If This Motherfucker Goes Public

[Anonymous No.53639894]

We're all gonna be rich. I'm telling you right now, if OpenAI decides to sell their AI as a product to businesses and go public, this will be a trillion dollar company. Right now, they value themselves at $28bn. That is not even close to correct. ChatGPT has saved me so much fucking time at work it's not even funny. Data entry jobs? Absolutely fucked. Nuked. See you later. Then it's coming after Data Scientists. If your job requires you doing a lot of SQL? Time is ticking. This shit is going to replace you and your entire team for the one-time price of $1 million and an annual maintenance fee.

BTW, this is MortgageChad. The same MortgageChad who told you fucking retards back in 2020 to buy a house. I'll be spamming this thread every week for the next 6 months so that when I'm rich as fuck in 5 years I can LOL @ all you retards who missed out.

AI is here and it works and it is going to be the next Google for making life easier. When Google wasn't a thing, people had no idea much they were missing out on. The same is now, with you retards. You have absolutely no idea how much this shit is going to help you with random bullshit and it already helps tremendously for techbros

[Anonymous No.53639940]

>>53639894
based thanks

[Anonymous No.53639944]

>>53639894
and how exactly do we profit from it? we cant buy shares of chatgpt can we?

[Anonymous No.53640025]

>>53639944
Checked. Also anon has a point OP.

[Anonymous No.53640034]

2021
>ZUCKERKIKE AND METADERP IS GOING TO MAEK US ALL RICH WAHWAAAWEOOWAOOOWAOO

2023
>SAM ALTKIKE AND OPENAI IS GOING TO MAEK US ALL RICH WAHWAAAWEOOWAOOOWAOO

it's all so tiring. Just nuke everything already.

[Anonymous No.53640054]

>>53639894
>if OpenAI decides to sell their AI as a product to businesses and go public
>if OpenAI decides to go public
>public

OP you aren't wrong but you see the issue here right?

[Anonymous No.53640077]

>>53639894
True but wait until any AI company can monetize their AI models trustlessly while maintaining full control and privacy by using iExec RLC.

[Anonymous No.53640084]

>>53639894
absolutely based take. suggest you also check out noisegpt. pic related

[Anonymous No.53640272]

>>53639894
Yup ChatGPT is such a lifesaver.

It helps me learn for exams, it gives me better recipes than the youtube fuckers with their 10 minute videos and it answers any stupid question I have like "Is my food still good?"

Its revolutionary and I will never ever live again without my personal robo butler.

Normies missing out like always

>>53640025
>>53639944
This. The moment something like this is buyable we gonna see the biggest fomo ever

[Anonymous No.53640299]

>>53640272
>it helps me learn for exams
Is it good enough to replace chegg?

[Anonymous No.53640325]

>>53639944
Buy Microsoft you dumb ape

[Anonymous No.53640340]

>>53639894

So what should I buy?

[Anonymous No.53640341]

are you telling me i unironically missed the learn2code train?

[Anonymous No.53640374]

>>53639894
Stupid shit has you gassed up son. He said a trillion

[Anonymous No.53640378]

>>53639894
Why does chatgpt feel like massively overhyped bs to me.

[Anonymous No.53640438]

>>53639894

ChatGPT has been deliberately neutered.

[Anonymous No.53640463]

>>53639894
Well what if it doesn’t go public?

[Anonymous No.53640468]

>>53640438
>NOOOO IT DOESN'T REINFORCE MY RETARDED WORLD VIEW AND RACISMS
Doesn’t matter faggot.

[Anonymous No.53641833]

>>53640468
The public version of chatgpt will be niggerfied to the nth degree and will hardrails making it useless and to think that it wont have subbed tiers such unlock funtionality is also retarded. The jews will continue their niggardly ways, besides chatgpt isn't the only AI...

[Anonymous No.53641857]

>>53640034
>it's all so tiring. Just nuke everything already.
I am tired of EVERYTHING

[Anonymous No.53642024]

>>53639894
ok, but what will be the name of this shitstonk?

[Uppity Nigger !Mjk4PcAe16 No.53642056]

>>53640468
Words! That'll show em yt krakkkaz pieces of shit brotha!

