Seriously, what happened to the Google "Partnership"

[Anonymous No.54770851]

Did Sergey ever apologize for the deception that pumped his bags to ATH?

[Anonymous No.54770878]

>>54770851
oh look at all these desperate attempts to astroturf the JUMP news lmao.
Maybe pick something less gigabullish for LINK next time, retard.
>https://medium.com/google-cloud/on-chain-web3-marketing-with-google-and-chainlink-ca37dcb83f94

[Anonymous No.54770884]

>>54770851
They are still working with SWIFT on the PoC and directly working with Google Cloud

[Anonymous No.54770904]

Imagine being a professional astroturfer and waltzing into the asshole of the internet expecting easy victory, and just getting fucking dabbed on by unemployed autistic shut-ins kek. I love this timeline so much.

[Anonymous No.54770909]

>>54770884
yeah i partner with google cloud too to run my ~5 visitor / month website lol

[Anonymous No.54770912]

>>54770851
D

[Anonymous No.54770924]

>>54770878
So when I use a Google search engine to look up something I am in a "partnership" with Google? is that how it works in the world of enterprise?

[Anonymous No.54770944]

fuck you jump niggers

[Anonymous No.54770947]

>>54770924
No but when the inventor of Google Cloud datasets says:
>Google Cloud and Chainlink have a rich and long-standing collaboration unlocking hybrid blockchain/cloud applications through the combination of Google Cloud’s Public Datasets Program and Chainlink oracles.
Then you have a partnership.

[Anonymous No.54770963]

>>54770878
>>54770904
it's Jump TRADE you lazy fag, how are people gonna be aware of who (((our))) common enemy is if you don't name them properly?
also, you forgot to post the jeet CEO's face, don't get lazy now

[Anonymous No.54770967]

>>54770909
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwryDKQ7NNU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCGrRknomcg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG-ODpYRREQ

[Anonymous No.54770993]

This was a hilarious demolition. Watch them try to slide it.

[Anonymous No.54770996]

>>54770851
>he happened

[Anonymous No.54771024]

>>54770851
DO YOU FEEL LIKE YOUR QUESTION HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY ANSWERED, ANON? DO YOU FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE A DECENT ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF "WHAT HAPPENED TO THE GOOGLE PARTNERSHIP?" THAT YOU WERE SO SERIOUS ABOUT GETTING AN ANSWER FOR?

[Anonymous No.54771025]

also for any newfags lurking, all of this is 3 year old FUD from Zeus Capital (NEXO) which literally got raided by FBI lol

https://zeus-capital.com/assets/The_Chainlink_Fraud_Exposed.pdf

[Anonymous No.54771042]

>i open my google weather app
>i am partnered with google
xD

[Anonymous No.54771096]

What happened to the partnership, bros? Seriously what happened to it?

[Anonymous No.54771142]

>>54770947
OP BLOWN THE FUCK OUT!!!!!

[Anonymous No.54771158]

>>54771142
He "seriously" wanted to know and I seriously told him and then suddenly he disappeared. Very surprising! I suppose he was happy with the answers and went on its way kek. Sure would be a shame if people bumped this thread for a while lmao

[Anonymous No.54771200]

>>54770904
kek

[Anonymous No.54771253]

The utter state of fudfags, have a bump OP. Better luck next time

[Anonymous No.54771256]

>>54771158
It's probably the same schizo that is on biz 247 spamming this shit, it's more amusing than anything at this point, well done anon

[Anonymous No.54771282]

>>54771158
Based knowledge giver

[Anonymous No.54771286]

>>54770878
This was less than two months ago even
This thread sucks

[Anonymous No.54771298]

>>54770947
kek based, OP buttblasted into the next dimension.

[Anonymous No.54771389]

>>54770878
>>54770904
>>54770947
>>54770993
>>54771024
>>54771096
>>54771158
based
fudcucks spend thousands of hours of their lives spamming biz for pretty much no results and they can't even come up with believable lies
they're the cockroaches and lolcows of biz - lower forms of life than internet janitors

[Anonymous No.54771409]

>>54771389
Who would have thought that such low forms of life could even exist..

[Anonymous No.54771430]

>>54770878
>gigabullish for Link
okay cuck, is this chart gigabullish? lol

[Anonymous No.54771465]

>>54771025
Based Bulgarians

You cuckolds will never make it because of some small Balkanic country, how does it feel?

[Anonymous No.54771510]

WHERE ARE YOU OP DID I ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? COME BACK I JUST WANNA TALK

[Anonymous No.54771878]

>>54771465
>You cuckolds will never make it because of some small Balkanic country, how does it feel?

