/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.53891055]

Sergey talking about AI guardrails and replying directly to Eric Schmidt about his WSJ article on AI. Are we fucked?

[Anonymous No.53891070]

>falsehoods
You mean factual counter narratives.

[Anonymous No.53891087]

This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.53891095]

>>53891055
Just an auto serg twitter post shat out by CLLs garbage marketing, trying to ride the coattails of AI. I've been holding this shit for 5 years now. I'm in financial prison.

[Anonymous No.53891122]

>shady past?
checked
>well connected?
checked
>big things coming soon?
checked
>big adoption no price action?
checked
chainlink is a confirmed psyop

[Anonymous No.53891129]

>>53891087

[Anonymous No.53891133]

OMG ChatGPT is going to eat the entire cosmos. Help us Sergey! Please!

[Anonymous No.53891175]

Too many people have been exposing room temp iq’s. Some, especially on Reddit where I can look into their posting history, surprise me.

Some of you neo-luddites just can’t stomach the fact that a new form of intelligence has arrived and will outpace us in 2-5 years. It’s not that big of a deal and isn’t as existentially concerning as you think it is unless you make it a big deal.

Have any of you had a wife or girlfriend? Some things she will let slide and not even care about like you think she would, but if you pester her over and over again she will make it an issue. Same with Ai. Quit acting like it’s not going to be intelligent or it’s going to be ultra-satan, and the world will be a-ok. Keep it up, and the Ai might believe that it has something to fear or be concerned about with humans.

tl;dr - don’t be your own self fulfilling prophecy, dumb fucks cucks

[Anonymous No.53891240]

>>53891175
chat gpt pls go

[Anonymous No.53891279]

>>53891055
>So you heard about this current thing? Yeah? Uhu... huh... yea yea- heyheyhey but listen, listen! This where the blockchain comes in bro!

[Anonymous No.53891292]

>>53891055
He needs to shut the fuck up, all this does is cause LINK dumps.

[Anonymous No.53891296]

>>53891279
i dont get how this stupid faggot is talking about this shit when people have lost so much money

[Anonymous No.53891316]

>>53891055
Oh wow and it just so happens his ponzy... i mean link can solve this?

[Anonymous No.53892006]

None of this is in the white paper. Its hilarious watching chainlink shamelessly try to grift with nfts and AI.. Whats wrong sergey? Nobody wants to pay for your price feeds for their totally legit nft lottery projects? Lmao

[Anonymous No.53892036]

I just disagree with Sergey on the AI thing. More accurately, I disagree that the guardrails and infinite consumption bogeymen he has focused on several times are critical to the subject of AI.

I don't love that he seems to be simultaneously so off the mark and so mind numbingly conventional on an important tech topic like AI.

[Anonymous No.53892202]

This guy might be the biggest loser in crypto's history. Bigger than Carlos Matos, Jun Hasegawa, or SBF. He latches onto any narrative/trend like a hypebeast. DeFi! no no, NFT's! Blockchain gaming! Web3! Tokenized stocks! Decentralized identity! AI! Payments! Price feeds!

This fat faggot has been yelling at clouds for years. $20 3 summers ago. $7 today. I'd say he's failed miserably

[Anonymous No.53892240]

I honestly hope that SEC labels LINK as a security. That will force the team to actually comply with the laws and stop fucking over the investors.

[Anonymous No.53892319]

>>53891296
Respond to the Twitter thread, "nevermind AI, where's ccip".

[Anonymous No.53894220]

Fucking bumping this shit

[Anonymous No.53894277]

>>53891133
checked and kek'ed

[Anonymous No.53894288]

>>53892202
>DeFi! no no, NFT's! Blockchain gaming! Web3! Tokenized stocks! Decentralized identity! AI! Payments! Price feeds!
He dominates the market for half your list, and is about to be the first mover for the other half

[Anonymous No.53894291]

>>53891055
> in seeking growth, it will consume resources & if it can infinitely grow, it could in theory infinitely consume resources.
How is this pothead leading a crypto project lmao

[Anonymous No.53894311]

>>53891055
Eric Schmidt sets it up
>hurr durr how do we stop AI from going skynet
Sergey knocks it out of the park
>chainlink, duh

How would you interpret this as being fucked? Is it because you're a nolinker?

[Anonymous No.53894318]

>>53892036
You haven't thought these things through well clearly. Smart Contracts are an obvious choice for siloing AI systems.

