Polkadot BTFO - another dapp migrates away

[Anonymous No.53125728]

https://blog.syntropynet.com/post/syntropy-chooses-cosmos-for-web3-development/

"Our development team faced multiple challenges when building with the Substrate framework, which is used to build chains within the Polkadot ecosystem. It ultimately did not meet our specific needs and requirements. We experienced repeated stability issues with our public testnet, and developing business logic for our decentralized application was difficult and time-consuming."

[Anonymous No.53126081]

>>53125728
Cosmwasm and Cosmos SDK are so comfy bros

[Anonymous No.53127475]

Not surprised

>Jonas Simanavicius

Imagine Lithuanians being able to use computers, boggles the mind

[Anonymous No.53127760]

>>53125728
What's the sui/make it stack for atom?

[Anonymous No.53127786]

why do Cosmos and Polkadot fanboys shit talk Polygon when in reality its doing a much better job?

[Anonymous No.53127791]

>>53127786
no one actually uses Polygon. these are all bots

[Anonymous No.53127809]

>>53127791
>bots
lol, Polygon has some of the most popular dApps on the market built on it. how did you automatically assume “bots”

AAVE, Uniswap, Curve, Quickswap
these are all dApps that have TVL in the hundreds of millions of dollars

now name one dApp on Cosmos or Polkadot that can remotely compete with that

[Anonymous No.53127903]

>>53127809
I think both moonbeam and evmos have those same Dapps because they're easily copy and pasted from eth to any evm environment, it makes no sense for evm projects not to colonise other chains. The fact that jeets that can't afford eths gas fees have congregated onto polygon isn't a special or even particularly good when polygon itself isn't secure or decentralised in any way, it just makes the inevitable crash worse.

[Anonymous No.53128226]

Noia ruined my life

[Anonymous No.53128331]

Syntropy (NOIA) was supposed to develop their own chain instead they're going from one to another because...because they're not competent enough or what?

[Anonymous No.53128595]

>>53127786
Polygon will succeed if it adopts tech outside the evm

[Anonymous No.53128703]

>>53128331
It's a chain on a chain. Look up how cosmos and polkadot work. Thorchain is it's own thing but uses cosmos iirc.

[Anonymous No.53128729]

>>53128703
Yes, but I rather meant their own blockchain.

That DARP thing to function will need shit ton of blockchain transactions which will make the use of it very expensive. Or am I missing something anon?

[Anonymous No.53128734]

Skale will be the next polygon

[Anonymous No.53129093]

Syntro-whatnow?
https://twitter.com/csaint02/status/1608324590379597824

[Anonymous No.53129839]

>>53128729
probably too early to comment
I also don't know that much about the tech,
if your interpretation is correct (every bandwidth purchase requires its on TX on chain) then yes you are correct.
But I doubt this is how it will operate

[Anonymous No.53131680]

>>53125728
>tfw 150 atom staked
i'm not comfy yet but starting to get close

[Anonymous No.53132113]

>>53131680
based. 550 atom stacklet here. ideally id want 2k so i net 1 atom/day staking but im poor bros

[Anonymous No.53132391]

>>53132113
i also hold/stake juno, osmo, and various other cosmo shitcoins. recently sold all my evmos idk if that was smart or not. should i continue that route or go totally all in on ATOM?

[Anonymous No.53132427]

No one gives a shit about Polkadot anon. Nothing beats ETH and Polygon scaling it.

[Anonymous No.53132803]

>>53131680
>>53132113
>>53132391
yall would make more buying and staking the token in OP's pic
if they succeed with their goals its an easy 100x

[Anonymous No.53134773]

>>53125728
kek RIP pedochain

[Anonymous No.53135381]

>>53131680
>>53132113
3400 atom here, wagmi bros

[Anonymous No.53135497]

>>53135381
Eternally and unequivocally based

[Anonymous No.53136582]

This project is complete vaporware and they won't deliver anything on Cosmos either. No one in the Polkadot community has any clue who these guys were and if you check their repo you can see they're using a version of substrate from December 2021 and didn't update since. You just need to read their stuff to figure out it's all buzzword bingo with no substance to back it.

[Anonymous No.53137568]

>>53136582
or... just maybe most of their work has nothing to do with a blockchain
its really a web2 company (bandwidth routing) where you buy their product (bandwidth) using their token.
they will likely accept dollars as payments and just do buybacks in their token (the ceo has said eventually all purchases will convert to NOIA at some point)
none of their clients want to pay in $NOIA, the FTSE100 / SP500 most finance departments aren't that forward thinking to hoarde the tokens (which represent bandwidth) before they become worth more bandwidth (aka $)
but it appears a few autists here are...
Im going to shut up from now on though as I'm still waiting to buy (im dca'ing)

[Anonymous No.53137961]

>>53137568
If that's the case they wouldn't need to launch their own chain, they could just do the ERC20. You have no clue what you're talking about and you're going to lose money on this shit.

[Anonymous No.53138187]

>>53127475
I always thought Lithuanians were slavs. I guess not?

[Anonymous No.53138234]

>>53135381
What's that daily yield look like?

[Anonymous No.53138805]

>>53127786
Don't be fooled, you and I know that poly is based in therms of defi, they currently have the highest TVL so far
>>53127791
That's a big lie, I'm using polygon, I'm currently staking my ORE here, so you definitely do not have a word

[Anonymous No.53138954]

>>53128226
Kek, someone bought in at >$0.60

[Anonymous No.53138972]

>not holding syntropy so you benefit either way
shiggy

[Anonymous No.53139008]

>>53132803
explain like i'm retarded what their goals are, anon

[Anonymous No.53139018]

>>53132113
where the fuck are you staking 2000 atom to get 1 a day??

[Anonymous No.53139032]

>>53139018
Bruh apy is like 21% and rising last time I checked

[Anonymous No.53139194]

Cosmos is sleeping on GKEY

[Anonymous No.53139935]

>>53139018
Stake it on chain and autocompound using yieldmos or restake