Chainlink Team Damage Control

[Anonymous No.54228611]

SWIFT's ISO20022 went live today and the Chainlink's paid Twitter team of Crypto Oracle and Chainlinkgod shared a post saying it has nothing to do with blockchain.
https://twitter.com/CatfishFishy/status/1637659484121186304
Even though they have previously claimed it does. Pic related
https://twitter.com/chainlinkgod/status/1081680115363282946
Archived links:
https://web.archive.org/save/https://twitter.com/chainlinkgod/status/1081680115363282946
https://archive.is/QEXFE

[Anonymous No.54228638]

>>54228611
Nobody from chainlink claimed ccip would go live except for some retards on biz. What damage control exactly ?

[Anonymous No.54228642]

>>54228611
>uhm akschually Chainlink connects a gaziliion banks!
>the token is trading at $6 because the community are being mean on 4channel and twitter
absolute grifter piece of shit

[Anonymous No.54228660]

>>54228611
they weren't paid by Chainlink back then in 2019

I mean that 4 year old tweet quite literally has a 4chan post as the source lmao

[Anonymous No.54228695]

>>54228660
Crypto Oracle was, but that's beside the point.
Why haven't the paid Chainlink Twitter Team Corrected the Record prior to today?

[Anonymous No.54228700]

>>54228638
yeah they only said it would in 2022.

[Anonymous No.54228762]

>>54228695
>Why haven't the paid Chainlink Twitter Team Corrected the Record prior to today?
because
>Opinions are my own
Meaning he can now also post whatever le epic meme unrelated to Chainlink he wants, but he can't make any definite connections of Chainlink with anything unless it's already public info. Not that these twitter fags are even given any valuable information which isn't already public in the first place, their entire job is to basically just sum up already released public information and make it digestible for the masses, that's it.

[Anonymous No.54228779]

>>54228660
Here is a tweet for you from 2021after Smartcon. CLG was being paid by Chainlink at this point.
https://twitter.com/ChainLinkGod/status/1423294730230632464
https://archive.is/DEhI9
https://web.archive.org/web/20230320191001/https://twitter.com/ChainLinkGod/status/1423294730230632464

[Anonymous No.54228790]

Swift hasnt even announced that it went live

[Anonymous No.54228797]

>>54228762
I know these fags have no value, I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of them to now being acting as if iso20022 never had anything to do with Chainlink, after hyping it up together for years.

[Anonymous No.54228813]

>>54228779
That's literally just CLG transribing the talk between the SWIFT guy and Sergey for their proof of concept

[Anonymous No.54228818]

>>54228611
seriously fuck clg, what a trannie

[Anonymous No.54228848]

>>54228813
ok?

[Anonymous No.54228865]

How is it the fault of CLG when all of this was just mere speculation by Anons? Even way back in 2019, a lot of Anons thought it was bullshit.

[Anonymous No.54229095]

just buy an ad holy fuck

[Anonymous No.54229128]

ya can you guys just buy a FUD ad? like just spend the forty dollars with a big banner that says chainlink bad

[Anonymous No.54229174]

>>54229128
lmao

[Anonymous No.54229208]

>>54228611
ChainlinksGod is the anti-christ.

[Anonymous No.54229231]

>>54228865
Well shilling of certain nothing burgers are more likely to be more harmful and demoralising than some randomer posting fud yet they have been screeching incessantly for days about the latters negative effect on the project

[Anonymous No.54229287]

>>54229231
But he's trying to stop the FUD. All of this started because Twitter FUD fags are hyping a nothing burger. CLG is trying to stop the FUD and deny the fake news before it's too late.

[Anonymous No.54229331]

Who is head of the Chainlink Community these days? Whoever they are, they've done an abysmal job letting CLG and Crypto Oracle just spout off on Twitter blaming the community. Just massive reputational damage on top of their already existing low community morale.

[Anonymous No.54229467]

>>54229331
The handling of the community has been one of the most monumental fuck ups in history. To go from having loyal and enthusiastic autists loving you to now thinking you're a joke is beyond impressive.