[Anonymous No.54771941]

>>54771878

[Anonymous No.54771960]

>>54771941
>t.

[Anonymous No.54771978]

I wonder if the inventor of Google Cloud datasets saying:
>Google Cloud and Chainlink have a rich and long-standing collaboration unlocking hybrid blockchain/cloud applications through the combination of Google Cloud’s Public Datasets Program and Chainlink oracles
was a good enough answer to OPs serious question. I sure hope so, he seemed legitimately concerned.

[Anonymous No.54772043]

>>54771978
>Google Cloud
https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/04/27/google-cloud-partners-with-polygon-labs-adding-yet-again-to-its-growing-roster-of-web3-firms/
buy matic

[Anonymous No.54772551]

>>54771430
>solid consolidation after a huge run-up
>id dis gigaboolsh?
Yes.

[Anonymous No.54772829]

>>54770851
I have a partnership with Google for my email account and to upload my audiovisual content

[Anonymous No.54772845]

>>54770851
Google left Chainlink because project was incompetent. They are moving to SupraOracles now for best oracles in blockchain

[Anonymous No.54772856]

>>54772551
>consolidation
You’re a retard

[Anonymous No.54772861]

>>54770996
Did this chad jeet really make Sergey his bitch?

[Anonymous No.54773223]

>>54772856
>pull-back into price stabilization is not consolidation because... well, uh...
>BECAUSE IT JUST ISN'T OK!?!?

[Anonymous No.54773268]

>khater 2.0

[Anonymous No.54773344]

>>54770851
Lol OP you are such a fucking loser its painful

[Anonymous No.54773741]

>>54772856
>You’re a retard

[Anonymous No.54773788]

OP cannot recover from this holy kek ive never witnessed anyone get btfo so hard

[Anonymous No.54773803]

>>54771024
I like the cut of your jib

[Anonymous No.54773897]

>>54770993
I don't actually see any evidence of a partnership with Google.
May we see some credible evidence?
Be advised that a Twitter screen cap of a literal who having a personal opinion is not a credible argument.
Partnerships are legally binding formal agreements with paperwork and disclosures.
Where are they?

[Anonymous No.54773923]

>>54771978
That doesn't sound like a partnership at all. Where is the corporate announcement from Google of such a collaboration?
Links pajeet coders using some Google feature don't make a partnership.

[Anonymous No.54774136]

>>54772551
>solid consolidation
fancy word for cuckold bagholder

[Anonymous No.54774254]

>>54773897
>>54773923
>I don't actually see

[Anonymous No.54774321]

>>54774136
>being so cucked by winners holding link
>posts an unrelated, dissimilar chart in hopes nobody will notice

[Anonymous No.54774407]

>>54770851
I feel like the crypto community should be a tad more forgiving and patient when discussing these sort of things. I mean LINK is actually one of the top coins in the tech they're offering and yet people act like the devs are gods and can't make mistakes. It's the same shit with ETH and the 2.0 release where everyone was left dissatisfied even tho the changes allowed for platforms like 0X0 to arise and a new wave of DEX to be created to basically amp the farming and pool system. I've been using it since it launched and it's honestly game changer and yet linkies on this board can't wait a bit for more development to be made on the top coin? This gets me down bros

[Anonymous No.54775624]

>>54774407
>I feel like the crypto community should be a tad more patient
Yes.

[Anonymous No.54775815]

>>54774407
>I mean LINK is actually one of the top coins in the tech they're offering

Their "tech" has no purpose (evidence: no one is actually paying Chainlink a single dollar for their software services), the token isn't needed except as a funding token for Sergey to buy more celebrity endorsements and keep looking for new, fraudulent "use cases".

This scam is located offshore because everything they do is basically illegal in every jurisdiction in the world that matters. You simply can't print your own security, and then dump 30% of it to the public and pretend you have no legal obligations.

BTW, what the FUGG happened to the Gravelcoin partnership? Or the Oracle partnership? Or the Google partnership or SWIFT?

You see, in reality, Chainlink is a Vechain type model whereby they dangle some fabulous "use case" carrot on a stick, the paypigs fund it, Sergey buys himself another celebrity endorsement or shovels tokens to some literal who data aggregator which then allows him to proclaim another "PARTNERSHIP". There's no business activity here besides dumping premined trash tokens (illegal) and offering no value or services in return.

[Anonymous No.54775826]

>>54771024
Nowhere has the question been answered. Show me one iota of evidence that Google (the corporation) has even acknowledged Chain.stink.

