/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.53395311]

>If 2019 repeats, Link will peak at $130 this year.
>we are just weeks away from a 20x

I can barely contain my excitement

[Anonymous No.53395482]

>>53395311
checked
weeks.... ser?
please, explain

[Anonymous No.53395513]

>>53395482
two more weeks
trust the plan
Q

[Anonymous No.53395517]

>>53395311
That’s a big if

[Anonymous No.53395540]

Until this range is broken it’s all just noise faggots

[Anonymous No.53395552]

>>53395540
>thick
>blue
>lines

[Anonymous No.53395557]

>>53395517
You're a small if, sucker.

[Anonymous No.53395565]

>>53395311
Only reason I still hold link is because I’m a cuck and love it when it dumps the most and pumps the least

[Anonymous No.53395569]

>>53395540
You have no vision. It's why you raise chickens.

[Anonymous No.53395736]

>>53395565
dont you usually have a cock cage image to post along with this?
you're slipping up, anon

[Anonymous No.53395758]

>>53395565
currynigger

[Anonymous No.53395777]

>>53395758
incel cuckold =-)

[Anonymous No.53396310]

Someone post his face so he flips out again and goes in a thirty post rant.

[Anonymous No.53396321]

>>53396310
Why bother? These faggots are already bordering on psychosis even after a full year of market dumps. I literally wouldn't be surprised if they completely lose it next bullrun and kys.

[Anonymous No.53396428]

>>53395777
How the fuck have these gone unchecked. I hate what this place has become

[Anonymous No.53396457]

>>53396428
You don’t check discord/telegram shill digits, nigger.

[Anonymous No.53396459]

>>53396428
too many incel cucks posting reddit frogs

[Anonymous No.53396470]

>>53396459
Don’t make me post your selfie exposed face, curry shitskin.

[Anonymous No.53396479]

>>53396470
notice how they don't post the chastity cages anymore while screeching about how everyone else is a cuck in these threads
it took them like 2 days to figure out that it wasn't a good look for them lmao

[Anonymous No.53396485]

>notice how they don't post the chastity cages anymore while screeching about how everyone else is a cuck in these threads
>it took them like 2 days to figure out that it wasn't a good look for them lmao

[Anonymous No.53396490]

>>53396479
Sounds pathetic lol.

[Anonymous No.53396508]

>>53396485
>"cuck cuck cuck seethe seethe seethe"
>s oybooruimagegenerator.jpg posted 50 times in 3 days
at least you aren't posting cockcage(30).jpg
that's an improvement

[Anonymous No.53396525]

>>53395569
What's wrong with raising chikuns?

[Anonymous No.53396530]

>>53395569
You have too much imagination. It's why Sergey's girth continually expands.

[Anonymous No.53396545]

>>53395311
Feels good to be a freelinker. I can still like LINK and swing the blow-offs and manipulation.

[Anonymous No.53396586]

>the image that makes chaincucks seethe

[Anonymous No.53399314]

>>53395311
Checked

[Anonymous No.53399343]

Dare I say... two more weeks?

[Anonymous No.53399361]

>>53395540
Gee, I sure wonder what happened to Bitcoin in these three specific instances of Link hitting $9

[Anonymous No.53399378]

>>53396545
freelinkers are the only chads left in crypto

[Anonymous No.53399395]

>>53399361
bitcoin finally found a usecase and it's as a LINK sentiment/price manager kek

[Anonymous No.53399422]

[Anonymous No.53399429]

who even cares anymore?
link peaked when it got to #5-6 in total marketcap, out of 15,000 other altcoins at the time.
it was never going to be able to outperform itself again

the time to exit has come and gone

[Anonymous No.53399433]

>>53399361
>does link go up last alongside all of the other garbage erc20 ponzi tokens from 2 bullruns ago?
>No. Surely it's a secret Bulgarian cabal tanking the entire market in order continue accumulating tokens not needed for the uniswap price checker service!

[Anonymous No.53399461]

>>53399433
I just asked what Bitcoin did in those three specific instances of Link hitting $9, bro.
No need for the schizobabble.

[Anonymous No.53399517]

>>53399429
Link is the absolute closest crypto has ever gotten to mass institutional/mainstream adoption.

[Anonymous No.53399566]

>>53399517
kek if that's true then crypto is dead

[Anonymous No.53399588]

>>53399566
Before institutional/mainstream adoption, crypto's biggest use case so far has been Defi.
For which Chainlink has also been the biggest catalyst.

