Why can't the US government just print money?

[Anonymous No.54020250]

What would the actual economic impact be if the FDIC decided to just compensate everyone who had money in Silicon Valley Bank and then shut the bank down? And it was done through some mechanism that's pretty much just printing money but with a tiny veneer of plausible deniability.

I guess banks would act more risky in the future since they know they'd be bailed out. So there could be more bank failures in the future and then the FDIC would have to choose to bail them out or not. But barely any banking licenses get created anyway so, apart from larger banks doing this, the problem might stay the same.

What would actually happen? I don't see how foreign investors could then just take their money elsewhere because the USA is the exceptional country. But then maybe they'd fear wacky behaviour elsewhere by the government.

[Anonymous No.54020274]

>>54020250
Even more ridiculous inflation
Only a goy would ask something like this btw

[Anonymous No.54020311]

> What would the actual economic impact be if the FDIC decided to just compensate everyone who had money in Silicon Valley Bank and then shut the bank down?
yes good idea, just like 2008, all we need to do is kick the van down the road another decade, also let’s not arrest any of the banker jews responsible for this
genius anon, wish I’d thought of that

[Anonymous No.54020348]

>>54020274
>>54020311

I know it's a horrendous idea. But what, in practice, would happen due to the loss of confidence? That money would go in other banks so I don't see how it would cause major inflation.