LINK working with SWIFT

[Anonymous No.5393906]

https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17

Why is no one talking about this!?!?! This is insanely huge.

>We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle. Allowing smart contracts on various networks to make payments, send governance instructions, and release collateral with over 11,000 banks.

[Anonymous No.5393916]

>sibos17
Old+priced in
Get out, Sergey is dumping

[Anonymous No.5393932]

>>5393906
The fact that Ripple is $50 billion because it can in theory compete with Swift. While Link is actually working with Swift... do the math.

[Anonymous No.5393946]

quit shilling absolute shit

[Anonymous No.5393957]

>SELL THIS SCAM COIN LINKIES

[Anonymous No.5393986]

>>5393946
but /biz/ likes coins that can be explained by colorful images. Reading is beyond them

[Anonymous No.5394000]

>>5393946
>>5393916

Oh are we still doing the FUD thing?

Even if XRP is a competitor to SWIFT, SWIFT is well established already. The transition (if it ever happens) would not happen overnight.

XRP has nothing to do with LINK, though.

[Anonymous No.5394009]

Sell your links! do it now, ill even buy them off you. Anyone wanna sell them to me at .40c?

[Anonymous No.5394073]

shilling is so weak and yet some faggots jump in, sell soon or you'll holding the infamous link bags for at least another quarter. literally zero news and next announcment is in 2-3 months.

[Anonymous No.5394158]

>>5394073
This

[Anonymous No.5394280]

>>5394073
> infamous link bags

I've literally made 12 ETH trading LINK alone. I'm done selling though -- I have no doubt this will be $1 end of Q1. It hasn't dipped below $0.50 in awhile.

[Anonymous No.5394316]

>>5394073
>he still thinks LINK is going back down

Nope.

[Anonymous No.5394443]

>>5394280
was 0.28 cent 28 hours ago nigger.
i'm holding 12k link,missed so many pnd in the last 2 months because i didn't had the balls to sell, not this time. still searching for the top to dump them, hope im not too greedy.

[Anonymous No.5394593]

You're retarded. You mean when everything flash crashed for a second, it dipped to $0.30. That's like saying "Bitcoin was just $10k!".

Jesus christ, stay poor.

[Anonymous No.5394768]

>>5394443
This isn't a pump and dump, we're at 60cents anon it's the real deal

[Anonymous No.5394818]

>>5393906
That's been there for months newfag.
t. stinky linky

[Anonymous No.5394844]

>>5394073
>and next announcment is in 2-3 months
And yet LINK is all you're gonna be hearing about for the next 2-3 months.

[Anonymous No.5394887]

I'm selling all my link at .85 cents ,this wont last it will go to .15 before the year is up

[Anonymous No.5394917]

Alright, it's been fun joke FUDing on LINK but none of us actually believed the FUD right?

This coin is so obviously winner that we all recognized the satire... right?

Or is biz really so stupid that they thought the coin was just going to stay at .20 forever in this market, with this much hype, with such an active fan base.

Please tell me you all bought at least 1000 of these bad boys?

[Anonymous No.5394962]

>>5393916
Priced in? Oh I just found the biggest retard on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.5394965]

>>5394887
Nah, .15 is unrealistic. People are too into it to let it fall that low. Unless there's another market crash you probably won't see cheaper then .40-.35 tops.

[Anonymous No.5395143]

>>5394593
>>5394593
link went to 0.3-0.35 cent after the announcment before the crash and hanged on 0.35 -+, meaning link pumping only because everything else is, when the market stabilize, it'll go back to 0.25-0.45 zone for a while. if the news has such an impact, it should have pumped a few days ago.
>>5394844
it's all i've heard about for the past 3 months.
again, im strongly belive in link but i just don't see how it can reach anything higher than this without significant news.

[Anonymous No.5395181]

>>5393932
Are companies really going to switch to an unknown system which would take massive investment and infrastructure changes or just stick what they already have?

What do you really believe?

[Anonymous No.5395471]

>>5395181
Considering ChainLink is plug and play, while adopting ripple means making massive infrastructure chages, the choice is clear

[Anonymous No.5395514]

>>5395181
>which would take massive investment and infrastructure changes
It actually doesn't need those

[Anonymous No.5395589]

Who in the hell has been constantly making these market buys over the last 3 days? The order book has been basically flat on the buy side and a wall on the sell side and they just keep tearing through levels without any meaningful pullbacks. Its fascinating to watch

[Anonymous No.5395669]

>>5394917
In all hoesty when link was first spammed on this board i thought it was just another pnd. The constant threads made curious about it and so i gave it a shot and read the whitepaper. After understanding its use case and importance for worldwide blockchain integration I went 75% in at 40c. If blockchain as a whole succeeds this coin will be undoubtedly needed. I think this coin will either break or make people rich and all this fud is probably just a combination of 4chan contrarians, satire, and anons not seeing the biggee picture. For now, we stinky linkys must appreciate the memes and fud attempts so that we can accumulate more

[Anonymous No.5395743]

>>5393916
>priced in
It's really not.

If the Swift relationship had been priced in, Link would be sitting on a multi-billion market cap right now.
And that's without mentioning the likes of AXA, Sony, BNP Paribas, Santander, Zeppelin etc.

[Anonymous No.5395841]

whales have finished accumulating, this shit is now going to the stratosphere.

[Anonymous No.5395843]

>>5395471
This.
Banks don't even have to change their APIs.

Using Chainlink will be infinitely lower threshold for banks than coding their own oracles, even.

[Anonymous No.5395914]