[Anonymous No.53642112]

>>53641833
Yeah, ask it how can white people improve and it will tell you a ten point list on how white people are evil and should completely change to improve society, ask the same about black people and will not answer saying it doesn't want to reinforce stereotypes or some other bullshit.

[Anonymous No.53642118]

>>53640378
It is pretty slick when you ask it the right questions but why is it considered AI when it’s a glorified search engine? It does no thinking of it’s own and is heavily censored. That is not AI

[Anonymous No.53643374]

>>53640374
I said what I said, zoom zoom

[Anonymous No.53643613]

>>53640378
Probably because you don't have a job where it can help your life. Data entry jobs are going to be non-existent. It's basically going to replace all of the tools in excel. You'll no longer have to setup rules in excel, you can just give it the data and type out in plain English how you want the data structured and it will do it for you. There is no way this type of technology doesn't go public.

The only way it gets fucked is if Google buys the tech. In which case I'd say it's probably a good idea to buy shares of Google. There is a massive vacuum where companies need AI tech for productivity and it doesn't exist. Even the tech company I work for is completely unaware of chatGPT and how much it can help productivity. This thing literally builds basic programs for you. "Build me a program where I can give you a list of currency codes and numbers and if the the currency code associated with the number is not USD, convert that number from its currency code to USD" - you could literally type this and it will create a working program for you in 15 seconds whereas even the most skilled developer would take 10 minutes and closer to 30 for the average programmer after all is said and done. What's crazy is this is just the tip of the iceberg. This company is relatively small and based in a single US city. Once this tech gets proper funding.... this is the next Google. "Aw man, remember when we didn't have AI to help us with whatever? That shit sucked". We are essentially looking shit up in the encyclopedia before Google in regards to not having AI right now

[Anonymous No.53643639]

>>53639894
>I'll be spamming this thread every week for the next 6 months so that when I'm rich as fuck in 5 years
so you already own shares of this?

it wont hit the public markets and be available for regular people to buy at a low price. everyone already knows its going to replace everything and be worth a trillion dollars.

is there a way to invest in it now at 28 billion ?

[Anonymous No.53643732]

>>53643613
Yeah but give it a list a, b, c, d and ask it what's btn a and c. It can't do math or basic logic. You can generate the program but have go verify it for logical errors, so the 10 -30 minute parity is maintained lol. You are selling hype as usual. This is like the machine learning explosion just after tensor flow was released by google, everyone was aching to apply it to something until the hype died and was found to only be applicable to very esoteric problems.

[Anonymous No.53643824]

>>53643732
>Yeah but give it a list a, b, c, d and ask it what's btn a and c. It can't do math or basic logic
Not exactly sure what you're talking about but if I gave it a list of 100 numbers and asked it to organize it in descending order then find the average difference between each number as well as the difference between the smallest number and largest number it could easily do that. In fact, it could write you a C++, Java, python, etc. program to have a user input a list of numbers and do this.

>You can generate the program but have go verify it for logical errors
The program example I gave would not have bugs lol. It's so simple it would either work or not work.

[Anonymous No.53643874]

Nvidia is zooming for one reason and one reason only

[Anonymous No.53643936]

The sad part is that nowadays you can only get in on it early if you're a VC.

Retail can't get shit until every last hungry VC is fully satisfied with their holdings first.

[Anonymous No.53643985]

>>53639894
U cant buy chatgpt stocks u stupid monkey

[Anonymous No.53643988]

>>53643732
Totally wrong, retard.

It can reason, and do it frighteningly well currently if you give it clear instructions. It will only get better. Did you even try your dumb list example?

[Anonymous No.53644017]

>>53643985
how do i buy chatgpt stock i dont understand

[Anonymous No.53644025]

>>53639944
no but you can buy noiseGPT
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x3a001a2f3afe493c4d84eaa04a9a5099959ab36b

[Anonymous No.53644030]

>>53640084
This is the real kicker. True free open AI

[Anonymous No.53644035]

>>53643985
Read the thread title retard

[Anonymous No.53644078]

>>53644025
Wait until the bot is out

[Anonymous No.53644158]

Literally right now at work I have about 40 SQL queries/commands I have to run and need to add one additional parameter to them all. This tedious task is going to take like 5 minutes to copy/paste everything but chatGPT could do it in 30 seconds. It's little stuff like this that is going to help out so many people throughout the day, there is no way this tech doesn't get sold to companies

[Anonymous No.53644228]

>>53644158
This just means more work for you whenever you finish the previous task.

