FUCKING DO SOMETHING

[Anonymous No.53867134]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.53867152]

Quiet pussy. You got scammed by a russian and you’ll just sit there and take it, like the pussy you are

[Anonymous No.53867178]

>>53867134
Hows cult life bitchboy? Youre a coweard. Youre literally subservient to a russian hahahaa what a fucking bitch

[Anonymous No.53867190]

You were scammed by a fat russian, cope

[Anonymous No.53867192]

>>53867134
Fucking get wrecked you stupid pece of shit, russian lover fuck

[Anonymous No.53867196]

>>53867134
*dumps*

[Anonymous No.53867215]

>>53867134
It's aint needed

[Anonymous No.53867228]

>>53867134
LOL..once you get passed the anger stage this all becomes humorous

[Anonymous No.53867300]

>>53867134
Deserved it cuck

[Anonymous No.53867325]

>>53867134
>cube id
Looks like the linkers win again.

[Anonymous No.53867335]

>>53867134
snap!

[Anonymous No.53868129]

[Anonymous No.53868327]

Wow you lost huh? Chainlink not doing so good? kek baggies

[Anonymous No.53868604]

>>53867152
>>53867178
>>53867190
>>53867192
>>53867196
>>53867215
>>53867228
>>53867300
>>53868327
Check out this absolutely unhinged fudfag doing overtime tonight, I hope he's paid well (LOL).
Repeatedly posting with the same broken english and punctuation, they're not sending their best.

[Anonymous No.53869173]

LINK will win in the end

[Anonymous No.53869195]

[Anonymous No.53869287]

PIECE OF NIGGER SHIT KEEPS DUMPING NONSTOP

WHAT HAPPENED TO $8

[Anonymous No.53869304]

>>53869173
seems fine

[Anonymous No.53869309]

Muh blue dot Coinbase announcement. What a fucking nothingburger like always

[Anonymous No.53869325]

>>53867134
>>53867152
>>53867178
>>53867190
>>53867192
>>53867196
>>53867215
>>53867228
>>53867300
>>53867335
>>53868129
>>53868327
>>53869287
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE
Jesus christ.

[Anonymous No.53869404]

>>53869325
It's easier to believe all of this, and type it out 20x a day, than admit you either bought or missed the top of a shit token. Fucking lol. Gme/ chainlink merger when?

[Anonymous No.53869415]

>>53869404
We don't have to "believe" fudders are seething and posting about Chainlink non stop, we can see it for ourselves every single day.

[Anonymous No.53869419]

>>53867335
nico draining her piping hot pee on my face

[Anonymous No.53869425]

>>53869415
he's also retarded enough to think that people actually write pastas out every time they see them

[Anonymous No.53869437]

>>53869415
>fudders are seething
Yeah, that'll help you hit your investment goals. Lol. Did you forget why you bought the fucking things?

[Anonymous No.53869444]

>>53869437
>that'll help you hit your investment goals
It won't.

>Did you forget why you bought the fucking things?
To make money.
Which is why fudding Link is retarded, and always was.

[Anonymous No.53869453]

>>53869444
>To make money
Checked and keked. You're doing it very wrong.

[Anonymous No.53869483]

>>53869453
Spend many hours and dozens of posts telling me all about it.

[Anonymous No.53869514]

the appointed savior of the choinoink community has entered the thread boys, rejoice as fudders tremble in fear!
>(((we))) don't listen to da fudderz!
>(((we))) can see!

[Anonymous No.53869517]

>>53868604
Uh oh stinky! Stinky linkie! Cleanup on aisle 700k!

[Anonymous No.53869527]

>>53869483
Yeah, we're both here wasting time. The difference is my money isn't locked in a shit token ponzi staking scheme ripped directly from animal coin mania 2020. You have to spend 12 waking hours down here convincing yourself that evil Bulgarians are why you haven't made it yet and my "fudding" is evidence that you made the right decision despite CHART.PNG; I'm just grabbing a lul with my coffee.


insert reddit space to feed confirmation bias


Anyways bro. Have a fun Monday and keep never selling. I'll probably be back to "SEETH" in a few hours.