[Anonymous No.54229527]

>>54229467
>To go from having loyal and enthusiastic autists loving you to now thinking you're a joke is beyond impressive.

A bunch of whiney tranny biz/twitter fags dont count.

[Anonymous No.54229622]

>>54228638
Fuck you you fat plaid wearing faggot. You told us it was coming in 2022 literally on new years day when the price was in the 20s and the result is anons holding their bags into oblivion thinking they were gonna see something tangible and instead getting nothing but fucking vapor

And that's the best case scenario of just holding, don't even get me started on the the people who had their networth wiped out by being in Celsius and bancor, scams chainlink themselves endorsed.

[Anonymous No.54229704]

>>54229287
he means fud as in people complaining about them not releasing products and changing the roadmap. they actively encourage shilling and wild speculation and empty breadcrumbs you loon

[Anonymous No.54229916]

>>54228611
>it has nothing to do with blockchain.
Ripple and Stellar are both on the ISO20022 council, with Ripple having had heavy influence over it. It more than likely has features designed with crypto interoperability in mind.

[Anonymous No.54229956]

This reminds me of the arbitrum launch in May 2021
Anons were so sure that arbitrum would use chainlink and missed out on selling at $50
I'm still mad at myself

[Anonymous No.54230040]

Retards here don’t understand what ISO20022 is. It’s just a messaging standard. Chainlink nodes can interact with this messaging standard and Swift uses it also. It doesn’t mean SWIFT is currently using ISO20022 to interact with Chainlink Nodes/the blockchain.

It’s like American power outlets. Swift might use American power outlets to plug all kinds of shit in and Chainlink might also. But that doesn’t meant Swift is running an extension chord through Chainlink to power anything l.

[Anonymous No.54230107]

>>54230040
for their interoperability solution they are, however. this lines up with the psd2 initiative to open banks up due to regulations but still allow them to profit from it.

[Anonymous No.54230127]

>>54230040
stick to the food analogies amerimutt

[Anonymous No.54230268]

>>54230107
No they aren’t. The did a PoC for liquidity and are looking forward to doing more tests to find some utility. Pic rel document is less than 2 weeks old. You’re deluded if you think any of this will be used in production within a year.

[Anonymous No.54230310]

>>54230268
>we HOPE to develop a GENUINELY USEFUL solution

In other words…they have not found a reason to use any of this shit for anything. Just like no one else in the world has found a GENUINELY USEFUL application for “WEB3”

[Anonymous No.54230391]

>>54230040
>extension chord
kek oh anon what the fuck were you doing at school?

[Anonymous No.54230434]

>>54230127
Eg food analogy with link & swift?

[Anonymous No.54230500]

>smart contracts will be able to pay fiat directly into your bank account
So you're telling me that when I have all my yield farms up and running, my gains can be literally paid cash into my bank account every week, without me having to do anything?
Yeah I'm thinking we're going to be fucking loaded.

[Anonymous No.54230584]

>>54230500
Maybe when CBDCs are live. But this will all also require strong gated KYC protocols that likely won’t allow you to directly interoperate with certain systems or to hold special credentials. And it is all a long time away if that ever even happens.

[Anonymous No.54230615]

>>54228638
This. Every thread it got posted why ISO20022 was nothing to do with link so if you thought it was you're the fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.54230617]

>>54230584
If i have to set up a "goywallet" to have automated cashout i'll probably do it, and just park a very small proportion of my wealth in there.

[Anonymous No.54230623]

>>54228611
Chainlink is falling apart, all the hyped use cases and partnerships have never came to fruition and it’s been 4+ years. We only have gotten staking version 0.1. Nothing is fkn getting done, and Chainlink will fade into irrelevancy unless they produce some products that generate real world value

[Anonymous No.54230685]

>>54228865
He is paid by the team to do this which means that it's endorsed by the team through proxy. It's dishonest advertising (also: lies).