[Anonymous No.53399601]

>>53395311
I cannot believe how many of you retards actually think this will happen. Desperation seems like it's at fever pitch.

>>53399429
This

[Anonymous No.53399637]

>>53399588
so crypto didn't even take off before it died, gotcha

[Anonymous No.53399655]

>>53399637
>>53399566
>chainlink bad because crypto bad

[Anonymous No.53399703]

>>53399655
check and kek

But really it's more like he's saying "crypto bad because Chainlink bad".
Which may be even more retarded.

[Anonymous No.53399725]

>>53399655
nice strawman
>a criticism against Chainlink is a criticism against the entire industry
kek the red herrings and the moving of goalposts are endless

[Anonymous No.53399749]

>>53395311
2 more weeks marines
keep trusting the plan
the storm is coming

Q

[Anonymous No.53399750]

>>53399725
>a criticism against the entire industry
Didn't you say "crypto is dead"?

[Anonymous No.53399764]

>>53395311
Kek and all you retards are staking. Fucking glorious

[Anonymous No.53399804]

>>53399725
You:
>crypto is dead
>crypto didn’t even take off before it died

Also you:
>I’m not criticizing the entire industry, guys!

[Anonymous No.53399806]

>>53399750
yes, in the context of your own premise of LINK being the closest crypto to achieve adoption etc
you see anon, by accepting that premise you essentially accept that crypto has failed so far
if you ask me, I don't believe DeFi is the future of DLT

[Anonymous No.53399812]

>>53399804
that's what happens when you frantically swap ids from your phone
see>>53399806

[Anonymous No.53399849]

>>53399764
>staking is all or nothing
I have staked a portion of my stack, and left some aside to take profit should we see such a pump. I was never going to be entirely out of LINK regardless of how hard it pumps

[Anonymous No.53399879]

>>53399806
>crypto has failed so far
But you implied it's going to fail in the future too.

Also, your fee-fees about Defi don't matter, it was objectively crypto's biggest use case so far other than manually sending from A to B.

[Anonymous No.53399900]

>>53399879
>But you implied it's going to fail in the future too.
it has already failed you mongoloid lmao
you concede to the fact in the very next sentence, kek the absolute state of the deranged holders
>it was objectively crypto's biggest use case
>was

[Anonymous No.53399937]

>>53399900
I don't think you know what "the future" means.

[Anonymous No.53399947]

>>53399937
do you realize you're arguing with your own constructed premises right now
you brought up defi as a measurement of adoption, I dismiss it

[Anonymous No.53399971]

>>53399849
plenty of retards on /biz/ staked ALL of their stack

[Anonymous No.53399983]

>>53399947
Interesting choice of thread to voice your dismissal of crypto as a whole. Surely a Bitcoin thread would be more appropriate than a rank 25 obscure altcoin?

[Anonymous No.53399988]

>>53399517
>institutional
bitcoin, nothing even comes a close second as of today
>mainstream
link was a normie coin last run, and like all normie coins they don't come back again

[Anonymous No.53399999]

>>53399983
I'm only dismissing defi but keep them red herrings coming little fella

[Anonymous No.53400016]

>>53399947
My premise is that Link is closest thing crypto has to a key towards a future of institutional/mainstream adoption.

>>53399988
>>institutional
>bitcoin
lmao, being turned into a hollow paper asset does not count.

[Anonymous No.53400024]

>>53400016
and I reject that premise
>nooooo that doesn't count!!11
kek the absolute state

[Anonymous No.53400035]

>>53399812
>that's what happens
What is?

[Anonymous No.53400072]

>>53400024
>and I reject that premise
Swift/Link is BY FAR the closest crypto has ever gotten to mass institutional/mainstream adoption.
That's an objective fact.

[Anonymous No.53400084]

>>53399999
Checked. Fine, but I'm interested, if not DeFi, what areas do you think crypto will actually have a usecase moving forward?

[Anonymous No.53400092]

>>53400072
>10 pbtid
seething cuckold lmao

[Anonymous No.53400104]

>>53399971
I don’t understand how people can see someone like this employed at a company and not feel wary about putting money into it or any project they do.
Look at this cunt with her cunty face, cunty hair, cunty glasses it’s amazing how she hits the stereotype so hard.

