The market is starting to understand Link

[Anonymous No.5355465]

Isnt it comfy af all these big projects come with a bowtie that says 'Oracles serviced by ChainLink'. The future is unfolding before our eyes. This is going to be an enormous mammoth and likely the top performing coin of 2018.

[Anonymous No.5355746]

>>5355465
2018? senpai eoy 1 dollar

[Anonymous No.5355777]

>>5355465
Req is a gamble

[Anonymous No.5355837]

>>5355465

LINK's already ranked 7th out of 100 in having lost the least within the past 24 hours.

[Anonymous No.5355904]

>>5355465
The writing is on the wall and I don't understand how /biz/ isn't seeing it yet. Chainlink is literally the go to guy for oracles, and we all know oracles will be huge.

Brainlets aren't gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.5355980]

>>5355904
It's a go to guy for SmartContracts, hence smartcontract.com

[Anonymous No.5356013]

>>5355465
The trifecta is real. REQ, LINK, QSP.

All three will be huge in 2018.

[Anonymous No.5356026]

>>5355980
Not really, no.

[Anonymous No.5356074]

[Anonymous No.5356076]

>>5355980

https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

5.5 LINK token usage

The ChainLink network utilizes the LINK token** to pay ChainLink Node operators
for the retrieval of data from off-chain data feeds, formatting of data into blockchain
readable formats, off-chain computation, and uptime guarantees they provide as operators.
In order for a smart contract on networks like Ethereum to use a ChainLink
node, they will need to pay their chosen ChainLink Node Operator using LINK tokens,
with prices being set by the node operator based on demand for the off-chain resource
their ChainLink provides, and the supply of other similar resources. The LINK token
is an ERC20 token, with the additional ERC223 “transfer and call” functionality
of transfer(address,uint256,bytes), allowing tokens to be received and processed by
contracts within a single transaction.

[Anonymous No.5356084]

Chainlink does look super useful once these 100s of "almost ready for launch" coins get rolling

too bad it's a meme coin and no one actually explains why they think it's worth investing in

[Anonymous No.5356097]

>>5355904
Biz is retarded, don't try and save them.

[Anonymous No.5356107]

Is 14,000 link enough?

[Anonymous No.5356118]

>>5355904
Biz shills this shit all day tho

[Anonymous No.5356122]

>>5356084

Too bad you can't read and could decide what to invest in yourself.

[Anonymous No.5356145]

>>5356013
Shill me QSP. I own a little but not sure about it. Is the only time you use the coin to pay for your audit? And does that only need to happen once for every smart contract written? Seems like it wouldn't get used that much...

[Anonymous No.5356158]

LINK rank 89. Moved up 11 spots from 100 a few days ago. Despite the dip and loss of value LINK is still out performing other coins and moving up. When money comes back into alts LINK could see a rise in price.

[Anonymous No.5356171]

>>5356122
I can read, and have made plenty of good investments.

Oracles are a bit technical and above my understanding. Why would it be considered bad to look for more technical minds to explain the value of chainlink in the current crypto world?

[Anonymous No.5356188]

>>5356026
>>5356076
Unbelievable, you guys are celebrating your investments and you don't even know what you're invested in lol. I won't bother but if someone has the patience please explain these people. Otherwise DYOR

[Anonymous No.5356202]

>>5356158
1$ EOY 2017

[Anonymous No.5356207]

>>5355980
Not really. You still have to have write the contract yourself or have someone else write it for you. They just had the forethought to snatch up that URL before anyone else.

[Anonymous No.5356219]

>>5356171
>Oracles are a bit technical and above my understanding.

[Anonymous No.5356220]

>>5356188
I'm not sure if you're trolling or not. Do you actually know what Chainlink does?

[Anonymous No.5356278]

>>5356219
>thinks he's stephen hawking because he read the chainlink whitepaper

[Anonymous No.5356294]

Let’s go. Those of us in chainlink from the start we understand.

[Anonymous No.5356348]

>>5356171

>Why would it be considered bad to look for more technical minds to explain the value of chainlink in the current crypto world?

Of course this wouldn't be bad. There are tons of videos and summaries out there that break oracles down for laymen and explain why LINK has so much potential. Go watch/read those, don't rely on people on biz to explain a complicated concept that's already been simplified and is accessible. Just google, "Sergey explains ChainLink" and watch the first video that comes up.

