/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.53086795]

>the price of token goes up with company’s performance
>-30% after staking is live
Lmao

[Anonymous No.53086879]

>>53086795
the price is matching the company performance

[Anonymous No.53086885]

>>53086879
That’s what I just said retard

[Anonymous No.53086901]

>>53086885
i am agreeing with you then

[Anonymous No.53086905]

>>53086795
>it isn't real staking
>staking is live
make your mind up will you? I'm hovering over the 'buy' button

[Anonymous No.53086932]

>>53086905
>it isn't real staking
That’s cope. It’s real staking. I don’t remember when mainnet was live and everyone was like, this isn’t real mainnet.

[Anonymous No.53086957]

>>53086932
Bro youre seething so hard right now. We know you hold and stake link.

[Anonymous No.53086977]

>>53086957
What?

[Anonymous No.53087008]

>>53086977
Are you playing the concerned fudder who holds or the I dont hold link fudder who secretly holds?

[Anonymous No.53087026]

>>53086957
Notice how triggered these bagholders get kek

[Anonymous No.53087028]

>>53087008
I held link and I sold earlier this year if that’s what you’re asking. Did you buy the top you stupid fuck?

[Anonymous No.53087045]

>>53086795
The staking is not real staking is why the price went down. Sergey promised staking and what everyone though was legitimate Chainlink staking collateralized on nodes. What we got was just a staking farm for the community and what was worse is that it was announced beginning of year and released end of year

[Anonymous No.53087046]

>>53087028
>I held link and I sold earlier this year

[Anonymous No.53087055]

>>53087045
You’re a coping retard if you think later versions of “real staking” is going to change anything.

[Anonymous No.53087063]

>>53087055
>is going to change anything.
Enlighten us then.

[Anonymous No.53087072]

>>53087063
>dude just make the pool bigger lmao

[Anonymous No.53087090]

>>53087072
Thats your criticism....? Removing more tokens from circulation is bad?

[Anonymous No.53087092]

>>53086795
buy the groomer
sell the jews

[Anonymous No.53087123]

>>53087090
Yes because removing tokens sure did make the price go up :)

[Anonymous No.53087143]

>>53086932
It isn’t fully utilized staking for the entire network until V1.0. This is just a test to get a working model. Sergeys tossing believers two bones, Link and Build tokens. Thankfully I don’t need to get rich by yesterday and have time on my hand, so I don’t mind waiting and accumulating more at these prices.

[Anonymous No.53087145]

>>53087123
2.5% isnt really much. What do you think will happen at 50%?

[Anonymous No.53087194]

>>53087145
Essentially people wanting to participate in the network will need to buy Link tokens (which will increase price) to pay to node operators and stakers. (Which will just stake more, removing more out of circulation. Increasing price more). We used to talk about this kind of stuff all the time, it was pretty unanimous we had to wait until V1.0 to see any big moves which is why I’m confused on where all the good talking points went? It’s a cesspool of 3rd world fud making 50 threads a day now. I guess they REALLY don’t want newfags to buy. Fair enough, if you can get fudded out of something by third worlders you didn’t deserve to make it in the first place. To any newfags reading this, heres a tip:
Read the fucking whitepaper

[Anonymous No.53087424]

>>53087194
Sers i stake 7k link is it enough to get rich?

[Anonymous No.53087456]

>>53087424
Eh that’s more than I got. So good shit.

[Anonymous No.53087533]

>>53086795
>trading at $5 after half a decade
chainshit lol

[Anonymous No.53087673]

I just bought my first 500 links and the price is already up 4 cents. Happy new year holders! Or is it 'hodlers'????

[Anonymous No.53087975]

>>53086795
>token depends on performance
This is false. It depends on hype and easy money.

[Anonymous No.53088001]

>>53086795
Hey guys I staked my entire stack of 7K. I feel kinda weird about it. How do I unstake? I’ve checked everywhere and there’s no button to do it. Can any anon help me out?

[Anonymous No.53088478]

>>53087194
>>53087145
>dude they don’t want newfags to buy!
You coping fucking retards it’s literally the opposite. If (((they))) don’t want you to buy they would have priced all of you faggots out

[Anonymous No.53088886]

>>53086795
predictive prog
pawn

[Anonymous No.53088906]

>>53086885
>>53086901
Kek

[Anonymous No.53089054]

>>53086795
staking is just dilution by minting more tokens you newfag retard. Never in the history of crypto has staking helped coin performance

[Anonymous No.53089454]

>>53087194
They don't want newfags but they DO want some random incel like you to buy in. Yes it's all going to plan

[Anonymous No.53089487]

>>53086879
>>53086885
It's settled then, everyone agrees. The price is shit because the company is shit and the company is shit because the ceo is a fatfuck that cares more about adding 10 pounds of fat to his midsection every month than he cares about doing anything to give the token value.