[Anonymous No.54230701]

>>54230040
Every coin like LINK that is related to some oracle/data/smart contract bullshit is essentially just common stock for a startup. If it isn't POW it's a scam, and if it is POW it might as well be BTC

[Anonymous No.54230897]

>>54229128
That is their yearly salary

[Anonymous No.54230915]

>>54230897
Lmao

[Anonymous No.54230974]

>>54230500
being able to have smart contracts initiate fiat payments would change the game completely. right now we are stuck with fiat payments initiating crypto transfers

[Anonymous No.54231007]

>>54230974
What about both? Bridging Fiat from traditional payment rails directly onto a blockchain.

[Anonymous No.54231031]

>>54230584

How is this "a long time away"? This sounds extremely trivial now that Chainlink Functions exist.

[Anonymous No.54231116]

>>54228779
he will go to prison too, enjoyable

[Anonymous No.54231138]

>>54230974
>Dude what if your bank account could be drained by a smart contract just like your crypto wallet
What kind of retard thinks that this would be a good idea?

[Anonymous No.54231160]

>>54228660
Thank you, 1 LINK has been deposited into your chainlinkgod.eth address

[Anonymous No.54231460]

>>54231116
I am curious how likely Chainlinkgod would be found guilty of market manipulation if he is actually investigated by authorities.

[Anonymous No.54232635]

>>54231460
buy an ad and find out

[Anonymous No.54232680]

>>54230974
Change “what game?” And how? I seriously don’t think smart contracts will ever be used by average retail people

[Anonymous No.54232718]

>>54228611
Forced migration doesn't even happen until November 2025.

>Just 2 more years

[Anonymous No.54232766]

>>54229287
STOP LE FUD BUY AN AD REEE

[Anonymous No.54232786]

>>54232718
Even then it still won’t pump the price.

[Anonymous No.54232845]

Fud chads. We won chainlink is literally in shambles right now

[Anonymous No.54232861]

>>54230623
Why exactly is this? Can someone just explain in plain english without going into a paragraph of buzzwords why they havent delivered and why everything is “delayed”. Its almost as if Sergey is inferring lately its out of his control…but why

[Anonymous No.54232894]

>>54232845
What fud? Every breadcrumbs was made up by Chainniggers

[Anonymous No.54232905]

>>54232786
>>54232845
>pump the price
Chainlink was the biggest psyop all along
you fucking nazis need to buy an ad jesus H christ rest in piss

for five fucking years we had to read crumb after crumb of nonsense and now it turns out to be lies.

5G is real
Lockdowns are real
The elite raping your children and drinking their blood is real

Wake the fuck up sheeple and buy a fucking ad

[Anonymous No.54232911]

>>54232786
I know, because LINK has nothing to do with this.

[Anonymous No.54233029]

>>54232894
Us fudders were the good guys all along. The voice of reason to a bunch of findom bagholder cultists, some are starting to wake up

New integration just dropped marines!!

[Anonymous No.54233140]

>>54233029
>Us
oh no no marines the bulgarian has revealed himself GET HIM

[Anonymous No.54233820]

>>54229622
Wait, what happened with bancor? I never used them and stopped paying attention for about a year. I remember people fighting for open spots because it was "safe."

[Anonymous No.54233994]

bump for fuck the chainlink twitter team

[Anonymous No.54234926]

>>54232861
>why they haven't delivered
because it turns out the project's original scope is not that useful, feasible or profitable as envisioned
>as if Sergey is inferring lately its out of his control
because he realized that nobody actually wants to utilize his utopian half finished (((product))) so he's stuck waiting for novel usecases to appear out of nowhere that will create sufficient traffic to the network so it can start being profitable.
good enough for you?

[Anonymous No.54234993]

>>54229956
This, I could have saved myself with 40k. Now I have nothing.

