its time to bring the big guns out

[Anonymous No.53339446]

dont take it personal

[Anonymous No.53339455]

>>53339446
Who the fuck even uses Arbitrum? its all just fake numbers to compete with competitors like OP and Polygon

[Anonymous No.53339461]

>>53339455
100%
they're known to fake their user counts. they're infamous for this

[Anonymous No.53339462]

>>53339446
>>53339455
nice thread rahnjeet

[Anonymous No.53339469]

>>53339455
>>53339461
i love how biztards say the most retarded shit ever but never actually back it up with real data
fucking pathetic

[Anonymous No.53339472]

>>53339469
>source
>>53339462
he's actually seething holy fucking kekies

[Anonymous No.53339480]

>>53339462
>nice thread rahnjeet
>t. 50 y/o arbi boomer that doesnt know how to get his funds off the chain

[Anonymous No.53339492]

>>53339446
wen mainnet?

[Anonymous No.53339504]

>>53339446
>>53339455
>>53339461
you seriously need to stop the cope.
if the numbers were fake then explain the near record breaking gas spent last week

[Anonymous No.53339525]

>>53339462
>>53339504
Not here to defend Mantle as I've yet to try their testnet, but I do agree that Arbitrum heavily pumps their numbers
The chain is old, slow, and expensive with basically no new development that happened in a while

You seriously think more than a couple thousand are using the chain daily? I doubt the number number is anywhere the tens of thousands that they project every day

[Anonymous No.53339531]

>>53339504
>record breaking gas spent last week
imagine flexing gas fees for an L2.... its literally designed for the opposite to happen

[Anonymous No.53339567]

>>53339504
thats cause its the most expensive out of all L2s
Mantle would never. Time to shift towards a modular architecture

[Anonymous No.53339574]

>>53339472
they didnt even try lmao
i feel offended

[Anonymous No.53339588]

>>53339446
based + checked
>>53339525
tried the testnet. there might actually be something behind this this time

[Anonymous No.53339601]

>>53339446
except that arbitrum pays gas in ETH. mantle doesnt

[Anonymous No.53339610]

>>53339531
Gas fees are directly proportional to the current demand for transactions. Higher gas fees generally mean network uptake. How is this a bad thing?

[Anonymous No.53339630]

>>53339601
This.
Im confused as to why they would do this. They actually seem legit and could cause a change. Why didnt they just set gas fees in eth?

[Anonymous No.53339640]

>>53339601
>>53339630
They could have easily set gas to ETH but they didnt and this is by design. They didnt want to be stuck in a situation like Arbitrum where devs would rather build on other chains because of token incentives

[Anonymous No.53339642]

>>53339640
okay but doesnt this affect the security of the chain?

[Anonymous No.53339648]

>>53339610
Not all L2s are built the same. Arbitrum currently has one of the highest rates of gas fees
Sure, a couple cents dont make a difference in a single transaction, but multiply that by thousands and you'll see a major difference

[Anonymous No.53339660]

>>53339642
Not really
I researched everything about this
To make it simple. The way that tokens are staed on EigenLayer give the chain 100% of Ethereum's security
There is zero compromise
I'm surprise why other L2s still havent implemented a similar system. Its pretty clever

[Anonymous No.53339668]

>>53339446
>Mantle bros fighting with Arbi bros
>both of them buying my bags
thanks for this anons
i win. i always do

[Anonymous No.53339687]

>>53339668
He gets it

[Anonymous No.53339689]

>>53339455
i dont need to buy a separate token to transact

[Anonymous No.53339746]

>>53339455
this, it's literally crawling with botted wallets all trying to rack up transactions in the hopes of getting an airdrop