[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 329 KB, 2400x2769, 73880D77-C7A2-42CD-B74A-2C06E4FED47F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53612220 No.53612220 [Reply] [Original]

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1622613348113174528?s=46&t=MgB928UazLcjY3QGYNM82w

What most people see:
>mob agreement

What it actually is
>top buyers flipping from fans to haters

>> No.53612226

>>53612220
Duh
But there is a reason why those buyers became haters you know.

>> No.53612255

>>53612226

Yeah because they are top buyers.
You think these “reasons” would matter if they had not bought the top and it kept going up?

Or if these “reasons” didn’t exist? They’d have other reasons.

Its no different from buying BTC at 20k then hating it at 6-3k. Or buying eth at 1.4k last run and hating it at $200.

There will always be cope reasons from bagholders but reality is it is simply because they are top buyers and these types always turn into hatred at the bottom and get out.

>> No.53612271

I really it hope it plunges another 50% so all over leveraged retards lose their gold ticket.

>> No.53612276

>>53612220
fuck off from my board already dorks

you are mentally ill if you find this shit exciting in 2023

its no longer 2017, make a general to contain the batshit crazy link losers

>> No.53612295

>>53612271
The dump to $5 + celcius + blockfi + ftx + bancor + linkpool rug has cleansed it already. Its been range bound for almost an entire year with little volatility.

Whoever survived that and still has a degenerate appetite for gambling likely has little to no funds to have large leverage anymore

>> No.53612352

>>53612295
This range reminds me of BTC 2018 at 6k. Same cope too about the leveraged players already being washed out. I think dump to $2

>> No.53612406

>>53612352

No bottom is completely without a large number of people like yourself doubting so and calling for a further 50% or more crash.

In 2018 it was people calling for 1k or $30 eth.

>> No.53612413
File: 236 KB, 1493x793, 1675690292796354.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53612413

>>53612406

>> No.53612426

>>53612220
I see top signal, doxxers are still reading people tweets and finding any information to discredit them

>> No.53612454

>>53612426
Esl

>> No.53612464

>>53612454
>pol still holding
Top signal again

>> No.53612466

>>53612413

What does this literally who screencap mean to convey?

I can give you a post of people saying eth is a steal all the way down from $1400 every 100$ till the bottom. I can show the same for BTC dumping last time from 20k all the way to 3k with people saying it was a steal every step of the way.

It doesnt mean anything. There will always be people who are permabulls and want to buy. This is one of the biggest traps noob bears fall into.

Its like the inverse of bears saying
>40k is too pumped, good short.
>41k is too pumped, good short.
>42k is too pumped, good short.
>43k is too pumped, good short.
>44k is too pumped, good short.
>45k is too pumped, good short.

…..
>58k is too pumped, good short.
>59k is too pumped, good short.
>60k is too pumped, good short.

>> No.53612477

>>53612406
Noone called for 1k in 2018 stupid newfag. The bottom was when everyone stfu and disappeared. You are a clear sell signal.

>> No.53612495

>>53612466
so you admit your entire premise is retarded?
thanks

>> No.53612497

>>53612226
>>53612271
>>53612276
>>53612352
thanks for playing

>> No.53612509

>>53612464
>he called me esl that means he came from pol
Nope you’re just esl

>> No.53612539

>>53612255
No. The team is not delivering for shit. There is only so much you can look past.
T. Ico holder

>> No.53612543

>>53612477

Mate, so many people were calling for 1.8k, 1.5k and 1k in 2018 after 3k hit. What are you fucking smoking?

Your a fucking noob if this concept of people always wanting more no matter how much something has crashes is new to you

>> No.53612691

>>53612539
you're just a phoneposting poorfag

>> No.53613089

>>53612220
It's possible but Sergey kept betraying us and lost the trust he had.
Despite selling his truth > trust, the one most untrustworthy was him.
How ironical that the person who wanted smart contracts to establish trust was the person who didn't deserve it.

He displayed his weakness of character by not taking ownership for his failures and letting scammers destroy his community.
He cucked us all by not playing politics until it was too late.
His project is now in a death spiral where every pump is followed by a BTC dump from his opponents.

He destroyed the economics of his project by playing it safe because he fears the US cuck government despite having an international project.

>> No.53613102

>>53612255
If the tech is so good then why did it dump 90%? Turns out it’s just another shitcoin.

>> No.53613121

>>53613102

Link and BNB are literally the only projects that survive since 2017-2018. Everything else is literally dead.

This will be the same thing that happens to everything born in 2020-2021. 2 or so coins will survive from there by 2025.

>> No.53613170

>>53613121
>-90%
>survive
You’re a delusional mongoloid that married his bags. And why are you comparing bnb to link? Bnb is still in top 10 and link dropped down to 20

>> No.53613227

>>53613170
it's still 1000s of percent above ico and all the degenerate outlets shorting it over the past few years are dead. this consolidation is going to lead to a mega rally.