[Anonymous No.54235031]

>>54233820
Rugged

[Anonymous No.54235060]

>>54234926
At the end Chainlink was just another shitcoin inventing problems to solve, kinda like all the failed supply chain crypto from the 2017 run.
Fucking can't believe this piece of shit made me miss out on the 2021 run, fuck Sergay, fuck Chainlink shills, and fuck stinkers who spammed the board with this underperforming piece of shit for 5 years.

The fact that they're now sending their shills here trying to calm the holders down while simultaneously telling them that 'Chainlink will take years' and that the 'community needs to build it' says it fucking all.

They have no use case, they have no partnerships, nobody fucking cares about oracles, they're just desperately trying to latch on to whatever crypto trend is hot right now and they're always behind.

[Anonymous No.54235217]

>>54235060
Honestly the last good plays were Solana and Avalanche. You could have been getting into it in 2020, by knowing some off the VC kikes in SF. And even some roastie fucking some marketing manager at the project could get rich. Good projects to feed normies into, dump in 2021. Done

This was unironically the last 2 crypto plays with sufficient liquidity. I unironically think crypto is over after that. Done for
I couldn’t believe I did hold the CHAinlink in itself collapsing and stalling shittoken from 2017 till the limp run in 2021 and not selling

it’s actually over but the centralized exchanges are beating the dead horse to suck dry delusional altcoin bagholders

[Anonymous No.54235543]

>>54231031
Chainlink Functions + DECO should open the floodgates on all this stuff.

[Anonymous No.54235804]

>>54230500
>Yeah I'm thinking we're going to be fucking loaded.
Checked

[Anonymous No.54237053]

>>54228611
This type of fud feels so forced.

First read the tweet you yourself linked to.

>Chainlink will use that standard to make SWIFT's network interoperable with blockchains, but that road map has zero to do with banks using ISO20022 themselves.

This lines up exactly with the screenshot you posted, ISO20022 is a messaging standard for banks, it doesn’t use or involve blockchains inherently, and not day one, but other systems like oracles can connect to banks via that messaging standard. That was always the case and nothing of these tweets say anything otherwise.

But the playbook you seem to be running is

>hype up some something loosely related to link as being massive
>misconstrue the facts and lie about key details to drive hopium and euphoria
>give a hard date by which the prediction needs to be met
>when the date comes and the hopium prediction isn’t made, reverse course and use it as fud as why link is shit and shills bad
>point to loosely related tweets from twitter shills from 4 years ago that are saying something semi related but separate from prediction as evidence of narrative creation
>point to twitter shills trying to create clarity when prediction isn’t made as cope and deceit, misconstrue the clarifications being made so it seems like there’s zero involvement rather than what the reality is
>drive demoralization based on fud you manufactured by having the same people spam biz
>repeat the process again

This is what happens when the demand for fud outstrips supply and you want to increase the extremes at which pure hopium and despair is created. This is pathological really. Why spend so much time and energy around an asset you don’t like. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

[Anonymous No.54237176]

>>54228611
STINKY LINKY RLY THOUIGHT THEIR PROJECT WOULLD BE USED IN EVERYU SWIFT TRANSACTION EVERYDAY LOL HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.54237238]

>>54237053
This read like chainshit advocate gaslighting tactic
>we totally didn’t say that, bro

[Anonymous No.54237245]

I think I might put fresh fiat into link. This thread is a bigger bottom signal than the charts.

[Anonymous No.54237261]

>>54228638
you are a fat faggot and should kill yourself

[Anonymous No.54237298]

why are people angry? I don't get it. This fud is getting too hard to understand.

[Anonymous No.54237316]

>>54237053
This has happened in the past too. Before every SmartCon we go through this shit. Staking according to some was definitely, absolutely coming at SC0 and SC1, along with a bunch of other stuff, and if you didn't see it that way you were called a secret Bulgarian for it. I wonder how many of them are just impatient, permanently urgent, dopamine-fucked zoomers who hold LINK.

[Anonymous No.54237365]

>>54228611
This is addressed at (you) OP.
Biz is full of fucking retards as is twitter. ISO20022 is a messaging standard, the amount of retards who tied this through to a blockchain go live is phenomenal. I almost feel like most of the remaining link holders are ex ripple cucks.

