March 1, save the date

[Anonymous No.53770995]

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-accepts-community-request-start-iso-20022-migration-march-2023

[Anonymous No.53771008]

>>53770995
All iso coins will giga dump on that day. You can rest assured and screenshot this. Lmao.

[Anonymous No.53771011]

>currently pushed narrative

[Anonymous No.53771015]

>>53771008
Every hear a buy the rumor sell the news, nothing will happen day of

[Anonymous No.53771023]

>>53770995
Not connected

[Anonymous No.53771088]

>>53771023
If you are a clueless faggot like this anon who got filtered by "muh serverless solution for web3 developers", it's worth noting that this shit already dropped in closed-BETA as you can read here:
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/functions-hardhat-starter-kit
DYOR before spewing your bullshit you clueless faggots

[Anonymous No.53771097]

>>53771088
nice digits, i will not shitpost at your misguided attempt to help the retards here

[Anonymous No.53771104]

>>53771097
>misguided attempt
elaborate (like I did) or GTFO

[Anonymous No.53771117]

>>53771104
i don't think i will

[Anonymous No.53771125]

>>53771117
Good, GTFO then

[Anonymous No.53771126]

>>53770995
>https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-accepts-community-request-start-iso-20022-migration-march-2023

The link says March 20th is when SWIFT starts ISO-20022

Maybe we will get news on March 1st but its hard to say

[Anonymous No.53771168]

>>53771126
As if they're gonna announce CCIP the very same day that SWIFT will flip the switch, it would make no sense imho

[Anonymous No.53771220]

>>53770995
They're gonna announce functions, see the link here: >>53771088

[Anonymous No.53771270]

>>53771008
Most likely, none of them will pump until everything is up and running. Until then they are basically stable coins.

[Anonymous No.53771644]

>>53771220
I posted both of them and your reading comprehension is basically african american tier

[Anonymous No.53771679]

Nothing ever happens. Crypto is a scam

[Anonymous No.53771729]

>>53771644
>I posted both of them
I know.
And you're implying it's going to be something else, it won't.

[Anonymous No.53771796]

>>53771126
The March 1st thing is a fud attempt as they know nothing will happen then. They keep repeating the 1st so we'll hopefully go along with it and be 'so demoralised' on that date. V weak.

[Anonymous No.53771854]

>>53771729
What don't you exactly understand about the difference between fresh new alpha vs preexisting closed-beta? Find me just ONE time that Sergey announced something already available, I'm all ears.

[Anonymous No.53771869]

>>53771729
It seems strange to hype up the event with "muh ALPHA" if it really is just going to be functions. would be very anticlimactic as we already know all about that

[Anonymous No.53771879]

WHO HERE IS LOOKING FORWARD TO BOB'S PROFITABLE COMPLIANCE KEYNOTE SPEECH IN ZURICH IN MAY?

[Anonymous No.53771914]

>>53771854
I just want them to release CCIP or DECO at this point, get the exisiting ideas into production before introducing something new

[Anonymous No.53771925]

>>53771879
no one, you are literally the only ID holder left

[Anonymous No.53771963]

>>53771925

[Anonymous No.53771979]

>>53771854
>>53771869
The tweet is from Feb 15, which is roughly when /biz/ found out about functions.

[Anonymous No.53771986]

Some twitter nigger said that Sergey and Ari are going to be at the March 1 event. I can't find any info citing that though. Is it true or was that twitter guy just being a faggot?
I'm considering unfollowing all those "Link marines" on twitter. They're all stupid faggots using 4chan terminology and speaking exactly like the pajeets who shill random shitcoins on this board. I followed them for maybe some Chainlink alpha but it's just stupid cope from them. Twitter is OK for Avalanche news though.

[Anonymous No.53772000]

>>53771979
/biz has been posting about functions since January, that's when the github was first leaked

[Anonymous No.53772003]

>>53771914
>>53771979
You know that the team drops bombs like sweet nothings out of the blue so be prepared, because one way or another March 20 is the deadline. VERBATIM

[Anonymous No.53772038]

>>53772003
You're setting yourself up for disappointment if you expect anything to do with Swift x chainlink being announced on the 20th

[Anonymous No.53772121]

>>53772000
This. I recall seeing a thread on it a while ago.

[Anonymous No.53772204]

>>53772038
I'm no moonboy nor I have financial problems so it could take another 4 years for what I care, still posting tho since I don't have to wagecuck

[Anonymous No.53772226]

>>53770995
Hint: “ALPHAAAAAA”

Open your eyes

[Anonymous No.53772272]

>>53772226
You know as much as me, probably less, but in both cases we can only wait and see

[Anonymous No.53772274]

If I hold crypto a year and a day it gets counted as a long term hodl, right? I.e. reduced tax rate?

[Anonymous No.53772275]

>>53772204
That's fair. Swift x Chainlink is goint to happen 100% at some point. Just see so many twitter linkies posting like March 20th is gonna be some switch flip event

[Anonymous No.53772297]

>>53772274
Nvm, I stopped being retarded and googled it. Answer is yes.

[Anonymous No.53772982]

>>53772297
Congrats on that

[Anonymous No.53772990]

>>53771168
>>53771168

I agree. I worded my post poorly. I was just trying to clear up that the SWIFT launch isn't the 1st but the 20th while supposedly the Chainlink team has an announcement on the 1st from my understanding.

[Anonymous No.53773013]

>>53772990
So 2 more weeks™ for real this time. It wouldn't surprise me to be honest, just another mass-hallucination manifesting itself into reality, many such cases

[Anonymous No.53773014]

Seriously, at this point who cares? Another typical hyping of some meaningless event.

[Anonymous No.53773041]

>>53773014
>at this point who cares?
Actually good, that's the whole trick to not sell your bags to (((them))) ever. You're set

[Anonymous No.53773289]

>>53770995
It's just going to be Functions, not swift related.
Patrick was the main dev evangelist guy at Chainlink up until very recently so it makes sense that he's very excited.
Also he contributed some example Chainlink functions Js code.
https://www.usechainlinkfunctions.com/

Also I have to respond specifically to this post >>53771854 I hope you're not so stupid that you think "alpha" in Patrick's tweet is a software alpha, and not in fact the financial information meaning of alpha (information that leads the market response essentially). Because that would mean you're clinically retarded. Also guess what, Sergey isn't even presenting at that March 1st event. I agree if it was something the team was keeping really close to the chest then Sergey would present and it would be something new but I think all signs point to it being Functions.

All that said, I know SWIFT is most likely still on the table but this upcoming March 1 thing is simply not it, no matter how much you hope it is. I would be willing to bet 1k LINK on it

[Anonymous No.53773395]

>>53773289
>I hope you're not so stupid that you think "alpha" in Patrick's tweet is a software alpha, and not in fact the financial information meaning of alpha (information that leads the market response essentially)
I am but I'm afraid you're on another whole level of autism with your interpretation fren
>I would be willing to bet 1k LINK on it
You'll shid n piss your pants when I'll tell you that there's this thing called shorting on February 28

[Anonymous No.53774572]

>>53773395
Thanks for the tip. Clearly you take a great interest in the Chainlink project. That's wonderful.

[Anonymous No.53774622]

>>53773289
arbitrary external calls will make ccip, fss, and deco possible, so I'd say it's a big deal

[Anonymous No.53774626]

>>53773395
alpha in this context 100% is referring to market leading info. everything else may be up to interpretation or speculation, but that is not.

[Anonymous No.53774696]

>>53771008
>All iso coins
What does it mean to be an ISO coin? Swift wants you use your shitcoin?