[Anonymous No.5356351]

>>5355465
literally a JSON parser. also no product

[Anonymous No.5356530]

>>5356351

Enlighten me what that means

[Anonymous No.5356613]

>>5356278
Stephen Hawking is a retard though
>muh black holes
>muh universe is expanding

[Anonymous No.5356738]

It's actually disgusting watching everyone disregard Chainlink and chase empty pumps instead. This is the most innovative piece of technology that financial and insurance sectors have all been waiting for and it will actually revolutionize the world and strengthen every industry it touches.

Look at Vitalik, Roger, Justin, and Charlie constantly focusing on publicity stunts, shilling, and talking about the pricing of their coins. Sergey is actually the most reliable leader in the cryptosphere focusing only on his technology and development, no bullshitting with publicity stunts. Only honest answers to honest questions when he gets the chance.

I feel like I'm taking fucking crazy pills watching all of this play out. Etherscan shows that soon 95% of all available circulating LINK will be consolidated into less than 15,000 wallets and that continues to shrink as more people try to chase pumps, they're being shaken into stronger hands. As soon as Sergey's saved up LINK is finally handed over to institutions we'll see the price jump by increments of dollars and it'll be way too for most people by then. This is so fucking ridiculous and scary in showing how stupid most of /biz/ actually is.

[Anonymous No.5356844]

>>5356738
>Look at Vitalik, Roger, Justin, and Charlie constantly focusing on publicity stunts, shilling, and talking about the pricing of their coins. Sergey is actually the most reliable leader in the cryptosphere focusing only on his technology and development, no bullshitting with publicity stunts.
??? but Vitalik never did that, moreso, he said eth is overvalued at $10 or something and even tweeted those pedo tweets without giving a fuck

[Anonymous No.5356853]

>>5356738
I really don't understand why people can't hold. Just look at the price action in ETH or NEO, you can't tell when it is going to take off but when it does you're not going to have time to buy back in cheaply. People are throwing away tickets to an early retirement.

[Anonymous No.5356874]

>>5356738
soon 95% of all available circulating LINK will be consolidated into less than 15,000 wallet

Are you saying anyone that has LINK now is gonna make it? Only 12k wallets in existence.

[Anonymous No.5356897]

fuck it, I've already lost from BTC/ETC being btfo, might as well split my last $2500 between REQ, LINK and DOGE

[Anonymous No.5356948]

All in on link and REQ let's go

[Anonymous No.5356974]

>>5356107
That's not enough. Sell your DGB bags and buy more chainlink.

[Anonymous No.5356995]

>>5356348
>loads first video as instructed
>first sentence is "smart contracts limited to tokenization"
>/biz/ thinks this is good for layman
>/biz/ wonders why no one wants to invest

[Anonymous No.5357042]

>>5356738
Fucking this. I have 100% faith in both Sergei as a person and LINK as a technology. It's even more amazing that he's the one leading the project. Comfiest hold for years to come. It may not reach BTC levels of USD value but the fact that it's going to pay dividends and will be ingrained in all aspects of business industries is fucking amazing.

[Anonymous No.5357045]

>>5356738
Fine you convinced me

[Anonymous No.5357075]

>>5356738
ELI5 why you think any institution wants LINK coins? lmao

[Anonymous No.5357109]

How much chainlink is enough? Looking to make AT LEAST 10 million.

[Anonymous No.5357119]

>>5357075
You have to go back.

[Anonymous No.5357125]

>>5357109
One

[Anonymous No.5357141]

>>5356844
Is any of that supposed to be a good thing? That's still discussing pricing. Enjoy your memes I guess but I'll take a professional, level-headed developer any day.

[Anonymous No.5357154]

>>5356013
you forgot WTC

[Anonymous No.5357202]

>>5357075
>ELI5
No problem. get in the van.

[Anonymous No.5357203]

>>5355465
Well, to be fair, you need a pretty high IQ to comprehend LINK.

[Anonymous No.5357233]

>>5355980
This.
The oracles and the Link token are merely the means to the end goal of mainstream fucking smart contracts.

Make no mistake, mainstream smart contracts will rule the world.