The funniest part of it is that mcfatfuck is going to have to dump more to keep up with falling price of the token.

[Anonymous No.53089509]

nigger

[Anonymous No.53089537]

Yall got dumped on by Eric Schmidt.

[Anonymous No.53089995]

I have 60k Link all staked and I'm going to be very rich as a result. There's literally nothing anyone itt can do to prevent it. Imagine that. You couldn't change my mind. Describe how this makes you feel?

[Anonymous No.53090005]

>>53089454
Big boys aren’t going to buy in until the product is working properly and their competitors are using it and saving millions, you dumbshit. Rome wasn’t built in a day.

[Anonymous No.53090015]

>>53087533
That's actually pretty remarkable growth butt buddy

[Anonymous No.53090784]

>>53089995
You deserve your fate.
Lets put it that way...

[Anonymous No.53090799]

>>53090005
>Rome wasn’t built in a day.
Yeah except this is crypto and 1 year = 5 year you stupid fag

[Anonymous No.53090818]

>>53090005
>just wait until rome is built, bro
LMAO

[Anonymous No.53090834]

>>53090818
Also this

[Anonymous No.53092382]

>>53086932
This is not the staking that was supposed to be the critical part of making the DON a reality that I was explained to on here multiple times over the years.
If I could go back in time I tell people in 2023 staking is literally just a contract that pays out 4.75% in LINK from a reward pool and that's it. The same as the old degen farms with single sided staking in defi summer 2020, I would be laughed at and called a paid fudder.
Just as I probably will be now.
Makes you think.

[Anonymous No.53092413]

oof big yikes so many problematic misconceptions to unpack in this sub

[Anonymous No.53092635]

>>53086795
I wonder if he noticed his massive impact on the price of Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.53092648]

>>53092382
Mainnet started small as fuck as well, you know. Now look at it.

[Anonymous No.53092654]

>>53092648
>now look at it
it doesn't look that good
are they paying you to shill on new year's day? lmao imagine the desperation

[Anonymous No.53092663]

>>53092654
Chainlink completely dominates the oracle space, and is the most adopted crypto in existence (maybe after ETH).

[Anonymous No.53092683]

>>53092663
>most adopted
then why is both the price and it's services flopping as we speak?
pic related
>inb4 muh TVE screenshot from mid 2021
TVE is an entirely useless cumulative statistic that amounts to nothing tangible, just like every other chart Chainlink posted in their latest tweet
>x checks performed guise!!!!
it is absolutely pathetic

[Anonymous No.53092684]

>>53092663
https://www.smartcontractresearch.org/t/discussion-post-chainlink-transaction-value-enabled-tve/2771
your TVE bro

[Anonymous No.53092690]

>>53092683
>>53092684
you ok bro?

Don't take my word for it btw: https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/02/17/bofa-says-chainlink-likely-driver-for-defis-tvl-growth-to-203b/

[Anonymous No.53092701]

>>53092690
>Chainlink will drive DeFi to $200b bro, don't believe me, check this marketing article right here!
>Feb 2022
oh wow, amazing growth anon, thank you for posting this
meanwhile in reality

[Anonymous No.53092714]

>>53092701
>marketing article
It's Bank of America.

[Anonymous No.53092716]

>>53092714
>Banks don't do marketing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXLYo4oi5YM
any other piss poor takes you have to share with us?
pic rel, more "insane vertical adoption" for you

[Anonymous No.53092720]

>>53092716
>Banks don't do marketing
You posted Bank of America marketing itself.
I posted Bank of America "marketing" Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.53092722]

>>53092720
>I posted Bank of America "marketing" Chainlink.
thanks for conceding
have some more adoption while you keep scrambling for semantics

[Anonymous No.53092732]

>>53092722
>haha Bank of America is marketing Chainlink, and is (apparently) lying in the process, you lose!

fucking kek

[Anonymous No.53092739]

>>53092732
seeing how the total TVL has dropped to 38b, yes, they lied
that's how marketing works anon

[Anonymous No.53092745]

>>53092684
This report is horseshit btw, he keeps basing his numbers on locked values and Defi volumes.

[Anonymous No.53092748]

>>53087123
They added about 2% to the circulation around the same period, it wasn't meant to be a tokenomic assisting event

[Anonymous No.53092749]

>>53092739
>number changed since they spoke about it
>that means they lied

You have mental issues.

[Anonymous No.53092751]

they lost contract with some of western central bank, because sergay is slow and get rugged by his friends.