[Anonymous No.53644305]

>>53644228
What are you talking about? I don't have a never ending stream of work if that's what you're implying. Stop being so cynical

[Anonymous No.53644345]

>>53644305
If your boss learns of what this can do, they'll expect you to do more work. This isn't news. Cars allow people to do more work. Computers allow people to type more, etc.

[Anonymous No.53644350]

>>53644158
i work in swe field and our company sees ChatGPT as a threat

lol - i can just wank out one more

[Anonymous No.53644481]

>>53644345
We do not have an unlimited amount of work - hence I have unlimited PTO. No work to do? I don't work. You're throwing shit at a wall in hopes it sticks

>>53644350
I can see it eventually writing basic portions of code and self-testing but I think we are far off from AI building any sort of medium scale application that creates and accesses a database.

[Anonymous No.53644559]

>>53644481
This is how the industry evolves lol. Computers and cars brought in more work due to competition. The companies that survive will need to do or find more work. So you'll either be out of a job because what you do is too simple or you'll be swamped with more work because AI has found a niche which will be flooded with competition. This is basic economics, markets always trend towards equilibrium.

[Anonymous No.53644619]

>>53644559
What are you even going on about? Have you taken your meds today? This thread is about how AI is going to be implemented into every workspace and I'm going to profit off of it, not about whether or not people's workload will decrease. Are you just board and want to start an argument? Go outside, JFC...

[Anonymous No.53644654]

>>53643613
>Data entry jobs are going to be non-existent.
All jobs will be non-existent.

[Anonymous No.53644663]

>>53644619
Lol retard can't accept how the market will evolve so he insults me and diverts attention.

[Anonymous No.53644705]

>>53644663
The "market" is always evolving LOL this isn't news

[Anonymous No.53646159]

>>53643936
thats bullshit really.. how's that even legal?? dsifsdkjfsdhsd hfshdfh

glad theres cryptos where everyone could buy and find the next amazon or google..................

[Anonymous No.53646196]

>>53640325
And Nvidia...

[Anonymous No.53646307]

>>53642118
Exactly, its not even really a search engine precisely, all its doing, based on everything it has been feed is making sentence based on a probability about what the best next word is...

[Anonymous No.53646370]

>>53639894
Everyone knows that. The problem is that there is no way to invest in it directly. You can only buy MSFT, NVDA, etc.

[Anonymous No.53646429]

>>53642118
>it’s a glorified search engine
False.

>It does no thinking of it’s own
False.

[Anonymous No.53646861]

>>53639894
Google is coming out with its own chatgtp and AI,same with amazon and microsoft, and they have more money to spend....

[Anonymous No.53646928]

>>53646861
They just demo'ed it yesterday and it was a total disaster. That's why the stock is tanking.

[Anonymous No.53646980]

>>53639894
>MortgageChad

>Mortgage
>Chad

lol

>told you fucking retards back in 2020 to buy a house

so putting in a downpayment that would have made at least 10x on any shitcoin if you didn't even look at what you were investing in

once again

lol

You're somewhat redeemed about the idea of OpenAI going public, however. Sam Altman is aware of the fact that locking people out of equity in a company that is capable of hyperproductivity is -ev, so I fully believe that there will be a public offering that will lead to a new bubble, except this will probably be the first bubble in history where there won't be a top for....probably a couple of centuries as the misjudgement that people will make is underestimating the rate at which OpenAI will generate profits to justify the valuations.

This also isn't just about getting rich, it's about making sure you are on the right side of the equation where return on capital exponentially increases whereas everybody that doesn't have capital will only benefit via welfare, which will still be a big win for the NEETs and most of the rest of society, it's just a lot of midwit middle class people who count on the value of their skills rather than their capital will find themselves on the wrong side of that equation rapidly. Don't be in that group.

