Link bagholders are the most disgusting, stupid, ugly, annoying vapid cunts in this world.

[Anonymous No.53703193]

They are fucking scum, the scorn of biz. Link baggies are poor and . Atrocious rapscallions.

Sergey alive number one #1 in blockchain?….fuck the bagholders,..FUCKk asshole linkies no good i spit in the mouth eye of your coin. . kill all the link farm animal with btc dump. now we the xrp rule.
ape of the zoo CEO Sergay Nararov fuk the great schwab and lay egg. this egg hatch and LINK was born. stupid baby form the egg give back our money.

[Anonymous No.53703211]

Anti-linkers think chainlink is just another token, and chainlink labs makes nothing but vaporware (CCIP, DECO, etc).
Chainlink bulls think defi will lead crypto's growth in the coming years, and chainlink will be one of the foundations of the development of defi (CCIP, DECO, etc.).

For anti-linkers the fact that link is an erc20 token is a factor that adds to their impression that it's a shitcoin.
For chainlink bulls, the fact that the token happens to adhere to the erc20 standard isn't relevant.

For anti-linkers, the cult-like, shitcoin-tier volume (and content) of chainlink posts on biz is consistent with that of a shitcoin - therefore it's a shitcoin.
For chainlink bulls, the cult-like, shitcoin-tier volume (and content) of link posts on biz is mostly background noise.

Anti-linkers look at chainlink's run from $0.3 to $50 to $7 and they see a pump and dump that will end at $0, just like any other shitcoin.
Chainlink bulls look at chainlink's run from $0.3 to $50 to $7 and they see one bullish cycle, that will lead to another one past the previous ATH, just like any other cornerstone crypto project.

Anti-linkers are sure chainlink will never pump again. That's what shitcoins do.
Chainlink bulls are sure it'll pump again past the previous ATH. That's what AAA projects in crypto do.

[Anonymous No.53703245]

>>53703211
Based pasta

[Anonymous No.53703262]

>>53703211
Checked and based. Anti-Linkers will use the rope in the end.

[sage No.53703348]

>>53703211
Damn totally nailed it.

[Anonymous No.53703564]

>>53703193
Ah, this must be a bot post using the rumored English Second Language Model. Interesting.

[Anonymous No.53703595]

>>53703193
Totally
Organic
FUD

This is the most aggressive campaign I have seen in my 6 years as a linkmarine. You shills truly want to keep LINK out of as many hands as possible.

If you’re wondering where the FUD is coming from it’s cause we’re only months away from the release of CyberCode 2.0 testnet. As an insider, I know you folks have no idea what/the importance of CyberCode 2.0 is gonna be for LINK when the alpha releases around the end of October next year (give or take a few months) so I will spoonfeed you out of kindness of heart:

CyberCode 2.0 secures the ledger cryptographically to encode transactions at 20x magnitude of legacy infrastructure. It achieves this by taking blockchain transactions to the BbC-2022 layer and parsing them through the node network incentivized by super linear sequencing which Sergey said is very close to finish line. This activity is incentivized through semi-permeable staking allowing LINK token holders to benefit for verifying data both on main chain and Blockchain Byzantine Consensus 2022 layer.

The obvious benefits of super fast transaction speeds also brings exponential economies of scale! What this means sir is if farmer has 500 Kg cow for sale, he can put the beast to market on the blockchain to verify the weight in a trust less system faster than global SWIFT system. Soon any business who wants to stay relevant will have to buy LINK to have access to CyberCode 2.0 feature. A unique proposition. Those who don’t use this system (powered by LINK) will get left behind.

Scammer motherfuckers want you to think that banks and other organizations are not currently fulling their bags with cheap LINK as we speak. DON’T LET THEM WIN. If you hold more than 50 LINK right now, you already made it. Immediately when we breach the $8.50 resistance it’ll be too late for you. You have been warned, sir. So go buy many LINK for you dream to come true.

[Anonymous No.53704057]

>>53703595
Fucking kys jeet

[Anonymous No.53704073]

>>53703193
they look like this, imagine the smell

[Anonymous No.53704468]

>>53703193
>>53703211
>>53703245
>>53703262
>>53703348
>>53704057
>>53704073
Good points. Unfortunately I have stacked all my linkies and can’t sell.

[Anonymous No.53704946]

>>53703193
BLOODY BASTERD I FUCK YOU UP!!

[Anonymous No.53705035]

>>53704073
Is that Tom Hanks lmao

[Anonymous No.53705282]

swift cbdc interoperability protocol doesn't use chainlink
kek baggies

[Anonymous No.53706496]

You couldn’t be any more obvious could you you faggot linkcel. Even the newfags know you discord niggers write these retarded and baseless self-fud threads larping as jeets. Instantly the thread floods with all of you faggots while the 1pbtid nigger OP switches IP.

[Anonymous No.53706776]

>>53703211
>Anti-linkers think chainlink is just another token, and chainlink labs makes nothing but vaporware (CCIP, DECO, etc)
post proof of CCIP and other working products

[Anonymous No.53707650]

>>53703211
All that text without describing the usecase for the token.