[Anonymous No.53092753]

Fuck linkies I hate them so much it's unreal

[Anonymous No.53092760]

>>53092745
yes because these are much more useful than the completely arbitrary and random TVE metric that ONLY chainlink utilizes because their actual TVL chart dropped off a fucking cliff
>TVE = cumulative value "passed" through various protocols which use link = wash trading
it's truly hilarious how you completely neglect mentioning these other day-to-day charts I've been posting
>>53092749
>number pulled out of their ass turns out to be completely wrong
>I'll keep bringing it up anyway while I pretend a year old marketing report is still relevant and proves muh adoption
you're pathetic and you're not fooling anyone

[Anonymous No.53092768]

>>53092760
>these are much more useful than the completely arbitrary and random TVE metric
Every single transaction that uses inferior oracles is at major risk.
TVE is an extremely good metric.

>>number pulled out of their ass
So take it up with Bank of America.

[Anonymous No.53092769]

>>53086795
Eric is one of THE scariest gov't shills/IC shills there is...like hes Soros level of "I know whats best for everyone" just without the amount of fuck you money GS has. But man, I will never forget hearing his side of events and reading his book and then hearing Julian Assange's side of events and reading his book (all about the same meeting) and holy shit Eric is insidious

[Anonymous No.53092776]

>>53092768
>Every single transaction
non sequitur and completely irrelevant to the point
>TVE is an extremely good metric.
thanks for not elaborating beyond this mantra
>So take it up with Bank of America.
you're the one bringing it up as if it's still relevant you absolute retarded mongoloid
is the defi tvl at 203b?

[Anonymous No.53092781]

>>53092776
>non sequitur and completely irrelevant to the point
TVE refers to the value of all transactions that are supported by Chainlink oracles.
Every single one of these transactions would be at major risk if they used literally any other oracle.
It's absolutely relevant.

>you're the one bringing it up
Pretty sure Bank of America brought it up. I'm just quoting them.

[Anonymous No.53092784]

>>53088478
Yeah, the "the Illuminati is secretly accumulating link" line is always lazy self soothing cope. The project entire MC is literally just $2.5 billion and has been much lower even. It really would not have been hard for them to just buy all circulating tokens or frankly buy out the company or make a more legacy supported competitor. All much easier than years of discrete suppression. Of all the big crypto funds we've seen into whether through public wallets or liquidations we've seen they don't tend to own much link. All supported by the price action showing it has no greater floor than any other alt on average.

Link may be good/great but you're not competing with Grays living in flying invisible pyramids for the tokens. Good investors don't marry a sector and anyone who has ignored link for a few years now would likely have increased their assets substantially to be in a better position to buy if it offers promise again.

[Anonymous No.53092796]

>>53092781
>TVE refers to the value of all transactions that are supported by Chainlink oracles.
>Every single one of these transactions would be at major risk if they used literally any other oracle.
It's absolutely relevant.
these two sentences state completely different things, no such conclusion can drawn from sentence 1 to sentence 2, you moron
TVE is useless because it is CUMULATIVE, it's not day-to-day, and you continuously fail to establish a connection between muh network security and muh TVE
retard
>I'm just quoting them
they were wrong so stop quoting them

[Anonymous No.53092799]

>post times
how do you niggers type so fast?

[Anonymous No.53092809]

>>53092796
Im not joining this full discussion but i agree that the team's new infograph leaning heavily on cumulative charts is pretty telling.

Of course things will slow down in a crypto bear but it still felt a little lame to me to not just own that.

[Anonymous No.53092815]

>>53092796
>TVE is useless because it is CUMULATIVE
Of course it is.
A transaction made in the past doesn't lose the value it had at the time.
Even if you transact the same contract value back and forth, that value is at risk every single time you transact it.

>they were wrong
They were right, Defi TVL was 203 billion when they wrote the article.

[Anonymous No.53092821]

>>53092809
>leaning heavily
it's only cumulative charts, anon, what do oyu mean leaning heavily
>>53092815
then why don't you post the day2day instead of the cumulative stats? let's see how much value chainlink enables on a daily and monthly basis instead of adding up every meaningless wash trading txs from 2019 to date
>could drive the value up in the future
>the value was already up when they posted it
could you stop the pilpul and contradicting yourself with every other post? jesus fucking christ

[Anonymous No.53092824]

>>53092809
Those infographics were always cumulative. If they had shown for instance the additional partners for each month, fudders would be whining about "but what about the partners that left".

[Anonymous No.53092827]

>>53092824
>but what about the partners that left"
did you just came up with that fresh head canon?
holy fucking hell it's like I'm talking to a brick wall

[Anonymous No.53092829]

>>53092821
>then why don't you post the day2day instead of the cumulative stats
Because transactions made in the past don't lose the value they had at the time.