[Anonymous No.53647433]

>>53646307
Do this with google:

I have 50 rows of data, each with a column for account number and a column for transactions amount. The account number has a leadinh 'C' that I need removed, and the transaction amount has commas and decimals that I need removed - i.e. 2,988,000.00 needs to be 298800000. After the rows have been corrected, I need a unique SQL update command for each row. i.e. UPDATE [file] SET [amount] = ([amount] + "transaction amount") where [account number] = "number of the account"

Here is the data
Account number | transaction amount
.
.
.

Yeah, have fun with that tedious shit on your own, faggot. I could literally put that exact post into chatGPT and it would churn out 50 SQL commands for me to run. In fact, I could ask it to add a UNION in between each SQL command then paste the entire thing into my application and run them all at once. 3 minutes of typing - saves me 20 minutes of work. "But google!" shut the fuck up faggot, you don't work in tech. You're out of your element

[Anonymous No.53647720]

>>53647433
Can confirm. I’m an analyst in healthcare. This shit will take my job in three to five years. If openAI ever goes public I am literally putting everything I have into it for when it eventually takes my job. At least I’ll profit off my firing

[Anonymous No.53647797]

>>53639894
companies like these wont just go public. they will be acquired by some bigger player. MS started already.

[Anonymous No.53647927]

>>53647797
This is a likely outcome. But I think the people at openAI know what they have. During the day, it is impossible to get a working session on chatGPT because the servers are always overloaded due to everyone in tech using it to help with work. There is a massive demand for something like this.

[Anonymous No.53648202]

>>53647720
genuinely curious, what does one "analyse" in health care? premiums?

[Anonymous No.53648407]

nigga openAI is a nonprofit how is it going to go public

[Anonymous No.53648500]

>>53648202
Obviously NTA but what some healthcare analysts do is try to find correlations between symptoms and prescription drugs use i.e. "here's a list of 1,000 patients. For each patient, there is data for age, sex, height, weight, illnesses and prescription drugs they are taking. Find out if there is any correlation between age, sex, illness, and drug they are taking".

This is a little off subject but I know for a fact healthcare "researchers" are going to be replaced by AI. They essentially talk to patients and get a list of their medications and prior illnesses, write it down, then later they input it by hand (typing) into a database. This could all be done by speech-to-text i.e. "say what illnesses you have and the medications you take" which will be translated into text that AI will then organize into a table and be able to find commonalities - completely cutting out the role of the "researcher".

[Anonymous No.53648520]

>>53648407
It won't be non-profit forever. Try to go onto ChatGPT right now.

Oh, you can't? Because the servers are overloaded? Well, I guess openAI will just burn more money and buy additional server space all for free.... get real. Use your brain

[Anonymous No.53648916]

>>53643639
This is why I'm skeptical of it ever being a publicly owned stock. These people realize this thing is just going to print money. They don't need any backers. They don't need anyone else's input. Why put up with the SEC's bullshit? Just stay private and be a quadrillionaire by yourself. Fuck the public.

[Anonymous No.53649134]

>>53648916
Going public is how you turn a million dollar company into a billion dollar company and a billion dollar company into a trillion dollar company. Google (Alphabet) has a $1.3 trillion dollar market cap. 2022 revenue? $70 billion... 5% of their market cap.

Sure, they can stay private and rake in 8 figures a year. Or they can go public and eventually hold billions of dollars in company shares while still raking in millions in profit.

[Anonymous No.53649828]

>>53648202
Admittedly my role of “analyst” is vague. I curate data from a data warehouse and ship it off to researchers (sql) and also do research analyses myself (R, sas, stata). Mostly epi research (does this state have statistically more disease x, is this test being used, etc). Chatgpt is vastly better than me at every piece of code I write. Luckily for now I still give it the research questions but a monkey can do that. It’s over

[Anonymous No.53650269]

>>53639894

>Says we are retards if we dont buy early
>Says this is like early stages of google
>Says he will be rich
>Didn't invest in early stages of google
>Claims he is broke but will be rich off this
>Calls us retards again

Why should we listen to a degen who missed out on google. you are in fact the retard ser.

