the drop to $20s. Rebought around $7 about 3000 pees and have been dcaing since the sub $7 drop. Will stop buying once I hit 10k pees or it goes above $7 before then. Currently ate around 6000 pees
Now please stop sucking each others dicks shitskins

[Anonymous No.55061737]

>>55061707
Rude.

[Anonymous No.55061754]

>>55061707
Holy shit respect first fudder that actually has proved they’re white or Asian. Carry on then

[Anonymous No.55061757]

R1b alien tech, nigger, kikes, and jeets need not apply.

[Anonymous No.55061832]

>>55060093
I'm the one who wrote that and for all the noobs.
Most L1's in this space are just ETH forks like Avalanche for example. Avalanche can't scale, in fact L2's for Avalanche are being build as we speak. If this isn't a redflag.... enjoy poverty.
ICP is build as an all encompassing monolithic blockchain. It's Dfinity way of saying, we're responsible for at least 60% of the innovations in this space and we just build a fucking complete technology stack from scratch.


My point is that L2's are not secure.
Side chains, l2's, roll ups do not inherit the L1's security, because execution is done either independently on L2 or done 50/50 between L1 and L2. Most L2's are inherently centralized, fewer nodes = fewer validators to validate transactions.

ICP literally runs a twin copy of the blockchain directly on a smart contract... I'm fucking busy can't entertain the midwits.

[Anonymous No.55061869]

>>55061496
Mine is.

[Anonymous No.55061890]

>>55060093
One day this will catch a green dildo to 50$ and it will be fucking hilarious

[Anonymous No.55061897]

>>55061754
It's alright, this space is in desperate need of an on-chain Proof-of-Race project.

[Anonymous No.55061966]

>>55061897
Agreed. At least you don’t have the avax roaches saving pics of your hand every single time you post your hand to prove you’re white. You’re literally the first person I’ve ever seen fud icp here and prove they’re white. So congrats on that

[Anonymous No.55061973]

>>55061832
Crypto needs a new paradigm we've been stuck in this everyone trying to copy eth pnd fork clones while slowly pretending to not run into the same problems (scalability). It's so obv when you look at the space as a whole this is an inevitable top 10 coin and will J curve in 2024-2025

[Anonymous No.55062025]

I own 1000 ICP at a 3.80 average

[Anonymous No.55062034]

>>55060093
HELLO NIGGERS! I have Avax

[Anonymous No.55062093]

>>55061832
>Most L1's in this space are just ETH forks like Avalanche
This is the biggest retard flag kek
>L2's for Avalanche are being build as we speak
not for scaling purposes
>ICP is build as an all encompassing monolithic blockchain
This is neither a good thing, nor is it something ICP is actually capable of.
>Dfinity way of saying, we're responsible for at least 60% of the innovations in this space
kek
>L2s suck
yes
>ICP literally runs a twin copy of the blockchain directly on a smart contract
retardedly misleading

[Anonymous No.55062227]

>>55062093
Retard coping avaxxie. It’s just funny how much you faggots cope

[Anonymous No.55062260]

>>55062227
oh shit it's handfag, waddup? Still no actual arguments and begging to see stranger's hands on an anime forum though I see kek

[Anonymous No.55062329]

>>55062260
At least I can prove I’m white unlike yourself

[Anonymous No.55062479]

>>55062329
I have nothing to prove to downbad shillers of centralized, unscalable insider/VC scams on an anonymous image board kek People can choose to use their brain to engage with an argument or not. It makes literally 0 difference to me or any token what a handful of retards on biz say, ICP provides quality entertainment though at least.

[Anonymous No.55062551]

>>55062479
Shitskin detected and opinion discarded

[Anonymous No.55063023]

>>55062551
and yet avax still lives on in your head rent free kek
I'm curious, what did avalanche do to hurt you so bad as to inspire your obsessive FUD complex?

[Anonymous No.55063102]

>>55063023
>>55061707
See these shitskins have no life.

