ICP IS NOW RANK #26

[Anonymous No.54646325]

AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU BRAINDEAD FUDDERS CAN DO ABOUT IT

[Anonymous No.54646340]

It's below fucking litecoin of all cryptos lmao

[Anonymous No.54646343]

>>54646325
WAGMI ICPCHADS

[Anonymous No.54646348]

>>54646325
cool I'm only down 150k

[Anonymous No.54646350]

>>54646325
So ICP will be rank 1 but the price will be $20

Fuck y’all for making me buy this coin

[Anonymous No.54646377]

>>54646325
Didn't they just change their definition of circulating supply specifically for this reason?

[Anonymous No.54646406]

>>54646325
>launched at $700
>now worth $6
>still rank 26
jesus christ this is garbage. when you promise decentralized front ends and deliver a KYC playpen instead, this is the least you deserve.

[Anonymous No.54646414]

so what exactly changed? only the amount of icp dfinity holds is non-circulating now? does staking on nns matter? i think around 50% is staked. how is it calculated for other chains?
t. 1k icp and retarded

[Anonymous No.54646425]

>>54646414
They just added another layer to the scam. Not worth paying attention too.
Price will dump now on the hype.

[Anonymous No.54646468]

I miss all the old people memes

[Anonymous No.54646478]

getting so many good screenshots for the inevitable "why did i trust icypiss" threads

[Anonymous No.54646501]

>>54646325
PEE PEE

[Anonymous No.54646658]

>>54646325
Feels good to be a pee chad

[Anonymous No.54647129]

>>54646325
Wallah, and just like that ICP will never be under rank 30 ever again. Top 10 end of year. Top 3 within 3 years.

[Anonymous No.54647469]

>>54646325
When will it pass shitlink?

[Anonymous No.54647514]

>>54647129
It's voila icpetard

[Anonymous No.54647580]

>>54646414
bro..
you had all this time
and you have
1k icp

imagine how much time you spent browsing these boards
the amount of time you spent reading up moonman archives
ouch

[Anonymous No.54648101]

>25

[Anonymous No.54648304]

>>54646414

https://forum.dfinity.org/t/circulating-supply-definition/19297

"As a follow up to NNS proposal 117360, DFINITY plans to update the Circulating Supply API within the next 24 hours per the new Circulating Supply definition. The change will be first reflected on the IC dashboard and then will propagate to coin aggregators on their subsequent data pulls (daily in most cases).

A Quick Recap

DFINITY recognized that the definition they chose for Circulating Supply (CS) at mainnet launch was (1) not aligned with ICP’s peers and (2) was overly complicated and confusing. After researching and discussing with major market leaders like Coin Market Cap, DFINITY recommended to the ICP community a change in the CS definition to define the metric as all tokens except the Foundation’s liquid tokens (Circulating Supply = [Total Supply] minus [Liquid Tokens Owned by the Foundation]). The new definition was recommended with the dual goals of (1) aligning to industry peers and (2) producing a simpler definition that is more understandable. The forum thread above captures the conversation around that discussion.

The high-level justifications for the chosen definition are:

ICP staked on the NNS is being used for the designed utility of the ICP token (governance participation) and therefore all tokens staked on the NNS should be included in the CS.
All staked tokens on the NNS are controlled by their owners (i.e., there are no escrow-like situations in which the token holder is not in control of actions taken to the token).
The industry tends to consider liquid tokens held by the foundations to be non-circulating.
After community discussion, DFINITY proposed to ratify the new definition with the NNS DAO through a motion proposal. That proposal was adopted 3 with 99.5% of votes in favor. DFINITY is now ready to execute the proposal by updating the circulating supply APIs."

[Anonymous No.54648456]

>>54646325
I guess the clown market will continue

[Anonymous No.54648470]

>>54648304
And wallah just like that ICP is now in the top 20. Suck it.

[Anonymous No.54648476]

I still can't tell if icpiss babies are actual anons or paid shills

[Anonymous No.54648560]

>>54648476
Even worse pol chuds, everyone that shills icp is racist

[Anonymous No.54648566]

>>54648476
I get paid daily from my neuron that holds 1488 ICP.

[Anonymous No.54648597]

>>54646406
And to think I almost considered buying at $50

[Anonymous No.54649570]

>>54646325
True, major gains are almost completely priced in. Enjoy tracking btc and ETH from now on.