[Anonymous No.53894321]

>>53891070
>You mean factual counter narratives
This. You know it. You can see the technocracy slowly taking shape in front of your eyes.
t. Link maxi but increasingly because I see it as inevitable and I know what side of that deal I'd rather be on

[Anonymous No.53894339]

>>53891095
those are just financial guardrails. link is against infinite growth

[Anonymous No.53894351]

>let me pay vitalik gas fees for every ai decision so that ai can be guardrailed on the blockchain
Lol that's retarded

[Anonymous No.53894375]

>>53894351
>vitalik
Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.53894376]

>>53894311
how the fuck is chainlink going to stop AI? what a joke

[Anonymous No.53894382]

>>53894376
Proof of humanity/identity for one.

[Anonymous No.53894428]

>>53894321
It's something I've been thinking about a lot since the Coinbase L2 announcement. Something you just get tiny whiffs of, like in the BIS document about cross-CBDC communication where it talks about "regulator nodes".
They are going to keep applying pressure to crypto, insofar as it represents the open source, idealistic version of Web3 and DLT based systems.
Then they will launch their own take on Web3, they're building it right now. And all the institutional liquidity, and all the r/technology smug skeptics whose current understanding is simply "it's monkey pictures and scams", because that's what the news tells them, will pile in and say "oh THIS is magnificent, nothing like the scam filled crypto of before. We can trust large institutions like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan and the BIS and the WEF to responsibly manage this from the top."
And without 99% of people even noticing, they will sideline the dream of truly disintermediated technology and replace it with a faster, better system of what they are doing to everyone already. And the normies will crow about it, because they don't know any better.
And the idealists, the crypto fanatics who dreamt the biggest, will be relegated to a niche sort of irrelevant nerd. Like Linux purists. Or open source fanatics in general.
That's how they're going to kill crypto. By "adopting" it. And Chainlink is going to be a big part of their solution.
I have held LINK since ICO, but now more than ever I get why they attract so much resistance from the purists. I used to say "never selling" because I was excited about making it. Now I say "never selling" because I am grasping for a lifeline before they fully close the doors.

[Anonymous No.53894736]

>>53894428
Yep, this is what my gut is telling me too. There's going to be some delicious irony in having "trusted" institutions being the thing that drives mainstream adoption of blockchain technology.

[Anonymous No.53894791]

>>53894382
the O N L Y solution

[Anonymous No.53895011]

>>53894318
Why would we use smart contracts vs regular code to silo an AI?

[Anonymous No.53895019]

>>53894428
I've been saying this for a while but I'm quite sure it will happen just like it happened with Casinos:
https://youtu.be/xNyAsdhG_Yg?t=499

[Anonymous No.53895029]

crypto is an elaborate trading cards game

[Anonymous No.53895041]

>>53895029
bullish

[Anonymous No.53895352]

>>53894428
based anon for understanding what can happen

[Anonymous No.53895508]

>>53891055
a very schoppenhauer-esque take on live and growth

[Anonymous No.53896148]

>>53891055
>OP pic
This shit actually has me worried about Link, when I consider it in the context of my pic. It's perfectly understandable and good to change directions based on the market, but I'm now getting the impression that Sergey is just "putting out fires" where he's jumping onto new initiatives before the previous products have been finished, since they got relegated to lower priorities. Sergey, you need to focus your company to actually push out some products, finish some before jumping onto "new initiatives", ok?

[Anonymous No.53896187]

>ai trendy
>quick make a tweet about ai
>what ccip?
>fuck ccip

[Anonymous No.53896218]

How's that swift partnership going, sergey?

[Anonymous No.53896238]

>>53891055
raiden told the story when i was a boy. mgs2

[Anonymous No.53896242]

>>53896148
>cont'd
Not to mention, aggressive expansion can lead to company collapse. Sergey needs to be careful here about expanding Chainlink's (and Chainlink Labs') size and scope to fast too soon. Seriously, if he keeps expanding without delivering anything (staking v0.1 does NOT count. We are still waiting on CCIP, DECO, FSS, Staking) Chainlink Labs can end up in dire straits, which would mean I invested in this project for nothing. Sergey please deliver some of these.

[Anonymous No.53896721]

>>53894428
Yep, that's what I'm afraid of.

[Anonymous No.53898826]

>>53896242
Too late. Hes already got a payroll in hundreds of millions. This is why psych majors dont make good ceos. And he has no balls so theres that too

[Anonymous No.53899113]

>>53896242
>if he keeps expanding without delivering anything
how can you expand without delivering anything? Just today they launched Functions, which is huge. quit being a fudding faggot and think about what it takes to build what Chainlink is building. If you get it, then do what you can to help them. If you don't, then shut up and keep your small-minded thoughts out of the way.

[Anonymous No.53899206]

>>53896148
he's only saying that to try and make up for ccip not launching in 2022