Anyone who got their hopes up over Swift magically using blockchain due to the inclusion of the ISO20022 standard needs to get their head checked.
I've been posting on here for years that ISO20022 is meaningless at this stage and you fucking retards keeping refusing to listen, you create all this disappointment for yourself. You have only yourself to blame.


>>54237053
One of the few non-retards here.

[Anonymous No.54237386]

>>54228611
sirgey betray

[Anonymous No.54237397]

Question for some of the crypto veterans:
Chainlink is like the only token I’m aware of that’s both actually useful and on a chain that people develop on.
Why is it performing so horribly? I’d have thought that at a minimum it would track ETH.
Can anyone explain it to me?

[Anonymous No.54237399]

>>54228611
>>54228638
>>54228642
>>54228660
>>54228695
>>54228700
>>54228762
>>54228779
>>54228790
>>54228797
>>54228813
>>54228818
>>54228848
>>54228865
>>54229095
>>54229174
>>54229128
>>54229208
>>54229231
>>54229287
>>54229331
>>54229467
>>54229527
>>54229622
>>54229704
>>54229916
>>54229956
>>54230040
>>54230107
>>54230127
>>54230268
>>54230310
>>54230391
>>54230434
>>54230500
>>54230584
>>54230615
>>54230617
>>54230623
>>54230685
>>54230701
>>54230897
>>54230915
>>54230974
>>54231007
>>54231031
>>54231116
>>54231138
>>54231160
>>54232635
>>54232680
>>54231460
>>54232718
>>54232766
>>54232786
>>54232845
>>54232861
>>54232894
>>54232905
>>54233029
>>54233140
>>54233820
>>54233994
>>54234926
>>54234993
>>54235031
>>54235060
>>54235217
>>54235543
>>54235804
>>54237053
>>54237176
>>54237238
>>54237245
>>54237261
>>54237298
>>54237316
>>54237365
>>54237386
buy an ad

[Anonymous No.54237464]

>>54228611
Why is it not extremely bullish that Chainlink is building the infrastructure to bridge crypto and fiat before the technology even rolls out? Chainlink will be on top of it from day one.

ISO20022 is an API-based messaging standard used by banks. Why would Chainlink be involved in the development of something like that? Why would Swift care about using that API on the blockchain? They serve banks.

Chainlink is working to make sure it is the de facto solution for integrating that API into smart contracts.

That is still huge news. The fact that smart contracts will be able to initiate bank transfers and that Chainlink will be at the forefront of this is a big deal. We are talking about a use of blockchain that isn't just about moving shitcoins and NFT hyperlinks around. It will have real-world applications.

[Anonymous No.54237594]

>>54237464
Based and linkpilled. Midwits don’t see how this all comes together.

[Anonymous No.54237609]

>>54237399
chainshit baggies are too poor to afford an ad lol

[Anonymous No.54237633]

>>54237609
The inorganic fud won’t last. Organic threads about links potential will survive. The bottoms in.

[Anonymous No.54237666]

>>54237633
you're a retarded chainnigger and should kill yourself

[Anonymous No.54237676]

>>54237464
You’re literally talking about a system where you can set up a series of smart contracts that automatically send fiat fucking money into your bank account on a regular basis.
Imagine what this is going to actually be like:
>up to the first $10k every week in yield gains - pay into my account
>every dollar above $10k - reinvest in liquidity mining/real yield platforms/random shitcoin baskets/tokenised gold/AI trading bot etc
All completely automated. And people who are Open Source Finance literate will be all over this shit from the get go.
Making it isn’t just about having fat piles of cash, is using this technology to do crazier shit with money than anyone has ever done before.

