The Graph (Ticker GRT)

[Anonymous No.53061274]

It's eternally over

[Anonymous No.53062136]

>>53061274

[Anonymous No.53062156]

>>53061274
$4 next bull cycle.

[Anonymous No.53062202]

>>53062136
Your photoshop skills are so terrible that you need to be hinted down like an animal and executed.

[Anonymous No.53062245]

>>53062156
is that it?

why? The Graph has been working fine without a token for years right? it's useless token won't change anything

[Anonymous No.53062290]

>>53062245
>is that it?
I guess a 100x profit isn't enough? Speculating it bottoms out at 4 cents, of course.

[Anonymous No.53062773]

>>53062245
That was the hosted service. It's free, it requires a ton of centralized infrastructure, it occasionally has issues from all the demand for it, and it's being killed off next quarter.

[Anonymous No.53062844]

>>53061274
It's funny you bring this up. . .
I just sold all of my grt today
Because there are literally 30 better lower risk higher return tokens

[Anonymous No.53063526]

>>53061274

[Anonymous No.53063929]

>>53063526

[Anonymous No.53064468]

>>53063929

[Anonymous No.53065337]

>>53064468
prefer
>>53063526
like
>>53063929
love

[OmegaMaker !i6apW.sJiU No.53066492]

3 reasons why PRQ > GRT

1. Speed and efficiency. GRT uses subgraphs which in turn requires constant connections between indexers and nodes and connections of data. This requires resync of the nodes and reindexing of the data. Just imagine refreshing all the time. This takes a lot of time. PRQ has already done this and has the data waiting for you in a data pool.

2. Reliability. PRQ is “mostly” centralized. GRT and subgraphs fall prey to one of their verifiers moving to a more lucrative sub graph. What happens then? Well the integrity of the data is lost even for only a short period of time. This is also why the main argument against chainlink is why would they need link if they can build their own centralized oracle? In the case for PRQ there is already a centralized solution ready for you RIGHT NOW.

3. Customizability. Data lakes are superior to subgraphs because they do everything of the same but also allow either PARSIQ or yourselves to create you customized pools of data specific to anyway you want it. This makes the job of developers working in projects 10x easier. Again, request response time is not always consistent with nodes — any Web3 developer would confirm that because nodes tend to drop from time to time they are neither the easiest nor the most reliable source of data. This is not to suggest that nodes are unimportant! Rather, it is only to point out that, when looking at the case at hand (i.e., ease for both back-end and front-end development), they are not the top choice.

THERE IS NO NEED FOR DECENTRALIZED DATA EXTRACTION WHEN THE DATA IS ALREADY COMING FROM DECENTRALIZED BLOCKS!!! The decentralization is only necessary in proving the data hasn’t been tampered with. That is why PRQ is far far superior

[Anonymous No.53066663]

>>53066492

[Anonymous No.53066852]

>>53066492

[Anonymous No.53067495]

grty stays dirty

[Anonymous No.53069295]

>>53066492
You got eternally btfo last thread. Fuck off already, loser bitch