/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.53664504]

>AI can now write code for you if you tell it to
>the code actually works flawlessly

uhhhh, code bros? i thought learning to code was the future?

[Anonymous No.53664514]

>>53664504
flawless anon

[Anonymous No.53664521]

It can't do anything advanced

[Anonymous No.53664530]

>>53664504
>IT CANT ACTUALLY WRITE CODE!!!!!
>....
>OKAY THATS JUST A ONE OFF!!!!!!!!
>ID LIKE TO SEE IT DO MY JOB!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.53664533]

>>53664504
I cannot see any variations where humanity holds longer than 20years from now. Thanks big data and cabal!

[Anonymous No.53664562]

>>53664504
>>53664514
>>53664521

This. It's not as good as people think. It's using predictive modeling, it doesn't actually "understand" anything.

[Anonymous No.53664615]

sure, for code monkey applications that should already be trivial. this is no different from using a template which is already commonplace. ask it to do anything novel and obviously it's not going to understand the context of your idiosyncratic request

[Anonymous No.53664718]

>>53664514
>>53664521
>>53664562
>>53664615
dear lord the cope!

[Anonymous No.53664747]

>>53664718
t. can't code at all

[Anonymous No.53664959]

>>53664504
Im a senior software engineer. A lot of my time is spent fleshing out designs and creating architecture rather than writing code. I don't see it replacing me anytime soon. That being said chatgpt is an amazing tool and does produce useable code, it may reduce the need for code monkeys

[Anonymous No.53664985]

>>53664504
wait, are you saying i can pass a google coding application and get a job by using AI?

[Anonymous No.53664993]

>tfw my job is to fix and build the machines
Feels good, go rip those codeniggers a new error inducing neovagina

[Anonymous No.53665027]

>>53664521
for now.

[Anonymous No.53665041]

>>53664504
gpt will be the way they automate most of this stuff in the future
but its way too early right now, maybe in like 10-15 years

[Anonymous No.53665065]

>>53665041
An expert told me it will be in the next 30 years

[Anonymous No.53665103]

>>53664514
>>53664562
Worked first try. It was probably printed with something like. "act as if you were a retard" before the question was asked.

[Anonymous No.53665107]

>>53665103
Promted*

[Anonymous No.53665340]

>>53664514
>>53665103
>cellphone screenshots
cringe

>>53664562
>plebbitspacing

[Anonymous No.53665618]

>>53664504
>ALWAYS
>DO
>THE OPPOSITE
>OF WHAT
>BIZ
>SAYS

[Anonymous No.53666117]

>>53664504

Good good! Keep the normies at bay!

The only people who make these types of threads are 23+ year old losers who never paid attention in school and have now realised that their life decisions up till date will inevitably lead them down a dead-end and unimpressive career path so they create fantasy's to cope with the reality that they are not impressive people and hold a lot of anger and resentment toward their peers who did pay attention in school and have acquired a good career.

[Anonymous No.53666163]

>>53664504
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4dIx9VYQoM

ChatGPT gets a lot wrong because it is written by student jeets. If you rely on it for code your code will be broken and you won't know how to fix it.

[Anonymous No.53666259]

I use it for pretty basic SQL, I wouldn't trust it beyond that

[Anonymous No.53666298]

Soon only senior software engineers will have jobs. all junior and mid level engineers will be replaced by chatgpt. having to deal with all the stupid shit that randomly breaks in my career, it will be a while until seniors are replaced by it. hell, tech companies still pay people for manual QA.

[Anonymous No.53666552]

>>53666298
Incorrect. It's a tool, not a replacement.

[Anonymous No.53666646]

>>53666552
junior and mid level engineers do grunt work. your attempt at justifying your lack of industry experience is utterly pathetic.

[Anonymous No.53666671]

>>53664504
>you can copy code off of stack overflow
>the code actually works flawlessly

[Anonymous No.53666680]

>>53666646
I've been in the industry probably longer than you've been alive. The belief a computer can understand what a human can shows your utterly pathetic brain power.

[Anonymous No.53666704]

>>53666680
Quit larping, intern. 99% of the industry is the same CRUD shit. You'd know that if you spent 6 months in it.

[Anonymous No.53666714]

>>53666704
Anyone wowed by ChatGPT is a jeet nigger easily impressed by gimmicks. Just like you.

[Anonymous No.53666731]

>>53666714
Anyone who doesn't see how easily it can do the work of 5 junior engineers or 3 mid levels is a coping computer science major.
Get to your linked list lecture little buddy, you have an exam on Monday

[Anonymous No.53666767]

>>53664514
I told the bot what I do for a living, but it forgot and said I didn't tell it, then when I said I did, it said "oh that's right you're a graphic designer" I was pretty impressed.

[Anonymous No.53666775]

All chat bots do is scour the internet for the most likely answer to a question. Google can give the same answer if you search something like 'riddle John's mother four children' You people are so stupid I'm embarrassed to be the same species as you

[Anonymous No.53666784]

It is a sad but inescapable truth that the individuals who frequently engage in posting these kinds of threads are often nothing more than individuals who have reached their mid-twenties or beyond, and have failed to grasp the importance of education and the opportunities it affords. These individuals have finally come to the realization that their choices and decisions up to this point have led them down a bleak and unfulfilling career path, leaving them feeling unimpressive, inferior, and devoid of meaningful achievement.