[Anonymous No.53400107]

>>53400072
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_in_El_Salvador
unfortunately, that's the closest crypto ever got, and it was a gigantic nothingburger
>>53400084
private dlt technology on the backend facilitating payments, cbdc, social credit scores etc
the current "open source" industry is serving as a giant testing ground, after they're done all of them will trend to zero

[Anonymous No.53400127]

>>53400107
Swift is so much bigger than El Salvador in virtually every way imaginable.
Tell me you're joking.

>private dlt technology on the backend facilitating payments, cbdc, social credit scores etc
Guess what you need for this.

[Anonymous No.53400150]

>>53400127
>Swift is so much bigger
it's a literal PoC, El bagholder is using BTC as a legal tender TODAY, not in 10 years
>Guess what you need for this
not an erc667, that's for sure

[Anonymous No.53400162]

>>53400104
All Trillion dollar+ companies are filled with cunts like this

[Anonymous No.53400168]

>>53400162
Exactly, they are overvalued as well.

[Anonymous No.53400171]

>>53400150
>not an erc667, that's for sure
mask slipped

[Anonymous No.53400178]

>>53400150
>>Swift is so much bigger
>it's a literal PoC
That PoC is the absolute closest crypto has ever gotten to mass institutional/mainstream adoption.

>not an erc667, that's for sure
The answer is oracles. You need oracles.

[Jealous No.53400198]

> just weeks away
What number of weeks would you estimate?

[Anonymous No.53400200]

Daily reminder that assblaster said link would get to $50 (he called the top kek), followed by a dump to $10 (pretty close), and then finally pump to $200

Suck my dick faggots, retarded shills your karmic retribution for posting misleading information will be paid by your families

[Anonymous No.53400210]

>>53400171
what mask? again you people seem to be operating under the assumption that whoever genuinely doesn't believe in link is doing so out of ignorance
>>53400178
no, accepting BTC as legal tender in a country is the closest crypto has ever gotten to mainstream adoption

[Anonymous No.53400212]

>>53395540
Wyckoff almost complete

[Anonymous No.53400227]

>>53395777
Checked trips

[Anonymous No.53400232]

>>53400210
>no, accepting BTC as legal tender in a country is the closest crypto has ever gotten to mainstream adoption
Swift is so much bigger than El Salvador in virtually every way imaginable.
Tell me you're joking.

[Anonymous No.53400263]

>>53400210
>private dlt technology on the backend facilitating payments, cbdc, social credit scores etc
You are ignorant if you believe all of this can be achieved without an oracle. Doesn't mean it's definitely chainlink, but I don't think betting against it is the smart move with the information we have currently

[Anonymous No.53400303]

>>53400232
swift is a banking messaging system, el bagholder is a country
BTC as legal tender is much bigger than a PoC of experimental technology with no guarantees of actual adoption
now is the El bagholder experiment working? fuck no, but neither is muh swift+chainlink connection materializing into anything tangible or substantial after more than 5 years
>>53400263
private dlts don't need oracles, they're private
decentralization is a meme, there cannot be institutional adoption on "decentralized open source" blockchains
that's why they're desperately trying to find a work around on this through sgx (failed lol), deco etc
pro tip: they won't succeed

[Anonymous No.53400342]

>>53400303
>BTC as legal tender is much bigger than a PoC
Absolutely not when the legal tender is El Salvador and the PoC is with Swift lmao

[Anonymous No.53400389]

>>53400342
kek, are you broken?
let me put it this way: you can actually buy things legally in el bagholder with BTC, TODAY
otoh, you can't do absolutely nothing with LINK as of today, and SWIFT does not use the token in ANY WAY
is this getting through your head anon?

[Anonymous No.53400394]

>>53400303
>private dlts don't need oracles, they're private
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Being private has literally (LITERALLY) nothing to do with being a private ledger, you literal retard.
Stop posting.

[Anonymous No.53400407]

>>53400389
>El Salvador
>mass adoption
please choose one

[Anonymous No.53400425]

>>53400394
you're confusing chainlink's public feeds with private customized blockchains without a native token utilized by banks and institutions
such dlt systems absolutely do not need a "Decentralized oracle network", the source of the data is literally the company themselves
>>53400407
>swift proof of concept
>mass adoption
pick one and only one

[Anonymous No.53400456]

>>53400425
>swift proof of concept
Obviously nothing is certain. Would you change your mind if Swift publically states they are moving foward with the Chainlink model for their CBDC network?