Cumulative TVE shows the total value that was transacted with the support of Chainlink oracles. It makes perfect sense.

[Anonymous No.53092835]

>>53092821
When Bank of America posted the article, Defi TVL was $203 billion according to their sources.
And they believed it COULD grow.

How were they lying? Because it didn't grow?

[Anonymous No.53092843]

>>53092829
>Because transactions made in the past don't lose the value they had at the time.
they're also irrelevant to the current value chainlink is enabling since they happened in the past, using them as an indicator to demonstrate "growth" is disingenuous, they would have done a much better job by posting daily charts showing the "insane vertical rate of adoption", but you know that, everybody here fucking knows that, you're just being purposefully obtuse like always
>>53092835
>How were they lying? Because it didn't grow?
yes? are you retarded?
at the very least, they were simply wrong, rendering their article MEANINGLESS
why the fuck can't this simple fact get through your head?

[Anonymous No.53092848]

>>53092843
>they're also irrelevant to the current value chainlink is enabling
The chart clearly states the timeframe.

>if you say something COULD happen and it doesn't, that means you're lying
lol my dude

[Anonymous No.53092851]

>>53092848
>The chart clearly states the timeframe.
the chart is cumulative, any cumulative charts goes up only, it's not a reliable indicator of growth especially on linear, and you're tiresome with the same retarded btfo'd arguments
>if you say something COULD happen and it doesn't, that means you're lying
again, if they weren't lying, they were wrong
why do you like to propagate disproved reports? what's your agenda here?

[Anonymous No.53092853]

>>53092851
>any cumulative charts goes up only
Not if usage stops.

>if they weren't lying, they were wrong
Not even that.
When you say "can" or "could", that includes the possibility that it doesn't happen.

[Anonymous No.53092863]

>>53092853
>Not if usage stops.
>implying you can even tell if usage rate is going up down or sideways by looking at that monstrosity of a chart
that's why it's bullshit, bro, why don't you mention all these day2day charts I've posted? is it because they completely reck your bullshit narrative?
>When you say "can" or "could", that includes the possibility that it doesn't happen.
bottom line is they were wrong
quick question, did sergey lied here or was he simply wrong and if so should people be able to hold him accountable?

[Anonymous No.53092891]

>>53092863
>>implying you can even tell if usage rate is going up down or sideways by looking at that monstrosity of a chart
It's a very simple cumulative chart, growth is extremely easy to see.

>bottom line is they were wrong
The article is first and foremost about the fact that Chainlink is the key driver for the growth until that point.
They merely added that it COULD continue to grow, which was obviously a possibility.

[Anonymous No.53092911]

>>53092891
>purposefully ignoring day2day charts of chainlink services showing "growth" has stagnated
>purposefully avoiding to address Sergey's announcements
>keep bringing up a completely irrelevant marketing report from a year ago which has been entirely disproven as if it still pertains any kind of relevancy
>"TVE is awesome"
>why??
>"it just is, okay?? trust me on this, anon"
I'm done here

[Anonymous No.53092920]

>>53092911
Mainnet started extremely small, and quickly exploded to become the single most-adopted crypto platform since ETH.
Even players like BofA reported on this.

That is all.

[Anonymous No.53092924]

>>53092920
>disregards the entire post
>"mainnet was awesome, is all I'm saying"
literally WHAT THE FUCK lmao bot confirmed

[Anonymous No.53092929]

>>53092924
>>disregards the entire post
I came into this thread saying mainnet started small and quickly grew.

[Anonymous No.53092937]

>>53092929
you actually came to this thread to once again insinuate that BTC is suppressing LINK, which btw dumped the hardest last week on its own, and then once you begun harping on about muh exponential growth I completely obliterated you with facts which you have yet to acknowledge

[Anonymous No.53092941]

>>53092891
I bet the people complaining that Chainlink doesn’t do marketing are the same ones whining about Chainlink using THE most common and harmless marketing tool of any company: cumulative growth charts.

[Anonymous No.53092946]

>>53092937
>harping on about muh exponential growth I completely obliterated you with facts
So Chainlink mainnet didn't grow exponentially from a single feed with three nodes?

[Anonymous No.53092950]

>>53092941
lel exactly

[Anonymous No.53092974]

>>53092946
bro chainlink exploded from a two man team like a terrorist strapped with C4 lmao

[Anonymous No.53092987]

>>53092974
The actual network blew up even harder.

[Anonymous No.53092998]

>>53092946
the growth seems to be stalling bro
you would've known that if you weren't starring at cumulative charts all day

[Anonymous No.53093007]

>>53092987
COPE
O
P
E

[Anonymous No.53093017]

All the shill talking points can be shut down in an instant by posting the LINK/ETH chart, it's that simple. Link has made ZERO gains vs ETH since mainnet release. Everything else is just pure copium.

