Blockstream

[Anonymous No.52919116]

What's the deal with these guys? Are they good, evil, both?

[Anonymous No.52919162]

very effective at preventing btc from scaling

[Anonymous No.52919188]

What exactly happened with these guys? Why were they against larger blocks?

[Anonymous No.52919240]

>>52919188
i think they are addicted to their own farts, they have control and refuse to give it up
the moment they let the blocksize go up, it completely invalidates the need for LN (and them)

[Anonymous No.52919247]

>>52919188
>What exactly happened with these guys? Why were they against larger blocks?
Because they sell solutions caused by having small blocks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g

[Anonymous No.52919253]

>>52919116
don't trust anybody with a beard that big

[Anonymous No.52919254]

I want to know what Maxwell's this guy is related to.

[Anonymous No.52919262]

Wonder when that neckbeard's air supply is gonna expire?

[Anonymous No.52919277]

(((Blockstream)))

[Anonymous No.52919412]

>>52919116
They glow in the dark

[Anonymous No.52919420]

>>52919188
The argument is that larger block sizes make the size of the entire blockchain larger, thus reducing the amount of people willing to run a node. However with Moore’s law for hard drive space it’s kind of a retarded argument

[Anonymous No.52919425]

>>52919116
This guy is a jewish faggot scammer

[Anonymous No.52919547]

>>52919116
Their only reason for existing is to nerf btc.

[Anonymous No.52919661]

>>52919116
Literally all their predictions came true.

[Anonymous No.52919678]

>>52919547
Wrong. Their only reason for existing was to nerf Bitcoin, therefore BTC is a thing. BTC is not Bitcoin. BSV is Bitcoin. Ginger-beard failed.

[Anonymous No.52919752]

>>52919116
The fuck is the deal with that dusty ass beard kek like do something with it

[Anonymous No.52919875]

I keep thinking that guy is Julian Assange

[Anonymous No.52919907]

>>52919678
bsv is kill, faggot

[Anonymous No.52920246]

>>52919907
BSV is very much alive and growing.

Get a life loser.

[Anonymous No.52920339]

2012 fag, watched it all, imagine this.

> Bitcoin exists
> People start using it for quirky payments, an online donation, some gambling (satoshi dice)
> Then real life businesses start to accept bitcoin, a muffin store here, a taco stand there, a coffee shop there.
> Next online businesses, real businesses start to accept it for stuff
> Next huge businesses start to accept bitcoin for things, steam, microsoft, etc.
> Bitcoin is obviously growing, a huge organic success. Existing competitors to bitcoin's payment network want it stopped.
> Enter Blockstream, they buy off the key developers and moderators of discussion forums (bitcointalk and /r/bitcoin).
> All discussion of "alternative" non-blockstream controlled nodes is banned. Bitcoin+
> Paid off developers all decide that increasing bitcoin's capacity is dangerous and refuse to lift the temporary 1mb blocksize limitation.
> Transaction costs go up because demand for transactions exceeds blockspace supply.
> The mempool of broadcasted transactions grows and never clears, transactions become stuck in the network and never make it into blocks.
> Blockstream add "replace by fee" to bitcoin, now you can rebroadcast a transaction at a higher fee.
> Bitcoin now becomes a nightmare for online businesses, they have no way of trusting if a transaction that was broadcast to the memory pool will make it into a block. Online business requires instant payment, not waiting 10+ minutes for payment confirmation.
> User experience with online payments becomes shit, customer support gets hammered and businesses REMOVE support for BTC payments.
> BitPay, a company that was growing rapidly by allowing IRL businesses to accept bitcoin and easily convert it to cash stops growing, no businesses want to touch bitcoin, it's toxic. Bitpay slowly fades into obscurity.
> Gavin Andresen comes out and states that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, Blockstream dev's immediately revoke his access to the bitcoin software repository.

[Anonymous No.52920386]

>>52920339
> Segwit is announced, a controversial addition that changes the structure of a bitcoin block to one that no longer conforms to the white paper description. By seperating the witness data from the transaction data the idea is that blocks can use this space to have more transactions. Stupid because increasing the blocksize to 2mb has the same effect.
> Blockstream no longer measure blocks by MB or KB but by a "weighted" size.
> No miners want segwit, it requires miners signal in their blocks support for it and once a critical mass of miners signal support, the hard fork would occur and it would be baked in.
> Miners are seperated into two camps, segwit supporters and big blockers.
> Blockstream shit their pants and race all around the world to have meetings with miners making false promises that they'll make more money by supporting segwit.
> Miners decide that they'll support segwit only if the blocksize is lifted to 2mb
> Segwit 2x is decided upon.
> Segwit is activated (Bitcoin cash is created to maintain the original bitcoin without segwit)
> Blockstream betrays the miners, never increases the blocksize to 2mb
> Attacks on BCH begin, a huge smearing campaign, exchanges refusing to list it. Coinbase even pulled support temporarily after initially listing it because the price was rapidly rising, to 50% of BTC's price.

I saw it all, BSV is the 2012 Bitcoin with full potential unlocked and as bitcoin should be.

[Anonymous No.52920439]

these losers even went back to Bitcontalk to ban my 2013 created account because I'm speaking the truth. I haven't used the account for years but this is the extent that they'll go to to keep this information from you.