>> No.53613262
File: 6 KB, 236x213, NOOOOO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53613262

>>53613170

>> No.53613270

One of the only projects that is down substantially versus 2020. Linkies are the ultimate cuckolds

>> No.53613285

>>53613227
>dude just buy right at the ico!
If I had that kind of power I would have bought btc and eth at a dollars you faggot. Plus I doubt you even bought at ico.

>> No.53613293
File: 1.56 MB, 1399x1622, Currynigger.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53613293

>>53613270
Curryniggeeeeeeeeer.

>> No.53613348

>>53613285
man you're seething. i wasn't saying you should have bought at ico. look at all the other projects that are collapsing and nearing ico or lower. link is still well above it so that anon has a point about surviving regardless of it is compared to ath.

>> No.53613411

>>53613102
ETH dumped from $1400 to $80 in 2018. LINK would need to dump below $3 to match ETH's dump from back then.
>inb4 b-but ETH's tech is shit!

>> No.53614973

>>53613121
That's because Link is a web3 project just like ORE, web3 is the future, and any project that offer any services there will definitely succeed

>> No.53614992

>>53613121
The cuckoldry is INSANE

>2017:
Link was at 20 cents
BNB was at 20 cents

>2023:
Link is at $7
BNB is at $280

>> No.53615166

>>53614992
How many people bought BNB at 20 cents and held until now?
How many people bought LINK at 20 cents and held until now?

That's all that matters.

>> No.53615238

>>53614992
This board was calling binance an altcoin scam casino that wouldn't exist in a year and bnb worthless when it was under a dollar.
Now it's the biggest exchange. Those people all lost their money on ftx. And chainlink just admitted node operators can use other tokens and link is not needed

>> No.53615266

>>53615238
Yeah I remember because I was lurking here in 2018.

Everyone was calling BNB a useless scam, biztards just can't get something right. Even redditors made more money

>> No.53615322

>>53615238
>/biz/ was wrong then
>but not now.
fuck me you are dumb as fuck, you just made the opposite point.

>> No.53615346

>>53615322
biz is always fucking wrong

>> No.53615382

>>53613089
No one ever wants to address this point.
Don’t worry, they’ll just post some pasta about how everyone but them is an incel loser who also has link bags.

>> No.53615381

>>53613411
ETH also went from under a dollar to 4 digits in a year. Link is a good long term hold; however, the price action in the last 2.5 years has been horrible, there is no denying this.

>> No.53615388

>>53614992
And now do quant

>> No.53615443
File: 193 KB, 1852x1120, quant-usd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53615443

>>53615388
>2018
20cents
>2023
$130

QUANT is another crypto that completely BTFO chainlink. It's funny how /biz/ NEVER shills crypto that eventually pump

>> No.53615573

>>53615238
By this logic, wouldn’t the entire board shitting on Link be bullish?

>> No.53615596

>>53615443
Quant was shilled into oblivion here. You just werent here yet. you probably think 50$ quant is cheap as well

>> No.53615705

>>53615596
quant has been mocked to oblivion here
ftfy

>> No.53615735

>>53615238
binance will be the last to fall. a fuckload of bnb is probably on their balance sheet and cz has been doing the same shit sam and all these other fuckers do. a history of "accidents" and mishaps but people still believe in the guy. scams can pump and dump. bnb being worth 300 doesn't mean it has genuine fundamentals.

>> No.53615830

>>53615705
the shillbert stuff was top tier.

>> No.53616040

Chainlink is pozzed, it logically does not solve shit. The sociopaths in the government love chainlink because it will have multiple oracles fighting over confirming if the corrupted tax code algorithm that was hecking democratically voted into law is still frickin epic and safe and not hacked inside your cuck contract you signed with them.

>> No.53616305

>>53615705
QNT was part of the Chainlink x Oracle startups. Any self respecting Linkie bought some below $4

>> No.53616827

kek even normalfags know.
literally any angle you look at this from it screams scam

>> No.53616878

>>53613411
>ETH=needed
>LINK=not needed
link is overvalued as it is

>> No.53616915

>>53616878
why is eth needed? for gas in settlement costs? lol. it's going to simply be a settlement layer while chainlink does all the work and takes all the fees.

>> No.53617038

>>53615381
True.
>>53616878
Untrue. There are multiple L1s that do what ETH does. There is only one oracle standard, and that oracle standard contains a token that is needed to participate in the network.

>> No.53617392
File: 177 KB, 775x1232, 1675793688725.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53617392

>> No.53617649

>>53612477
Absolutely not, people were calling for 1k$ btw almost every day.
I started coming here when everything was crashing because I knew that’s the best time to come back.
I left again during the bull run in 2020/2021 only occasionally checking back.
I’m back now because this is the start of the reversal.

>> No.53619108

>>53616305
I actually bought it below that range and added some Ore as well, I'm sure since both are web3 project, they will do well in no time