[Anonymous No.55063107]

>>55060093
>all l1s have been hacked
>all l1s cant scale
lol nope. forgot avax. ICP is certainly an IQ test....a lot of idiots on here failed buying it.

[Anonymous No.55063296]

I lost mid 5 figures on this piece of shit

[Anonymous No.55063316]

>>55061135
rent free

[Anonymous No.55063344]

>>55063102
projection, you FUD avax so much you got a meme made about you topkek

[Anonymous No.55063370]

>>55063344
Kk shitskin

[Anonymous No.55064154]

>>55062093
>>55062093

You reply with 'kek', 'can't scale', 'retard'.... it's obvious that ICP is fundamentally the strongest project in the space.

ICP never suffered from congestion issues, fees never spiked beyond 0.001 ICP. , 99,99% uptime, has never been affected by AWS outages, Cloudfare outages, never had a brief outage, hackers never found any medium-high vurnabilities, the only chain in crypto's history that has been able to successfully upgrade the size of smart contracts to GB's, meanwhile your shitcoin can only move coins from A to B. Try to prove me wrong then.... You can't many tried, they all failed.
Avalanche engineer blames ''bug'' for the chain inability to scale....

https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2021/02/14/avalanche-crippled-by-bug-triggered-by-unusually-high-volume-engineer-says/
L2-Rollups are being developed by third parties, because Avalanche can't scale.

https://twitter.com/Avax/status/1572618060225298432
Avalanche crippled by cloudfare outage.

https://status.avax.network/incidents/7qd8vdd8d1js
Avalanche subnet's C-chain see brief outage because avalanche can't scale.

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/03/23/avalanche-blockchains-x-and-c-networks-see-brief-outage/
Péter Szilágyi finds a critical insta-death bug in avalanche.
https://cryptobriefing.com/an-ethereum-core-dev-saved-avalanche-from-24b-network-insta-death/

[Sage No.55064259]

>>55061707
Time stamp

[Anonymous No.55064482]

Fun Fact, Avalanche and all these other eth-Derivatives, never had a real partnership, real world adoption, real world use case to begin with. It's all a elobarate marketing scheme to get niggers like >>55062093 to invest their lifesavings in.
Almost every fucking partnership in this space is fake.
If an organization wants to use Avalanche, Ethereum, they can just fork it, grab a copy on GitHub, adjust the parameters to their needs and here you go...free enterprise avalanche, no mainnet tokens were ever bought, no mainnet contracts were ever deployed. When you see avalanche niggers bragging about deloitte partnerships just laugh at them. Deloitte never bought mainnet tokens, never deployed mainnet contracts.
ICP can't be forked. FederItaly bought ICP from the market and converted them to cycles, it's the only legit real world adoption, this space has ever seen.
Avalanche will never see real world adoption, this nigger chain can't scale and it will never be able to scale without sacrificing security on a l2.

[Anonymous No.55064682]

>>55060093
>>55064482
Stop trying to make ICP a thing. It's not gonna happen. Its current price is ridiculously distant from its ATH and the free fall continues.

[Anonymous No.55065048]

>>55064154
>>55064482
21 year old senior in college over here
Just bought 10k icp after reading this, just got a flashbulb moment

[Anonymous No.55065568]

i hold 10 sneeds. fuck roaches.

[Anonymous No.55065640]

>>55061473
>he doesn't know

[Anonymous No.55065798]

>>55060093

[Anonymous No.55066126]

>>55060093
I have just one, and it might seem a little kekable, but Marlin pond

[Anonymous No.55066149]

>>55066126
If u like it u like it, nobody in this board has the right to kek at u, we all like some kind of garbage

[Anonymous No.55066170]

>>55063316
It's hard to know who's the one seething

[Anonymous No.55066174]

>>55066126
So there's still some layer 0 supporters out there

[Anonymous No.55066192]

Out of crypto brit founders I trust pedo gav more than schizo dom, dunno why, just do.

