i wasted three years of my life on this and so did many others

[Anonymous No.54189831]

hahaha..... absolutely unbelievable

[Anonymous No.54189847]

coin went literally 700x from ICO price and you bought the top

[Anonymous No.54189919]

>>54189831
>three years
Newfag

[Anonymous No.54189934]

>>54189831
I wasted 5. Why the fuck didn't I sell the top of link & linkpool.
Fuck

[Anonymous No.54189974]

Chainlinkgod and Crypto Oracle, (who are on the CLL payroll for anyone that didnt know) tempering expectations all of a sudden is a warming up for more very bad news. Nothing of significance is going to get released, there is barely any demand for their product and they probably had a lot of money in SVB.

These two faggots where on the hype train like you wouldn’t know. Did the Chainlink team asked them to give reality checks to retail when the market was pumping? No of course not. Because that liquidity was used so they could dump on retail.

So now they’ve choosen to gaslight us. “Hey anon, can you stop being so negative, you’re scaring new victims we can dump on” “you know, this is like a long bumpy hike, please sell your tokens and move on if you’re not enjoying it anymore”.

I will make in my personal mission to ruin this project.

[Anonymous No.54190010]

>>54189974
I literally lol'd to chainlinkgod & the oracle. What a bunch of fags. I sold in december, but have been following link since I really believed in it. Its turning to be a real shitshow now. You have to be deluded to defend link at this point.
I feel very sad for every delusional linkie who just can't see the truth.

[Anonymous No.54190024]

>>54190010
And yes, I want to sew chainlink ruined at this point.

[Anonymous No.54190493]

>>54189847
>muh 700x gainz
cope, it got outperformed by everything

[Anonymous No.54190539]

you newfag top buyers are so funny lol

[Anonymous No.54190569]

>>54190539
>OGs with 100k stacks still haven't made it after 6 years
>makes fun of "newfags"
the cuckoldry of the Link community is outstanding lol

[Anonymous No.54190590]

>2016-era alt
you guys realize these all died in 2020, right?
old alts never come back, they get replaced by new ones,
utility never drives valuations above the hype they get in their first bull market.

[Anonymous No.54190842]

>>54190590
LINK has lasted through 2 bull markets and pumped to new ATH in the second one. But I doubt it happens again.

[Anonymous No.54190857]

>>54190842
it was launched too late to take advantage of the 2017 top, which is why like most alts launched/tradable around the same time pumped early in this bull market and then faded away when the new alts took over.

[Anonymous No.54190860]

>>54190842
Link barely even pumped in 2017-2018

It went from 20 cents to $1

[Anonymous No.54191129]

>>54189974
>tempering expectations all of a sudden is a warming up for more very bad news
at first i thought this was fud, but fuck its real
we really did got scammed didnt we and now the board has destroyed itself in the process

[Anonymous No.54191285]

>>54189831
You will never make it

[Anonymous No.54191436]

>>54190860
ICO was 10 cents and I think it hit like $1.40 or so… 14x is not bad

[Anonymous No.54191464]

>>54189831
2017 was almost 5 years ago bros...

[Anonymous No.54191486]

>>54191436
It’s pretty bad for crypto. $1 to $20 is a “decent” pump I guess. In fact, I don’t understand why all the hype around chainlink when it never even had a good pump.

[Anonymous No.54191497]

>>54191464
wait... fuck.... it's 2023
almost 6 years

[Anonymous No.54191498]

>>54191436
considering the fact that back then the entire top 200 did a x100 minimum and LINK actually dropped in ranks from November 2017 to January 2018, yeah, it did nothing.

[Anonymous No.54191527]

>>54189974
>and they probably had a lot of money in SVB.
Oh fuck lmao I literally didn't even consider this.
The dumps have to be cashed out somewhere...and that is certainly one possibility.
otoh that shit is getting bailed out so whatever. It doesn't really matter.
But still funny how I was laughing at all the YC nerds getting rekt while possibly having my own financial dominator losing the bag I've had my ass blown out over these years to give them.

[Anonymous No.54191554]

>>54190569
>>OGs with 100k stacks still haven't made it after 6 years
Honestly hard to even wrap my head around this since in my mind they had all already made it...
Fucking weird desu. Like I've been living in an alternate reality and today I woke up and somehow I'm in a timeline that doesn't quite feel right...