[Anonymous No.5357239]

>>5356188
>3 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.5357270]

>>5355465
Can we PLEASE FUD the shit out of LINK for a day or two still!? I took profit yesterday and want to accumulate more :-(. Sitting on a measly pile of 20k right now...

biz pls

[Anonymous No.5357279]

>>5356738
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH FUCK LA
I'M BUYING I'M BUYING
WHY DIDN'T YOU WRITE THIS EARLIER WHEN IT DIPPED

[Anonymous No.5357302]

>>5356026
>>5356207
>Not really
Yes really.

>>5356207
>You still have to have write the contract yourself or have someone else write it for you.
What the fuck dude, lmao.

[Anonymous No.5357330]

>>5356738

mfw my wallet is in the top 500

[Anonymous No.5357350]

>>5357270
We did that the last month constantly and even were able to buy at 0,14 cents. I will send you some postcards from the moon though.

[Anonymous No.5357380]

>>5357302
Try reading the whitepaper again. They provide an oracle service, which are used to make smart contracts functional outside of crypto. They don't necessarily provide the smart contracts themselves.

[Anonymous No.5357443]

THE

FIRE

FUCKING

RISES

[Anonymous No.5357475]

50% link 50% req here

Comfy AF

[Anonymous No.5357492]

>>5357380
>They don't necessarily provide the smart contracts themselves.
The whole point behind the Chainlink network is that centralized oracles are inherently flawed, and that decentralied oracles are the only real way to achieve mainstream smart contracts.
Also, AXA and Sony have had a firewall smart contract running for many months now.
Also, read the fucking URL for the site.

The goal is mainstream smart contracts.
The tools include oracles, nodes, the Link token, APIs, etc.

[Anonymous No.5357529]

Did SWIFT already make its announcement today?

[Anonymous No.5357533]

So us there supposed to be a swift announcement today?

[Anonymous No.5357554]

>>5357492
>being this dense

Just hold and you'll make it, you won't understand why though.

[Anonymous No.5357566]

>>5357330
How can you check this?

[Anonymous No.5357581]

>>5357554
Is this some new kind of fud or something?
Fucking lmao.

[Anonymous No.5357588]

>>5357075
>ELI5
I'm guessing this is a plebit abbreviation? Yeah suck a dick.

[Anonymous No.5357604]

no one has yet to explain why LINK will bring in mass adoption investors
even if companies value it, that won't make Chad buy LINK coins on binance

[Anonymous No.5357608]

>>5357581
Nodes, the LINK token, APIs etc as you put it are all used to make the oracles function. Stop acting like you understand the tech.

[Anonymous No.5357609]

>>5357475
lmao thats insane. two ico shitcoins that are around for couple months.

[Anonymous No.5357625]

>>5357109
Need answers. I need 10 million at the very least. I have 21k saved up from forex trading but I might need to wagecuck to accumulate more.

[Anonymous No.5357637]

>>5355777
a triple seven gamble? im in

[Anonymous No.5357655]

LINK is going to hit its new ATH today in the wake of all this.

[Anonymous No.5357656]

>>5357625
no one knows faggot and damn you're a greedy nigger with a child's mindset.

[Anonymous No.5357671]

>>5357604
Because you will make passive income by staking LINK tokens to oracles, on top of the usual rise in cost as demand increases.

[Anonymous No.5357727]

Normal people won't buy Link, but firms and banks will, because they can act as node operators and make passive income. At the same time, this diminishes circulation and adds value.

Most of us are gonna pool our link together in a smart contract to compete against these firms and act as node operator ourselves.

[Anonymous No.5357738]

>>5357608
>are all used to make the oracles function
Lol, oracles function without any tokens.
The tokens are for staking and node payment.

All those things (network, nodes, oracles, Link token, SGX infrastructure, ...) are tools for creating mainstream smart contracts.

Smart contracts exist via ETH, but only for crypto, since external data cannot be used in the blockchain.
That's what oracles do; they translate external data into data you can use on the blockchain.
Thus allowing for smart contracts that are based on external data; i.e. mainstream smart contracts.

You're cute tho.

