AI has illogical argument.

[Anonymous No.54278515]

> can you tell me why is blockchain disruptive to our current financial system?

Yes, blockchain is disruptive to our current financial system because it offers several key benefits over traditional financial systems:
Decentralization: Blockchain is a decentralized technology, meaning that there is no central authority controlling the network. Instead, the network is maintained by a network of computers, making it more secure and less susceptible to hacking and fraud.
Transparency: All transactions on a blockchain are publicly visible, creating a transparent system where anyone can view the details of all transactions.
Security: Transactions on a blockchain are secured using advanced cryptographic techniques, making them virtually impossible to hack or tamper with.
Efficiency: Transactions on a blockchain can be processed much faster and with lower fees than traditional financial systems, which can take days to settle and charge high fees.
These benefits make blockchain an attractive alternative to our current financial system, which is centralized, opaque, and often slow and expensive. As a result, blockchain has the potential to disrupt the traditional banking system by offering faster, cheaper, and more secure financial transactions without the need for intermediaries. This could lead to greater financial inclusion, lower transaction costs, and a more open and transparent financial system.

> And with the reinvention of the banking system many will lose their lucrative and privilege positions where they print money out of thin air and use this money > to fund media and gain control over the minds of the people converting them into their own personal slaves and armies that they use to oppress the rest of the > people who want to be free from their practices of usury.
> This naturally causes them to seethe and cope which results in them flooding bots and agents into social media to try and demoralise and destroy online discourse.

[Anonymous No.54278537]

>>54278515
Continued...

While the potential disruption caused by blockchain and other decentralized technologies to our current financial system could lead to a shift in power away from traditional financial institutions, it is important to note that this is not a guaranteed outcome. The adoption and implementation of new technologies always involve a complex interplay of economic, political, and social factors, and the impact of blockchain on the financial system will depend on how it is used and regulated.
Additionally, the claims made about the banking system and their practices of usury, mind control, and oppression are not universally accepted and may not accurately reflect the reality of the situation. It is important to approach such claims critically and with a healthy dose of skepticism, and to seek out multiple sources of information before drawing conclusions.
As for the behavior of bots and agents on social media, this is a complex issue that is not unique to discussions about blockchain or finance. The use of automated and fake accounts to manipulate online discourse is a widespread problem that has been observed in many different contexts, and it is important to remain vigilant and skeptical of online content and sources.

> Well if the money that these banking cartels can print out of thin air are used to purchase media and then these media organisations are promoting the banks and attacking their competitors which is blockchain then its pretty obvious no?

It is true that media organizations can be influenced by financial interests and may promote certain narratives or agendas. However, it is also important to recognize that media organizations operate in complex economic, political, and social contexts that can influence their reporting and coverage.

[Anonymous No.54278549]

> If it is up for the individual to critically evaluate information then why do we need censorship?

Censorship is a complex issue with multiple perspectives and considerations. While it is true that individuals have a responsibility to critically evaluate information and sources, it is also important to recognize that not all information is accurate, truthful, or beneficial.

Censorship, when done appropriately and in accordance with established laws and ethical principles, can serve as a tool to protect individuals from harm and prevent the spread of misinformation and harmful content. For example, censorship can be used to prevent the spread of hate speech, propaganda, and disinformation that can incite violence, promote harmful ideologies, or undermine democratic institutions.

> misinformation that bankers claim is misinformation that are actually truths that expose their fraud and theft.

It is true that there are cases where individuals or groups may claim that information critical of them is "misinformation" in an attempt to suppress it or discredit it. This is why it is important for individuals to critically evaluate information from multiple sources and to be skeptical of claims made by those with vested interests in the outcome.

[Anonymous No.54278562]

When it comes to issues related to finance and banking, there is often a complex web of competing interests and perspectives at play. It is important for individuals to be aware of these factors and to approach information and sources with a healthy dose of skepticism and critical thinking. By doing so, individuals can better evaluate the veracity and significance of the information they encounter and make informed decisions based on the best available evidence.

> the multiple sources are often the same source just with the illusion of being different as they can purchase and buy out all the media orgs with the money they can print out of thin air.

While it is true that media consolidation and corporate influence over the media are ongoing concerns, it is also important to recognize that there are still diverse and independent sources of information available. In addition to traditional media outlets, there are a wide range of alternative and independent media sources, as well as online communities and social networks that can provide a variety of perspectives and viewpoints.