Simple as.

[Anonymous No.55066195]

>>55066126
Anon, why did you get into that?

[Anonymous No.55066233]

>>55061395
This pic is extra funny when you know moonman faked owning real estate in netherlands.

[Anonymous No.55066510]

>>55066149
I've never seen a more cocksucking reply in my life.

[Anonymous No.55066593]

>>55061707
Hey, whoever you are, we've been on the end of serious criminal defamation which has caused a lot of pain and harm to a lot of people. This is not a laughing matter. You are presenting false statements as though they are facts, without reference to the California legal filing, which would show these are hearsay allegations made by lawyers trying to extract settlement money from DFINITY by making false and embarrassing claims. As it stands, you have presented those same false and harmful claims by shitty lawyers as your own claims about real facts outside that protected California legal environment, because you have not referenced a source. Your behavior causes real harm and we're not ok with people defaming us. You should consult a lawyer about your situation, but as of now, I must ask you for your real name and address and lawyer so that I can send legal filings to you. Obviously, every additional cost you make us expend (such as searching for your identity) will be claimed from you as damages. It's a great shame that you have chosen to do harm to innocent people by promoting lies and remain committed to that path.

[Anonymous No.55066706]

>>55061395
based memer

[Anonymous No.55066965]

>>55064154
Fucking KEK, it's real

[Anonymous No.55067023]

>>55060093
ICP is a scam and moonman is a scammer.

[Anonymous No.55067069]

>>55060363
/thread but let them enjoy their delusions

[Anonymous No.55067074]

I bought ICP on Moonman's recommendations around $40 and I'm financially ruined.
I sold off most of it for BTC a few weeks ago and just keeping 1000 to see if I can at least break even when BTC bullrun starts next year at the halving.
BTC bullruns tend to lift up all of the shitcoins even if they're dead.

[Anonymous No.55067230]

>>55064154
Welp that's a knockout

[Anonymous No.55067931]

>>55064154
This kills the roach

[Anonymous No.55067946]

>>55064154
Roach bros i don't feel so good

[Anonymous No.55068131]

>>55060093
0

[Anonymous No.55068695]

>>55067069
Cope harder. You idiots come barging in ICP threads when you claim you don't like it. Just point out what shitcoin flavor of the month you hold so we can all collectively laugh at your dumbass.

[Anonymous No.55068879]

>>55060093
>ICP is the ultimate IQ test
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[Anonymous No.55069830]

>>55060093
ICP is pure shit, I would rather buy a meme like CHUNKS which has good usecase and its gonna moonshot eventually. Suck it up ICP.

[Anonymous No.55070870]

>>55064154
Holy shit, i’ve not seeing such a thorough ass beating on /biz/ in a while.
I dont even really like ICP because you guys are insufferable faggots in other threads, but goddamn, avax is pure putrid dogshit in comparison.

[Anonymous No.55070897]

>>55070870
Once the quantum computers are out all the L1s will suffer or even might die. Only projects that are built on PQC will have a chance to survive.

[Anonymous No.55071259]

>>55064154
>never spiked beyond 0.001 icp
>never spiked beyond 0.0001 icp
ftfy
also it never will spike beyond that because its not a gas fee but a fixed fee to burn icp. there is no gas fee for the end user.

[Anonymous No.55072725]