[Anonymous No.53869531]

>>53869514
>>53869517
>>53869527
you had 2 years subhumans

[Anonymous No.53869540]

>>53869527
>we're both here wasting time
I'm talking about, shilling, informing myself on my investment. We are not the same.

[Anonymous No.53869558]

>>53869540
and the board responds to you by expressing the sentiment that your "investment" is garbage and that you should be ashamed for associating yourself with it

[Anonymous No.53869564]

>>53869527
Oh! Here's one more post under a different ID to prove indisputably that I'm a brown handed transsexual telegram paid fudder sent here by Bulgarians to steal your lucky charms!
You can win teh internet knowing that $1000eoy is guaranteed because I went off wifi.

[Anonymous No.53869574]

>>53869558
>the board responds to you by expressing the sentiment that your "investment" is garbage
Which is a waste of time and money.

[Anonymous No.53869581]

>>53869558
>4x4 bingo

[Anonymous No.53869590]

>>53869574
relentlessly shilling a fundamentally useless shitcoin with no future is a waste of time and money

[Anonymous No.53869591]

>>53867134
>>53867152
>>53867178
>>53867178
>>53867190
>>53867190
>>53867190
>>53867190
>>53867190
>>53867192
>>53867196
>>53867215
>>53867228
>>53867300
>>53867325
>>53867325
>>53867335
>>53868327
>>53868604
>>53869173
>>53869195
>>53869287
>>53869304
>>53869309
>>53869325
>>53869404
>>53869415
>>53869415
>>53869419
>>53869425
>>53869437
>>53869444
>>53869453
>>53869483
>>53869514
>>53869517
>>53869527
>>53869531
>>53869540
>>53869564
>>53869574
18 digits fudfags

[Anonymous No.53869594]

>>53869590
Even the biggest companies and richest people in the world shill their shit. It's never a waste of time.

[Anonymous No.53869615]

>>53869594
it's not "your shit" bro, you're not getting paid for this, you're only hoping that some other gullible retard is going to pump your worthless bags but guess what, nobody drinks the kool-aid anymore, (You)'re on your own
enjoy "shilling" your trash and consequently getting your shit pushed back

[Anonymous No.53869622]

>>53869615
>it's not "your shit"
it literally is

[Anonymous No.53869658]

>>53869622
>my 4chinz identity is tied to a lottery ticket
>yes I'm doing it for free and yes, I'm more than proud for it
read the ToS and understand you're not an investor, you're literally doing charity

[Anonymous No.53869667]

>>53869658
I write legal documents for a living, is this quite literally the first time you ever read a ToS?
Even the police's ToS says they don't have to actually protect you.

[Anonymous No.53869670]

>>53869658
of course not, chainlink isn't a security you crippletard lol

[Anonymous No.53869672]

>>53869667
when did I ever invest in da police?

[Anonymous No.53869676]

>>53869672
when you call them to help you in an emergency

[Anonymous No.53869694]

>>53869676
I call them for free and they've never ignored any calls
what kind of third world shithole are you living in? thai? kek
I must say though, I do enjoy all of the mental gymnastics you're forced to perform when confronted with reality
>I-I write legal documents for a living bro honest to god trust me!1
isn't choinlank supposed to remove those kinds of professions? aren't you fucked if it succeeds? they're all rhetorical cause I know you're larping, as usual

[Anonymous No.53869695]

>>53869531
And you had 2 years to sell for anything else on the planet that has outperformed link lmao

[Anonymous No.53869699]

>>53869694
>I call them for free and they've never ignored any calls
Gee, they do THAT even though their ToS says they don't actually have to do that?
How strange.

[Anonymous No.53869705]

>>53869699
>le police tos
police is not a pay per service, moron, they do not have a "ToS", they do not have investor obligations or expectations, you've been shitposting here for almost 3 years and you still can't form a cohesive analogy ffs

[Anonymous No.53869716]

LINK mm is so based lmao.