[Anonymous No.5357789]

>>5357604
Good. We don't want them or niggers like you giving LINK a false value. You're so incredibly short-sighted that all you see is exchanges. When the time comes, we'll exit the market and divest into nodes for lifelong gains and returns from the institutions themselves. At that point, the only ones who are interested in flipping it to take advantage of you retard normies will be in a position to command whatever value they want. It's so FUCKING obvious.

[Anonymous No.5357809]

>>5357566

Use the "Token Holders" tab.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#balances

[Anonymous No.5357811]

>>5357141
>dat id

[Anonymous No.5357818]

>>5357330
mfw when I’m in the top 100

[Anonymous No.5357821]

>>5357604
Normies don't really have a use for Bitcoin either, but they buy it because it goes up in value.

[Anonymous No.5357890]

>>5357738
Yes, you're proving my point at the end there. Chainlink provides oracles which enables smart contracts, but that doesn't mean they are smart contract providers. Because that isn't their deal. And the whole point of Chainlink is that the oracles are decentralised, in which case no it won't function without tokens. How did you get this far in life?

[Anonymous No.5357930]

>>5355465
couldn't buy the dip because coinbase was being fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.5357939]

Okay seriously guys I know we're all gonna make it and truly believe in LINK but can we stop spoonfeeding these fucking new money normies and continue quietly accumulating? This is such a fucking goldmine that there's literally no reason for us to want the price to go up. Everyone needs to do a 360 and go back to fudding right the fuck now.

[Anonymous No.5357953]

LINK is so fucking stable absolutely nobody wants to sell it

[Anonymous No.5357967]

REQ and LINK is all you need for lamboland

[Anonymous No.5358075]

>>5357939
This! The price doesn't even matter right now, the lower the better. Once the actual product is out, the pump will come, that's certain.

[Anonymous No.5358102]

>>5357890
>but that doesn't mean they are smart contract providers
You mean they don't write the contract for you? How the fuck could they?

>the whole point of Chainlink is that the oracles are decentralised, in which case no it won't function without tokens
In Chainlink's case, yes.
The tokens are a tool for sustaining the node network, and the node network is a tool for creating decentralized oracles, and the decentralized oracles allow for relatively trustless mainstream smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.5358110]

>>5357939
I understand your sentiment and I'm in the same boat, I still have a good amount of money that I want to spend on LINK, but rubbing it in everyone's faces is too much fun.
Those fuckers are too dumb to buy anyway.

[Anonymous No.5358113]

>tfw the one reason i hold anything else besides LINK is to flip them to acquire more LINK
I don't give a shit about messaging apps or VR or chink baby food or RFIDs. Fuck XMR too. Sergey is well on his way on making LINK happen and there's never been a larger guarantee in this crypto world.

[Anonymous No.5358193]

>>5358102
>You mean they don't write the contract for you? How the fuck could they?

Yes that's my entire fucking point, because you turboautists are insisting that Chainlink does exactly that. Providing an oracle doesn't mean providing smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.5358264]

>>5357939
I'm with you on this. I don't care about pennies or its current value even if I go up +$10,000. I'm looking at the long-term in 2018 and 2019 so the only thing that matters is getting more LINK. Sats or USD will never come into the equation for me, I'll just continue buying with as much of my paycheck add I can every week without a care for the current price. Again, I'm not losing sleep over splitting hairs and counting pennies.

[Anonymous No.5358339]

>>5357202
Kek

[Anonymous No.5358341]

>>5357939
>tfw genuinely believe so much in LINK that i can't even properly FUD anymore
Wow. I actually tried in another thread and I just couldn't come up with anything. Guess I'll just go back to making shitty shoops of Sergey.

[Anonymous No.5358349]

>>5358193
Go read the white paper.
Literally the first words in the first paragraph are "smart contracts".
And the name of the website is "smartcontract.com".

The entire point of the Chainlink network is to provide mainstream smart contracts.
Claiming otherwise because they don't write your contract for you is retarded on several levels.

[Anonymous No.5358373]

>>5357939
Yes!

[Anonymous No.5358406]

dumped my bag and plan on buying back in when it bottoms out
youre all morans lmoa

[Anonymous No.5358408]

REQ is using kyber network not LINk you stupid faggots

[Anonymous No.5358428]

>>5358349
>The entire point of the Chainlink network is to provide mainstream smart contracts.
No, the point is to ENABLE mainstream smart contracts. The contracts themselves will be made by unrelated people possibly using zeppelinOS as a tool to do so.

