>>53283648
You don't need a
>lol
RSI (14, close, SMA, 14, 2) crossing 50
>lol
from some homosexual smuggy tweeting cherrypicker with hindsight bias.
Which you are also presenting here with your
>obviously tests and rejections
Needless to say, both OP and >>53280238 are homosexuals and those 'advices' or whatever you call it are just dumb. Basically >>53277131
Of course, if positive happens, they will tell you they were right. If negative, they will find an excuse or won't come back and appologize.