[Anonymous No.53093034]

>>53092821
No not all the charts they've posted are cumulative. Things like smartcon attendance each year aren't.

>>53092824
Again no, they used to use more rate charts. Also how do cumulative charts cover people leaving? The issue is precisely that that's the sort of information lost.

[Anonymous No.53093059]

>>53093034
>Things like smartcon attendance each year aren't.
look again, anon

[Anonymous No.53093067]

>>53093059
Even if there are more people, who gives a shit. Clearly it isn't resulting in any more buy pressure. Just more incels at a half hearted conference.

[Anonymous No.53093078]

>>53093067
>more people
if we accept the premise that this chart is accurate, it literally shows that less people attended SmartCon 2022 than SmartCon #1
the absolute state

[Anonymous No.53093081]

>>53093067
what if link tokens could be used to pay for smartcon tickets?

[Anonymous No.53093105]

>>53093078
In the end it doesn't really matter. And the team are desperately trying to warp their numbers to make it look good. Notice how they don't mention TVS anywhere anymore. Because it has cratered off a cliff. And a cumulative chart always looks relatively good and you can't really apply that to TVS. All in all, posting these things feels like a sick joke by the team. Why do people care about link? They see it as an investment. But right now, Link has made basically no gains vs the two biggest established projects, BTC/ETH. So that means NOTHING net value flowed to Link holders since mainnet release, regardless of the network apparently enabling trillions.

[Anonymous No.53093113]

The problem with Sergey is he has a talent of talking in high ideals, but so far nothing concrete has really been implemented. So it's all talk. It works for the link cultists though. However most linkies bought in 2017 because of the Sibos PoC and corporate breadcrumbs, not because of NFT poopoo price feeds.

[Anonymous No.53093135]

>>53093067
>>53093105
>>53093113
The price of Link is purely speculative, just like BTC, ETH, ADA, XRP, ...
It will not go up when it has poisonous grassroots, or when it's never allowed to price anything in.

[Anonymous No.53093147]

>>53093135
>chainlink did nothing wrong
>holders and btc are to blame for pa
I've been hearing this since 2020, time to change your script shill

[Anonymous No.53093148]

>>53093034
>no, they used to use more rate charts
Not really.
These charts were always cumulative, here's last year.

Also, see >>53092941


>>53092998
>the growth seems to be stalling bro
lel there go the goalposts
Also, in case you hadn't noticed the entire crypto industry crashed into oblivion during the past 12 months or so.

[Anonymous No.53093154]

>>53093147
>>chainlink did nothing wrong
What did they do wrong, other than maybe be slow with certain releases (which ETH, ADA, ... do even worse)

[Anonymous No.53093158]

>>53093135
Yea surely it is due to some random twitter incels or a Bulgarian conspiracy and not the team dumping large amounts of link

[Anonymous No.53093161]

>>53093135
>poisonous grassroots
we need more transexual queer furry child predators just like ETH otherwise globohomo will reject us
>we
>us
they do not want us in their club

[Anonymous No.53093164]

>>53093158
Grassroots enthusiasm is extremely important for speculative price growth.
Look at Doge, GME, QNT, XRP, ETH, BTC, ...

[Anonymous No.53093168]

>>53093158
>not the team dumping large amounts of link
Half the top 20 dumped way more.

[Anonymous No.53093173]

>"The whole market is down, not just us!"
but you said the adoption is exploding? lmao
>What did they do wrong
for starters see acknowledge this>>53092863
where's the vertical insane growth, the enterprise layer and ccip anon?
>muh eth and muh ada
wow, now that's how you move the goalposts, deflect and steer attention away!!

[Anonymous No.53093178]

>>53093173
>>"The whole market is down, not just us!"
>but you said the adoption is exploding?
I didn't say it "is" exploding, I said it "did" explode since the launch of mainnet.

[Anonymous No.53093193]

[Anonymous No.53093198]

>>53093193

[Anonymous No.53093206]

>>53093178
and I did tell you the growth is stalling
this doesn't get us anywhere, you're unable to break your script

[Anonymous No.53093214]

>>53093198
did you take a picture of your screen holy fuck discord tranny psyop confirm

[Anonymous No.53093220]

>>53093206
>and I did tell you the growth is stalling
1) doesn't change that Chainlink mainnet did grow explosively
2) maybe that's because all of crypto melted down in the past 12 months

[Anonymous No.53093222]

>>53093214
The info only appears when hovering over the info button so there is no way to screengrab as moving the cursor hides the info.
I guess I should sell my Link?