[Anonymous No.54776293]

>>54775815
>>54775826
>evidence: no one is actually paying Chainlink a single dollar for their software services
>Show me one iota of evidence that Google (the corporation) has even acknowledged Chain
You can bring a retard to water,
but you can't force it to not dehydrate to death.

[Anonymous No.54777522]

>>54773788
XDXD haha he got dabbed on so hard

[Anonymous No.54777545]

>>54776293
>>54777522
>Still got nothing.

So if you can't at least prove the Google partnership hoax, I can prove the very real Gravelcoin partnership.

Do you remember Gravelcoin? What do you make of the partnership?

[Anonymous No.54777551]

>>54777545
>lets put the goalposts over there now please and talk about something else
lmao absolutely writhing

[Anonymous No.54777573]

>>54777551
No, by all means, go ahead, show us the evidence for the primary question posed in OP and show us a formal agreement between Google and Chainlink.

I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.54777626]

>>54777573
you can't reason with bagholders, they're dumb as shit.

Linkies take the cake for being smug midwits who think they know what they're talking about (they don't). They married their bags like a bunch of cucks and will keep hoping for the meme $1000 EOY which will never happen

[Anonymous No.54777632]

>>54777573
lmao keep bumping the thread, bro, you're doing great

[Anonymous No.54777634]

Allow me to educate you LINKcels. I will get an answer directly from Alphabet themselves through their Investor Relations office.
Be prepared for the Final Solution to the LINKcel problem on this board.

[Anonymous No.54777672]

You can't reason with FUDfags, they're dumb ass shit.
FUDfags take the dick for being smug midwits who think they know what they're talking about (they don't). They married their fudbags like a bunch of cucks and will keep seething knowing anons hold link.
>Verification not requried.

[Anonymous No.54777695]

>pay for Google BigQuery
>Were partnered with Google!!!
Uhhh.....

[Anonymous No.54777837]

>>54777634
Let's resolve this matter once and for all, shall we?

>>54776293
>>54777522
Be ready to eat your words you worthless incel.

[Anonymous No.54777859]

>>54777672
>DAILY REMINDER
LINK IS A SINGLE
DIGIT
C U C K O L D
TOKEN

[Anonymous No.54777862]

>>54777837
jesus fucking christ dude run that through GPT4 at least, your writing is absolute garbage. Are you 15?

[Anonymous No.54777869]

>>54777672
Tiktok Linkcel.
For someone who has no information about any of the alleged "partnerships" you sure have a big fucking mouth.

Why don't you put out, big boy? Put out like your mother did.

[Anonymous No.54777880]

>>54777837
>thanks in advance
are you 12 or just dumb?

[Anonymous No.54777884]

>>54777862
Seething Linkcels. This is gonna be good when I shut down the game of partnership stick and carrot.

[Anonymous No.54777891]

>>54777880
If you had worked a day in your life and interacted with real people in the physical world, you would know how to speak to people. Now sit in the corner linkcel.

[Anonymous No.54777907]

>>54777634
>>54777837
>EST
>favour
Leaf detected

[Anonymous No.54777908]

>>54777869
>tellor
lmaooo Chris Blec come fetch my food

[Anonymous No.54777915]

>>54770947

[Anonymous No.54777929]

>>54777907
Are you ready Linkcel? Just IMAGINE what will happen to your bags once I get a definitive answer.

You might want to start rehearsing some kind of coping mechanism. Something, something Bulgarians, Zeus Capital, niggers? Eh? Linkcel? What do you say?

[Anonymous No.54777934]

[Anonymous No.54777949]

>>54777929
Are you michael the chink from Ontario?

[Anonymous No.54777952]

all this cope posting by baggies doesn't move the needle at all on the chart
you guys are desperate to keep your safe space for what end? nobody with wealth are going to buy your bags because of some schizo posts on 4chan. the fud might at least save some people from being unintentional exit liquidity, but it's equally pointless discussion.

[Anonymous No.54777998]

>>54777949
Nope.
Alberta oilfield chad.
We make real things that allow you wimpy betas to get heat in your masturbation caves in the winter.

[Anonymous No.54778014]

>>54777952
>the fud might at least save some people from being unintentional exit liquidity, but it's equally pointless discussion.

It's obvious that this 2017-tier ICO shitcoin will never see an ATH ever again. It failed to do so in the absolutely manic, excessive 2020-2021 period. It's literally over.
But I do this just to remind the bagholders how badly they fucked up by holding this garbage through $40-50.

[Anonymous No.54778020]

>>54777998
I thought the time read 8:11 not 18:11. Alberta sucks ass and you got hilariously btfo itt

[Anonymous No.54778036]

>>54770851
open a google cloud account....it s partnership.... just hold guys...

