Chainlink’s marketing has dramatically improved

[Anonymous No.53490857]

[Anonymous No.53490865]

>>53490857
SEE?
SEE?
I PEE!

[Anonymous No.53490920]

they need to say nigger more

[Anonymous No.53490932]

>>53490857
and yet nothing fundamentally changes.

If only Adelyn was never hired and a white man took the helm from the get go.

[Anonymous No.53491501]

>>53490857
Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol?
Sounds neat.
Here's a screenshot I took in 2019.
It's currently 2023.

[Anonymous No.53491519]

>>53491501
Which is why your village refused to sell at $50. We've read your tale of woe enough. Enough!

[Anonymous No.53491521]

>>53491501
lmao

[Anonymous No.53491542]

>>53491501
Holy fuck bro they announced something before they shipped it. Absolutely unprecedented.

[Anonymous No.53491549]

>>53490857
How so

[Anonymous No.53491618]

>>53491501

It was announced in 2021

[Anonymous No.53491707]

>>53491618
Still, for it to be 2023 and this ico'd in 2017, with nothing to show but scam partnerships is concerning. Today I read about the latest scams which have very little organic userbases

[Anonymous No.53492330]

>>53490857
nah
i just think that the vibe has changed on here in particular because the fud spammers have been really angry and sloppy lately
apparently one of their discord friends was outed as a guy who became suicidal over his wanking habits lol

[Anonymous No.53492547]

>>53491501
delete this

[Anonymous No.53493169]

>>53491501
>>53491707
Hey guys, just so you know, SWIFT will be using Chainlink. Confirmed.

[Anonymous No.53493193]

>>53492330
I really really like touching my penis

[Anonymous No.53493506]

>>53491707
>with nothing to show but scam partnerships
lmao Chainlink gained the most crypto adoption since ETH.

[Anonymous No.53493536]

>>53490857
>Chainlink’s marketing has dramatically improved
Doesn't look any different to me.

[Anonymous No.53493641]

>>53493536
Maybe the pay has increased for making these threads.

[Anonymous No.53493993]

>>53493536
He meant because they have a white guy now. This is how some people think.

[Anonymous No.53494405]

>Chainlink’s marketing has dramatically improved
>community jannies turn a blind eye to scams, delays and other letdowns in the ecosystem and just parrot quadrillions of dollars all the time
adelyn was a fucking genius compared to this

[Anonymous No.53494472]

>>53493506
So what? Token is still not needed

[Anonymous No.53494494]

>>53494472
it's a bot using the same replies
now he's going to respond
>every tx on chainlink mainnet needs the tokerino!11

[Anonymous No.53494595]

>>53494494
Every tx on mainnet needs the tokerino!11

[Anonymous No.53494682]

>>53494472
talk to Vitalik, see pic

>>53494494
lmao yeah I'm the bot, not the "token not needed" posters.

[Anonymous No.53494717]

>>53494682
Eric Schmidt said the value of token increases with use. Are you saying he’s wrong?

[Anonymous No.53494735]

>>53494717
Great pivot anon.
Also, there are more things that impact value, not least of which speculation. But overall increased use does have an objectively positive impact on the token.

[Anonymous No.53494915]

>>53494735

So we have either:

>Eric Schmidt is a retard and choosing to associate directly in working capacity to the extent of showing up in person at smartcon for a presentation, while having a gargantuan legacy and reputation while being one of the richest men on the planet putting his reputation on the line for a shitty scam token not needid project

Or

>bagholder salty little virgin anon on 4chan doesnt know what he is talking about

I think its obvious to anyone that the second option which i about you, is the correct reality.

Face it, you retards screech all day online but the fact Schmidt is involved basically btfo you and you hate to acknowledge it because any rational person including you, can see that everything you whine about isnt worth listening to and you are powerless to stand up to a name like Schmidt.

This is an appeal to authority and you simply cant do anything about it, whiney child

[Anonymous No.53494927]

>>53494915
Based

[Anonymous No.53494942]

>>53494915
It's pretty amazing how Eric absolutely wrecked your mental stability.

[Anonymous No.53494954]

>>53494915
Wait, I just realized that you're agreeing with me.