[Anonymous No.53869722]

>>53869705
>they do not have a "ToS"
They do.

[Anonymous No.53869739]

>>53869304
extremely bullish

based Klaus

[Anonymous No.53869748]

>>53869722
>A police officer cannot be held liable for the actions of another person. If the suspect is actively attacking the victim, the officer cannot be held liable for the injuries caused by the suspect.
that's what this essentially boils down to, it doesn't mean the police are not liable to do their fucking job, it literally means you can't sue the police for a crime, not that they aren't obligated to try and stop the crime or impeding the perpetrators you dunce
>a granny dies on an isolated cabin at the mountain tops on bumfuck nowhere
>family is looking for financial compensation so they sue the police and the state
>police claims that since the crime scene was a remote place there was nothing they could do
there it is, you fucking retard, I just destroyed your stupid argument in 5 minutes

[Anonymous No.53869766]

>>53869748
>>A police officer cannot be held liable for the actions of another person
>that's what this essentially boils down to

Hell no, it's literally that the police has no duty to protect individuals.

[Anonymous No.53869769]

>>53869304
How much of an impact will Everest play here? They are to my knowledge the only ID providers working with Link no?

[Anonymous No.53869773]

>>53869766
>the police has no duty to protect individuals
source it instead of talking out of your ass

[Anonymous No.53869779]

>>53869773
>source it
I did

[Anonymous No.53869799]

>>53869779
that source you provided does not state that the police has no duty to protect individuals
this is how we're going to play this? you're just going to repeat the same shit for eternity?

[Anonymous No.53869818]

>>53869799
>that source you provided does not state that the police has no duty to protect individuals
It literally does.

[Anonymous No.53869831]

>>53869818
>muh one(1) out of context sentence from jewpedia
it literally doesn't
let me help you a bit
https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1981/79-6-3.html
where exactly can this statement be found?
ps, if you really like choinlank, I suggest you stop posting because you're doing more harm than good lol

[Anonymous No.53869845]

>>53869831
Here's the first mention.

[Anonymous No.53869869]

>>53869845
>The duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists
>The duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large
>The duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large
here's the important part which contradicts your retarded statement
this only proves my example you retard, the granny is an individual citizen in this case

[Anonymous No.53869870]

>chainlink tokens are a good investment, despite the chart, because the cops don't have to help you
???
At this point, i think you're just bumping the thread to keep blue hexagons on page 1. Lol

Here's another bump to help you out.

[Anonymous No.53869882]

>>53869870
>chainlink tokens are a good investment, despite the chart, because the cops don't have to help you
kek
his argument in a nutshell
I might be turning this into a meme at somepoint
>chainlonk good cause police have the same tos!

[Anonymous No.53869918]

Guys, I’m feeling desperation despite the price being a bit higher than beginning of January. Is this the psychological bottom?

[Anonymous No.53869944]

>>53869882
>SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IS BULLISH FOR LINK
Apparently the fourth industrial revolution will be a zero return on investment golden age powered by flatlined uniswap price checker tokens and a meh approach to broken windows.
My god ill never be able to leave /biz/. It's a wonderous garden of broken human psychology.

[Anonymous No.53869960]

>>53869869
Like I said, the police has no duty to protect individuals.
You denied this was the case, and it literally is the case.

[Anonymous No.53869971]

>>53869882
No, my argument is a ToS always looks retarded.

[Anonymous No.53869986]

>>53869971
>No, my argument is a ToS always looks retarded
Therefore, $1000eoy!

[Anonymous No.53870009]

>>53869304
>>53869769
The O N L Y solution

[Anonymous No.53870010]

>>53869986
That's not the reasoning at all.