[Anonymous No.53093227]

>>53093220
this doesn't explain the fact that chainlink services have been declining long before the market broke down
you would have known this if you took 3 minutes to check the multiple charts I've posted itt

[Anonymous No.53093274]

>>53093222
digits confirm bro crypto is dead as a doornail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that crypto was as dead as a door-nail.

[Anonymous No.53093366]

>>53093274
Ironmongery (with emphasis on mong) aside; pay no heed to what 'crypto' is doing and instead channel your scrotum-brain upon that which the banks and its service industries are scheming. Only then will you find the path to riches. I myself have laser-eyes aimed directly at Swift as the next port of call, as I suggest you ought, despite your archaic writing style.

[Anonymous No.53093369]

DR;NS
Good luck retards.

[Anonymous No.53093374]

>>53093366
Let my digits be your guide.

[Anonymous No.53093428]

>>53093227
>chainlink services have been declining long before the market broke down
Even if this were true, it doesn't change the simple fact that Chainlink mainnet grew explosively since mainnet launched.

[Anonymous No.53093618]

>>53092769
What book is this anon

[Anonymous No.53094213]

>>53087194
>wait until V1
J-Just o-one more update!

[Anonymous No.53094247]

>there’s still incels here reeeeing about a token they don’t have to buy or interact with

lol

LMAO bros just filter chainlink from your lives and move on.

[Anonymous No.53094283]

>>53094213
>J-just sell your Link!
No.

[Anonymous No.53094314]

>>53090005
>Rome wasn’t built in a day.
Remember the year they announced water supply at the beginning of the year and then released v0.1 at RomeCon which was "everybody has to use their own buckets"? Good times

[Anonymous No.53094332]

>>53094314
topkek

[Anonymous No.53094341]

>>53094283
>ill never sell!
Kek and right on cue linkies join the prestigious club of XRP schizos, GME baggies, and AMC cucks.

[Anonymous No.53094344]

>>53090005
Imagine if Sergey was in charge of building Rome. Would take literal decades to finish, kek.

[Anonymous No.53094357]

>>53094344
Instead of centuries?

[Anonymous No.53094362]

>>53090005
>he thinks an obese, disgusting mutt is going to build anything
LOL
O
L
If mcfatfuck nastyslob was in charge of building rome it never would have been built. Sirgay's physique is representative of his work ethic and intellegence, nothing but fat to be trimmed kek

[Anonymous No.53094368]

>>53094344
>>53094357
It would never be built really. Wheres DECO and CCIP? Still not here. But plenty of roasties taking linkies money.

[Anonymous No.53094373]

>>53094362
>mcfatfuck nastyslob
kek, that's a good one. I'll be using that one in other threads.

[Anonymous No.53094379]

>>53094368
So did Nastyslob outright lie when he said CCIP would be ready by the end of the year (last year).

[Anonymous No.53094381]

>>53093222
Do you not have a “print screen” button.

[Anonymous No.53094481]

>>53094283
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuude i fight the fudderzzzzz by losing it all!!!!!

Cuck spotted. They have tools to fight low T these days you know. In other words, you dont have to go through life being a pathetic pushover little bitch

[Anonymous No.53094507]

>>53094373
good, fuck fat "people"
bring back bullying until they all suicide

[Anonymous No.53094528]

>>53086905
>it isn't real staking
those are real losses of real money lmao

[Anonymous No.53094539]

>>53087008
pure unadulterated cope from the pineal gland of a zoomer, wow, amazing
is it even legal for me to read this post??? lmao

[Anonymous No.53094755]

>>53094481
Even if I was thick enough to let retards like you mentally bully me into financial moves, it's too late, buddy-boy. I have 60k Link staked over 9 wallets and there's nothing you can say or do which can affect that until at least late August.
I do have a couple thousand Link I purposely kept out, in case it moons between now and then and I want to buy something. Maybe you could try and persuade me to sell that?
I've just made a coffee and have a little while, so if you want to go right ahead and persuade me, I'm all ears.
Btw, Sorry about the staked ones, if I'd known you felt so strongly I'd have consulted you first.
Anyway, on you go.. I'm listening.

[Anonymous No.53094854]

We're excited to announce that we will deliver real staking, ccip and enterprise abstraction layer this year, as well as low latency oracles, deco, fss, mixicles, ocr2.0, swift poc, linkpool naas, node insurance, big banks partnerships, reputation systems, cbdc integration, quadratic security, smart derivatives with isda, cex por, new byzantine fault tolerant consensus mechanisms, direct revenue capture model instead of token dumps, dedicated oracle lanes on L1s, town crier, candid, integration with Oracle baas and 100 startups, docusign smart contracts, and a truly decentralized network with user SLAs and neet nodes instead of a 3/5 multisig. All of this by, yeah ermm, Q2 2023 at the latest. So keep holding my link marines.