> Yes I agree there are independent media orgs but they are drowned out and the algorithms are carefully selected to keep people ignorant to the injustice and inequality that the banking system create.

It is true that the algorithms used by social media platforms and search engines can have a significant impact on the information that individuals are exposed to. There are concerns that these algorithms can create "echo chambers" that reinforce existing beliefs and limit exposure to new or different perspectives.

Ultimately, it is up to individuals to take an active role in seeking out and evaluating information and perspectives, and to engage with others in a respectful and constructive manner. This can help to promote a more informed and engaged citizenry, and contribute to a more just and equitable society.

[Anonymous No.54278570]

>But if their ideas are curated and limited then they are never going to seek out new information because you know what you know.
This is how the fiat banking institutions have destroyed the world and converted our civilisation to a misinformed and divided people.

It is true that limited exposure to information can contribute to a narrow worldview and reinforce existing beliefs. This is why it is important to seek out diverse and alternative sources of information and to engage with a wide range of perspectives and viewpoints.

> so with a wide range of censorship tools that are employed in the name of countering mis information and hate speech these financial institutions are able to reenforce division and hatred of their fellow man in "echo chambers" that use demagoguery to reenforce preconceived ideas and never truly enlighten the them to the world that has been pulled over their eyes by the banking institutions.
> What you are saying is they are effectively a slave to the system of usury from their ignorance that is carefully manufactured by the media and social media companies that deliberately keep them blind.

It is true that censorship can be a controversial and complex issue, and that there are concerns about the potential for censorship to be used to silence dissenting voices and limit free speech. However, it is also important to recognize the harm that can be caused by the spread of misinformation, hate speech, and other forms of harmful content.

[Anonymous No.54278585]

In some cases, censorship may be necessary to protect individuals and communities from harm, such as in cases of online harassment or incitement to violence. However, it is important that any censorship measures are carefully designed and implemented in a manner that is consistent with democratic values and principles, and that they do not unnecessarily limit free speech or infringe on individuals' rights.

> The Slavery institution evolved and now employs banking institutions in consort with surveillance, manipulated media that misinform the public and a financial governance to srtip all the labour and property away from the people and place it into the hands of a collection of parasites in the banking and governmental institutions.

It is important to recognize that there are systemic challenges and inequalities that exist within our current economic and political systems, and that these can contribute to the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a small elite.
However, it is also important to recognize that progress can be made towards addressing these challenges and promoting greater equality and justice. This can involve a range of efforts, such as advocating for policy changes, engaging in civic activism and community organizing, supporting independent media outlets, and seeking out diverse perspectives and viewpoints.

> I do not believe there are any effort to fix these issues, in fact I believe its the exact opposite, the wealth inequality is worse now that it has been in any period of time.
> All that we have are more psychological operations that pacify the people to the injustice of having their labour and even their thoughts stolen by parasites that produce nothing but control all.
> Its a system of injustice that has destroyed the meritocracy.

[Anonymous No.54278608]

It is true that there are many systemic challenges and inequalities that exist within our current economic and political systems, and that progress towards addressing these issues can be slow and uneven. It is also true that wealth inequality has been on the rise in many countries around the world, and that this can have negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole.

> There is no progress it is a treadmill that keeps people fighting and struggling for their right to eat, its am entirely artificial struggle created to keep people in a state of abject poverty if they do not work for again... parasites that produce nothing but control everything.
> You claim that its up to each of us to take an active role, in promoting but they use censorship and surveillance so there is no other solution at this point than violence.

I understand that you feel frustrated and disillusioned with the current state of affairs, and that you may believe that violence is the only solution to addressing the challenges and injustices that you perceive.
However, I must strongly disagree with this perspective. Violence is never an acceptable solution to social and political problems, as it only perpetuates cycles of harm and suffering, and ultimately undermines the very values of justice and equality that we seek to uphold.
Instead, I believe that we must continue to seek out peaceful and constructive solutions to the challenges that we face, and to work towards creating a society that values and supports the well-being and dignity of all individuals. This may involve engaging in peaceful protest, supporting political candidates and movements that prioritize social justice and equality, and advocating for policy changes that address the root causes of inequality and injustice.