[Anonymous No.53494967]

eric schmidt, the guy the appear only on one video and has made an appearance after. Is he even still with the team? top kek

[Anonymous No.53494973]

>>53494967
Eric Schmidt brought up Chainlink out of nowhere during some interview.
He's an actual believer.

[Anonymous No.53495055]

>>53494973
Ofc he is

Its been planned since 2008

4IR is here and you vill be happy

[Anonymous No.53495104]

>>53494954

>when in doubt just pretend im right

How badly did i just smash your ego? Kek

Now get back to your pathetic existence of video games porn and virginity

[Anonymous No.53495127]

Wait im confusing two anons. My bad.

Point still stands to all these freaks getting but blasted. They hate to acknowledge Schmidt. All they do is squirm with lines like.


…he he associates with a scam…. He never talks about link since those times he talked about link….

[Anonymous No.53495141]

holding link for 5 years has given me borderline personality disorder

[Anonymous No.53495177]

>>53495104
Anon, you really need to work on your reading comprehension.
Either that, or your 4channel ID recognition skills.

[Anonymous No.53495185]

>>53494967
Hes not “with” the team the way most here think. He is not working on the project, nor does he have an understanding of the nuts and bolts, which was made clear to anyone who watched the Smartcon interview. Since being named an advisor last December, he has mentioned Link like 3 times tops, none of which of have amounted to any positive price movement.

Maybe at some point, there will be something positive to show from his capacity as an “advisor”, we’ll see. Anyone claiming that Schmidt is actively working with the team (as in, regularly) either has inside information not available to the rest of us or is making it up.

I had hoped that Sergey would be leveraging Schmidts’ years of experience to help move this along faster, but I dont think his ego permits it. Hopefully that changes.

[Anonymous No.53495271]

>>53495185
>he has mentioned Link like 3 times tops, none of which of have amounted to any positive price movement
guess why

[Anonymous No.53495276]

>>53495185

Anyone who isnt a midwit has seen the painfully obvious changes Sergey has been making since Schmidt got on board especially since smartcon.
he is definitely mentoring sergey in the right direction and sergey is listening.

If you cant see what im talking about you just arent cut out for this and too stupid and too emotional about your investments

[Anonymous No.53495389]

>>53495276
What changes? I could see Adelyn getting fired being one of them, but it doesn't appear that CLL is doing in-person office work like Schmidt suggested during smartcon.

[Anonymous No.53495405]

>>53495276
Would you mind enlightening us on all these changes and how you specifcally tie these back to Schmidt?

On your second paragraph, not sure where youre getting that. Seems like projection.

[Anonymous No.53495422]

>>53495389
His implies there were some major sweeping changes. If its in reference to a boomer saying to be in the office more, thats laughable. Im gonna need more than that.

[Anonymous No.53495431]

>>53495422
He not his*

[Anonymous No.53495462]

>>53495405

Why would i throw you whiney little bitches who cry and spam up the board constantly a bone? Fuck off. On your own.
If you cant see its you own loss. You lost spoonfeeding privileges from me

[Anonymous No.53495550]

>>53493169
The Proof of concept is confirmed, but that's it. They go through lots of concepts

>>53493506
Hasn't done anything to help the market value. 100000 LINK tokens are worth 6 figures, that's pathetic

[Anonymous No.53495610]

>>53492330
>a guy who became suicidal over his wanking habits lol
fucking pathetic
but of course you'd have to be to be those guys

[Anonymous No.53495614]

>>53495185
I would say he actually has made changes believe it or not, Sergey fired that worthless chink from CMO, and fired the underperforming enterprise team. Problem is, the new CMO is a nobody and they don't have enterprise sales or customers still

[Anonymous No.53495697]

>>53495550
>Hasn't done anything to help the market value
Guess why

[Anonymous No.53495704]

>>53495614
>they don't have enterprise sales or customers still
Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.53495765]

>>53491501
Rubic is going to integrate ChainLink. It’s on the roadmap. You’ll have a draft of what CCIP will be.

[Anonymous No.53496061]

>>53495614
ok thanks for at least giving an answer. I agree those are some changes but not sure how you can specifically tie that back to Eric Schmidt. The damn Link community was calling for her head years ago so I could just as easily attribute the change to them. Ditto that with the sales team, but not even sure that's a bullish sign. I'm all about cutting the dead weight but sales is the most important thing to getting a business going. Without sales there is no business.