[Anonymous No.53400468]

>>53400456
absolutely but it won't
>inb4 wait for march and iso 20022!!

[Anonymous No.53400527]

>>53400342
You mean like the poc they did with swift 5 years ago? It’s great how that turned out

[Anonymous No.53400535]

>>53400456
I don't put too much weight into anything happening in March regarding ISO20022. I doubt it has much to do with DLT just yet.
>but it won't
I'm betting it will, as it's all but confirmed that the Chainlink model is one of 2 concepts Swift is moving forward with following their initial tests

[Anonymous No.53400552]

>>53400535
Meant for >>53400468

[Anonymous No.53400630]

>>53400425
>private customized blockchains without a native token utilized by banks and institutions
>such dlt systems absolutely do not need a "Decentralized oracle network"
They literally do

>the source of the data is literally the company themselves
lmao
Swift's PoC is about interoperability between different banks and their different chains.

You have no idea what you're talking about, literally ZERO.

>swift proof of concept
>mass adoption
A lot closer to mass adoption than fucking El Salvador lmao

[Anonymous No.53400639]

>>53395311
the aol of oracles

[Anonymous No.53400644]

>>53400303
The irony is someone like yourself wouldn’t waste time explaining why the solution can’t be oracles/link unless you were fearing it actually might be in the back of your mind. There’s only two reasons for someone logically to waste this much time discussing link here, either they hold it, or they held it at one time and want to convince themselves they made the right decision to sell. Effectively you’re employing the spoonfeed via fud strategy and/or simply sating your ego. I’d be interested if you actually posed an interesting alternative, but you haven’t, and to be honest you mostly just sound like a demoralized bagholder who stubbornly wants to fud out others out of frustration at how long you’ve had to wait yourself.

[Anonymous No.53400692]

>>53400639
That was Oraclize.

>>53400527
Swift is still actively pursuing smart securities, anon.

[Anonymous No.53400696]

>>53400535
>>53400644
https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/nyic/project-cedar
I'm almost entirely convinced this is what they're going with, and so far it looks like this has nothing to do with LINK, and obviously you won't be able to invest in it.
>There’s only two reasons
>muh false dichotomy
the actual reason is that I believe you people are actively distorting reality and presenting half assed speculative theories as facts

[Anonymous No.53400725]

>>53399988
>close second
there is none

[Anonymous No.53400731]

>>53400696
>presenting half assed speculative theories as facts
That's rich coming from the same guy who is certain Swift won't use Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.53400807]

>>53400731
remember the so called Blythe Masters/Digital Asset connection?
how about Oracle's Q4 2020 integration?
Docusign?
turns out, despite all the bread crumbs, the connections, the hints, it was yet another dead end
but surely, SWIFT will turn out different, right?

[Anonymous No.53400825]

>>53400696
Still doesn’t explain your obsession with this specific investment on this specific shithole of the internet, mister deboonker. If I felt a bunch of idiots were ruining themselves by obsessing over vaporware I’d leave them to it, I gain absolutely nothing from discussion with them.

[Anonymous No.53400847]

>>53400807
>remember the so called Blythe Masters/Digital Asset connection?
>how about Oracle's Q4 2020 integration?
>Docusign?
Literally none of them ever announced they were working together on a product.
Swift has.

But do tell me more about how institutional private chains don't need oracles because they are their own source fucking lmao

[Anonymous No.53400853]

>>53400807
Oh I’ve seen you post before, never mind I know who you are, that’s the handy thing about images they sometimes give away your anonymity.

[Anonymous No.53400862]

>>53400807
I had a feeling you were this guy
>>53400757

[Anonymous No.53400876]

>>53400825
you could just say you're out of arguments instead of all these words anon!
>>53400853
>>53400862
>>/biz/thread/S52678294#p52679015
I'm not OP btw if that's what you're implying

[Anonymous No.53400884]

>>53400853
>>53400862
kek he's a serial cross-thread fudder

Thomas?

[Anonymous No.53400892]

>>53400456
>nothing is certain
one thing is: swift's cbdc interoperability protocol doesn't use shitcoins

[Anonymous No.53400916]

>>53400876
I have no interest in arguing with you, but I am interested in your motivations. If you admitted something reasonable, like you sold all your link but in the back of your mind you fear swift could be frontrun like ethereum’s EEA announcement, and you could be priced out forever, then your obsession would make sense. If you truly thought link were a dead project with no future though, it wouldn’t occupy space in your mind.