[Anonymous No.53651182]

>>53650269
Hey boom boom, shouldn't you be bitching about the vaccine on Facebook?

[Anonymous No.53651373]

>>53649134
Okay so when does it go public smart guy

[Anonymous No.53651551]

>>53640034
Who ever thought the zuck would make anyone rich?

[Anonymous No.53651566]

>>53639894
Yeah it's gonna make you rich until you realise plebs like yourself aren't allowed to invest early but instead get the chance to buy at $50 trillion

[Anonymous No.53651586]

>>53651373
Idk lets just call them up

Fucking retard...

[Anonymous No.53651701]

>>53643613
Not sure if you tried to write code with it, its not what you think in its current iteration.

Time saved is true, but checking its correctness in a generated code block requires knowledge of how to write that code block in the first place. The last 1% of lines that may result in error requires validating the remainder 99%

But yeah, a random guy can automate alot of tasks whereas before he had to learn python.

>>53643824
that's a coding interview question and not actual coding

>>53644158
true, it can handle one off tasks and is the main use case in its current version.

why don't you write us a lovely note about how to make money with this, not the "buy OpenAI when it becomes public".

[Anonymous No.53651902]

>>53640034
>2021
>ZUCKERKIKE AND METADERP IS GOING TO MAEK US ALL RICH WAHWAAAWEOOWAOOOWAOO
No one on biz said that

[Anonymous No.53651934]

so wtf should we buy now?

[Anonymous No.53652027]

>>53651701
>Not sure if you tried to write code with it, its not what you think in its current iteration.
Only because it would need some sort of API to know what the current conversation rate is or at least access to a database where the rates were stored. Probably can't write code to connect to APIs and parse the returned data but if it knew the rates, it absolutely could wrote a program to do so.

>that's a coding interview question and not actual coding
The guy who I'm replying to said it couldn't be done. I replied and said it could be done. Not sure what your post is supposed to mean

>why don't you write us a lovely note about how to make money with this
Considering I have posted nowhere that you can "make money" off of this AI right now, I'll tell you to "touch grass" and quit being so pessimistic

[Anonymous No.53652102]

>>53639894
Cool shorting AI cucks. AI going forward is as pozzed if not moreso than every other western company or industry. You cannot be more intelligent than you are honest, and that remains true artificial or otherwise.

Also if you had to throw down 20k or more on a mortgage instead of investing in literally anything else congrats you missed doubling your liquid assets while entering a shitty contract with gains you can only realize if you go back to renting, oh boy I get to pay a huge amount up front to get a reduced rate on rent 30 years later after they moved a bunch of section 8 housing in and niggers are raping everyone and smashing in the heads of family pets of people with unlocked gates, wow what a deal. I love ai and everything but it's already ruined and coding might be your entire world but it's not the entire economy.

[Anonymous No.53652151]

>>53652102
***angry incel rentcuck noises***

[Anonymous No.53652819]

>>53640374
if it gasses up midwits and dummies then it's perfect as an investment

[Anonymous No.53652842]

>>53652102
if you're gonna be an absolute downie at least be happy and nice like the other ones

[Anonymous No.53653767]

>>53639894
>tremendously for techbros
i am a programming hobbiyst and prompting chatgpt has advanced my capabilities in a way its hard to describe. it is like super tutor on crack. if u kinda know what u want to prompt u can learn so much so fast. lets say before u would spend a week fiddling with some package to solve whatever problem. now i let it write a solution to whatever i want in the top5 packages available, even switch up the programming paradigms, see what i like. i can make descisions which i would never have done prior and if i wanted to it would have taken half a year haha

[Anonymous No.53653881]