[Anonymous No.53870019]

>>53869971
no your argument is that baggies shouldn't be worried at all about the ToS clearly stating that every participant is effectively relinquishing their legal rights, or that the company is not liable to deliver any of their promised features, or that the staking unlock can be revoked at any times lol
>guise they just put this up for shits and giggles, it means nothing!
the absolute state of bagholders

[Anonymous No.53870024]

>>53870019
>baggies shouldn't be worried at all about the ToS
Yes.
Because all ToS look like that.

[Anonymous No.53870044]

chainlink falling to sub 5$ before april. I'm here for the mass biz sudoku that will happen

[Anonymous No.53870063]

>>53870024
https://ethereum.org/en/terms-of-use/
>ctrl + f suspension of services = 0 results
>ctrl + f CFTC, SEC = 0 results
>ctrl + f EXCLUSION OF CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATED DAMAGES = 0 results
meanwhile, from the updated chinklink ToS
>You understand that the Foundation is not registered or licensed by the CFTC, SEC or any financial regulatory authority. No financial regulatory authority has reviewed or approved the use of the open-source software utilized by the Chainlink Network. The Website, the Services, and the Chainlink open-source software do not constitute advice or a recommendation concerning any commodity, security or other asset. The Foundation is not acting as an investment adviser or commodity trading adviser to any person.
not only is their ToS completely different in tone and content compared to every other crypto ToS you can find, it is also ridiculously long
you're a kike for attempting to portray this as anything other than a foreshadowing of what is about to unfold here

[Anonymous No.53870082]

>>53870063
forgot this
not to even mention that they literally have an equally long and ridiculous ToS only for their staking service kek
>We assume no liability or responsibility for any: (a) errors, mistakes, or inaccuracies of content; (b) personal injury or property damage, of any nature whatsoever, resulting from any access to or use of the Interface; (c) unauthorized access to or use of any secure server or database in our control, or the use of any information or data stored therein; (d) interruption or cessation of function related to the Interface; (e) bugs, other harmful elements, or the like that may be transmitted to or through the Interface; (f) errors or omissions in, or loss or damage incurred as a result of, the use of any content made available through the Interface; and (g) the defamatory, offensive, or illegal conduct of any third party. Under no circumstances shall we or any of our officers, directors, employees, contractors, consultants, agents, affiliates, or subsidiaries be liable to you for any claims, proceedings, liabilities, obligations, damages, losses, or costs in an amount exceeding the greater of (i) the amount you paid to us in exchange for access to and use of the Interface over the preceding twelve (12) month period, or (ii) $100.00. This limitation of liability applies regardless of whether the alleged liability is based on contract, tort, negligence, strict liability, or any other basis, and even if we have been advised of the possibility of such liability. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of certain warranties or the limitation or exclusion of certain liabilities and damages. Accordingly, some of the disclaimers and limitations set forth in the Terms may not apply to you. This limitation of liability shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law.

[Anonymous No.53870089]

>>53870082
>bugs, other harmful elements, or the like that may be transmitted to or through the Interface; (f) errors or omissions in, or loss or damage incurred as a result of, the use of any content made available through the Interface
kek, they're literally saying
>we are not liable for not fixing bugs on our premier feature which enables actual value and secures our network
imagine unironically attempting to defend this in good faith

[Anonymous No.53870160]

>>53870044
Checked. Buy orders set.

[Anonymous No.53870222]

>>53869304
>>53869591
>>53869739

The only thing that matters at this point is if owning Link will exempt us from any sort of digital ID/vax pass. Yeah we will be rich blah blah blah… but the old world ain’t coming back so the being rich part is different now. All you morons who spoon fed us brainlets back in 2018… all thought we were going to get rich and that’s why you were buying. Once you said it’s gonna get rid of all the paper pushing jobs and shit…I immediately knew it was a catch 22. Yeah we will be rich but chainlink was going to bring us into a world I have no interest in. Then covid came and it was off to the races on this shit. I don’t really care about anything except not eating bugs, not living in a pod; and.not having some gay digital passport with vax shit linked to it. If owning link exempts is from all that then I’m cool.

[Anonymous No.53870272]

>>53870063
>>53870082
You're comparing the Link staking ToS to the Ethereum.org website ToS.