[Anonymous No.53400919]

>>53400892
They definitely won't use an interoperability protocol where the receiving DLT has to be a specific one.

[Anonymous No.53400935]

>>53400884
I can assure you, I'm not and never was a twitterfag cancer
I literally post in LINK threads once in 2 months, but when I do, I try to engage in the conversation instead of shitposting
most of the times you call me a bulgarian tranny and all is well
>>53400916
it occupies a remaining sui stack in my portfolio, which I'm anxiously looking forward to get rid of, if that makes sense
I've posted on staking threads as well

[Anonymous No.53400969]

>>53400892
They didn't use the names of any of the potential projects in that release

[Anonymous No.53400995]

>>53400935
>most of the times you call me a bulgarian tranny
Considering how much of a colossal retard you are, you're being treated very mildly.

"institutional private chains don't need oracles because they are their own source"
Absolutely hilarious.

[Anonymous No.53401001]

>>53400935
>I literally post in LINK threads once in 2 months
See you in the next one

[Anonymous No.53401027]

>>53400995
let me rephrase that
>they don't need "decentralized oracle networks" for centralized, permissioned blockchains
>>53401001
thanks for conceding btw

[Anonymous No.53401038]

>>53400935
Well that answers it then. Appreciate the honesty anon, and don’t misinterpret me, I’m always interested in legitimate link “fud”, though nothing you’ve brought up here is anything new so it feels a bit pointless. We all know docusign, oracle etc were nothingburgers or at least put on the backburner and link is attempting to pivot towards swift as their main initial usecase. I’m honest with myself, I don’t think I’ll have any chance of successfully swinging if there is an insider’s frontrun moment like eth got, so I’ve staked and hold. I would like to see an anon put their money where their mouth is and successfully catch such a pump were it to happen though, because I’m positive there’s a few anons out there who are aiming to do just that. If you can post proof of it with sell and buy orders you’d own this board forever.

And of course in the alternative scenario that nothing ever happens, you’ve already won.

[Anonymous No.53401084]

>>53401027
Conceding what? You believe Swift will use
>https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/nyic/project-cedar

I believe Swift will use Chainlink. I doubt either of us is going to change our minds

[Anonymous No.53401109]

>>53401027
So what happens if that one oracle goes down? Or gets exploited or hacked?
Why should party X to the transaction trust the oracle of party Y when the latter has an active monetary interest in changing the data?

[Anonymous No.53401393]

>>53401027
Also, you said "private chains absolutely do not need a "Decentralized oracle network", the source of the data is literally the company themselves".
So when transacting from private chain A (run by bank A) to private chain B (run by bank B), how are both of these banks/chains "the source of the data" at the same time?

Your stupidity has so many layers I'm honestly having trouble coming to grips with the full scope of it.

[Anonymous No.53401695]

>>53400210
You knew that link was an ERC 667 token. You seem to be somewhat smart and you know alot about the token you are fudding. If you have done your due diligence on link, which is what is implied, then you must've realised that it will be used by swift and the banking cartel for CCIP, defi and CBDCs. So you know link is valuable but you're just fudding to keep people out so you can accumulate more, because this fud clearly isn't stemming from ignorance, just evil.

[Anonymous No.53402194]

>>53395311
two more weeks guys!!!!

[Anonymous No.53402243]

>>53400807
delete you post now, stop making logical sense

[Anonymous No.53402284]

>>53401695
Well he already admitted to owning a suicide stack, claims to be a demoralized bagholder that sold most and I guess follows for... some reason? This is what I don't get, there are anons that have convinced themselves that if it somehow happens, they can be unemotional and get back in before it does. But markets don't work like that. You won't get the swift news while link is at the bottom and be allowed to buy back in. What will actually happen is insiders will frontrun the news, but your bearish bias will keep you out and convince you that "this rally will fail like all the rest". Then you might even see a retrace, but it doesn't go to your buy level, it bounces and keeps going up. And you tell yourself you'll catch the next one.

