they will say we were lucky

[Anonymous No.54887573]

[Anonymous No.54887589]

What's 4.75% of 0 (Chainshit's future value)

[Anonymous No.54887616]

I dont feel that lucky
Six figure hell is not an easy task

[Anonymous No.54887637]

>>54887573
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude we got bank interest rates on our altcoin!!!!

>underlying goes down 90%

>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuude itsthhhh a consthpirathy!!!!

Your brain in a cuckold cult

[Anonymous No.54887649]

>>54887573
We were lucky:
>lucky to be on /biz/ when everyone else was on bitcointalk
>lucky to be here at the right time (2017)
>lucky that 2017 was a long bull when you could make gains even as an ignorant gambling retard, which is the most dangerous and precipitous time to be an investor
>lucky to have a group of people willing to do the work to go breadcrumbing, summarizing, shill pasta-ing, for no monetary or even clout rewards, purely to feed into a niche group of anons
>lucky to get into the presale pools that we overfilled without getting rugged
>lucky to have a group of anons through that whole critical early period who would argue, debate and answer questions, fast tracking our understanding of the magnitude and significance of the oracle problem
>lucky that Chainlink launched at a time when ICOs allowed full public entry, and when big projects launched at reasonable caps to make gains ($100m. These days LINK would have launched at a cap >$1b)

We were extremely lucky to exist at a crucial nexus in time when public access to these products was even possible at very early stage (compare to today's endless seed rounds before opening to the public at massive valuations) and when the VCs didn't have their claws in absolutely everything.
Yes, to be here now with 7,000 LINK staked you also had to be smart, patient, and exercise extremely good judgment and low time preference through many crazy events, but on top of that, anon, we are all very lucky to be here.

[Anonymous No.54887673]

>>54887573
H-Haha yeah..

[Anonymous No.54887674]

>>54887573

[Anonymous No.54887700]

>>54887616
sure but it's a hell of a lot better than what 99% of people have out there
just relax and wait for next bull
those with 10k make it next bull
and that's without build rewards which could be very nice

[Anonymous No.54887712]

>>54887673
Why dump?

[Anonymous No.54887714]

>>54887573
>>54887649
>>54887674
god speed marines

[Anonymous No.54887741]

>>54887589
>>54887637
>>54887673
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE!

[Anonymous No.54888155]

>>54887589
>What's 4.75% of 0 (Chainshit's future value)

[Anonymous No.54888195]

>unironically investing in “”””utility coins”””” in 2023

[Anonymous No.54889109]

>>54887589
Billion or so

[Anonymous No.54889127]

>>54887673
Just bought some thanks

[Anonymous No.54889141]

Just need to read >>54888888
Hope it says something bout lunc

[Anonymous No.54889788]

>>54887573
They will say I'm retarded. I had a similar stack and sold it all for under 1000 doll hairs.

[Anonymous No.54889796]

>>54887573
how is losing all your money lucky?

[Anonymous No.54889917]

new yearly low in sats and gwei
when does the pain stop

[Anonymous No.54889947]

Why not HODL just like 20 or 30 LINK? It's not even that much, but it could go up a lot

[Anonymous No.54889977]

>>54887649
>lucky that Chainlink launched at a time when ICOs allowed full public entry, and when big projects launched at reasonable caps to make gains ($100m. These days LINK would have launched at a cap >$1b)
This one truly feel surreal, and sad that it's over.
I can't believe how disgustingly closed the whole system became.
I wonder if true sybil resistance with identity on chain will maybe solve this or will VC parasites find another way to shutter it.
I truly don't believe Bankless, Sassano and their likes have anything more to offer than the average early /biz/raeli if even 1%. The fact they're in so many seed rounds and even have a fund now is disgusting.

[Anonymous No.54890042]

>>54889977
You can see the influence of govt heavies on them.
"You can keep developing, but from now on everything with actual potential will be VCs and insiders only, and by the time it goes public we'll launch it such a high cap that retail will no longer be able to make it from fundamentals investing and research alone."

What was the point of knowing everything about Arbitrum since 2019 if you're only allowed in with all the plebs, years later, at a $1b cap? Same goes for Aztec Connect, Fuel, Celestia and so many others. Shit I would have bought and held in 2017 as ICOs, now has already been out for years, clearly serious projects, and the only news is "We've closed another $100m seed round with the usual suspects".
And all of those "usual suspects" are dead silent because, despite being vocal mouthpieces for muh decentralised future, they were all allowed in seed.
Retail access to opportunity in crypto has been absolutely kneecapped, and there's nearly nobody to speak up about it because the number of people who understand it, but aren't insiders themselves, is extremely small.
Oh but you can still buy PepElon, don't worry.

[Anonymous No.54890075]

>>54890042
Yeah but link scammed their investors
>down 90 and never going up again

[Anonymous No.54890107]

>>54890042
Why do teams keep doing this thought? It doesn't make sense at all. If you'd be to launch something tomorrow why not make a fucking ICO, the stigma associated with it? It opens up to so much capital.

>>54890075
All anons that matter on this board bought in 2017 between 20 and 60 cents, nobody cares.

[Anonymous No.54890111]

>>54887573
Hopefully they won’t even know at all because they were distracted by AI and other shinier things

[Anonymous No.54890120]

>>54890107
100% due to regulatory pressure. US govt would be leaning on teams saying all early investors need to be KYC, which you can't do in a public ICO.
It's win/win for the govt as they get to basically control who makes it and who doesn't, by dictating that only KYC'ed and "approved" VCs and insiders are allowed in, at which point it just turns into "accredited investors 2.0".

[Anonymous No.54890162]

>>54890107
>All anons that matter on this board bought in 2017 between 20 and 60 cents, nobody cares.
I bought then and I care a lot, speak for yourself

[Anonymous No.54890956]

>>54887637
Chainlink is unironically a cuckold paypig cult

They're happy to wank their flaccid penis thinking about their measly 4% APY while their shitcoin keeps underperforming the market

[Anonymous No.54891197]

>>54887573
They certainly will.

[Anonymous No.54891242]

>>54890107
I bought at 10 cents at ICO and I also care very much. Where are you getting your info? Whoever it is, fire their ass.

[Anonymous No.54891522]

>>54890107
LOL so youre down millions and dont care? That doesnt make sense