[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 114 KB, 1270x808, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54896305 No.54896305 [Reply] [Original]

BUY!

>> No.54896326

Not yet. Waiting for light blue.
24 to 26k

>> No.54896423
File: 163 KB, 1270x808, 168357518526094x.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54896423

>> No.54896431
File: 582 KB, 800x800, 1656075930842936.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54896431

>>54896305
>>54896423

>> No.54896441
File: 123 KB, 543x699, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54896441

>>54896305
What a joke.

>> No.54896499

i'll buy when it hit the ultra-violette line.

>> No.54896662
File: 120 KB, 1270x808, light blue.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54896662

>>54896326
>Waiting for light blue
Here?

>> No.54896668

Stop the cope, it's over

>> No.54896760
File: 703 KB, 2960x1295, 1668032919149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54896760

>> No.54896774

>>54896423
WE STILL HAVE TIME TO BUY

>> No.54896822

>>54896760
This chart failed to predict the 30k pump whereas I predicted it from 15k. Bitcoin is never going below 20k again.

>> No.54896885

>>54896423
And what happened last cycle you mong?

>> No.54897006

>>54896885
FTX Paper Bitcoin

>> No.54897028

>>54897006
yep. And the roaches that gathered around sam are getting more unhinged and desperate by the day, while their contracts near the end of their lifes

>> No.54897066

>>54896305
Not yet. Waiting for 12k.

>> No.54897108

>>54896305
but that chart was invalidated some time ago

>> No.54897144

>>54896423
Do you understand how a y-axis works?
The prices at the beginning of the red line are much better places to buy than the beginning of the red line.

>> No.54897147
File: 58 KB, 1012x558, 1663299692214433.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897147

>>54897066
Binance signalled 8k would be the bottom. Regardless, if it drops below 15.5k it definitely won't stop anywhere above 10k.

>> No.54897353

>>54897147
>>54897269
desperation, pass it on

>> No.54897365

>>54897353
He's just coping with thinking btc would drop from 15k to 10k and missing out on an easy 2x. He and every other retard.

>> No.54897399
File: 3 KB, 1134x80, 8k Binance August 2022.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897399

>>54897365
Wrong. Anons have been talking about the 8k signal on Binance LOOONG before BTC hit 15.5k. Picrel for example. That's August 2022 -- 15.5k happened in November 2022.

>> No.54897415

>>54897399
ok, and anons in 2022 are not anons in 2018. The board is flooded with retards and you decided to put your faith in proof of social consensus even after the board changed. You may as well just write reddit collectively predicted a 10k bottom, because they overwhelmingly did and none of them bought at 15k.

>> No.54897462

>>54897415
I said nothing about 2018. You claim anons now talking about the 8k signal on Binance is anons just coping because they missed buying at 15k. Which I showed you is false. It's a continuation of anons talking about it pre-15.5k. If you think anons talking about the 8k signal is something that began after 15.5k then you're very new to /biz/.

>> No.54897496
File: 3 KB, 819x98, 8k Binance September 2022.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897496

>>54897399
Another example. The 8k signalled mentioned in September.

>> No.54897506

>>54897462
You are coping so hard it's unreal.
Guy in picrel? Probably also didn't buy at 15k. Probably won't buy the next dump bottom either because it's not hitting his favorite number and he and you will seethe eternally for it.

>> No.54897517

Sometime shortly after the next halving, the average two income household with no kids won't be able to afford 1 bitcoin. Until then it's a buy. If you're taking 10% price flunctuations seriously then you need to spend a solid hour meditating on the fact that there will only ever be 21 million bitcoin and what that means for a planet of 8 billion people.

>> No.54897540
File: 5 KB, 548x208, 8k Binance August 2022 - 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897540

>>54897506
Again, your claim was that anons now talking about the 8k signal on Binance is anons coping because they missed buying at 15k, implying talking about the 8k signal is something new. Which I showed you is false.

Quote: >>54897365
>He's just coping with thinking btc would drop from 15k to 10k and missing out on an easy 2x
And that narrative got insta-destroyed by: >>54897399 >>54897496 and picrel, another example.

>> No.54897563
File: 3 KB, 795x115, 8k Binance July 2022.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897563

>>54897399
>>54897496
>>54897540
Yet another example. July.

>> No.54897567

>>54897540
The prediction is fail. I did not ever claim that anons back then were coping. I am claiming that anons today are coping. See >>54897365, he referring to you. Today. Right now. The entire pump from 15-30k you seethed about it.
It is not my fault you struggle to read.

You believe that you can never be wrong, but unfortunately you can, and you were.

>>54897563
Please get therapy.

>> No.54897595

>>54897540
no, retard. Saying that they are posting that shit NOW after missing the 15k bottom doesn't imply that no one ever said 8k before lmao, what fucking logic is that? Also you are always gonna find post scalling literally every possible number, someone called 0, 1k, 2k, 3k etc. Absolute fucking nobrain retard

>> No.54897601
File: 2 KB, 523x98, 8k Binance August 2022 - 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897601

>>54897567
>I did not ever claim that anons back then were coping.
Nobody said you did. You want people to think anons talking about the 8k signal is something new which began after BTC hit 15.5k, which is totally false.

Here's another example from August. The 8k signal was posted about many times prior to BTC dumping to 15.5k.

>> No.54897617

>>54897595
>Saying that they are posting that shit NOW after missing the 15k bottom doesn't imply that no one ever said 8k before lmao
That's exactly what it implies and what this anon: >>54897365 clearly wants people to think. The only alternative is that he's so extremely new he actually wasn't aware people talked about the 8k signal long before BTC went to 15.5k.