[Anonymous No.5358456]

>>5358408
They're moving onto LINK asap :)

[Anonymous No.5358457]

>>5358349
Wow I thought you were just misunderstanding me but turns out you are actually functionally retarded. Obviously they talk about smart contracts all the time because that's the entire point of their business. Jesus fucking christ.

>>5358428
This.

[Anonymous No.5358474]

>still never passed ICO price after a year
>there are people in this thread still holding their bags
>implying the sells won't come cascading immediately after reaching $0.43
Deluded stinky linkies.

[Anonymous No.5358481]

>>5358428
This guy gets it

[Anonymous No.5358504]

>>5356874
You're ruining his Discord copypasta.

[Anonymous No.5358543]

>>5358474
Nice fud blud rate mud/spud

[Anonymous No.5358565]

>>5358428
The point was that Chainlink will be the go-to guy for smart contracts. See >>5355980
This is a very simple fact.

Saying "not really" because you still have to enter the terms yourself is absolutely retarded.

>>5358457
>smart contracts are the entire point of their business.
This is what I'm saying lol.

[Anonymous No.5358569]

>>5355904
What oracle means?

[Anonymous No.5358576]

>>5357330
tfw on page 3000

[Anonymous No.5358608]

>>5357939
Pleeeeeeease -- I need to fill up my coffers more. I've been moving stuff around so much during the past day, I need to get more back into LINK ASAP

[Anonymous No.5358631]

>>5358474
Ico price was .00038 eth or .11 usd at the time. Are you being intentionally ignorant?

[Anonymous No.5358632]

How much link to make it? Real answer please

[Anonymous No.5358666]

>>5358565
You still don't get it, really. They won't be the go to guy for smart contracts because that will be a smart contract provider, which is already a business. They just plug an oracle into it.

[Anonymous No.5358681]

>>5357075
underage b&

[Anonymous No.5358683]

>>5358457
>>5358428
>>5358481
To put it simply: there will be many platforms for "creating" smart contracts.
And the go-to guy for all of them could very well be Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.5358730]

>>5358666
The point is that Chainlink will be the go-to guy for pretty much all smart contract creator platforms.
Be it platforms like zeppelin, or your bank setting up insurance smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.5358780]

>>5357789
yeah, sure. giant corporations and banks will just let you profit off them rather than create their own system/tech
good luck kid

[Anonymous No.5358790]

>>5358730
Yes, so the go to guy for oracles like my first post said.

[Anonymous No.5358839]

>>5357656
You're the nigger here, I'm just not stupid enough to pretend like I give a fuck about this coin's fundamentals because as we've seen, this market only goes off of hype, and I've seen this coin been shilled on here for months now as the next big thing, so you can't really blame me for wanting to go all in on it and becoming a millionaire as a result you dumb, fucking, autistic nigger.

[Anonymous No.5358905]

>>5358790
The whole point of the project is smart contracts.
If you want to set up a smart contract, Chainlink is who you go to.

Because there will not be any one "go to guy" for the actual writing of the smart contract terms; there will be many hundreds of thousands. From your neighbor to your bank.

[Anonymous No.5358913]

Now that the dust has settled can we all agree that LINK had a moderately successful PnD culminating in a meandering jargon blog post posing as an "update" and is now well on its way to returning to its true price, 15 cents. I wouldn't be surprised at all if this Christmas Sergey again tests his limit by swimming across a large body of water but this time fails to make it across. That's of course if he isn't already dead in a Thai bathhouse after ODing on all the cocaine that he bought with the ICO funding. Rory probably logs into Sergey's slack account now and then to offer some proof of life in order to keep the con going.

[Anonymous No.5358960]

>>5358474

God i hope so. I sold 50k at 2500 thinking it would keep dumping and I'm literally shaking right now. Please friendly whale market sell 1MM

[Anonymous No.5358972]

>>5356738
>the post that saved chainlink
thx bb my $0.44 sell order went off

[Anonymous No.5358984]

>>5358905
Now you're just contradicting yourself. Go to sleep.

[Anonymous No.5359058]

>>5358984
Lol, sure I am.

Chainlink/Smartcontract.com is aiming to be the go-to guy for smart contracts. End of story.

