[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 777 KB, 928x1658, 1647310041513.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54080109 No.54080109 [Reply] [Original]

high IQ overview of what's happening for the average /biz/tard

>> No.54080126

>high IQ overview
>tweet says it’s for dummies

>> No.54080137

>>54080109
B00kmarked

>> No.54080138
File: 67 KB, 637x171, 10614104-050E-478A-8368-BCCCD053C080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54080138

Isn’t that just quantitative easing?
Look at what had happened to the value of the Japanese yen and the growth of Japanese industry over the past 15 years if you want an idea of where this will head kek

>> No.54080156
File: 28 KB, 657x527, 1671128150999566.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54080156

>>54080109
>using bank taxes
>(no taxpayer money)
do these people even read what they type? The funds the FDIC is pulling from are taken from the "fees" (taxes) on the bank themselves which the cost of is directly put back on the customer (specifically in the form of lower returns on savings)
This retard is already saying "wow this is so successful its going to be in a textbook!" before the markets are even open or the reaction from the larger public.

>> No.54080160

>>54080138
It’s closer to an unsecured loan. The fed now has counterparty risk, they lose tax payer money if the banks borrow and end up defaulting

>> No.54080181

>>54080109
>high IQ
>literal zoomer babbel niggerspeak
Kill yourself

>> No.54080208

>>54080109
>Loaning failing banks money in exchange for assets that are worth less than the value of the loan costs the government nothing
What

>> No.54080226

Does this mean shorting SIVB is free money?

>> No.54080230

>>54080208
The bonds will mature for face value, it costs them zero in the long run yes. Just have to HODL some bags

>> No.54080286

Where's the tl;dr faggot.

>> No.54080290

>>54080109
The one thing I have learned during my time in finance is that you have to obfuscate every action you take enough for the public to stay on autopilot. The core of your business, fractional reserve banking, is a crime and everyone that it is explained to fully understands this. But it is complicated enough so that the average journalist is unable to grasp it and for the average consumer you might as well be doing complex math. This is the same shit. Complicated enough for the average Joe, but actually just another obfuscation of what is evidently just another round of shady practices.

>> No.54080297

>>54080160
>the taxpayer eats the losses
Increases my resolve to avoid being a wagie.

>> No.54080303

>>54080109
Noone cares about your twitter account you raging dick sucker.

>> No.54080331

>>54080109
bro if there's one more fucking bank run thread I'm gonna yawn so hard god damn boooring we already know your tradfi systems suck that's why we went into crypto

>> No.54080336

>>54080156
Add to this he claims that the toxic bonds that the bank holds aren't worthless.

Another psyop

>> No.54080377

>>54080230
>the government buys back bonds with money procured from those bonds and will pay itself back the bond value with money from bonds purchased by other banks that they can then get a loan on for the price paid for these new bonds

we’re in the 3rd kikel of hell

>> No.54080416

>>54080226
Was wondering this myself.

>> No.54080451

>>54080160
>they lose tax payer money if the banks borrow and end up defaulting
No they don't. They can hold it to maturity at worst.

>> No.54080500

>>54080156
You don't get it. Smart banks would be putting money away for unexpected liquidity demand anyway. You want your bank to do that, and that's precisely what SVB didn't do.

>> No.54080525

>>54080416
no, they stop trading, there are people with active puts who won't get their trade completed. The game only favors the devotees of stability.

>> No.54080558

>>54080156
>>54080336
Yeah the burden of lost money is expanded to the customers of other banks aka the public. Privatised gains socialized losses.
Also not just the bonds but the loans made by svb to tech are also worthless. 90% of these tech ventures by trannies will not be profitable to pay back

>> No.54080594

>>54080230
So if the government is putting their money into a bond that will be worth the same in one year, does that not mean they realise that being in a break even point in one year is good? Signalling the y expect the economy to be fucked so 100% is the safest option?

>> No.54080607

What's really super cool is how the executives cashed out before it went tits up.

>> No.54080630

>>54080109
>using bank taxes (no taxpayer $)
aren't the bank taxes literally tax payer money?

>> No.54080645

PRICED IN

>> No.54080683

>>54080109
This will not age well, and it's largely incorrect.

>> No.54080725
File: 53 KB, 1287x595, 1678681446585677.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54080725

we'll se if this really cost the tax payer $0

if this chart goes up, thens jts a bailout, through and through, and we're paying for it via inflation, and twitter op is a lying fuck

>> No.54080734
File: 6 KB, 97x128, freg31.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54080734

tldr

>> No.54080761

>>54080109
>deposits will be made whole using magic dollars and clever accounting
lol
pay up, goy