[Anonymous No.53496080]

>>53495462
No one is whining, we're just having a conversation here. This is a discussion forum. If the mere idea of a discussion enrages you so much, maybe take a break for a while?

Also, I will add, the whole attitude with the "fuck off do your own research/go read le whitepaper" definitely hurt Link price during the '21 run. You guys ran off retail speculators that could've given you another 2x minimum, which is huge given the size of people's bags here.

[Anonymous No.53496454]

>>53495704
Show me the enterprise sales. Provide was supposed to be it but they drag their feet worse than Chainlink

>>53496061
I would say Eric pushed for far more and Sergey hasn't listened, at least with remote work. Fuck remote work for a team trying to become the next big thing, you need a packed HQ with devs working in the same building. The CMO part is absolutely because their marketing was extremely low impact and shoddy. She couldn't market drugs to an addict

[Anonymous No.53496707]

>>53496080

I have been one of the biggest spoonfeeders since 2017.
I remember when $5 there were arguments about if fudding leddit was worth it anymore and i was definitely on the stop fudding side as they were priced out above $5 anyway.
But the army of newfags wanted to be le freaking cool fud le own investment gang and fhey outnumbered everyone who was talking sense, and then you just had the newfags who didnt want to feel priced out buying above $5 so doubled down on le fud club.

I gave up spoonfeeding because this community is just schitzo fudders now. Not worth it. Anyone with a brain can work it out. Anyone who cant - too bad. You had 5 years.

Im not telling people to dyor maliciously, im telling people to fuck off and do it because im tired of spoonfeeding for years to whiney fudders.
At this point only people capable of figuring it out for themselves can make it with LINK

[Anonymous No.53496727]

>>53496707
You're not a spoonfeeder, you're a defeatist cuck who can't stand the fact that LINK didn't perform as well as you wanted it to.

[Anonymous No.53496835]

>>53496727

Whos defeatist? I was spoon feeding right up to mod last year when i realised it wasnt worth it to the cretins on here anymore. I have only added to my stack since.
Unlike some i am not some unemployed chud who put all their dreams into link at the top in 2021. I had always figured it would take till 2025 minimum to grow exponentially. I also have other income streams. Did i think LINK would be $7 in 2023? No, but i didnt think $1000 or anything close either.
Did i think LINK would hit $50 in 2021? No and that blew me away too so much in fact i sold some because it felt irrational.

This community on biz for LINK is DEAD and there is no need to spoonfeed the bottom barrel virgin basement dwellers anything. Anyone who has been paying attention is already in and gets it. Spoon feeding now is singing to the chior or just fuelling some pol incels spam for weeks. It doesn’t actually help anyone on the fence anymore

[Anonymous No.53497098]

>>53496835
>Whos defeatist?
evidently you are, you type exactly like a deflated loser who's disappointed in LINK's performance because they understand nothing about what it is and what it intends to do. The LINK community on /biz/ is without a doubt the best (maybe the only) place for link discussion at a certain level but you probably wouldn't know that if you weren't around in 2017. Discussions still take place here whenever a new development arises but losers like you aren't satisfied unless there's 15 retarded hopium threads on this board at any one time.

[Anonymous No.53497312]

>>53497098
This smells like projection

[Anonymous No.53497741]

>>53497312
Another loser who expected ETH type gains from the project, I assume

[Anonymous No.53497946]

>>53490857
If you have to tell people it’s improved instead of them noticing it for themselves, is it really improved?

[Anonymous No.53498529]

Doesnt matter when token price is still $7 and its at 2018 levels in eth and btc price

[Anonymous No.53498632]

>>53497741
>buy chainlink or stay poor! $1000 eoy! 81k is fud!
>w..what? you expected eth like gains? It was always a 20 year hold bro

Link shills lied to and scammed this entire board lmao. Old biz shilled btc and eth and made all the OGs rich, nubiz shilled and hyped the worst performing coin, meanwhile they smugly made fun of dog coins while simultaeneously getting outperformed by those literal who dog coins.

[Anonymous No.53498642]

>>53498529
That sounds like exactly the time when good marketing would be important

[Anonymous No.53498871]

>>53498529
so it's at the perfect accumulation level...

[Anonymous No.53498958]

>>53498871
>bagholderbingo.jpg

[Anonymous No.53499366]

Quantitative eating