Just for a reminder of how sudden eth's pump was, it went from about $8 in December 2016 to $290 before the first significant pullback... which went to $200. I promise you there are anons scared to death of something similar happening with link and them missing out. For some, its why they hold with a deathgrip and will never sell. For others, its why they fud with such ferocity, because they want to reassure themselves they made the right decision, and they won't be that eth anon who sold too early. But I guarantee it'll happen to some. Fuck there are still anons who occasionally admit they sold before the initial google pump, or the 5-20 pump, and never got back in.

[Anonymous No.53402308]

>>53396586
lmao

[Anonymous No.53402356]

>>53402284
>Fuck there are still anons who occasionally admit they sold before the initial google pump, or the 5-20 pump, and never got back in.
I sold 500,000 at 60 cents back in 2017. Thought about buying it all back in 2018/19 when it was 20 cents. Never did.

[Anonymous No.53402400]

>>53401027
>they don't need "decentralized oracle networks" for centralized, permissioned blockchains

wow

[Anonymous No.53402485]

>>53402356
Being a beautiful young lady in Bulgaria makes up for your poor financial decisions. Count your blessings you greedy whore.

[Anonymous No.53402509]

>>53402400
checked
I mean its been a while since we've actually discussed the oracle problem on here, but the entire issue is that centralized permission blockchains are somewhat pointless without a decentralized oracle network, no? Otherwise you might as well just run everything on a centralized server, blockchain not needed. If there is interest being shown in DLT, it effectively needs the oracle layer to have relevant usage in the real world. Or you need to run everything on a single decentralized chain like Vitalik envisioned, but that will likely never be the case.

[Anonymous No.53402595]

>>53400303
Chainlink/decentralized oracles is a nascent technology, even more nascent than blockchains themselves. So keep in mind it is literally starting from nothing and didn't have a single main net price feed until June 2019 (running on 3 nodes lmfao). I'm actually surprised Chainlink/SWIFT isn't even further behind given that.

[Anonymous No.53402610]

>>53402485
But I was a man in America before that

[Anonymous No.53402662]

chainlink is scam coin., you could be buying good privacys coin called discreet/ DIST that actual have real oracles called zero layer and give privacys and data on chain

protip we dist team fired chainshit because it scam and went with superior oracle

[Anonymous No.53402704]

>>53402662
>t. ser
Winner for most obvious poo post of the day.

[Anonymous No.53402766]

>>53402356
Genuine question anon, did you get back in after the google/coinbase pump? Or you stayed on the sidelines? What's funny is if you at least sat in btc/eth you still did relatively well, since link has retraced most of its sats/gwei gains since 2019.

[Anonymous No.53402810]

>>53402766
I bought a shitload of ETH at the bottom in 2018, so I'm doing fine. Already retired and all, but it still stings knowing I could've had over 20 million if I played my cards right. 9 figures if I had swapped all my LINK for ETH at the peak ratio.

[Anonymous No.53402901]

>>53402810
I said count your blessings you greedy whore. You shouldn't be here crying about missed opportunities. Go, be free.

[Anonymous No.53402928]

>>53402901
Being retired means I have a lot more time to waste on /biz/. So I'm gonna stay.

[Anonymous No.53403014]

>>53402928
You're not retired, you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.53403128]

>>53403014
It's Monday, and I'm not working. Denial isn't healthy anon. I'm only trying to warn people here that "swingies get the rope" isn't just a meme. It is very possible to lose your chance to buy back in.

[Anonymous No.53403139]

>>53399999
Wasted on a retard

[Anonymous No.53403168]

>>53395569
Bro raising chickens is based as fuck.

[Anonymous No.53403233]

>>53403128
You swung and retired. And retirement is cool because now you can waste your time not working. You're the posterboy for good health. Tell us more.

[Anonymous No.53403246]

>>53403233
Seethe more

[Anonymous No.53403286]

>>53403128
I appreciate your candor anon. I think what’s incredible is link very likely still has an eth-like pump in it, but this board has become so demoralized they view even revisiting ath as unlikely. Anons are literally afraid to show hope. I don’t think it affects those who are never selling, but It’s likely effectively killed any new retail interest in the project.

[Anonymous No.53403345]

>>53403246
No, it's just funny.

[Anonymous No.53403361]

>>53403345
Funny how? What's funny about it?

[Anonymous No.53403384]

>>53403286
Retail interest will come back I'm sure, a lot of alts are lagging behind ETH and BTC right now.