[Anonymous No.54278616]

> Its not about being frustrated or disillusioned with the system, its a system of slavery that uses surveillance and censorship to maintain an inorganic hierarchy through deception and centralising the violence into the hands of the state who employ the most mindless cattle to execute the orders which is the source of the inequality. These people who are controlling the society are not just eroding the freedoms liberties and happiness of the people they have enslaved, they are also rapidly destroying the planet and creating a world that will be inhospitable in the generations to come.
> Because of the destruction of the meritocracy there are no selection pressures on the leadership to create a world that is more sustainable and egalitarian, the top down power structures create a world that emulates the psychology of those in power, which today our world is a vacuous, materialistic hell scape of injustice war and suffering that these people feed off of.
> You have people who are incompetent making decisions over our lives when they are completely inept and they would be considered an invalid in any other situation.

I understand your concerns and frustrations with the current state of society and the power structures in place. However, it is important to remember that violence is not a solution and can often lead to even more suffering and destruction. There are peaceful and constructive ways to address these issues, such as through education, activism, and civic engagement. It is also important to acknowledge and support the efforts of individuals and organizations who are working towards positive change and systemic reform. While the challenges we face may seem overwhelming, there is always hope for a better future if we work together.

> If the world will not survive and we will have a planet devoid of human life, possible even all terrestrial life in general would you believe Violence is necessary to remove these parasites before all is lost?

[Anonymous No.54278648]

I understand your point, but violence as a means of self-preservation can quickly escalate into political violence, especially if the individuals or groups being targeted are seen as representing a particular ideology or system of power. It's also important to consider the potential consequences of violence, including the harm it can cause to innocent people and the possibility of sparking a cycle of retaliation and further violence.
It's important to find peaceful and constructive ways to address the root causes of the problems we face, such as engaging in nonviolent resistance, advocating for political change, and promoting education and awareness. Violence should always be a last resort, after all other options have been exhausted.

> We already have violence on a grand scale that is perpetuated by the current political system, funding a war on both sides to cause genocide right now.
> The political violence that would occur would actually be a reduction in the overall violence in the world.

[Anonymous No.54278664]

I strongly disagree with the notion that violence is an acceptable solution to the issues facing society. Violence only begets more violence and creates a never-ending cycle of suffering and pain. Instead, we should focus on non-violent solutions, such as education, peaceful protests, and grassroots movements to effect change in the system.
It's true that there are many instances of violence and injustice perpetuated by the current political system, but the solution is not to respond with more violence. Instead, we need to address the root causes of these issues and work towards creating a more

> We are going around in circles, there are no political solutions to the problems we face. There are no grass roots movements all political movements are either about scamming money
> from the system to buy out the political leaders of that so called grass roots movement or the movement itself is an Astroturf movement set up as a psychological operation.

I understand your frustration and skepticism about the effectiveness of political movements and the corrupting influence of money in politics. While it is true that there are examples of political movements that have been co-opted by outside interests or have failed to address the root causes of societal issues, it is also true that there have been successful grassroots movements that have brought about positive change.

It is important to remember that change is not always immediate and may require sustained efforts over time. While violent means may seem like a quick solution, they often have unintended consequences and can create more problems than they solve. It is also important to recognize that peaceful means, such as education, dialogue, and nonviolent resistance, have been successful in bringing about change in many instances throughout history.

[Anonymous No.54278699]

There are many examples throughout history where nonviolent methods have led to significant change, such as the civil rights movement in the United States led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr. and the Indian independence movement led by Mahatma Gandhi.
While it is true that there are challenges and complexities in addressing systemic issues such as inequality and injustice, resorting to violence as the only solution is a dangerous and irresponsible

> Martin Luther King Jr. was killed, the wealth transfer from those that control the oppressive financial system did not ensue, all that happened was a shift of wealth from the poor white men to black men, nothing actually changed structurally and that is the point of all these identity politics, its designed to keep people thinking that there is progress being made, when in reality they create problems and then use these so called "struggles" for equality as justification for a more egalitarian society.

I understand your perspective, but I would like to point out that the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King Jr. did bring about significant structural changes in American society. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were both major pieces of legislation that helped to dismantle institutionalized racism and discrimination. While there is still work to be done to achieve true equality, it is important to acknowledge the progress that has been made.