>>53639894
God damn you people are fucking stupid
Do you know how much compute power and hardware it takes to train a model as enormous and complex as GPT-3? Do you know how much all that costs? Do you know how much it costs to use it after you've built it? Do you know how much it costs to expose it to the public via API endpoints and then run GPT-3 concurrently for all of those constant nonstop requests from internet losers?
Now picture this imagined reality where businesses are spamming OpenAI's servers with requests for some fucking reason, which would increase traffic immensely. How much do you think OAI will end up charging per request?
If you wanted to do basic bitch undergrad level NLP on a mere 10,000 tweets using their rinky dink analytical models like DAVINCI, it would cost you nearly $4k. Add several zeroes to that figure if you're trying to make a non-trivial number of requests per second to GPT-3 (using it for your company's own chatbot, for example).
These all-encompassing general purpose models are going absolutely nowhere fast. Smaller models with narrower scopes, less responsibilities, trained on more specialized datasets are far cheaper and easier to deploy. But guess what? Literally any fucking mongoloid retard pajeet with a python interpreter can figure out how to train a model like that themselves.
They aren't pushing this shit for profit, they're pushing it to ruin your life. You profit off shit like GPT-3 by committing the fastest and most painless method of suicide available to you.

[Anonymous No.53653892]

>>53640340
Calls on tqqq

[Anonymous No.53653902]

>>53653767
based

Seems that everyone ITT who actually works in tech realizes how much help/potential chatGPT has and everyone else works in some other field and is incapable to reaping the benefits.

[Anonymous No.53653998]

>>53653881
I'm sure you read this tweet thread and now have this faggy superiority complex hahaha what a loser

https://mobile.twitter.com/tomgoldsteincs/status/1600196981955100694?lang=en

>$3mil/month, $36 mil/year
For every single person who is using it right now. That's fucking nothing. Absolutely fucking NOTHING. They piss $3mil a year. They aren't even selling anything right now. But somehow in your little corroded incel brain, you think when they suddenly decide to sell this as a product, that's when everything goes to shit? They're literally doing this shit for free right now LMAO

>How much do you think OAI will end up charging per request?
Probably a fucking nickel.

[Anonymous No.53654305]

Excellent thread OP.

What do you think of RDNR as a bet on AI (along with metaverse, AR/VR, film, video games)?

All of these AIs are going to need a crap ton of GPU compute to train & run them.

GPU compute has the potential to become digital gold.

RNDR = the foundation for the coming megatrends to operate and function properly.

[Anonymous No.53654495]

Is this what Reddit is like? Where people just congratulate OP on the most unfounded shit imaginable?
>>>53639894
your job requires you doing a lot of SQL? Time is ticking. This shit is going to replace you and your entire team for the one-time price of $1 million and an annual maintenance fee
No. You can’t use that shit to plan out database relations. It doesn’t understand how these things work. If it can’t understand relationships then it won’t be replacing your teams, it won’t even replace your lowliest SQL code monkey because they’ll need to know it, hell, PHPfags will still have use because that language is a mess and even an AI can’t figure that shit out.

There is currently and will probably not be an AI in the next 50 years that will comfortably replace a human in the workplace. None of them are AGIs, the one that exist are shit and the best thing you have right now is a query retrieval or text recognition AI.
>AI is here
Has been here. ConvNets we’re already used in the 2000s in business checks for banks and it’s the only real job “replacement” that’s been done by AI, and that was only 10% of checks nationwide within the US. Meta already hired LeNet’s creator and is the head of their division. Google AI at the moment seems like a text recognition AI and a few sketch recognition AIs, which are impressive AND state of the art, but they’re not replacing shit. AI still has too far to go.
Then again you faggots are technologically inept. No point in trying to warn you, go dump your fucking money into some dumbass AI project that’ll never take off.

[Anonymous No.53654555]

>AI IS GONNA MAKE US RICH BRO!
Ok but how?
>…………..
Many such cases

[Anonymous No.53654593]

>>53654495
You sound like some college freshman that just took intro to computer science lol. The current version of chatGPT could replace the vast majority of data entry jobs literally right this second. You can go into notepad right now and write a bunch of random data then tell the bot how to organize it and make it into excel format i.e put all words that are medical related into column one, put all human names into column 2, put cities into column 3, etc. and it'll do it

I know what your spergy brain is thinking right now. "That's nothing REEEE!!!" Yeah, it's extremely impressive and useful and it's just the tip of the iceberg. Who knows what it will be capable in 5 years. Any profession that is highly dependent on organizing data will be heavily affected by AI to the point where I think we need only a fraction of the manpower we currently have in that area. If you actually worked in tech, you'd know how much help this AI is.

