Chainlink Functions is to 2023

[Anonymous No.53918343]

What CCIP/staking was to 2022. Say it with me…NOTHING BURGER.

[Anonymous No.53918362]

>>53918343
that's just some loser who bought link at $50, twitter is full of em

[Anonymous No.53918374]

>beta
>soon, just need a few decades of testing guys

[Anonymous No.53918382]

>using Twitter and then trying to shill you chainlink Twitter fud account on /biz/ by posting caps of yourself
this is a level of cringe my mind can barely even process.

[Anonymous No.53918389]

>>53918362
Yeah but everything he says is true

[Anonymous No.53918398]

The Chainlink team and developers remind me a lot of SafeMoon. I suspect that the team has a way to manipulate the market, so every time you buy, you actually end up paying them, similar to what happens with SafeMoon. You can easily verify this by looking at the team's social media profiles and examining their lifestyles. They most likely got rich after starting Chainlink, and they may have difficulty finding jobs at respectable companies.

The team tends to announce hyped-up developments that are ultimately of little consequence. They discuss a new feature that is not particularly innovative and could easily be replicated with just a few lines of code. It's similar to when SafeMoon announced that they were creating an exchange - while some uninformed investors may believe this will benefit the price, it's not actually an innovative development. Similarly, Coinlink's Crosschain feature is not particularly useful or necessary.

The Chainlink team, like SafeMoon, claims that they are being targeted by "paid FUDsters" who are spreading false information to manipulate the market. While it's possible that there are people spreading false information about Chainlink, when a coin has features that are not particularly innovative and are just copycats of what the market already has, it may be a target for this type of attack. However, this is not really an attack, but rather an effort to inform people about the true value of the coin.

If you're a developer working on smart contracts, you can certainly use Chainlink's product since it makes things easier. However, it's worth noting that you could achieve the same results on your own with relative ease.

In conclusion, I would recommend researching the Chainlink team and their innovations carefully before investing. While I haven't personally bought or sold LINK, I believe that there may be some questionable practices that are worth exploring further. Perhaps CoffeZilla will even make a video about it in the future.

[Anonymous No.53918399]

I think it's really cool when the loser posting from these sockpuppet accounts gets no replies because he is a low iq black hole of charisma and then he posts screenshots of his own posts here and then gets insulted by big dick linkchads like myself

[Anonymous No.53918536]

>>53918399
Remember when you celebrated a blue dot two weeks ago?

>-20%

Ouch…

[Anonymous No.53918577]

>>53918399
basado

[Anonymous No.53918607]

>>53918399
the saddest part is a lot of these fudders are also holders. they fud to cope with the fact that they bought the top.

[Anonymous No.53919021]

The Chainlink team and developers remind me a lot of SafeMoon. I suspect that the team has a way to manipulate the market, so every time you buy, you actually end up paying them, similar to what happens with SafeMoon. You can easily verify this by looking at the team's social media profiles and examining their lifestyles. They most likely got rich after starting Chainlink, and they may have difficulty finding jobs at respectable companies.

The team tends to announce hyped-up developments that are ultimately of little consequence. They discuss a new feature that is not particularly innovative and could easily be replicated with just a few lines of code. It's similar to when SafeMoon announced that they were creating an exchange - while some uninformed investors may believe this will benefit the price, it's not actually an innovative development. Similarly, Coinlink's Crosschain feature is not particularly useful or necessary.

The Chainlink team, like SafeMoon, claims that they are being targeted by "paid FUDsters" who are spreading false information to manipulate the market. While it's possible that there are people spreading false information about Chainlink, when a coin has features that are not particularly innovative and are just copycats of what the market already has, it may be a target for this type of attack. However, this is not really an attack, but rather an effort to inform people about the true value of the coin.

If you're a developer working on smart contracts, you can certainly use Chainlink's product since it makes things easier. However, it's worth noting that you could achieve the same results on your own with relative ease.

In conclusion, I would recommend researching the Chainlink team and their innovations carefully before investing. While I haven't personally bought or sold LINK, I believe that there may be some questionable practices that are worth exploring further. Perhaps CoffeZilla will even make a video about it in the future.