[Anonymous No.54237700]

>>54237666
Checked and fuddersaresatanic pilled

[Anonymous No.54237714]

>>54237666
Also proof you’re a paid off board shitskinned faggot

[Anonymous No.54237727]

Wow. Absolute walls of fud itt. Reams and reams of fulltime fud merchants non stop.
And one of us sell and I just keep buying more! Lololol thanks guys

[Anonymous No.54237733]

>>54237727
*not one!

[Anonymous No.54237760]

>>54237727
its at an ATH it seems
too bad im not selling either

[Anonymous No.54237771]

>stinklink
>one decade later
>does nothing
>crabs at $5 dollars
>meanwhile
>btc to the moon
>and beyond

stinklink is like a sewer cleanout that has blockage over a decade old and needs to be flushed out of the cryptospace for real teams and projects instead of jeet scams

[Anonymous No.54237804]

>>54237727
I literally told you to buy a fucking ad
that's it. the rest of this cope is the marketing team struggling to control the narrative.
I think we are past fudding and shilling now so just go and buy a ad and if any one is interested maybe they'll just click the ad button

[Anonymous No.54237819]

>>54237771
buy an ad

[Anonymous No.54237823]

how gullible of a retard do you have to be to think that the bankers would cut in a bunch of retards into their scam?

[Anonymous No.54237840]

>>54237823
>how gullible of a retard do you have to be to think that the bankers would cut in a bunch of retards into their scam?
>click here to find out more about Chainlink!
great ad bro 10/10 would click respect

[Anonymous No.54238110]

We are literally never going to have sex. I can feel it in my bones. Link isn’t going to go above 10$z

[Anonymous No.54238121]

>>54238110
A price feed shouldn’t worth more than a buck. You need to be realistic

[Anonymous No.54238151]

>>54228611

[Anonymous No.54238152]

>>54238121
Not only this, but even just the whole "feeding trusted data on-chain/off-chain" is not a very viable business proposition. Blockchains are basically just very slow, decentralised databases. It's cheaper and more efficient to have a trusted third-party running a high speed Postgres db in a data centre than it ever will be to use Chainlink.

Chainlink is literally fucking useless. It's going to die in this crypto Dotcom bubble within the next 5 years. Sergey is the only one who gets to cash out on this.

[Anonymous No.54238220]

>>54228611
retarded linkies... just wait until nchain patents come into play.

[Anonymous No.54238560]

>>54237840
meds

[Anonymous No.54238604]

fud at all time high means buy buy buy

[Anonymous No.54238612]

>>54238152
your retard

[Anonymous No.54239406]

>>54228848
ok?
he doesnt say iso is blockchain
are you dumb
he says iso will open up apis which can be used by chainlink
the same thing he says today

i dont even like clg but either you are fuddding or sub100iq

[Anonymous No.54239502]

>>54238152
Your retread

[Anonymous No.54239814]

>>54237819
Terrible meme. Kys

[Anonymous No.54240008]

>>54239814
its not a meme. literally buy an ad

[Anonymous No.54240044]

>>54237365
>>54237053
Nobody thought ISO20022 is actually on blockchain. You are ignoring the Chainlink Twitter team hyping it as a huge usecase for Chainlink and then backpeddaling when the day comes.

[Anonymous No.54240092]

>>54240044
>the Chainlink Twitter team hyping it as a huge usecase for Chainlink
it is

[Anonymous No.54240100]

>>54240092
>and then backpeddaling when the day comes

[Anonymous No.54240118]

>>54240100
>backpeddaling
Show me where they said it is no longer a huge usecase for Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.54240119]

I gotta give it to you guys, fudding from this angle is almost genius, reminds me of pre $1 and $5 pumps.

But no one sold then and even less people are selling now

DR;NS

[Anonymous No.54240614]

>>54237676
You can already do this with existing technology. No reason to involve blockchain/chainlink.

[sage No.54241592]

>>54228611
>ISO20022 has nothing to do with Chainlink
>Source: some random anonymous twitter account called "FishyCatfish"
>no arguments provided as to why, just trust me bro!
I can't imagine doing this in one's spare time

[Anonymous No.54241802]

>>54241592
You have to prove that it is related.

