/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.54876143]

>this makes the bitfuck seethe

[Anonymous No.54876157]

>erc-20 scammers getting desperate
You have been such a source of amusement for the last week
The suspension of search function for non account holders made ct the exit liquidity. Go there but likely you came from there

[Anonymous No.54876177]

>>54876157
>The suspension of search function for non account holders
just use nitter

also you didn't prove my point at all and I never mentioned erc20 tokens, but I guess you proved my point

[Anonymous No.54876198]

>>54876143
Lol better sell within the next 20 years, dont forget champ

[Anonymous No.54876199]

>>54876177
Wut. Me and 99% of people that never use twitter outside a quick search know about whatever. Go back

[Anonymous No.54876201]

>>54876177
you didn't deboonk this thread*

[Anonymous No.54876208]

>>54876143
Fiat has no bottom.

[Anonymous No.54876209]

>>54876199
It was you that brought up twitter and now you want to act like you don't use it, deranged bitshit

[Anonymous No.54876210]

You didn't adjust for inflation in the year 2136. How can I take this seriously?

[Anonymous No.54876213]

>>54876143
those prices seems to prove hyperbitcoinization will happen

[Anonymous No.54876223]

>>54876208
>>54876210
>energy prices will inflate 2^27 broo
not true and not relevant

[Anonymous No.54876222]

>>54876209
Because you erc-20 scammers all congregated there. The only ones seething about btc are erc-20 scammers from ct that see views and interactions on their advertising profiles plummetting

[Anonymous No.54876227]

>>54876222
I've been on biz for years and I don't care for ethereum, what now?

[Anonymous No.54876237]

They can just add tail emissions. Pretty obvious it's going to have to happen eventually, assuming Bitcoin is still relevant in a couple decades, hasn't been banned/switched to PoS by then, etc.

[Anonymous No.54876249]

>>54876227
Sure buddy that's why you made a seeth thread about btc

[Anonymous No.54876256]

>>54876237
>bitcoin should become an infinite supply shitcoin
but how are we going to fud monero after that bitcuck sisters ?

[Anonymous No.54876263]

>>54876223
Alright bro but I swear if 2136 comes and you're wrong I'm going to be angry!

[Anonymous No.54876266]

>>54876237
that is implying that bitcoin maxis would want to hard fork which historically they've been opposed to, see >>54876256


>>54876249
can you argue why I'm wrong? you've posted 4 times this far and haven't said anything of value, just random assumption adhoms

[Anonymous No.54876286]

>>54876223
Screencapped, gonna make you look retarded as fuck when you're wrong in 100 years

[Anonymous No.54876299]

>>54876286
kek

[Anonymous No.54876308]

>>54876266
Why should I provide genuine feedback for free to your seeth thread? So no I wont and just call you a seething ct erc-20 (((meme)))coin faggot

[Anonymous No.54876337]

>>54876308
>implying I'm the one seething while malding as we speak
>implying I use crypto twitter by the fact I post on biz in 2023
>implying I care or advocate for efferium tokens
>implying memes are a jewish concept
>still can't deboonk and lashes out because his laser eyes investment is mathematically doomed
meds. NOW.

[Anonymous No.54876362]

>>54876337
>Nou
>Nou
>Nou
>Nou
So discord. Sorry then erc20 scammer

[Anonymous No.54876371]

>>54876362

[Anonymous No.54876373]

>>54876143
>fees per block rn are like 1btc
>in 1 halving probably half the block reward will be from fees
>in 2 halving the majority of block reward will be from fees

We NeEd a TaIL emIsSion!!!1

[Anonymous No.54876385]

still crying?
must be feeling the pressure now taproot has shown bitcoin can be a sink for arbitrary on-chain activity.
the already obsolete security argument now completely btfo with no exception.

enjoy those heavy bags of whatever -70% in btc ath alt you';re holding.

[Anonymous No.54876393]

>>54876266

It's only a hard fork if the mining community disagrees with a new feature and choose not to participate in the updated blockchain. You really think the people who hold all the hashing and voting power in the network (ie. miners) are going to oppose tail emissions or anything else that would make their mining more profitable if Bitcoin ever gets to a point where it's unsustainable?

[Anonymous No.54876400]

imagine posting something that projects out more than 100 years and not factoring in the potential for new energy-related technologies over that timeframe

what a laughable midwit post. You don't know what will happen 10 years from now let alone 100+

[Anonymous No.54876405]

>>54876373
fees per block is 3.125BTC and outside of this temporary ordinals craze noone really does use it because of "muh SoV" so where would this fee market magically appear from?

[Anonymous No.54876414]

So you're saying I'm gonna be a gigagorillionaire?

[Anonymous No.54876496]

>>54876385
>BTC will be saved by "inscripted sats" that are cheaper than normal transactions size wise

the absolute state

[Anonymous No.54876521]

>>54876393
Miners do not vote holy fucking shit /biz/ doesn't know the first motherfucking thing about bitcoin

[Anonymous No.54876554]

>>54876521
>Miners do not vote holy fucking shit /biz/ doesn't know the first motherfucking thing about bitcoin

???

Who you YOU think has the final say and approval in BIPs then anon?

[Anonymous No.54876574]

>>54876554
Nodes you stupid nigger

[Anonymous No.54876596]

>>54876574

Lmao miners are the ones who create blocks, not nodes. If the miner community doesn't agree with a BIP they can just choose not to upgrade and mine on the newer version and hardfork the chain. At the end of the day it's the miners with all the power, they're the ones that secure and keep the network running. And as it should be, they're also the ones with the largest costs and most skin in the game.

[Anonymous No.54876612]

The real bitcoin died in the segwit fork. 1f u kn0w u kn0w.

[Anonymous No.54876614]

>>54876596
You're absolute newfaggotry is showing. Please learn how bitcoin works before posting on /biz/ again

[Anonymous No.54876627]

>>54876596
https://dailybitcoiner.substack.com/p/td-the-blocksize-wars-cyber-soldier?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=direct

Please look into the blocksize war you absolute newfag shitcoiner mong

[Anonymous No.54876643]

>>54876223
they already have in the past 100 years you fucking mongrel. The XAUUSD peg has seen the USD devalued by 99.9%. The economy only functions because there is no free market and central banks have a monopoly on money.

[Anonymous No.54876670]

>>54876627

And what, pray tell, would nodes do if miners took all their hash and computing power over to the forked chain? But please tell me more about how miners don't have the final say and all the leverage.

Miners begrudgingly went along with user initiated proposals in the past because they could still profit and make money. There's no guarantee they would go along with future ones if that was no longer the case.

[Anonymous No.54876685]

>>54876670
They'd lose all of their money like BCH and all the other shit forks lol

[Anonymous No.54876733]

>>54876670
This is literally baby's first bitcoin level stuff brother

[Anonymous No.54876867]

>>54876143
This is idiotic.
And is apparently based on the (incorrect) assumption that Bitcoin's hashrate is static.