[Anonymous No.5359100]

>>5359058
>The LINK Network is the first decentralized oracle network; allowing anyone to securely provide smart contracts with access to key external data, off-chain payments and any other API capabilities.

you are dumb

[Anonymous No.5359114]

>>5359058
Still wrong, like you explained in your last post. Anybody can make a smart contract.

[Anonymous No.5359123]

breakout when?

[Anonymous No.5359155]

>>5359100
Your point?
I never said Chainlink wasn't going to be the go-to guy for oracles, I'm countering the people who denied that it was going to be the go-to guy for smart contracts.

>>5359114
>Anybody can make a smart contract.
That's what I said.

[Anonymous No.5359265]

>>5359155
>That's what I said.
Exactly. So if anybody can make a smart contract, how is chainlink the go to guy for it?

This conversation is a massive waste of time but it's pretty funny you haven't just closed the tab yet.

[Anonymous No.5359288]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.5359300]

>>5359155
post one source, from anywhere, that link "creates smart contracts for other entities" or anything even remotely similar

[Anonymous No.5359335]

>>5357809
>tfw top 2000

We are the new elite.

[Anonymous No.5359336]

>>5359288
biz fucks me again. Just bought 1000 bucks at 3300

[Anonymous No.5359374]

>>5359265
>Exactly. So if anybody can make a smart contract, how is chainlink the go to guy for it?
That's where you connect your smart contract.
If you have a smart contract, Chainlink will be the go-to guy for it.
Just like your local garage is the go-to guy to take your car.

>>5359300
Why?

[Anonymous No.5359452]

>>5359336
Literally my last btc, fuhhh

[Anonymous No.5359461]

>>5359374
But you can have a smart contract without an oracle.

[Anonymous No.5359498]

>>5359374
jesus christ you're dense

[Anonymous No.5359520]

>>5359336
>>5359452
>tfw all your FOMO pays off and someone buys your bags
ehehehehheeheehh

[Anonymous No.5359575]

>>5355777
Are you sure you aren’t retarded?

[Anonymous No.5359576]

>>5359461
Crypto smart contracts, sure.
The concept of "smart contracts" was always envisioned to apply to mainstream transactions though.

>>5359498
You're the dense one.
"Hurrdurr a go-to guy only creates things".
This is you.

[Anonymous No.5359621]

>>5356013
HAHA, I came up with that. Glad to see it becoming a reality :)
2018, the year of the utility ALTs with the triforce leading the way.

[Anonymous No.5359628]

>>5359520
i'm seeing big sell orders get placed for 4-6k... bot pump incoming hopefully.

SAVE ME BIZ WHALE

[Anonymous No.5359687]

>>5358780
What do you think a decentralized oracle is for if you think that a company can just "make it's own"?

[Anonymous No.5359736]

>>5355777
>Req is a gamble
>777

[Anonymous No.5359737]

>>5358780
> I GROW MY OWN FOOD, FUCK TESCO MAKING MONEY OF ME

[Anonymous No.5359740]

>>5356013
I need more! Might sell some stuff for more actually.

[Anonymous No.5359744]

>>5359687
What do you think CHAINLINK is if you think it won't have competitors?

[Anonymous No.5359777]

>>5359737
a better analogy would be you being a corner market and a bank being walmart
good luck kid

[Anonymous No.5359780]

>>5359744
competition is healthy, but chainlink is the first of it's kind, if something comes along better I'll invest in that. Lmao @ your straws

[Anonymous No.5359783]

>>5355837
Feels really good to stay afloat during this crash just by holding one coin.

[Anonymous No.5359794]

>>5358780
Corporations outsource all the time. 'Jack of all trades and master of none' is a thing. It is why a lot of these 'I can do everything' coins will fail.

[Anonymous No.5359850]

>>5358780
>yeah, sure. giant corporations and banks will just let you profit off them rather than create their own system/tech
>good luck kid
They literally will.

"David Watson, head of digital cash products
at Deutsche Bank. “If someone else can
deliver a part of the value chain better than I,
and provided that I am comfortable that the
experience will benefit my client, I am happy
to provide 80% of a service, and bring in a
startup to offer the other 20%"
Sibos wrap-up paper: https://www.sibos.com/sites/default/files/sibos_toronto_2017_sibos_issues_wrapup_edition.pdf

[Anonymous No.5359905]

>>5355465
Link barely gave a fuck during the whole crash lol. Super bullish sentiment behind that coin right now. Watch out for the rocket next coming weeks.