[Anonymous No.54778038]

>>54778020
Not a single shred of evidence was posted here by the Linkcels. You colossal fuck-ups can't even mount a credible defense of your bags. All you've got are Twitter screenshots and lame insults.

[Anonymous No.54778074]

>>54777929
>Just IMAGINE what will happen to your bags once I get a photoshopped email response that says "Token not needed."
unhinged

[Anonymous No.54778092]

>>54775826
Kek if Link holders aren't retarded, this should be the first thing to ask, it can't possibly be a partnership if it's not acknowledge from both end
I know a project partnered with Audi and their official twitter handle tweeted about it.

[Anonymous No.54778093]

>>54778074
That's a pretty good pre-cope.
Keep them coming.

[Anonymous No.54778148]

>>54778092
>Link holders aren't retarded

The smart ones have been gone since $40 LINK.
What's left is a cesspit of lesser intellects, incels, shut-ins and reddit-tier bagholders who will ride this down to zero. Every shitcoin since 2014 has a small community of hold-outs who go down with the ship (RIP Digimarines, press S to defecate on OMG bagholders).

[Anonymous No.54778172]

>>54770851
>>54770924
>>54775815
>>54775826
>>54777545
>>54777573
>>54777634
>>54777837
>>54777869
>>54777884
>>54777891
>>54777929
>>54777998
>>54778014
>>54778038
>>54778093
>>54778148
absolutely btfo by >>54770878
just pretends it never happens and tries to keep his retarded thread going 11 hours later
time for the pasta which is always extremely accurate

The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

[Anonymous No.54778192]

>>54778172
>https://medium.com/google-cloud/on-chain-web3-marketing-with-google-and-chainlink-ca37dcb83f94

Nope. This a blog.

>The tutorial below walks through how you can use Chainlink Functions to connect to Google Analytics data that has been uploaded to Google BigQuery and trigger on-chain smart contract logic based on this data.

It's equivalent to someone using Gmail or any other Google service at work and then claiming to be partnered with Google. I feel embarrassed for you.

[Anonymous No.54778225]

>>54778192
Who wrote the blog?

[Anonymous No.54778239]

>>54778192
referring to the poster, not that specific post you low iq piece of shit

[Anonymous No.54778267]

>>54778225
Why would it matter what some private person wrote in their spare time, advertising FREE Google services in the process?

The fact that you have no hard evidence of any tangible corporate partnership with your little pump and dump ICO scam is here for everyone to see.

[Anonymous No.54778299]

>>54778172
I think the jump thread really has them upset atm. Curious.
>>54778267
>19 pbtid over 11 hours
And thats just this thread alone.
That really is subhuman tier behaviour - becoming an internet jannie would be an upgrade for you roflmao.

[Anonymous No.54778308]

>>54778267
>Why would it matter
Look into it. See if it matters. It's literally been covered higher up in the thread already, so you can just reread this thread and you'll find out who wrote it and why it matters.

[Anonymous No.54778337]

>>54778092
has to be ride right anon? Seen it mentioned few times before but never really fancied showing interest

[Anonymous No.54778443]

>>54778148
In essence, there's no ray of hope for anyone still bag holding LINK?

[Anonymous No.54778457]

>>54778036
Can literally see the tears

[Anonymous No.54778473]

>>54778092
Basic knowledge and that's how it should be, if they aren't acknowledging in anyway and it's one sided then it's probably not a partnership

[Anonymous No.54778564]

>>54770851
How do we make LINK holders understand that it's over and they should give it up

[Anonymous No.54778575]

>>54778443
It's like holding a shitcoin that ended up rugging

[Anonymous No.54778579]

>>54770851
banned

[Anonymous No.54778581]

>>54778564
A soft exit scam is the best they can hope for. One day, 4-5 years from now, LINK will be quietly delisted and they'll find out months later because no one will be talking about this 1 year from now.

[Anonymous No.54778594]

>>54778337
If you like anything vr then you'd definitely find it interesting, I like that they're doing something different with the tech

[Anonymous No.54778602]

>>54778579
sorry, I was banned from /pol/ so now here I am, in the other hell. how we doing stinkies? I knew about LINK back in ether delta days, never bought, worked on my own blockchain, i knew about staking but didn't get in time to stake because was out without my computer, lessons learned I suppose. I'm almost at 2k! I'll stake with you guys next time probably. I'm happy you guys are the ones making it.

[Anonymous No.54778827]

>>54778602
Thanks anon that’s based of you to say