>>55064154
>>55064154
>kek
ICP retards makes me laugh
>retard
some of you are retarded, but really the more accurate term is midwit
>can't scale
because it uses classical consensus (same as every other shitcoin) and as a result your subnets can only have like 7-28 nodes without taking a turboshit in throughput. Currently you can do only sub 1000 user writes per second which is the lowest throughput of any major chain besides ETH and BTC, and that's on your gigantic server racks. Avalanche c-chain alone regularly sees spikes in the 700-900 tps range. The only thing limiting throughput on avalanche is the VM and node hardware a subnet chooses, consensus is not the bottleneck.
>muh gas
That's not how gas fees work on ICP you retard kek
>ICP never suffered from congestion issues, fees never spiked beyond 0.001 ICP. , 99,99% uptime, has never been affected by AWS outages, Cloudfare outages, never had a brief outage, hackers never found any medium-high vurnabilities
Why is everyone involved with ICP starting with Dom at the top deceitful bastards, maybe you forgot about when a subnet saw any actual load and gagged/crashed for hours
https://forum.dfinity.org/t/is-my-5-year-dream-of-icp-and-dfinity-shattered-is-there-still-a-future-sns-1-decentralization-sale-questions/17178/2
or a single boundary node went offline and took out half the regions of the world
https://forum.dfinity.org/t/6-8-22-s-multi-continent-ic-outage-are-boundary-nodes-the-top-attack-vector-for-the-ic/13624
>Szilagyi bug
yea because dfinity is the sole proprietor of ICP, it's not an open decentralized protocol, and they aren't going to announce that shit to the world kek. Every piece of software has attack vectors and bugs, including ICP. There's nothing magical about it.
>Brief outage
It literally lasted an hour and occurred due to a bug introduced when changing the entire consensus mechanism and data structure of the x-chain, far more complicated than the Merge which took years

[Anonymous No.55072790]

>>55064482
>never had a real partnership
topkek. Here's a just a sample of the companies building public avalanche subnets right now
>Vodafone
>Alibaba
>SKplanet
>Professional Bowlers Association
>FIDE
>Spruce subnet with T.Rowe Price, Wisdomtree, wellington management, and cumberland
AAA games such as
>Shrapnel
>Off the Grid

>It's all a elobarate marketing scheme to get niggers like >>55062093 (You) to invest their lifesavings in.
Funny you should mention that, please see picrel. If you bought ICP you are exit liquidity for the team or seed round investors kek
>They can just fork it!
Yes as is possible with all permissionless, decentralized protocols. But they will be missing the seamless interoperability of the avalanche network of subnets which is the whole point.
>Deloitte
was never going to be a public subnet. Do you really think deloitte was going to put FEMA recovery documentation/renumeration information on a public ledger? It's takes like this that make you a retard. The point is the tech is real and it's better than any other protocol.
>ICP can't be forked
Yea because it's a closed permissioned system, dfinity literally controls the network. If the VM is open source though it could of course be repurposed.
>FederItaly
literal who. ICP has no actual adoption and nothing is made better for end users by using it, it's just shitty laggier web2.0 clones. ICP is strictly worse performance wise than AWS/traditional cloud and there is no way around that.

[Anonymous No.55073269]

OP here.
>>55060363 was the correct answer. ICP holders are midwits and ngmi. thanks to everyone that bumped this thread.

[Anonymous No.55074294]

>>55060093
>Internet Computer
Yeah, you failed it

[Anonymous No.55074341]

>>55072725
>>55072790
What do I do in order to host a dapp on avax?

[Anonymous No.55074465]

>>55074341
>host a dapp on avax
>dapp
>avax
Chose one

[Anonymous No.55074484]

As much as I like ICP's software.

Their entire deployment of coin distribution, VC scam, node requirements, and centralized control is just one giant piece of shit that is going no where.

An interesting idea, with some grievous flaws

[Anonymous No.55074518]

>>55074341
what are your requirements?
>>55074465
dapp=decentralized app
>decentralized
>ICP
pick one

[Anonymous No.55075047]

>>55072725
>>55072790

You lost.

[Anonymous No.55075326]

>>55075047
excellent rebuttal shill, how much does Dom pay you for these top tier replies?

