/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.54179142]

I feel like Chainlink Functions is bigger than we all realize. Either way I feel like there is something serious that is about to happen around the end of March to the end of April. My schizo senses are tingling off the charts. Its like a "timeline shift" or something.

[Anonymous No.54179198]

>>54179142
I feel this was as well but unfortunately nothing ever happens.

[Anonymous No.54179714]

>>54179142
felt it too. also the power of collective imagination anon is back. i unironically started visualizing how it would feel when link is 1000. timeline restored frens

[Anonymous No.54179777]

>>54179142
I think it’s “big” but it’s getting folks to adopt it. Which may take time since the industry is still in its infancy.

[Anonymous No.54179802]

>>54179777
CHECKED

[Anonymous No.54179811]

>>54179777
Checked. I'm also going to hide this comment in a thread because I feel like being too loud about it will ruin the magic, but has anyone notices that biz/ has very high volume posting with extremely low shitcoin spam at the moment? it's paradise.

[Anonymous No.54179872]

>>54179811
checked. I agree amount of scams are getting out of hand. And low quality content. About half the catalog is just legit bullshit

[Anonymous No.54179898]

>>54179142
>>54179198
>>54179714
>>54179777
>>54179802
>>54179811
Fuck you faggots. No matter how much you "FEEL" that being able to use APIs to interact with smart contracts is a PARADIGM SHIFT! Doesn't change the fact that no one wants to use blockchains for anything any time soon.

The biggest use case in the world right now is Swift's concluded proof of concept where the closing notes were:

>“Although the PoC demonstrated DLT could improve Nostro liquidity management and reconciliation processes, it also revealed that the pre-requisites will have to be met before banks can enjoy the full benefits of switching to a DLT process”
and
>"We look forward to doing more testing and proofs of concept"

God I'm so excited for you kids!

[Anonymous No.54180000]

>>54179898
https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/blockchain-technology-market-90100890.html

https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/blockchain-technology-market

https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/11/14/2554498/0/en/Heightened-Demand-from-Banking-Finance-Sectors-Drives-the-Blockchain-Technology-Market-to-an-Astonishing-CAGR-of-43-5-Future-Market-Insights-Inc.html

There’s a demand, even in the exploratory phase.

[Anonymous No.54180111]

>>54180000
Sucking up a bunch of tech VC money to "fiddle around" with a blockchain and pay your salary isn't a use case and it doesn't create value.

I mean, wouldn't it be easier to just tell me what blockchains are being used for that creates value? Siemens corporate bond on polygon?

[Anonymous No.54180193]

>>54179142
I-It's over bro's....The shadow fork went through

[Anonymous No.54180361]

>>54180111
Checked. I don’t disagree with you regarding that. But that doesn’t mean that new tech shouldn’t be explored.

HEY HOW DARE AOL EXPLORE INTERNET TO CONSUMERS

[Anonymous No.54180621]

>>54179898
>>54180000
>>54180361

With our investor hats on, we are looking for exactly this kind of technology which may have a small chance of becoming very widely used in future. There is nothing to be gained from investing in a technology once it is mature and everything is clear and competition has erased all margins.
Appreciate both of your research, getting into the details is the way to make better guesses about the future, and better guesses lead to better investment profits

[Anonymous No.54180681]

>>54179142
Chainlink = overhyped 2017 shitcoin

Sergey = narcisistic conman

Marines = retarded bagholders