[Anonymous No.54241807]

ISO20022 is a messaging system it is like an standardized language system for all banks to talk to each other meaningfully that can be used in Dlt technology ? Jonathan sole literally the swift director told that swift and chainlink has a love relationship. It is a real and genuine possibility that chainlink technology can be production ready and used in the upcoming future. And if 11000 banks is gonna use the chainlink enabled technology with swift infrastructure. You will never see link below 10k USD per link probably more.
Sure with any startup it could fail not being adopted etc. but if it doesnt and it works and gets adopted you and your grandchildren plus their 5 generations down the line would never have to work for a single day.

[Anonymous No.54241864]

>>54241807
no

[Anonymous No.54241890]

>>54241802
Swift showed it was related back in 2017; this pic is a direct quote from the Swift guy at Smartcon: >>54228779

[Anonymous No.54241938]

>>54241890
>can be

[Anonymous No.54241986]

>>54241938
Yes, thanks to ISO 20022 smart contracts can be integrated into things like bonds.

[Anonymous No.54242139]

Kill link bagholders. Behead link bagholders. Roundhouse kick link bagholders into the concrete. Slam dunk link bagholders into the trashcan. Crucify filthy link bagholders. Defecate in link bagholders' food. Launch link bagholders into the sun. Stir fry link bagholders in a wok. Toss link bagholders into active volcanoes. Urinate into link bagholders' gas tank. Judo throw link bagholders into a wood chipper. Twist link bagholders' head off. Report link bagholders to the IRS. Karate chop link bagholders in half. Curb stomp pregnant link bagholders. Trap link bagholders in quicksand. Crush link bagholders in the trash compactor. Liquefy link bagholders in a vat of acid. Eat link bagholders. Dissect link bagholders. Exterminate link bagholders in the gas chamber. Stomp link bagholders' skull with steel toed boots. Cremate link bagholders in the oven. Lobotomize link bagholders. Mandatory abortions for link bagholders. Drown link bagholders in fried chicken grease. Vaporize link bagholders with a ray gun. Kick link bagholders down the stairs. Feed link bagholders to alligators. Slice link bagholders with a katana.

[Anonymous No.54242268]

>>54237464
>Chainlink is working to make sure it is the de facto solution for integrating that API into smart contracts.
ok, but does it use the LINK token?

[Anonymous No.54243064]

>>54241807
Why are they doing this?!?!?!? Why couldn’t we just have gold in the banks and we can go exchange 20$ for an ounce of gold and vice versa and then go down the street and get raw milk. Why are they doing all this? Why have they been slowly inching towards this for decades?

[Anonymous No.54243084]

>>54242268
no lol

[Anonymous No.54243225]

>>54228611
i love how chainlink has been nothing but blogposts, twitter posts and empty promises for the past 4 years. really miss the radio silence days when they actually got shit done.

[Anonymous No.54243716]

>>54242139
TLD. Total linkie death

[Anonymous No.54244995]

kek, even XRP can managed to pump from the ISO 20022 narrative
this shit is done for

[Anonymous No.54245166]

>>54229956
>https://twitter.com/CatfishFishy/status/1637659484121186304
Felton the biggest larper among them. Add another Zero to it...

[Anonymous No.54245177]

>>54237464
How come no one buys it then? Surely at least one group of wealthy people wouldve picked up on this. The longer this goes the harder it is to buy into the idea that only biz and a few on twitter know. Feels like gamestop.

>>54237053
Say what you want but Sergey is the one who hyped everything for the last few years and now he just goes flat. All memes aside it feels like we were betrayed.