[Anonymous No.54191589]

>>54191486
With all the best projects either having no token available to the public, or launching at 1b valuation and shit like that...I think those days are long behind us.
Unless you're literally talking about bsc shitcoins or something that have very little liquidity and do a 20x and one or two whales dumps on everyone and it's gg they win the game.

[Anonymous No.54191652]

>>54189974
This is a huge red flag. They probably were told shit is about to hit the fan. Why wouldn’t you prepare people for a paradigm shift otherwise? Sergey is the biggest (literally) loser in crypto

[Anonymous No.54191720]

>>54191652
swift rugging them on no real integration during any of their announcements that are expected to come out next week
that would be hard to recover from

[Anonymous No.54191757]

im the OG LINK fudder on this board.

>bought a small bag at $0.11 because why not
>sold at $1.30

How does it feel stinkers? i took the best of your coin when she was a sweet young crypto just coming of age. i pumped and dumped her in the prime years and all you have now are my used goods. for all you know you have my dumped link swimming around in your wallet and every time you hold her bag shes thinking of me, the chad who pumped and dumped her in her youth and never called again.

[Anonymous No.54191761]

>>54191720
Doubt it. I'm convinced the "ISO20022 = CCIP!" posting has been astroturfed discord shit in order to create a crash. It's an interbank messaging standard that has no fundamental relation to blockchain. Swift is doing a ccip test but it won't be actioned in march, that would be insane given the timeframes involved.

[Anonymous No.54191956]

>>54191652
>Sergey is the biggest (literally) loser in crypto
He made $500 million off gullible biztards, he's just a sleazy conman

[Anonymous No.54192050]

>>54189974
It's ogre, sergey even said he is playing video games to run away from his problems, probably binge eating too

>this is the year marines
>here's a philosophy tweet while I dump another 50m link for "Q1 2023 initiatives"

[Anonymous No.54192069]

>>54189831
lmao its literally dumping to back to ico levels

[Anonymous No.54192132]

>>54192069
cucks are going to be pretty mad

[Anonymous No.54192162]

>pumps to 7.77
>dumps to 6.66
You retards really haven't noticed the pattern yet huh?
Pathetic.

Retards may have been to late to get to stake but at least you can take free profit from Ari's Numerological Siddhur Shabbat Ritual. Just wait for the shmityah to end stupid goyem.

[Anonymous No.54192214]

>>54191757
Are you bragging about missing a 40x by selling the top?

[Anonymous No.54192254]

>>54191527
Yes, they'll get their funds back but it will probably leak out in public how much every business had in their SVB account. My bet is that CLL is anticipating on real anger from bagholders once this gets out.

[Anonymous No.54192283]

>>54192254
When did discord decide on the chainlink SVB narrative? I’m seeing it shilled a lot lately

[Anonymous No.54192308]

>>54192254
I mean...cmon we all know how much they dump. It's not a secret at this point.
I'd be pissed if they lost all of that money though kek..talk about adding insult to injury

[Anonymous No.54192372]

>>54192283
Around 45% of tech startups used SVB. I'm willing to bet that percentage is way higher for tech startups located in San Fransisco or California.

[Anonymous No.54192440]

>>54192283
maybe it has to do with the rapid unfolding of events in the past week that brought it into the spotlights

[Anonymous No.54192485]

>>54189974
based as fuck, I also make sure that my 3.9k linkies are worthless as long as everyone elese also suffers

[Anonymous No.54192486]

>>54192214
do you know what crypto is LINKcuck? 40x is a nothingburger. 40x is a normal tuesday if you dont hold link, literally yolo in to any dex shitcoin. fucking stupid link cuck

[Anonymous No.54192555]

>>54192308
Believe me, you don't want that information to go public. It will give birth to new insights, speculation and gossip. In no way will it help the token value.

[Anonymous No.54192606]

>Make miserable trannies seethe literally every single day by simply holding link
Truly the comfiest hold

[Anonymous No.54192625]

>>54189847
Same thing I did with RIDE, thank goodness i sold off fast. I'm back in given that the project now has a functional product which is the motorverse and price is down to $0.048 a 4x or thereabout from IDO price so hell yeah I'm early.