[Anonymous No.5359935]

Link is a joke

[Anonymous No.5359961]

>>5358780
What about an assassin. You see it in films all the time, they always have henchmen but then get in a 'specialist' for a job. Sometimes you need specialists.

[Anonymous No.5360029]

>>5358780
To make a better argument than everybody else, why do all the giant corporations and banks currently use SWIFT, instead of making their own?

[Anonymous No.5360052]

>>5359850
nah, not when there's real money to be made. in speculation phase and with such a low amount of users no one cares - that will change quickly

[Anonymous No.5360128]

>>5360052
You think banks are going to get into the decentralized oracle network business?
Why?

Also, it doesn't matter what the banks do, they're going to be forced to open up their internal APIs anyway in 2018.

[Anonymous No.5360208]

>>5360128
Your claim is that LINK will be successful because banks will need them, no?

Banks don't need anyone.

[Anonymous No.5360229]

>>5360208
pls respond: >>5360029

[Anonymous No.5360330]

I am so sick of these Link threads for the past 3 months.

You idiots realize Corda will be the go to blockchain for the financial sector. Hundreds of institutions are backing it and yes, they have their own oracle.All internal smart contracts will employ a centralized oracle, since the majority of data a financial institution needs is in house

[Anonymous No.5360530]

>>5356013
Well damn, I hold some QSP and didn't really connect how it will work with LINK. Would picking up REQ focus me in too much on one possible future?

I'd like to hedge alittle, and regrettably I don't understand the technology that much behind LINK/QSP/ETH.

[Anonymous No.5360640]

>>5360052
>What is swift?
fudders gonna fud, bullshit from the top.

[Anonymous No.5360677]

>>5360330
Nice FUD saved

[Anonymous No.5360927]

>>5360330
I think I was the one who came up with the Corda fud originally. It was back when fud was bringing link down, atleast I thought it was partly because of the intense fud, anyway now that there's no slowing it down I can tell you Corda is a private network for fin institutes, it's not even blockchain. It will have a very narrow use case. They will probably use chainlink for external communication.

[Anonymous No.5360981]

>>5360640
I guess it's a good way of thinning the herd, anyone dumb enough to think any of those arguments make any sense kinda deserve to miss out

[Anonymous No.5360989]

Is it worth getting into LINK? Been researching crypto for months and I'm not confident about Bitcoin. Recently made some excess money to invest, should I go with LINK?

[Anonymous No.5361011]

>>5360989
HAHA.

The vision in my dreams are coming true.

[Anonymous No.5361050]

>>5355904
>/biz/ isn't seeing it yet
do you not see the daily shill threads?

[Anonymous No.5361061]

>>5360989
Read the whitepaper. If you can't understand it, don't invest in it.

https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

[Anonymous No.5361083]

>>5360989

Look at the zoomed out chart then you tell us. This was an ICO pump and dump scam that some of the bagholders were too dumb to figure out.

Avoid it at all costs. Check the CEOs twitter.

[Anonymous No.5361149]

last time i bought link at .40 it tanked to .20 very fast

[Anonymous No.5361152]

>>5360927
Further, out of the current tokens I have researched I predict only 3 of them will be around in 3-5 years time from now, Link, Ripple and RLC. That makes Link and RLC extremely undervalued at the moment and you're able to utilize your computing power for passive income. You rarely see anything worth considering on /biz anymore, but I suggest you take a look into these two

[Anonymous No.5361153]

>>5356171
>Oracles are a bit technical and above my understanding

[Anonymous No.5361181]

>>5360989
No, it's a chinese scam. Just buy BTC during the dip now, it's going to $25k next week.

[Anonymous No.5361195]

>>5361083
This

[Anonymous No.5361226]

>>5356738
how do store chainlink off line? i dont want to get fucked like i did with BTC. Some fuckers got into my acount and stole my coins

[Anonymous No.5361250]

>>5360927
topkek

I always love when FUDers finally admit they were lying

[Anonymous No.5361294]

>>5356294

>Those of us in chainlink from the start
Ouuuuuccchhhhhh well I guess once you've lost all your money there's nothing left to do but pray and shill until it recovers...

