[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 218 KB, 800x1281, 1637440684878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53567023 No.53567023 [Reply] [Original]

Is $1000 actually

a) possible
b) probable
c) certain

by 2025?

>> No.53567029

certainly it is possibly probable.

>> No.53567147

>>53567023
It will happen eventually. 2025 is probably too soon though.

>> No.53567165

>>53567023
d) all of the above

>> No.53567166
File: 112 KB, 750x920, . (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53567166

>LINK ever hitting over $100

>> No.53567228

>>53567023
0

>> No.53567401
File: 88 KB, 766x758, Lonkie2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53567401

>>53567023
schizo lonkies at their thing again

>> No.53567421
File: 8 KB, 227x250, 1614293284120.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53567421

A)
Yes
B)
No
C)
No

1000 is guaranteed. 1000 by 2025? Probably not, desu. But certainly, by, 2028

>> No.53567440

>>53567023
ok you guys are alright
chainlink never intended to be a scam however sergey hasn't been able to figure out how to keep making millions after "development" finishes as he will no longer be able to justify dumping minted tokens on the market.
however this is not the main problem. the main problem is ETH.
there will come a day when ETH becomes worthless overnight and its really going to bad for chainlink labs and chainlink.

>> No.53567623

>>53567440
Why would ETH become worthless overnight?

>> No.53567645

>>53567023
>>53567023
THe LINK token has no function.
there is no need for anyone to buy it
why would it ever become so expensive ???

>> No.53567710

>>53567023
Wasn't it supposed to be all of the three by last year?

>> No.53567738

>>53567623
ignore the AI reply

>> No.53567754

>>53567645
By your logic stocks should be value at $0. What is the utility/use-case of a AMZN share? LINK is stake in the company and its worth

>> No.53567760

yes

>> No.53567940

>>53567738
>>53567623
don't say i didn't warn you

>> No.53568622

>>53567940
Lol, why don't you explain yourself?

Instead you provide a warning with zero justification. Probably because you're full of shit.

>> No.53568680
File: 666 KB, 1284x1096, 2F15CDEF-A4AE-4CD4-B61A-65969DE0B2EA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53568680

>>53567645
Chainlink services are cheaper when paid in LINK

>> No.53568701

>>53568680
CAN be paid in link. I dont use bnb and i stilll use their service

>> No.53568757
File: 166 KB, 857x824, 31235689411815645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53568757

>>53567023

>> No.53568933

>>53568680
You mean more expensive when not using link tokens.

>> No.53569007

>>53568933
They are logically equivalent statement

>> No.53569053

>>53567440
ok i'll play, how long until ETH is worthless. looking between now and never, I'm guessing never

>fidelity, jpmorgan, blackrock, swift all intend to interface with eth