/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.54385525]

The US would unironically start a nuclear war rather than lose the USD hegemony

[Anonymous No.54385556]

You don't understand. Just because countries are dumping trillions in US assets and trading without USD doesn't mean the USD will lose its status as the globally reserve currency. Thatcher, who has been dead for decades, said 40 years ago that there is no alternative, so that must still be true.

[Anonymous No.54385690]

>>54385556
Almost checked, so when exactly should I buy back into USD with EUR shitcoin?

[Anonymous No.54385741]

>>54385525
Yes. Nuke the chinks.

[Anonymous No.54385762]

We shall see.

[Anonymous No.54385839]

>>54385525
Good thing nukes aren't real.

[Anonymous No.54385989]

>>54385556
Now there is an alternative, too bad

[Anonymous No.54386092]

>>54385525
>nuclear war
Doubt it. What will probably happen is that BRICS countries and NATO countries (or "West vs East", whatever you wanna call it) will drift apart economically and politically somewhat but nothing extremely dramatic like that will happen.

[Anonymous No.54386173]

>>54386092
The us is starting to look like a hermit kingdom with nukes just like north Korea. Even north Korea has more allies.

[Anonymous No.54386198]

The US (aka smallhats)

[Anonymous No.54386210]

>>54385556
god the yurocope is strong today. keep up the copeposting bud!

[Anonymous No.54386292]

>>54385690

After this crypto boom. It’s time to stack shiny rocks

[Anonymous No.54386488]

It is highly unlikely that the US would start a nuclear war in order to maintain its hegemony over the USD. While the US has historically shown a willingness to use military force to protect its economic interests, such as in the case of the Gulf War, the use of nuclear weapons is widely considered to be a last resort due to the catastrophic and unpredictable consequences that would follow.

Furthermore, the global economy is highly interdependent, and a nuclear war would have devastating consequences not just for the US but for the entire world. It is in the interest of all nations to maintain stability and avoid armed conflict whenever possible.

Instead of resorting to extreme measures such as nuclear war, the US has a range of diplomatic and economic tools at its disposal to maintain its economic power and influence. This includes negotiating trade agreements, leveraging economic sanctions, and working with international organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

In summary, while the US may be willing to use military force to protect its economic interests, it is highly unlikely that it would resort to nuclear war to maintain its hegemony over the USD.

[Anonymous No.54386526]

>>54385556
>nothing has changed in 40 years
2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.54386539]

>>54386488
The US literally decides what that program can and cannot say you fruitbag.

[Anonymous No.54386562]

>>54385525
>The US would unironically start a nuclear war rather than lose the USD hegemony
Yes. And that's because losing the USD hegemony would be more catastrophic for the US than a nuclear war.

[Anonymous No.54386616]

The us lost is soft power. The only way it can regain it's soft power would be to turn communist.

[Anonymous No.54387009]

Instead of just selling the dollars on the open market they probably would use the dollars to buy up US assets. China buying $1 trillion in farmland and real estate makes more sense than just collapsing the US. Unless there is a military purpose behind it.

[Anonymous No.54387039]

>>54387009
Not everything happens in orderly fashion. Sometimes world leaders say fuck it and that feels good so let's do that.

[Anonymous No.54387063]

>>54386488
AIfag