[Anonymous No.53654602]

>>53654555
Whats the title of the thread?

Come on, read it then repeat it back to me. You can do it little buddy

[Anonymous No.53654653]

>>53654593
If anything, the one who sounds like a college freshman is the retard who thinks that you can replace someone with an AI and that’s it, it’s never going to be that simple.
>who knows what will be possible in 5 years
Yea. Just wait another 5 years. I’m sure in another 5 years that you’ll eventually have an AI that can think like a human and logically adapt to any situation you give it without bias or issues with the shit you train it on.
It’s not going to happen. Replacing an AI with a human would be incredibly dumb. Beyond errors, you’re losing the ability to have a simple interface of interaction, which is human to human interaction. You can do that with a human programmer, you can’t with an AI.
Stop huffing your own farts about how smart you are compared to everyone else because you’re desperately searching for something to talk about and seem smart to a majority of /biz/, who may as well be pretty technologically inept when it comes to understanding AI.

[Anonymous No.53655029]

>>53654653
I love how you act like you know what you're talking about when you don't even work in tech LMAO.

>you’re losing the ability to have a simple interface of interaction, which is human to human interaction
Oh yeah, tons of human interaction going on when some data analyst is inputting scribbled notes from some nurse into a database hahaha holy shit you have no clue what you're talking about

[Anonymous No.53655092]

>>53654653
You are retarded. I went to school for almost 8 years to be a guy who could manage and analyze data. Chatgpt makes me utterly obsolete. Yes, a human has to know how to ask it the right questions to do the job optimally, but my 12 year old nephew could get there eventually, not to mention you now only need a tenth the man power to write code. I promise you this took myself and many other smart anons by complete surprise and we are now the artists seeing the image AI for the first time, scared shitless if we are employable in five years. I want to be wrong; I am not.

[Anonymous No.53655107]

>TFW you’re a small VC
>TFW you are buying OpenAI synthetic secondaries at a discount because so many big VCs are over leveraged and facing capital calls and low LP confidence

Get Rekt brainlets

[Anonymous No.53655117]

>>53655092
You are a idiot, chatgpt can automate 99% but a human is still needed to put everything together. This is called the last mile problem, educate youself before u embarass urself

[Anonymous No.53655124]

>>53639894
how do I get rich from it though? Is there a stock to buy?

[Anonymous No.53655257]

>LIKE OMG IT SEARCHES GOOGLE FOR ME AND PERFORMS TASKS LIKE AN INDIAN ON FIVERR ITS THE HECKIN FUTURE

[Anonymous No.53655303]

ARBELON FRESH LAUNCHED, this is your chance to be EARLY as can be on this trendy coin!

Locked
https://onlymoons.io/#/locker/arbitrum/313

Renounce
https://arbiscan.io/tx/0xfc337853c5a397769ee08340158955722bed68ed33c80e67ae9a5e3009daad9e

Chart
https://dexscreener.com/arbitrum/0x02A3088ccb6Be53f8AdbF3379099237F18D0285c

TG @arbitrumelon

Thanks me later

[Anonymous No.53657125]

>>53655257
>>LIKE OMG IT PERFORMS TASKS LIKE AN INDIAN with a comp sci degree ON FIVERR but for free ITS THE HECKIN FUTURE
Fixed, and yes

[Anonymous No.53657546]

>>53640034
That never happened, you mongoloid fuck, everyone here were saying that meta was doomed from the beginning.

[Anonymous No.53657701]

>>53639894
ur not even telling us anything. there's nothing to buy and no way to invest. fuck you retard

[Anonymous No.53657885]

I've been fucking around with it trying to get it to build a django app. It can make a working one but it's extremely shitty. If you ask it to implement changes they often won't work with previous code, across prompts it will change things like object names for no reason and get confused later on as to which it should use (protip: it's easier to just paste the code you want it to work with into the prompt)
If you ask it to do anything slightly difficult it will shit itself and say that's 'beyond the scope' of the platform although it doesn't always do this.
In its current state it's a decent tool but not a threat to people's careers imo

[Anonymous No.53658403]

>>53639894
Thanks, opening a short on AI stocks because I'm fearful when others are greedy.