[Anonymous No.53708161]

>>53706496
It really is desperate, isnt it? LINKies are watching the market pump without them, again. They come on here to make le epic pajeet self-FUD threads in a desperate attempt to create a hopium thread. No one else on /biz/ cares to FUD chainlink, its entirely irrelevant, as it underperforms the market and people are here making a lot of money while they baghold an asset so dormant it's lapped by grandpa Bitcoin consistently, while 90% of the rest of the alt-market multiples in value. Continue le steaking (heh, epic!) while everyone else makes money, niggers.

[Anonymous No.53711281]

I hate holding link it never ever pumps. I would of made it if I held any other coin in 2021

[Anonymous No.53712302]

>>53703595
didnt read, not buying this shitcoin

[Anonymous No.53712354]

I think Chainlink is a good project

[Anonymous No.53713304]

>>53706776
>>53707650
>Proving my point
stay poor

[Anonymous No.53713362]

>>53703193
>Atrocious rapscallions

>HOW DARE YOU

>YOU BEDEVILED ANONYMOUS MACHIEVELLIAN RAPSCALLIONS MONSTER TROLLS

>REVEAL YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS AT ONCE!!!

[Anonymous No.53715006]

>>53713304
>no proof posted
>still felt the need to reply
why?

[Anonymous No.53715673]

>>53715006
You're asking me why I felt the need to reply even though I didn't post "proof of CCIP and other working products"?
Well, I felt the need to reply because your previous post (>>53706776) looking for "proof" makes no sense and only highlights that my post (>>53703211) accurately describes the differences between us. It feels like I'm beating a dead horse here, but maybe if I word things differently you'll get my point.

We all have access to pretty much the same amount information, the only difference is that we interpret the risks and opportunities differently.

I look at all of it and conclude that in spite of all the shitcoinery going on (serg dumping, shitposts on biz, shit price action) there's a good chance that it'll work and it'll be a significant contribution to defi, and thank god there's no working proof or widespread adoption, otherwise it would be 50x the price it is now.
You look at all of it and think that there's so much shitcoinery going on (serg dumping, shitposts on biz, shit price action) that unless there's undeniable proof that it works and that it'll be widely adopted, it's most likely vaporware.

I don't know what your problem is with these statements. It seems to me like they're pretty accurate.
My whole point here is that linkbulls that swear FUDers are paid (or retards) are just as wrong as anti-linkers that swear all bulls are paid shills (or retards).

[Anonymous No.53716505]

>>53712354
you are a retarded nigger

[Anonymous No.53716544]

>>53707650
It's used as collateral, staking, currency for LINK services & rewards and as an investment vehicle. There's probably something I missed.

[Anonymous No.53716573]

>>53716544
back that post up rightcheya

[Anonymous No.53716590]

>>53703211
Everyone take note.

This poster replied to the OP with this long ass post mere minutes after the thread was created. This weak shill is made by a bot run by a paid shill >>53703211

[Anonymous No.53716604]

[Anonymous No.53716634]

>>53716590
Are you aware of copy/paste?
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.53716666]

>>53703193
>>53704057
>>53706496
>>53705282
>>53708161
>>53711281
>>53712302
>>53716505
>>53715006
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE
Jesus christ.

[Anonymous No.53717124]

>>53716666
checked
id usually call that wasted gets but the pasta is so accurate that no fudcuck has ever been able to argue against the absolute state of their own existence lmao

[Anonymous No.53717144]

>>53717124
wait until you realize the "fudcucks" are (You)
shills in one thread, fuds in the other

[Anonymous No.53717176]

>>53716544
Thanks for giving a legit answer. Makes me want to buy on the next gigadump

[Anonymous No.53717435]

>>53717144
nah
the post 2021 breed of fudders are obviously angry tourists from other boards seething at early linkies
pretending that theyre anything like regular link shitposters is low iq gaslighting and no one falls for it

[Anonymous No.53717535]

>>53717435
kek, you've been psyoped hard
it's the same group of people, and if you believe otherwise you're a gullible child
keep arguing with the same people over and over again while the "god protocol" keeps bleeding endlessly

[Anonymous No.53717764]

>>53717535
and yet your response is so angry - its like i was right and youre a salty tourist that bought the top in 21 and couldnt imagine being anything except angry and poor lmao

[Anonymous No.53719825]

>>53703595
Ah yes, I hear Jason Parser is the lead Dev behind Cybercode 2.0. With his credentials and his extensive background in cryptography chainlink is practically guaranteed to flourish.

[Anonymous No.53719887]

I hate salty baggies who fud post. They fud because they want someone to comfort them and give them all the answers. But if they spent anytime at all researching they would know what they are holding, too bad they spend all their time focusing on price action during a bear market. They are doomed to sell early anyways, always trying to catch the next big high not realizing they just had to be patient

[Anonymous No.53720953]

>I hate salty baggies who fud post. They fud because they want someone to comfort them and give them all the answers. But if they spent anytime at all researching they would know what they are holding, too bad they spend all their time focusing on price action during a bear market. They are doomed to sell early anyways, always trying to catch the next big high not realizing they just had to be patient