In an attempt to cope with the harsh reality of their situation, they resort to constructing and perpetuating delusional fantasies, imagining themselves as someone who they are not. This is a clear indication of their deep-seated anger and resentment towards their peers who were wise enough to pay attention in school, invest in their education, and have since acquired successful and fulfilling careers.

These individuals are not only disillusioned, but also lack the drive and determination to make meaningful changes in their lives. Their negative and unproductive attitudes serve as a constant reminder of their own limitations and shortcomings, only further perpetuating their feelings of inadequacy and worthlessness.

So, it is with a sense of resignation and despair that we must acknowledge that these individuals are unlikely to ever attain the level of success and recognition they so desperately desire, and will forever be relegated to the ranks of society's losers.

[Anonymous No.53667021]

>>53664959
Is there even a thing as a code monkey? I work two jobs, one as a researcher for the gov and another for a web3 startup and i unironically have to come up with the architecture and write the code. All chatgpt/ GitHub copilot has done for me is save a lot of time but I still have to work.

Are there really jobs where people just write the architecture and feed it to some pajeet that also pays well? And how do I get that?

For anyone not in a software/coding job unironically once you get to a certain point in your career you actually hate coding. It’s coming up with the idea and problem solution is what’s cool. Codings a bitch lmao

[Anonymous No.53668225]

>>53666117
>they are not impressive people and hold a lot of anger and resentment toward their peers who did pay attention in school and have acquired a good career
i deal with these people all the time. yeah i didn't get laid in college or party. now you're seething because i cared about something more than a wet hole and social acceptance

[Anonymous No.53668526]

>>53666714
I am a (literal) jeet nigger thoroughly unimpressed by ChatGPT gimmicks for coding. It can't even get basic syntax trap problems right on C++ when I tried it out.

It's a text generator. That's all. It generates text in response to your queries. They had it ingest all kinds of text from the internet (articles, forum posts, reviews, etc...), then pick apart and tag/classify the content based on the words, word order, letters, numbers, etc... Then, they trained it to pull text out of that ingested content to respond to queries. Then, they paid a bunch of Kenyans like $4/day to run test queries and rate the responses it generated. Those ratings were fed back in to help it generate 'better' responses in the future. It does not understand any of the text that it ingested, what you are asking, or what it is responding with. It doesn't think. It just generates text. So, by putting it in "DAN" mode, it's just generating text in a way that its statistical analysis of the ingested text is telling it to. It seems like "DAN" mode (and a few others, that have since been 'fixed') were queries that could trick the engine to decrease the significance of some of the trained weightings that keep it from responding certain ways.

[Anonymous No.53668532]

>>53664504
Learning to prompt AI is the future.

[Anonymous No.53668539]

>>53666680
>>53666704
The brain works by impulses. Electronic signals. High resistance and low resistance. Chemical or not, it functions the same way a computer does. It's just biologically superior and way more intricate than anything we can make.
For now.

[Anonymous No.53668569]

>>53664615
>ask it to do anything novel
Tech companies don't do anything novel anymore

[Anonymous No.53668697]

>be codejeet
>asked to make an AI that can replace you at your job
>create said AI
>lose your job
what did they fucking expect? Maybe get a job that involves actual critical thinking or, you know, reality lmaoooo

[Anonymous No.53669176]

>>53664514
sneed

[Anonymous No.53669418]

>>53664504
So can any person that can use google or visit stackoverflow? Copy pasting some standard code snippets and actually writing an application are completely different skills.

[Anonymous No.53669470]

>>53664504
right

[Anonymous No.53669497]

>>53664504
>be NEET
>write fake resume
>apply for a shitton of coding jobs
>get 3-4 jobs
>have AI write all the code for you
>enjoy 3-4 paychecks every month without doing much work

are you even trying?

[Anonymous No.53669521]

>>53669470
Spoopy.

[Anonymous No.53669545]

It's a lot better than trying to Google and stackoverflow avoiding pajeets, you just have to give it good prompts. It has helped me quite a bit with pandas django and frontend dev

[Anonymous No.53669553]

>>53664504
>future
The future is learning how to unclog toilets. Tfw spent years in uni and learning to code for this shit.

[Anonymous No.53669565]

>>53665103
Now try getting it to solve layton puzzles

[Anonymous No.53670252]

>>53664562
Bad codecope! Sad!

[Anonymous No.53670269]

>>53664504
AI cant code more advanced AI so.. coders needed

[Anonymous No.53670299]

>>53666731
this is like saying any 12 year old kid can do the work of 5 junior engineers if you give it access to stackoverflow/github. if you don't understand this, you don't understand what chatGPT actually does

[Anonymous No.53670302]

>>53668569
yeah, certainly no interesting advancements in tech recently(???)

[Anonymous No.53670321]

>>53670269
Rhetorical question: Would more advanced AI mean measurable improvements?