[Anonymous No.55076113]

>>55074518
Something like oc.app where I can chat with clients and host some pics

[Anonymous No.55076861]

>>55076113
well if you're being serious you could use the avalanche rust SDK to create your chat VM that defines how the chain is going to run. You'd then need define what the hardware requirements are for the app, if you want users to store pictures/video then you're going to need nodes with large amounts of storage space. You'd of course need to decide how you're going to monetize the app and what sybil resistance mechanism you'd want to use. Perhaps you want it to be totally open and permissionless. In which case you could make it a permissionless subnet where nodes, should they meet the hardware reqs, have to stake CHAT in order to become validators of the dapp. CHAT could then be used also as both a governance token, and as a miniscule gas fee per message users pay, larger for images ofc, so as to dissuade spam. Or maybe you want to imitate the original ICP architecture and make the validator set permissioned where only whitelisted entities can provide nodes and you want to use a "reverse gas" model where you the dapp deployer directly compensates the node providers via some scheme like subscriptions or ads. You could go about it any way you see fit really. Your chat users would then have seamless interoperability to the hundreds of millions in liquidity, NFTs, games, etc. on the rest of the avalanche network via avalanche warp messaging.

[Anonymous No.55077207]

>>55076861
Can't I just log into the avax DAO and deploy a smart contract and throw some avax at it for hosting? :/

[Anonymous No.55077412]

>>55077207
no because avalanche is a permissionless BFT protocol that anyone can deploy on with no central governing authority. Maybe one day someone will make a general purpose hosting subnet though that abstracts some of these considerations from you. If you don't care about centralization, latency/throughput limitations, lack of customizability of things like validator sets or tokenomics, then by all means use ICP. It can have it's little niche for hosting garage band dApps, that's not the point of avalanche though.

[Anonymous No.55077604]

>>55076861
You can't do this on AVAX. Stop lying. KYS.

[Anonymous No.55077635]

>>55077604
>N-n-no! You can't do this b-because, you just can't!
Seethe

[Anonymous No.55077677]

>>55077635
You literally can't. You cannot host a single solitary thing on AVAX because it just moves coins from A to B and that's all it can do.

KYS.

[Anonymous No.55077737]

>>55077635
>>55077677

https://dappradar.com/rankings/protocol/avalanche

Looks like all the games are basic 2d shit, wonder if Avax can even host Mario 64? Looks like dinosaur tech in comparison to icp.

[Anonymous No.55078707]

>>55077412
>no
Oh, shame. With BTC we got crypto payments (and with XMR real electronic p2p cash) and with ETH we got smart contracts, but ETH still can't act like a world computer. Avax seems like a speedy eth but not much more. I think the next money making paradigm will be blockchain that offers big computation and hosting with less hassle and that's what's cool with what Dfinity is trying

[Anonymous No.55078953]

>>55077737
already provided examples in development right now further up the thread.
>>55078707
> Avax seems like a speedy eth
That's your failure in comprehension. AVAX is simultaneously the fastest and most decentralizable consensus protocol in existence. Avalabs makes tools that people can use to build literally anything in a byzantine fault tolerant manner on dedicated nodes while still interfacing with the rest of the network. Dfinity offers computation/hosting in a BFT manner with the tradeoff of greatly increased latency and throughput reduction funded through questionable tokenomics compared to traditional cloud infra. And the only reason it is able to so is because dfinity permissions the nodes and de facto controls the network. You're investing in a far less performant AWS that maybe sees less downtime at the expense of UX. I'd argue there's not much financial value behind this tradeoff.

[Anonymous No.55078969]

>>55060195

kek

[Anonymous No.55079210]

>>55078953
Then why isn't one built then already. If it's that great they should have this implemented by now and many more crazy apps for that matter but everything listed in that link is pure garbage.