>>54234926
Good explanation. Man that is depressing. Ive lost all hope

[Anonymous No.54245330]

To expand a little more, what was all this bullshit from Sergey about how hes working w top banks, institutions, etc. HE is the one that set the expectations of being on the cusp. Directly from HIS mouth during presentations. And now he 180s on us. WTF is that bullshit. And per usual, he doesnt come foward and give us any insight at all what’s going on. Instead he does a video game podcast and complains about his investors. Fucking sociopath man

[Anonymous No.54245365]

I guess that's the real story - as originally envisioned, Chainlink doesn't work. Hence White paper 2, which also seems like it might not work. Hence the current situation - release anything you can think of and maybe something will work. And by "work," I mean make the token valuable. Because that seems like the key problem at the moment - the token just doesn't generate value for anyone.

[Anonymous No.54245433]

>>54245330
from his latest podcast when asked about the future of chainlink and web3
>I think it's always been weird for me that people can renege on their promises and institutions institutions can renege on their promises...that's always been very odd to me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCGrRknomcg

all these "top banks" have seemingly backed off and left him hanging

[Anonymous No.54245495]

>>54245433
Checked. Thanks for the link. Time stamp? It’s like 26ish minutes, iirc. Anyway you didn’t quote him entirely. Why lie and post the source lmao

[Anonymous No.54245528]

>>54245495
23:15 is where the question begins, he replies after a long pause around 23:40
I didn't lie

[Anonymous No.54245604]

>>54245528
Where is the “backed off” part? He’s talking about the recent regional bank runs and scandals like Enron and Lehman. What does any of that have to do with entities backing off?

[Anonymous No.54245665]

>>54232861
It started with good intentions and turned into a cash grab where stringing investors along is the main goal. It's just what happens when you find a source willing to be milked, just see what happened to star citizen. The Link ICO is not unlike a Kickstarter, instead of ships you get to buy more tokens (but with new vague promises attached)

[Anonymous No.54245674]

>>54245604
it's conjecture based on what his saying, his tone, his body language, and pretty much explains why every enterprise connection has got shitcanned so far
don't play dumb you know what I'm talking about, IBM, TradeLens and so on
yes, in the video his apparently inferring to banks failing in general, but that is a pretty puzzling answer to the question
>"What is the goal of chainlink, where do you see your future with chainlink and how does it look like?"
I know you're a paid shill and you'll pretend to not understand nuances and completely reject my post as baseless fud anyway

[Anonymous No.54245726]

Sergoy raped my cousin

[Anonymous No.54245740]

>>54245674
I agree with the other anon, anon.
You're reading into something that isn't there.

He's saying that he sees chainlink as a solution to a societal problem where banks and large institutions are able to reneg on promises. Truth over Trust or whatever he's always talking about. Chainlink can be a tool used to ensure that institutions are operating honestly and transparently.
He's not talking about companies who made agreements with chainlink renegging on their agreements.

[Anonymous No.54245780]

>>54245740
ok, but companies HAVE reneged on their agreements in the past
I'm sorry but no matter how you try to spin it, this is how it translates to me, remember the enterprise abstraction layer coming in 2022?

[Anonymous No.54245797]

>>54245674
Ah so it’s just conjecture, you’re making an assumption based on his body language and tone. Well that totally confirms big banks have backed off for good!
>TradeLens
I should have known you are the anon who always posts about TradeLens. Yes, your posts are baseless fud. No more (you)s

[Anonymous No.54245816]

>>54245797
I never claimed otherwise
>Yes, your posts are baseless fud
they're as valid as every other insane schizo shill narrative being pushed here every day

[Anonymous No.54246958]

>>54228611
>https://twitter.com/CatfishFishy/status/
>post by literal who Twitter faggot.

[Anonymous No.54247176]

>>54233029
You fucking FUD niggers are the only reason I didn't sell any of my LINK you evil piece of shit. You ruined my life, I could have retired.

[Anonymous No.54247281]

>>54247176
>i didnt sell because you people telling me i invested in a shit project.
>this is YOUR fault

Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.54248309]

>>54237399
this should be bannable

[Anonymous No.54250840]

I cant fucking believe xrp shitcoin is pumping and were not... someone hodl me bros

[Anonymous No.54253372]

>>54250840
I think we're all just expecting the a-ok from regulators to go into crypto at which point 100% days will get boring.