[Anonymous No.53094865]

anons come and discuss here

[Anonymous No.53094914]

chainlink is a scam and sergey nazarov is a scammer
enjoy being dumped on this year linkies

[Anonymous No.53095392]

>>53094368
Wow, I can tell how much you really want me to sell my link. Shame I can't though.

[Anonymous No.53096002]

>>53094755
I waited for hours and he never came back to persuade me :(
I was feeling vulnerable, too and could easily have been encouraged to sell. What a missed opportunity.

[Anonymous No.53096025]

>>53086795
So is Link a security?

[Anonymous No.53096223]

>>53096025
Yes, all cryptos are, except Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.53096283]

>>53096025
>>53096223

[Anonymous No.53096351]

>>53093227
>24 pbtid
Wow you really care about my financial well-being, I sold everything

[Anonymous No.53096355]

>>53086879
>>53086885
>>53086901
now hug and make up

[Anonymous No.53096359]

>>53096351
proof?

[Anonymous No.53096384]

>>53087045
>>53087055
The logic is reasonable at least: more and more people will be making money from staking rewards, more and more people will see others making money from staking rewards, so more and more people will want in on it. Demand for LINK will increase, driving up the price.

Not saying it's going to happen, but it could.

[Anonymous No.53096407]

>>53096384
>Not saying it's going to happen, but it could.
but it won't. At least not with Sergey at the helm

[Anonymous No.53096480]

>>53096407
>Sergey bad

[Anonymous No.53096522]

>>53096480
Imagine defending nastyslob on the internet for free. Just look at the price action, he's indefensible as CEO and a complete retard. Watching him talk to schiff was embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.53096595]

>>53096480
Meant Schmidt not Schiff. >>53096522

[Anonymous No.53096627]

>>53096522
Maybe try looking at the pic.
He turned Chainlink into a massive success, and your only counterargument is the price action which he has no control over.
At the most he could start promoting the price of the token, but he can't even do that if he doesn't want to get dicked up the ass by the SEC.

[Anonymous No.53096647]

Why aren't they using poopstink oracles to verify crypto sports betting? That sounds like a good way to get the ball rolling.

[Anonymous No.53096651]

>>53096627
>He turned Chainlink into a massive success, and your only counterargument is the price action which he has no control over.
If chainlink's success has no relationship to the price action of what use is there in investing in it?

[Anonymous No.53096665]

>>53096651
If price action is tied to fundamentals success, then explain Ada, Doge, GME, etc.

[Anonymous No.53096704]

>>53096665
>If price action is tied to fundamentals success
Never made this claim. What I'm saying is that I don't care about the tech if it doesn't translate to an increase in price. and something with as poor tokenomics as chainshit isn't going to see a pump any time soon.

[Anonymous No.53096723]

>>53096704
>Never made this claim
You said the only reason to invest in Chainlink is because of the relationship between pricee action and fundamentals success.

[Anonymous No.53096747]

>>53096723
>You said the only reason to invest in Chainlink is because of the relationship between pricee action and fundamentals success.
Never said this, you're misunderstanding me ESL. Your claim is that Nastyslob turned chainshit into a "massive success" and if that is indeed true from a fundamental and technical perspective it hasn't resulted in an increase in price. Therefore chainshit is a bad investment if you want to make profit.

[Anonymous No.53096755]

>>53096747
>Never said this
Here's a direct quote: "If chainlink's success has no relationship to the price action of what use is there in investing in it?"

This question LITERALLY means that you cannot think of any reason to invest other than the relationship between Chainlink's success and its price action.

[Anonymous No.53096865]

>>53096755
You make a very strong case against chainlink having any community anon. What point is there discussing data reliability?

[Anonymous No.53096923]

>>53096865
The absolute most important thing in price action is hyped masses.
While fundamentals are the cleanest way to obtain this, they're far from the only factor in gaining mass hype, nor are they even a strict requirement (see Ada, Doge, GME, ...)

[Anonymous No.53096929]

>>53096923
ADA actually has decent fundamentals if you bothered to do you research.

[Anonymous No.53096945]

>>53096923
No relationship between token price and technical deliverables makes a strong case against any community at all.
No ambassadors required.

[Anonymous No.53097064]

>>53096945
Community is another word for the masses, it's nearly all that matters.
If you have the community/masses, you don't even necessarily need any fundamentals; see Ada, Doge, GME, ...

[Anonymous No.53097072]

>>53097064
So since chainlink has no community it will never pump. Therefore no point in investing according to your logic.