[Anonymous No.55079233]

>>55077737
like wtf is this trash

[Anonymous No.55079258]

>>55078953
This has to be a scam. This looks unbelievably shitty

[Anonymous No.55079350]

>>55072725
>>55072790
Hey, whoever you are, we've been on the end of serious criminal defamation which has caused a lot of pain and harm to a lot of people. This is not a laughing matter. You are presenting false statements as though they are facts, without reference to the California legal filing, which would show these are hearsay allegations made by lawyers trying to extract settlement money from DFINITY by making false and embarrassing claims. As it stands, you have presented those same false and harmful claims by shitty lawyers as your own claims about real facts outside that protected California legal environment, because you have not referenced a source. Your behavior causes real harm and we're not ok with people defaming us. You should consult a lawyer about your situation, but as of now, I must ask you for your real name and address and lawyer so that I can send legal filings to you. Obviously, every additional cost you make us expend (such as searching for your identity) will be claimed from you as damages. It's a great shame that you have chosen to do harm to innocent people by promoting lies and remain committed to that path.

[Anonymous No.55079403]

>>55061368
Lmao the fact that ypu need to revise history to fit your headcanon is hilarious

[Anonymous No.55079815]

>>55076861
A large amount of gas to host pictures
>to dissuade spam
Kek. The cope in this roach is strong.
Remember when they were saying blockchains don’t NEED to do what Icp does, this faggot literally trying to square the circle. Love it. Continue roach.

[Anonymous No.55079833]

>>55060195
Kek, underrated

[Anonymous No.55079935]

>>55079815
kek caught this - now the roaches lie and says their shitchain could do it all too.

[Anonymous No.55081908]

>>55072725
i'm will be back home soon, you're eager to get humiliated again

[Anonymous No.55081954]

>>55060093
Don't care, still stacking ICP and LINK. Midwit cuckold bros... wagmi

[Anonymous No.55082083]

>>55078953
>avax is used to build literally anything
yes anything that sends something from A to B

[Anonymous No.55082106]

>>55061973

To my knowledge, ICP is the first working layer 0 of its kind, not to be confused with the 'layer zero' funded by the competition (avalanche) calls itself layer 'zero' + on chain interoperable still use bridges......
>>55072725

>Currently you can do only sub 1000 user writes per second which is the lowest throughput of any major chain.
This is your lack of understanding how Dfinity's subnet work. Avalanche copied 'parachain technology' from polkadot, and renamed it 'subnet' stolen terminology from Dfinity.

Avalanche subnets are independent blockchains, they can't message / communicate with other independent blockchains. https://twitter.com/dominic_w/status/1501543344035733505

Dfinity's subnet's and the smart contracts are interoperable like a distributed system should.

You can split an app in Dfinity into 2-5 canisters, doubling, five-folding throughput and data storage (true scaling). Apps on avalanche can't be sharded across the different subnets, because each of them are independent blockchain on their own.

This is how subnets on avalanche work, see picrel very different from what Avalanche is trying to portray.

https://docs.avax.network/assets/images/subnet-validators-0667a8ef05ae5dc26a545d2f52333208.png

Replace 'centralized' with avalanche primary network. Single point of failure.

[Anonymous No.55082132]

>>55072725

This is your attack on ICP?

https://forum.dfinity.org/t/6-8-22-s-multi-continent-ic-outage-are-boundary-nodes-the-top-attack-vector-for-the-ic/13624

Read the comments and the ongoing decentralization of boundary nodes.
I'm not done with humiliating Avalanche, it's quite funny, how Avalanche is trying to be the next ETH-killer by shamefully copying terminology, technology from its competitors. I know you niggers have bragged about how avalanche SGX bridge has never been hacked. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/08/architectural-bug-in-some-intel-cpus-is-more-bad-news-for-sgx-users/

The bridge code is controlled by 5 avalabs members, right? The entire value proposition of Avalanche rest on 5 people, moving coins from A to B, moving coins from Blockchain to Blockchain.

If 3 out 5 avalabs benchods collude or get hacked, the entire network becomes worthless overnight.

Still can't refute that ICP is layer 0, still the layer that can integrate all layer 1's. The first of it's kind.

[Anonymous No.55082183]

>>55060093
It was the biggest IQ test. I memed the hell out of that shit coin 1.5 years ago. Was new to /biz/ but everyone knew that was a scam.

I think the low IQs bit. Haha!