[Anonymous No.53403455]

>>53403345
>>53403361
You mean, let me understand this cause, ya know maybe it's me, I'm a little fucked up maybe, but I'm funny how, I mean funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I'm here to fuckin' amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how? How am I funny?

[Anonymous No.53403495]

>>53403361
You, giving advice. It's about perspective more than anything. Recognizing when enough is enough. Crying when you have millions that you could have more millions when you don't even know what to do with what you have. But you need more.

[Anonymous No.53403521]

>>53403286
I feel like I’m the only one still buying a shitload right now. Anything under $10 is a steal.

[Anonymous No.53403538]

>>53395311
kek. even IF that happened cuckold stakers will not be able to sell

[Anonymous No.53403554]

>>53403384
That’s true. I think the $20 level is when this board will flip bullish as that’s probably seen as most anons as the true top last cycle, whereas passing $50 is where you’ll start to see newfags fomo in like the $1 area in 2019.

[Anonymous No.53403781]

>>53395565
Please update your scripts trannies. This one sucks balls and it will never catch.
Token not needed was way better. I know , I know, now we know that the token is needed and you can't use it anymore but keep using it anyways. A lie repeated a thousand times becomes truth eventually

[Anonymous No.53403881]

>>53395311
>link peaks at $130
> i still need another x10 to make it
holy fucking shit im going to go insane. I'll make it but they'll have to wheel me about while I shit myself

[Anonymous No.53404052]

>>53403521
>Anything under $10 is a steal.
I believe that 2023 will be the last opportunity to purchase single digit link.

[Anonymous No.53404082]

>>53395311
why tho

[Anonymous No.53404132]

>>53404052
I wish I could share your hopium bro

[Anonymous No.53404257]

>>53395311
We haven't even broken $10 since this never-ending crab cycle began. You're talking about triple digits when it's still at single digits. WTF are you smoking?

[Anonymous No.53404311]

>>53395311
all so tiresome

[Anonymous No.53404316]

>>53395311
Link is a web3 project like ORE, they both have the fucking potentials to do well, as web3 continue to gain massive adoption.

[Anonymous No.53404492]

>>53404316
These bots are getting worse.

[Anonymous No.53406326]

>>53395311
I hate the fact that this year seems to be a good one for memecoins
they were supposed to be extinct years ago, how the fuck do things like vinu still exist? why the fuck are they still going up?

[Anonymous No.53407014]

>>53402284
>y y you cant critcize le cult unless you…(makes up a bunch of conditions to justify someone else not joining the cult)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH what a weakling. Nice reddit post, pussy

[Anonymous No.53407034]

>>53395311
Link won’t hit that until 2025 at the earliest

[Anonymous No.53407039]

>>53403014
Only in a demented link holder’s head can a multimillionaire be “retarded” because they didnt join their buzzword cult. Truly fascinating.

[Anonymous No.53407064]

>>53404052
>updates script to change 2019 to 2023

Yikes. Xrp 2.0

[Anonymous No.53407112]

>>53395311
2019 is not gonna repeat though because it was driven by a ponzi bubble in China

[Anonymous No.53407698]

>>53404316
>ORE

[Anonymous No.53408160]

>>53407014
>>53407039
>>53407064
Your material is pretty stale, anon

[Anonymous No.53409936]

>entire market is pumping
>link -0.2%

Ugh

[Anonymous No.53409997]

Just found out that Chainlink's number 1 developer advocate and onboarder, Patrick Collins, has left the team. Wtf is Chainlink doing to let the guy who has solely kept hundreds of devs interested and working with Chainlink products, to just walk.

[Anonymous No.53410095]

>>53409997
ari doesn't let anyone just walk
accidents will be had involving unidentified flying objects tat are classified the the usaf

[Anonymous No.53410134]

>>53409997
his material will still live on though, no?

[Anonymous No.53410159]

>still posting about fucking CHAINLINK in 2023
This shitcoin died like 3 years ago dude, its time to move on from vapourware 'muh oracls' shit.

[Anonymous No.53410179]

>>53409997
the more people that abandon chainlink the better crypto is a fucking scam best to just burn it down and come back in the morning to piss on the ashes

[Anonymous No.53410258]

>>53400072
Defi is closer to mass adoption than le heckin tokenized securities

[Anonymous No.53410355]

>>53400072
you might be right but the question is how long is it going to take?
are you really willing to miss another bull run holding an asset that has a bullish yet unrealized future?