To be clear: you're not even comparing to the Ethereum blockchain ToS, but to their fucking WEBSITE ToS.

[Anonymous No.53870320]

>>53870272
God that’s hilarious

[Anonymous No.53870384]

>>53869483
>t t theyre all the same person hurrrrrr

Man, life as a cult member cant be easy. You realize link is indistinguishable from gme at this point right? Just go into one of their generals.

[Anonymous No.53870406]

>>53869870
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHA

holy shit the cope….going off on tangents about tos on a mongolion forum and hypothetical cop situations haha. A link cultie thrives on humiliation

[Anonymous No.53870408]

>>53870272
nope, this >>53870063
and the screencap are directly quoted from here
https://chain.link/terms
and in this post I clarify there are two different ToS>>53870082
>not to even mention that they literally have an equally long and ridiculous ToS only for their staking service kek
and then I quote the staking ToS below
at least you've tried but I don't understand why you keep responding

[Anonymous No.53870430]

>>53870406
>going off on tangents about tos
Yes, this guy: >>53869658

[Anonymous No.53870439]

>>53870430
bro, just leave the thread

[Anonymous No.53870445]

>>53870408
Why are you bringing up website ToS in a discussion about Link staking ToS?

[Anonymous No.53870451]

>>53870445
I brought up this
https://chain.link/terms
why are you continuously refusing to engage with the actual argument?

[Anonymous No.53870457]

>>53870451
The actual argument was about the Link staking ToS: >>53869658

[Anonymous No.53870466]

>>53870457
here we go again
you're not winning this by pretending to be retarded, you stated that link tos is similar to every tos and I disputed that by bringing up this
https://chain.link/terms against this https://ethereum.org/en/terms-of-use/
eth doesn't have a "Staking tos" like link does, further disproving the point you've made here>>53870024
>all tos looks like that
it doesn't, eat shit

[Anonymous No.53870481]

>>53870466
The ToS for the ETH website says nothing on the website is necessarily accurate.
That's hilarious.

And all ToS are like that; they are always as retarded as they possibly can be.
Because persons and companies always want to skirt liability as much as they can.

[Anonymous No.53870503]

>>53870481
>all tos are like that
I demonstrated how the shitlink tos is entirely different in than eth, and everyone who's not blind can verify it with their own eyes
keep repeating your script like a broken record

[Anonymous No.53870529]

>>53870503
The whole point of a website is to provide information.
And then the ToS for the ETH website (and many others) says "don't trust the information on this website".

That's fundamentally retarded. And ToS are always like that.

[Anonymous No.53870582]

>>53870408
>>[ETH and Link] literally have an equally long and ridiculous ToS only for their staking service
So why did you try to shit on Link’s staking ToS specifically?
You just BTFO yourself up the ass.

[Anonymous No.53870630]

>>53870582
>hurr ebin troll
they're not equal, at all
eth tos is tiny compared to link's, what I've said is that link has an equally long and ridiculous tos only for their staking services, while eth doesn't
it's hilarious watching you desperately trying to find an angle to attack me from kek

[Anonymous No.53870666]

>>53870630
>link has an equally long and ridiculous tos only for their staking services, while eth doesn't
ETH doesn’t provide staking services itself, third parties do.

[Anonymous No.53870681]

>>53870666
good, this only serves to prove that link's ridiculous tos (both of them) are not similar to other tos and are unique to link only
get fucked cheerleader

[Anonymous No.53870704]

>>53870681
>only Link has ridiculous tos
Are you like 12?
The itunes ToS say you can’t build nuclear weapons.