>> No.54897623

>>54897601
It doesn't matter if the prediction was made a year ago, the prediction is failing and it will continue to fail. 15k is the bottom.
You demonstrate a complete lack of logic every time you start arguing so I am discontinuing this discussion, you are simply impossibly close minded even when evidence is growing larger that you are and were wrong. The fact that you even think making a prediction in the past is proof of anything when the prediction hasn't even come true is absolutely astounding. Truly, proof of social consensus is an 80 IQ model.

>> No.54897628

>>54897601
>You want people to think anons talking about the 8k signal is something new
no one ever said that. You are missing a brain or the capability to read. There's nothing in this thread that implies something like that. You literally don't understand words

>> No.54897641

The multi posting is getting to levels not seen ever on this board. Desperation, knowledge about what is coming, for some an OD, others end in a ditch and some will be found guilty killing their children and wont remeber

>> No.54897649

>>54897623
>15k is the bottom
If it is, doesn't change the fact people discussed the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit.
>It doesn't matter if the prediction was made a year ago
Now you're conceding and admitting defeat. Glorious. Victory accepted.

>> No.54897663
File: 1.95 MB, 2000x1706, 5a3f5c4266f5f8667932e08ab632e834adb0f200.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897663

>>54897649
>doesn't change the fact people discussed the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit
lmao you truly are retarded. I do feel a bit sorry for you.

>> No.54897667

SHIB volume goin crazy rn

>> No.54897700

>>54897649
>Tom, Jerry and Kyle said X because of reason Y
>but but but someone else also said X, way before Y happened!
SO WHAT?
What does that have to do with anything that was said?
It wasn't implied that THE ONLY POSSIBLE REASON to say X is Y. He says that Tom, Jerry and Kyle SPECIFICALLY are NOW saying X because of Y. IT DOESN'T SAY THAT Y IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE REASON IN HISTORY WHY SOMEONE CAN POSSIBLY SAY X.
THIS DOES NOT EXISTS outside your mind.
This implication IS NOT in the text.
THE FACT THAT SOMEONE SAID X BEFORE DOESN'T MEAN IN ANY WAY THAT THE REASON WHY TOM, JERRY AND KYLE SAID X - TODAY - IS NOT Y.
ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARD

>doesn't change the fact people discussed the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit.
Yeah, which is completely irrelevant, because it doesn't say anything about the reasons why OTHER PEOPLE are saying the same thing NOW (which could be TOTALLY DIFFERENT).

Use
your
fucking
brain

>> No.54897712
File: 33 KB, 303x298, 1680620819824504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897712

>>54897628
Anon 1 posts about the 8k signal >>54897147
Anon 2 claims posting about the 8k signal is just coping by anons who didn't buy at 15.5k: >>54897365 <-- showing he's either trying to mislead people into believing "copers who didn't buy at 15.5k invented 8k-signal-posting", or that he genuinely wasn't aware it's been discussed for months on /biz/ prior to the dump which took BTC to 15.5k.

>>54897663
>gets told: "doesn't change the fact people discussed the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit"
>says "lmao you truly are retarded"
Proof I'm correct, that people discussed the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit: >>54897399 >>54897496 >>54897540 >>54897563 >>54897601

You lose, tranime poster.

>> No.54897738
File: 23 KB, 804x440, tranime.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897738

>>54897700
We should try to be more patient, even though he is retarded it is not nice to yell at him. He doesn't know better. You can tell what he's writing makes no sense and the only possible explanation is that he is fundamentally incapable of understanding, most likely dropped on the head as a baby or similar.

>>54897712
>tra nime
Nevermind, fuck you retard. Not responding to your retarded strawmen again either.

>> No.54897744
File: 22 KB, 384x384, 1662471895707798.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897744

>>54897700
>Yeah
So you too now admit anons on /biz/ have indeed been talking about the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit. I accept your defeat. This was a super easy and fast victory. D-d-d-d-d-double kill.

>> No.54897756

>>54896305
i've lost track of how many times this stupid chart has been retroactively modified

>> No.54897760
File: 1.49 MB, 545x574, 1673723430941392.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897760

>>54897663

>> No.54897763

>>54897712
nope, big fucking retard
>copers who didn't buy at 15.5k invented
"invented" was never ever used. You are the only one reading that word. But at this point i'm pretty sure you are trolling, so just fuck off

>> No.54897764

>>54896423
Holy fuck crypto incels seething

>> No.54897767
File: 820 KB, 1540x1222, 1677105739628724.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897767

>>54897738

>> No.54897773

>>54897744
>So you too now admit anons on /biz/ have indeed been talking about the 8k signal long before 15.5k was hit.
The opposite was never ever said tho.
So you admit you should die suffering horribly and that you have severe brain damage. I fully accept that.

>> No.54897798

10 emotional desperate griever posts by one id trying to spam a narrative. Spring 2019 meets summer 2013

>> No.54897866

>>54897798
If you want some more 10k autist seething, enjoy.
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/53234303
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/53292709#p53292967

>> No.54897882
File: 16 KB, 320x320, 1606369971614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54897882

Should I DCA in BTC or ETH? I can afford more ETH so in theory that should lead to more gains post-halving, but if BTC breaks some crazy new ATH like 1mil I don't want to miss out. Was 15K the bottom?

>> No.54898346

>>54897882
You should have started dca 10 months ago

>> No.54898369

>>54897882
eth is a shitcoin, always was always will be no matter how many layers of ponzinomics. Unless you want to lose your money in a corpo scammer rug pull, only btc

>> No.54898623

>>54896305
the lgbt chart is fake and gay, it failed and was then altered to cover up its failure

>> No.54898960

>>54897798
clearly all that guy did was show the truth; he shilled no narrative nor did he voice any opinions