[Anonymous No.54192632]

>>54192606
>trannies are seething about my huge losses while the entire market pumps!
lol lmao even

[Anonymous No.54192633]

Chainlink hired me as an oracle to tell you that it's a ponzi or not. Unfortunately it's a ponzi.

[Anonymous No.54192890]

>>54192606

[Anonymous No.54192899]

>>54191956
kek he deserves the contract as much as the “cabal”

[Anonymous No.54192966]

>>54190590
They will argue link has utility all day though, “muh swift” and then you pull out the numbers and realize they could make more profit in 10 years running a McDonald’s and laugh at the VC scam

[Anonymous No.54193030]

>>54191761
It absolutely is. ISO20022 hype I don’t fucking get, amongst all the cryptotards in fact not just link, the bank I work for just updated our trade systems to spit out XML formatted swifts with ISO20022 information fields, like years ago in fact this happened. No crypto needed, we’re already ISO20022 compliant…

[Anonymous No.54193213]

>>54193030
thats not what that is about, nobody with a brain would think that starting in march the entire new swift system will literally use link tokens to function
no it is expected that somewhere buried there will be some mention that there is a part of the system that can integrate with link directly to handle bank to chain transactions
that will not mean anyone will be buying link for utility in march, but it would be the awaited confirmation for speculators to preposition for and start off the next big rally

if the opposite happens a lot of prepositioning of the past 9 months is looking very bad

[Anonymous No.54193286]

>>54193213
>it’s expected there will be a certain part of the system that can be integrated with link
Sure, anyone can format swift messages in XML standard. You can definitely build your own system and “integrate” it with ISO20022 Kek.
you’re not capturing “5 trillion” in value, you’re capturing the portion of banks that will want to integrate with chainlink, which is much lower than “5 trillion”

[Anonymous No.54193366]

>>54192632
>>54192890
Case in point

[Anonymous No.54193376]

>>54191129
You didn't get scammed you pumped an asset 700x ten years before it's ready because you're greedy, literally dot com bubble for millennials and zooms

[Anonymous No.54193417]

>>54189831
I hope you're now smarter and sold off this piece of shit. Use the remaining money to get into Eth, Ftm and probably Nxra. I'm hopeful you can recover your loss in this bull run.

[Anonymous No.54194149]

>>54192966
link can have the best utility in the world, it will never get the hype back which is what drove the pump and dump. same goes for nearly every alt.

[Anonymous No.54194167]

>>54189831
>>54189934
This is what crypto does to you, especially if you marry altcoin bags, hopefully you've learned your lesson. I also wasted many years on an altcoin project.

[Anonymous No.54194396]

>>54193286
i never said 5 trillion, you are attempting to make me waste time debating pointless shit arent you

[Anonymous No.54194439]

>>54192283
why does it even matter
SVB deposits are getting bailed out lol

[Anonymous No.54194618]

>>54191956
Do people realize that Sergey and Steve essentially invented the concept of a rugpull in crypto back when they built SecureAE as a front end to the first dex in crypto history?
It was a limit orderbook dex.
There were centralized asset exchanges like GLBSE and MPEX before. But this was a dex. No accountability.
SAE was the ultimate facilitator of liquidity pulls of tokenized assets.
Dude fucking INVENTED the token dump.
Think about that for a sec...
Sergey is the satoshi of dumps.
Sergey is a straight up hustler. Always has been.
He knew the potential of the dump from day one.
The only thing in his way was figuring out a way to dump in size, scale up, and avoid consequences.
Controlling the front end helped and enabled him to max out his dumps on NXT. But there's no way his appetite can be sated dumping on one singular chain. Why dump on one chain when you can dump on all chains?

[Anonymous No.54196817]

>>54189831
Hey is this that thing with the token not needed???
xDDDD

[Anonymous No.54196830]

>>54189831
i wasted 5 lol

[Anonymous No.54196898]

For the love of Jesus Christ and all that is Holy purchase an advertisement

[Anonymous No.54196950]

>>54189974
The sudden lashing out against fud really leads to me to believe Swift is a nothingburger