[Anonymous No.53411382]

>>53396457
Based

[Anonymous No.53411407]

>>53396525

Nothing its beyond based and probably the most anti-WEF thing you could possibly do. You can create organic compost so your chickens will ironically eat the bugz and produce you high quality eggs and meat. Use your compost for more produce and rinse repeat

The jew occultists fear the chicken farmer

[Anonymous No.53411443]

>>53400630
>such dlt systems absolutely do not need a "Decentralized oracle network"
>They literally do

I can't believe you are still even bothering arguing with him when he said private DLT systems don't need a decentralized oracle system.

There is no way he is that retarded its got to just be arguing in bad faith at this point.

[Anonymous No.53411453]

>>53401027
>let me rephrase that
>>they don't need "decentralized oracle networks" for centralized, permissioned blockchains

Yeah that is still wrong though kek

[Anonymous No.53412091]

>me thinking about all the LINK I'll be able to sell at triple digits because I'm not a stakecel

[Anonymous No.53412737]

I like the optimism but 2019 never had Nexo Bulgarians shorting and spreading fud 24/7.

[Anonymous No.53412791]

>>53412737
Nexo is dead, bub

[Anonymous No.53412949]

>>53399361
I don't even need to look to know bitcoin was rising at every single pump

[Anonymous No.53412964]

>>53412949
Nope.

[Anonymous No.53413562]

>>53395540
The chart for link in both terms of BTC and USD is fairly unique. It really does look primed for a breakout and meteoric rise, though I doubt that can happen in this market.

[Anonymous No.53413797]

>>53410355
>are you prepared to hold for life changing wealth?
That's an emphatic, 100% 'YES'.
What a dumb question.

[Anonymous No.53413845]

>>53399764
Whatever is working for you go for it, anon. I trust my current investments in Matic, DOT, and XPRESS.

[Anonymous No.53413860]

>>53395311
>$130
Not in this life linkies

[Anonymous No.53413871]

>>53412737
Dead on arrival, shit only works when a billionaire mentions it, it doesn't matter if they have good or bad stuff. The feeling is on payment solutions. They might scale as bitcoin acceptance rates increase

[Anonymous No.53413878]

>>53395552
kek, frbr

[Anonymous No.53413886]

>>53412949
>>53412964
Instant rekkage

[Anonymous No.53413887]

>>53395311
>130$

That’s only 6 figs me for me. That’s not enough.

[Anonymous No.53413891]

>>53412964
look like a shit investment, shorting now will still be profitable

[Anonymous No.53413906]

>>53413562
I think Link has good potential for growth, but payment solutions will likely drive the next market cycle.

[Anonymous No.53413965]

>>53400696
>https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/nyic/project-cedar
not competition to CCIP

[Anonymous No.53414011]

>>53413887
6 figures in a bear market are you kidding? I'm not even expecting that from a one-stop solution even though they're gaining more momentum and attention

[Anonymous No.53415123]

>>53399395

kek, from a cryptographic demo to manager junkware.

[Anonymous No.53415978]

>>53413887
Kek it needs to hit like 800 for it to be 7 figs. I'll take 6 figs happily

[Anonymous No.53416620]

>>53415978
you're going to sell at 6 figs?

[Anonymous No.53417295]

>>53413906
Well I agree web3 payments has taken it presence well. LuganoPlanB will be the perfect example for that. Mainstream adoption jeets.

[Anonymous No.53417330]

Fapped to BBC cuck porn 4 times before noon already anons how do I fucking stop this and fudding Link!?!????? It’s like I got into a trance of fapping and just can’t resist.

[Anonymous No.53417482]

>>53413871
Eric schmidt is a multi billionaire

[Anonymous No.53417517]

>>53412964
>pumps
>btc dumps

[Anonymous No.53418576]

New chainlink OC just dropped

[Anonymous No.53419508]

I'm beginning to think that I'm not gonna make it

[Anonymous No.53420129]

>>53399749
WWG1WGA

[Anonymous No.53420255]

>>53419508
Maybe the real making it was the shit posts we made along the way

[Anonymous No.53421430]

when the price goes to $2 and sergey finally allows people to sell after doing so himself, do you think the price will tank further?

[Anonymous No.53421539]

>ITT cuckolds waiting for their erc-20 token to moon