[Anonymous No.53097090]

Generally token ambassadors are supposed to spread awareness about the project to gain interest from developers and also sell tokens to interested parties who will in turn do things for the community to help that core developer-project connection thrive. Not so for Chainlink community ambassadors who think it is their mission to root out wrongthink and trample dissent within the ranks.
By your own argument price≠fundamentals or two more weeks and the fundamentals will be price in, teh future guys!
But the purpose of ambassadors and motivated community members is to cultivate an environment where people want to contribute to the project so that it can become successful and then they see a return through the token. I think you guys have failed to do this
>book of the new sun thread had no discussion of the project and seemed completely disconnected to crypto discussion
>the same hyper nuanced discussion of price≠fundamentals like itt including false comparisons to scams that sold more and pumped harder than link (probably because token ambassadors were doing their fucking jobs ignorance is bliss)
>meme history (no new memes ever)
>fud spam (google images saves)

[Anonymous No.53097100]

>>53097072
So far, Chainlink has had an extremely shitty community that tried its best to keep everyone out.
But that can change on a dime; look at GME, it went from an unknown dying stock to a market-mashing juggernaut basically overnight.

[Anonymous No.53097124]

>>53097090
Chainlink ambassadors are mainly active among industry players, and judging by Chainlink's adoption rate they've been extremely successful.
All Chainlink itself can do is build the product and integrate the partners.

Energizing the masses is up to the "community" itself.

[Anonymous No.53097127]

>>53097100
They pay people to do this you know they are called ambassadors who are paid to do this exact thing you are describing. I think Rory is in charge of that department and for years he has been very happy with how things have been going. Look at the TVL. Rory = good. Keeping people out is good look at the TVL

[Anonymous No.53097140]

>>53097124
>Energizing the masses is up to the "community" itself.
No it is about false promises and hype. Chainlink actively root out hype like you ambassadors root out wrongthink. We cannot discuss anything here anymore now do you realize that?

[Anonymous No.53097142]

>>53097127
yeah, because GME blew up thanks to GME's community ambassadors.
It totally wasn't a bunch of redditors who set up the whole thing.

If GME itself had tried to do what those redditors did, it would never have taken off.

[Anonymous No.53097158]

>>53097140
>Chainlink actively root out hype

[Anonymous No.53097167]

>>53097142
>Redditors are better than 4chin incel losers
so why did you think it was a good idea to make a community here?

[Anonymous No.53097181]

>>53097158
how can anyone get excited for this when they know that the token does not reflect any gains?

[Anonymous No.53097202]

>>53097167
I made a community here?

>>53097181
What "gains" did GME, Ada, Doge, ... reflect?

[Anonymous No.53097235]

>>53097202
you are part of this nuanced price fundamentals its okay growth doesnt show in the token because other cryptos and stocks did not reflect community ambassador pitch to save your jobs. if the institutional sales team was fired then the community ambassadors should be fired so anons can have a frank discussion about other ventures that would lead to profit and not five year psyops about data reliability.
>>53097202
>What "gains" did GME, Ada, Doge, ... reflect?
Rich people with money see more of a future in those projects and not chainlink i guess. i chalk that up to a community ambassador failing

[Anonymous No.53097331]

>>53097235
I have no idea what you're talking about anymore.
I also get the feeling that you have paranoid tendencies, judging by your obsession with these 'ambassadors'.

Just read >>53096923
a few times, that condenses my point.

[Anonymous No.53097456]

>>53097331
Of course you now have no idea of what I am saying but are very capable of delving head first into a very nuanced discussion of price not reflected in token because reasons then offering comparisons to other tokens and even stocks which have a better community than chainlink (but this isnt the community ambassadors fault because le evil 4chin nazis who were originally a community ambassador driven meme to try and fit in back in 2018) and you even include official pictures from approved sauces
>hype just took off because people were hyped!
>it was totally organic!
bro I know you are a massive retard by your posting style and quality but things don't happen for no reason

[Anonymous No.53097729]

>>53097456
There’s nothing nuanced about this; the more people are hyped the higher the price goes.

[Anonymous No.53097820]

>>53097729
why do you choose to kill hype?

[Anonymous No.53097838]

$1000 EOY? HAHAHA MORE LIKE $0.10

[Anonymous No.53098231]

>>53097729
So you want chainshit to have retarded communities like GME and ADA. By all means advertise it on reddit and maybe you'll pump past ath next bullrun... maybe.

[Anonymous No.53098246]

>>53098231
>So you want chainshit to have retarded communities like GME and ADA
>implying the current linknigger community isn't worse already

KEK

[Anonymous No.53098258]

>>53098246
the linkniggers are preferable to GME apes to be honest. It isn't fun making fun of people who are THAT mentally ill, but chainiggers will get there.