[Anonymous No.53870750]

>>53870704
are they saying you are relinquishing all of your legal rights at the moment you use an apple product? are they also stating they're not liable in case their latest ios update breaks the phone and leads to sensitive data leaking? didn't think so either
https://9to5mac.com/2023/01/09/apple-privacy-tracking-lawsuit/
you've completely lost so stop embarrassing yourselves, chainlank's tos literally reads as the prelude of a rugpull unfolding in real time

[Anonymous No.53870756]

>>53867134
Seriously what the fuck is this absolute shitscoins problem? It's remarkable how bad it is on price action

[Anonymous No.53870783]

>>53870750
>all of your legal rights
Kek 12 years old confirmed

>are they also stating they're not liable in case their latest ios update breaks the phone and leads to sensitive data leaking?
Literally yes:
f. Limitation of Liability. TO THE EXTENT NOT PROHIBITED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL LICENSOR BE LIABLE FOR (…) LOSS OF DATA
https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

Probably the majority of online services have such a ToS clause.

[Anonymous No.53870922]

>>53870783
this is about the APPS, not the product itself you retard, otherwise this lawsuit would have fell through
read this and tell me how it is comparable
>In no event will the Protected Parties' aggregate liability arising out of or in connection with the Website, the Services and the Chainlink Network (and any of their content and functionality), any performance or non-performance of the Services, your Distributed Ledger Technology assets, other digital assets, Link Tokens or any other product, service or other item provided by or on behalf of a Protected Party, whether under contract, tort (including negligence), civil liability, statute, strict liability or other theory of liability exceed the amount of fees paid by you to us under these Terms in the twelve (12) month period immediately preceding the event giving rise to the claim for liability.
this is the corresponding apple tos https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/
and I dare you to find me this:
>YOU HEREBY WAIVE ANY APPLICABLE PROVISION IN LAW OR REGULATION
this is the smoking gun, you literally CANNOT FIND THIS ANYWHERE ELSE, period
>YOU HEREBY WAIVE ANY APPLICABLE PROVISION IN LAW OR REGULATION
>YOU HEREBY WAIVE ANY APPLICABLE PROVISION IN LAW OR REGULATION
>YOU HEREBY WAIVE ANY APPLICABLE PROVISION IN LAW OR REGULATION

[Anonymous No.53870947]

>>53870922
>this is about the APPS
Which includes literal Apple apps.
In which case the “Licensor” is literally Apple.

Oopsie!

[Anonymous No.53870959]

>>53870947
>YOU HEREBY WAIVE ANY APPLICABLE PROVISION IN LAW OR REGULATION
find me this on their tos

[Anonymous No.53870981]

>>53870756
The guy who made it for free on a laptop has half a billion tokens left that he dumps millions of dollars worth every time the crypto markets make a hype driven leg up. It's basically a 10 year long slow bleed to move real money from /biz/, reddit, YouTube, and Twitter cryptokidz into early backer and celebrity ceo endorsers pockets using heavily implied promises that SOON someone will give a fuck about a crypto price checker service.

[Anonymous No.53870985]

>>53870959
Glad you conceded the “data leak” point.

Now post the source for that fragment.

[Anonymous No.53871016]

>>53870985

[Anonymous No.53871063]

>>53871016
You think that phrase means you’re waiving “all of your legal rights”?

[Anonymous No.53871119]

>>53871063
>you and all other members of the entity or organization on whose behalf you are using the Website or Services and/or the Chainlink Network hereby release and forever discharge the Foundation and all Protected Parties from, and hereby waive and relinquish, each and every past, present and future dispute, claim, controversy, demand, right, obligation, liability, action and cause of action of every kind and nature (including personal injuries, death, and property damage), that has arisen or arises directly or indirectly out of, or that relates directly or indirectly to, the Website, the Services and/or the Chainlink Network (including any interactions with, or act or omission of, other Website or Chainlink Network users or any third-party services).
yes anon, it's pretty straight forward
what's wrong, are you having trouble finding this on the apple tos? lol
take the L like the rest of your discord friens have and fuck off with your gaslighting attempts

[Anonymous No.53871123]

The fuck is going on in this thread, how can a rank 20 erc20 shittoken invoke such an emotional response?

[Anonymous No.53871126]

Remember that "1 or 2 decades" comment Sergey made at SmartCon?