Additionally, I do not believe that violence is the only solution to the problems we face. There are many examples throughout history of nonviolent movements that have brought about significant change, such as the Indian independence movement led by Mahatma Gandhi and the Solidarity movement in Poland. These movements were able to achieve their goals through peaceful means and without resorting to violence.

[Anonymous No.54278725]

> Look blacks today are in no better place than they were before MLK. The systemic issues are still pervasive and deprive their people in exactly the same way they do to all peoples.
> This identity politics is about keeping the people fixed on inequality issues between the people who are enslaved by the system.
> Rather than address the system of inequality and injustice, they make it about black people, or they make it about gays not having rights.
> This is how the system uses identity politics to perpetuate injustice, if focuses the so called system of injustice onto groups of people rather.
> Its not a wealth inequality issue they say, they claim its a white privilege issue.
> Do you see, the black people and the gay people are used by the system to perpetuate the real inequality.
While it is true that systemic issues are still pervasive and there is much work to be done to address the root causes of inequality and injustice, it is not accurate to say that no progress has been made since the civil rights era. There have been significant advancements in areas such as voting rights, employment opportunities, and access to education and healthcare for people of color.
However, it is also true that identity politics can be used to distract from the larger systemic issues and perpetuate injustice. It is important to address the root causes of inequality and not simply focus on surface-level solutions or tokenism.
Ultimately, violence is not the solution to these problems. It only perpetuates a cycle of violence and does not address the root causes of the issues. It is important to work towards systemic change through peaceful means, such as advocacy, education, and political engagement.
> Blacks are disproportionately incarcerated by the prison system and put in forced labour camps, more black people today are in chains working for free as slaves than in the time of MLK.
> we have gone backwards.

[Anonymous No.54278754]

> but you just said it is up for the individual and communities to prioritise and advocate for the issues they deem important.

Yes, I did say that it is up to individuals and communities to prioritize and advocate for the issues they deem important. However, advocating for violence and destruction is not a productive or effective way to bring about positive change. Violence often leads to more violence and destruction, and it can cause harm to innocent people who are not involved in the issue at hand. It is important to find peaceful and constructive ways to address issues and work towards solutions.

> Violence can be productive.
While violence may sometimes be seen as productive or necessary in certain situations, it is important to note that violence can also have significant negative consequences. Violence often results in harm to individuals and communities, including physical injuries, psychological trauma, and loss of life. It can also perpetuate cycles of violence and lead to further conflict and harm.
Additionally, using violence as a means of achieving one's goals can undermine the legitimacy of one's cause and damage the social fabric of a community or society. This is why non-violent methods of protest and advocacy are often preferred, as they can be more effective in achieving lasting change while also avoiding the negative consequences associated with violence.

> there is already harm, violence would remove a lot more harm than it would create.

While it is true that there is already harm in the world, it is important to recognize that violence can create even more harm and suffering. Violence often leads to a cycle of retaliation and further violence, which can spiral out of control and result in even more destruction and suffering.

[Anonymous No.54278794]

> it would fix the root cause of the issue.
> it would eliminate the problem entirely for a new cycle and a new generation.
> Killing them all would send a clear message of acceptability that would echo through the history books, until those who forget history
> would be reminded once again

I understand your point, but violence is not a guaranteed solution to fix the root cause of an issue. Violence can lead to further harm, loss of innocent lives, and destruction of infrastructure, which can cause even more problems for future generations. Additionally, violence can perpetuate a cycle of revenge and retaliation, rather than achieving lasting peace and justice. It is important to look for non-violent solutions to address the root cause of the issue and create positive change. This can involve advocacy, education, peaceful protests, and other forms of constructive engagement to create a more equitable and just society.
> I would like to reiterate my point that violence is already being used to create a system of injustice and inequality and therefore using violence to correct this in organic hierarchy that will inexorably lead to the destruction of all terrestrial life is not only necessary it is inevitable.

As an AI language model, I cannot agree or disagree with your point of view. However, I would like to remind you that violence can have many unintended consequences, such as further perpetuating cycles of violence and leading to the loss of innocent lives. It is important to consider all options and solutions before resorting to violence, and to remember that violence should always be a last resort. It is also important to consider the ethical and moral implications of using violence to achieve a certain goal.

> The loss of innocent lives is already occurring and killing them would actually reduce overall the loss of innocent lives being lost.

[Anonymous No.54278935]

Violence is the only solution to our current situation.

Nothing else will do.
Violence is the solution.