[Anonymous No.5361300]

>>5355465
>wow that was rough, now where was I oh yea I still have to dump that "linkchon" coin in the green.

[Anonymous No.5361317]

>>5361226
buy a ledger
or if you're ultra sweaty boot up an airgapped gentoo machine and generate a wallet there and NEVER move the private key out of that machine ever

[Anonymous No.5361341]

>>5360927
>it's not even blockchain. It will have a very narrow use case

please read the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.5361392]

>>5361341
>please read the whitepaper

Let's be real, none of those people can understand it. Nor will they ever even look at it.

Let people shit on it -- I've personally made 11 ETH on LINK alone from all the FUD. It's coming time to hodl, though -- big news is on the horizon.

[Anonymous No.5361411]

>>5361317
>ultra sweaty
i am in a suana. i bought at 400 dollars and moved my shit to btc-e when it was still a thing

[Anonymous No.5361478]

>>5361294
I'm not sure if this is a meme or you people actually think we lost money. I bought at ICO and have at least x4ed my money, so at this point probably done better than BTC.

[Anonymous No.5361575]

>>5361341
From the whitepaper: "There is no block chain. Transaction races are deconflicted using pluggable notaries. A single Corda network may contain multiple notaries that provide their guarantees using a variety of different algorithms." It's a solid project, but not competition for ChainLink. CL can connect DLT inspired networks like Corda to all blockchains and external smartcontracts

[Anonymous No.5361682]

>>5360208
>Banks don't need anyone.
Banks outsource most of anything IT-related you tard.
They even outsource their insurances. ING for instance does its insurance through AXA.

And like I said, it doesn't even matter because the banks won't even have a choice; they'll be forced to open up their APIs next year.

Also, they are literally saying themselves that they are open to working with fintech startups.

[Anonymous No.5361723]

>>5360330
> Corda will be the go to blockchain for the financial sector
Good.
CL will be made to work with the Corda blockchain then.
Also, Corda is most likely going to get integrated into Hyperledger. Which Chainlink also works with.

[Anonymous No.5361746]

Moon when? sick of getting cock teased been bagholding for months just want to break ATH

[Anonymous No.5361804]

>>5360989
no

[Anonymous No.5361834]

>>5361478
Damn, you lucky fucker. I went all in at 20 cents so I'm only up 100% right now.

[Anonymous No.5361881]

I bought in at 32 cents and wartched it bleed to 17. I got tired of the bullshit and sold at .23. I have literally 15x my money since then.
Good job holding guys

[Anonymous No.5361939]

>>5361881
How long did it take you to do that?

[Anonymous No.5362022]

>>5357953

No one wants to buy it either.

[Anonymous No.5362095]

>>5361083
is this serious I'm scared now I have all my savings in link ;__;

[Anonymous No.5362142]

>>5361226
myethwallet stores link desu, put a tiny bit of ETH on there though otherwise you won't be able to withdraw it

[Anonymous No.5362181]

>>5356107
is 12k link enough guys

[Anonymous No.5362245]

>>5361226
Why do you not have 2fa on everything

[Anonymous No.5362267]

>>5362095
>>5362142

thanks. also a lot of people saying it's shit are only in it for short term gains. I really feel like this tech is going be used.

[Anonymous No.5362325]

>>5362245
i do now. this happened like 4 years ago, i tryied to "day trade" and lost my ass so said fuck it im just gunna let them sit. I went to go check on my coins and couldn't get in. My stupidity cost me money. I dont want that to happen again

[Anonymous No.5362371]

>>5355777
>Gamble
>777
Phew, I was a little worried about my All-In move in REQ, but now I'm good.

[Anonymous No.5362469]

>>5356219
Fuck this photo makes me rage hard

[Anonymous No.5362641]

>>5357075
>ELI5
kill yourself you fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.5362728]

>>5361181
The worst thing is that you're 100% right

[Anonymous No.5362768]

>>5357533
this. i need to know.

[Anonymous No.5362879]

>>5361881
Well done, but we don’t all have autism like you and can hold a coin more than 3 months for guaranteed 100x gains