At first I didn't want to believe it, but now I'm starting to think it's literally going to be 20 years before a 10k stack makes it.
All the new concepts they keep releasing are decades away from widespread adoption.
CCIP hasn't even been birthed yet, let alone been able to be experimented with.

We've got a loooooong road ahead of us

[Anonymous No.53871178]

>>53871119
>yes
But it doesn't say that at all.
It says you waive any legal provision that says "the waiver does not apply to claims unknown to the creditor".

It’s a very specific and limited application, but you think it involves “all of your legal rights”.
You’re borderline illiterate.

[Anonymous No.53871234]

>>53871126
He also tweeted that good things take 10 years. He's not kidding. There's a reason it's not even top 20 in market cap (they are way behind where /biz/ expects them to be)

[Anonymous No.53871506]

>>53871126
THIS. I actually have it on good authority that CCIP is nothing more than a word draft concept on Sergeys phone, and its riddled with spelling mistakes to boot

[Anonymous No.53871564]

>>53871506
omg is this verified ?

[Anonymous No.53871588]

>>53867134
FUCKING BUY MORE YOU POOR CUNT

[Anonymous No.53871625]

>>53871126
It will be 10 years before chainlink is integrated into everything like google is now. But speculation always frontruns innovation, google didn’t moon overnight on one piece of news or integration, same will be true for link, speculators will just methodically pull up the ladder every so often. <$1 link had the ladder pulled in 2019, <$5 link had the ladder pulled in 2021, my guess is 2023 pulls the ladder on <$20 link, and 2025 <$50 link. You can swing to make it faster, just don’t ever gamble your whole stack.

[Anonymous No.53871672]

>>53871126
>”just hold for 10 more years marines!!! Then you’ll have a chance of making!!(not guaranteed)

[Anonymous No.53871778]

>>53871126
I want to die anons. Nothing good can come of this shit life. My only hope is that Sergey meant since Link came on the market in 2017. Then it would be only 4 more years but who am I kidding.

[Anonymous No.53872254]

I am on the brink of purchasing 1000 LINK. Talk me out of it please.

[Anonymous No.53873146]

>>53872254
if you buy then it will dump, please don't buy for the sake of my net worth

[Anonymous No.53873154]

This is the worst token I've ever held in my life

[Anonymous No.53873393]

>>53872254
go ahead, the more you own the harder you'll try to rationalize the bad price action. that's always hilarious to read

[Anonymous No.53874412]

You guys realize this will never run again right? The amount of denial on biz would be funny it wasnt so sad. Its a dead alt… you thought this one was different but its not yet.

You guys are like the cucks that catch your girl cheating and then live with it because she promises that was the only time

[Anonymous No.53874519]

Let's not get all mushy but rumor has it that Sergey is planning to get the gang back together for SmartCon23
This is official alpha
Banor, Celsius, Linkpool, FTX, all your former favorites will be back again live at SmartCon23 the smartest gathering of con men the world has ever seen.
Chainlinkgod will say nigger live at SmartCon23

[Anonymous No.53875278]

>>53871123
It’s funny watching how attached people are to some erc token.
There might be less seething if they sold near the top instead of holding -90% down from there, give or take. But I’m sure it’ll go back to ATH and even $1000 eoy because reasons.
Yep.

[Anonymous No.53875332]

>>53875278
>But I’m sure it’ll go back to ATH and even $1000 eoy because reasons
based uwu

[Anonymous No.53875396]

>>53874519
I’d actually watch that.
Wouldn’t pay for tickets or get the time off needed to go but I’d watch.

[Anonymous No.53875693]

it's weird that people still care about this coin. why the fuck do people here still care about chainlink? move on with your lives

[Anonymous No.53875759]

>>53871625
yeah, this
sergey's 10 year comments were always about the world economy being fully integrated with smart contracts. we don't have to wait that long to "make it"

[Anonymous No.53877406]

>>53870222
I too donot wish to eat the bugs anon

[Anonymous No.53878888]

>>53867134
we are going lower