[Anonymous No.52920455]

>>52919116
>What's the deal with these guys? Are they good, evil, both?
READ

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@adambalm/the-truth-about-who-is-behind-blockstream-and-segwit-as-the-saying-goes-follow-the-money
https://archive.vn/8TknX

[Anonymous No.52920462]

>>52919188
>Why were they against larger blocks?
because larger blocks mean more transactions per second which means they will compete with Credit Cards.

[Anonymous No.52920471]

Proof of deleted content and banning, good luck banning me from 4chan you faggots

[Anonymous No.52920510]

>>52920471
Sadly, a good number of my BSV posts are banned from 4chan. The faggot jannies hate BSV because they are all Corecoin bag holders. I have documented many instances of my posts being insta-archived here.

[Anonymous No.52920531]

>>52920339
Really this is my first bear and bruv I'm fucked all way round fr though, the fact that I low-key want to pay for services with my stables, BTC and low caps say Sylo and Zpay thrills me the most. Can the devs fucking do something already.

[Anonymous No.52920532]

>>52920471
Bless you OG. Thank you for your guidance and your knowledge. BSV is the way. Christ is King.

[Anonymous No.52920561]

>>52920531
The only thing a dev can do is take your money and launder it back to themselves with leverage. You are fuckin rekt.

[Anonymous No.52920700]

>>52919162
This. Bitcoin is an idea, it's not supposed to scale, it's supposed to set the stage for all other globohomo shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.52920806]

>>52919116
It's run by Adam Back (pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto), the guy who invented bitcoin. I think they can do what they want.

[Anonymous No.52920844]

>>52920700
Checked, but bitcoin is not an idea, it is a working implementation of a protocol (BSV). It is currently locked down, and scales to world record 4gig blocks on chain. Globohomos tried, but failed to steal the project, and the truth that CSW is SN will prevail, and BSV enthusiants will become rich as fuck for knowing this all along.

[Anonymous No.52920848]

>>52920806
>It's run by Adam Back (pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto), the guy who invented bitcoin
https://coingeek.com/faketoshi-series-adam-back-the-men-who-are-not-satoshi-part-2/

[Anonymous No.52920856]

>>52920848
Adam "tabs" back hasn't signed, so there is no way to know that his is SN... Wright that down, loser.

[Anonymous No.52920870]

>>52920856
I was refuting him

[Anonymous No.52920874]

>>52920561
The fact that SBF and Do Kwon fucking did it with customer funds and weren't wise in their dealings make the space looks like a ponzi scheme. Yet the greed of these retards won't stop the fact that solidity will dominate; NFTs is infiltrating and dominating the sports industry and even car brands as seen with Audi and the in-car entertainment tech in it.

[Anonymous No.52920939]

>>52920386
Why bsv banker faggot coin and not BCH? Ya know...the one that works.

[Anonymous No.52920949]

>>52920870
I'm retarded at reading, forgive me.

[Anonymous No.52920952]

>>52920700
That's not what Satoshi said in his emails

[Anonymous No.52920962]

>>52920874
it will be hard to dominate in a space that is built upon printed from thin air exchange coins.

[Anonymous No.52920968]

>>52920939
BCH got hijacked and failed to scale, nobody uses that shit.

[Anonymous No.52920981]

>>52920939
BCH decided that the dev's rather than the market should dictate how the coin is used. They did this by restricting the OP_RETURN limit to 220 bytes. They also wanted to get rid of proof of work in favor of an avalanch consensus mechanism and all sorts of other stupid shit. BCH is nothing but a developers play thing. Hard forks every 6 months, bullshit that won't attract any long term development because there's no guarantee that the years of work you've invested in won't be pointless because some BCH dev decided to change something.
They also refused to scale up the network which removed a bunch of use cases and utility from BCH. They want it to be purely for payments which is stupid because bitcoin was released with SCRIPT enabling so much more functionality.
They also allowed Amaury Sechet to come in and fuck the difficulty adjustment algorithim so that BCH could never have more than 10% of the hash power. This preserved BTC's claim to all the hash and miners during the initial fork.

[Anonymous No.52921217]

>>52920700
>Bitcoin is an idea, it's not supposed to scale,

[Anonymous No.52921226]

>>52920700
>Bitcoin is an idea, it's not supposed to scale

[Anonymous No.52921243]

>>52920700
>Bitcoin is an idea, it's not supposed to scale.

[Anonymous No.52921277]

>>52920962
Time will tell anon, everything started out as a vague and now y'all can imagine the evolution of the internet. But then lets see how well these automobiles will use these NFTs to their advantage especially in Web3 gaming.
>Folks are printing heavy on Trump cards, could this be where politics and NFTs come to play?

[Anonymous No.52921663]

>>52920870
>I was refuting him
It didn't work as that website looks biased to me, and the arguments were poor.

[Anonymous No.52922332]

>>52919116

Cockblockstream. They do to Bitcoin what you’re jealous friend does to your rap.

[Anonymous No.52922690]

>>52920339
>>52920386
>>52920439
I get hating Bitcoin Core and Blockstream but have no idea why you would want to tarnish your name attaching it to a con artist like Craig Wright. BCH accomplishes the same goal as BSV but doesn't have the weight of Fauxoshi attached to it.

[Anonymous No.52924925]

bump for interest

[Anonymous No.52924964]

>>52919116
They’re just the type of autistic nerds you see in every tech company. They think they built the whole thing and have strong opinions about everything.