[Anonymous No.53919031]

>>53918398
Oh fuck, sorry I got the next thread.

[Anonymous No.53919057]

>>53918343
This. So much announcements of use cases and nothing ever gets done. Always they just put another carrot on a stick

[Anonymous No.53919157]

Why are these niggers posting their own twitter posts lmao
Scholar

[Anonymous No.53919521]

>>53918389
low iq latefags are incapable of having an objective opinion on chainlink
its all emotional
thats why they spam biz with hilariously shit fud every day
just trying to circlejerk each other into thinking its okay that they bought and sold at a loss or gambled it all away on lending platforms

[Anonymous No.53919533]

>>53918343
Wdym, my steak is cooking just fine

[Anonymous No.53919554]

>>53918343
Dont you get tired of posting your own tweets you bag holding top buyer cum brained mongoloid.

[Anonymous No.53920819]

The Chainlink team and developers remind me a lot of SafeMoon. I suspect that the team has a way to manipulate the market, so every time you buy, you actually end up paying them, similar to what happens with SafeMoon. You can easily verify this by looking at the team's social media profiles and examining their lifestyles. They most likely got rich after starting Chainlink, and they may have difficulty finding jobs at respectable companies.

The team tends to announce hyped-up developments that are ultimately of little consequence. They discuss a new feature that is not particularly innovative and could easily be replicated with just a few lines of code. It's similar to when SafeMoon announced that they were creating an exchange - while some uninformed investors may believe this will benefit the price, it's not actually an innovative development. Similarly, Coinlink's Crosschain feature is not particularly useful or necessary.

The Chainlink team, like SafeMoon, claims that they are being targeted by "paid FUDsters" who are spreading false information to manipulate the market. While it's possible that there are people spreading false information about Chainlink, when a coin has features that are not particularly innovative and are just copycats of what the market already has, it may be a target for this type of attack. However, this is not really an attack, but rather an effort to inform people about the true value of the coin.

If you're a developer working on smart contracts, you can certainly use Chainlink's product since it makes things easier. However, it's worth noting that you could achieve the same results on your own with relative ease.

In conclusion, I would recommend researching the Chainlink team and their innovations carefully before investing. While I haven't personally bought or sold LINK, I believe that there may be some questionable practices that are worth exploring further. Perhaps CoffeZilla will even make a video about it in the future.

[Anonymous No.53920984]

>>53919521
>calls others low iq

Check the chart. You “smart” investment completely tanked.

[Anonymous No.53923442]

>>53918343
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMrfJgyTf68

[Anonymous No.53923499]

>>53918374
Gotta admit the bitterness on Twitter is fucking hilarious

[Anonymous No.53923562]

>>53919521
>>/biz/thread/S53824549#p53843244
Kys you shills got exposed

[Anonymous No.53923601]

>>53920984
>Being up 4000% is low iq
Sure, fuddy. Chop chop, you haven't reached your thread quota for today yet.

[Anonymous No.53923609]

>>53918398
Yeah not reading all that

[Anonymous No.53923625]

Devs can now connect their smart contracts to Google Analytics data hosted on BigQuery using Function's serverless infra.
Probably nothing.

[Anonymous No.53923674]

>>53923442

[Anonymous No.53923838]

>>53923625
and what do for token price?

[Anonymous No.53924316]

ever notice how it's only the esl fudders who use the specific phrase "token price"? you will never see the phrase "token price" when reading matic or uni fud

[Anonymous No.53926496]

>>53918362
There are sore losers who bought at $10. Read the room. The 20 cent gang is around in the weeds but are a small minority.

[Anonymous No.53926504]

People are still falling for this scam?

[Anonymous No.53927138]

[Anonymous No.53929213]

>>53924316
Grasping at straws
>its le heckin bulgarians!!!

Cringe

[Anonymous No.53929295]

>>53924316
They have some weird tells. Like when they all decided to start saying "Chainlink Labs" specifically, even though it's a dead giveaway every time.

[Anonymous No.53929296]

>>53926496
You prob had to revise this copy paste to sub in $10 for 30. Lmao cope harder. You lost hundreds of thousands hodling

[Anonymous No.53929472]

>>53919521
what part of the protocol is not in testnet or beta?