Im since 7 years in crypto

[Anonymous No.52896312]

but i never needed to use 1 LINK for anything

[Anonymous No.52896331]

ETH already has an SC feature, why do we need link?

[Anonymous No.52896352]

>>52896312
Link = dead shitcoin
staking = masternode scam
Sergey = fat grifter

The cultists will never acknowledge this and would rather screech about Bulgarians and trannies. It's beyond pathetic

[Anonymous No.52896362]

>>52896312
Unless you're a developer, you'll never need to use Link.

[Anonymous No.52896364]

>>52896331
To link it

[Anonymous No.52896394]

>>52896352
>talks about screeching
>is screeching in multiple threads about a token he doesn't hold

[Anonymous No.52896409]

>>52896394
lmao I love shitting on you cultist scum, post more based Sergey memes i'm sure that will help the price action

[Anonymous No.52896465]

>>52896409
>Yes, I also go out of my way to shit on random sportsball teams I'm not a fan of
>Why yes, I routinely spend my free time obsessively hating games I don't play
>Of course, I also regularly visit investment forums to bash stocks
I will never understand people like this. Mind boggling to think that there are people who would rather spend their time hating things instead of developing healthy interests and hobbies. I guess the "go build something" meme made a good point after all.

[Anonymous No.52896498]

>>52896465
I will never understand people bitching and moaning about FUD in /biz/
there is not a single project or asset in this board which doesn't get constantly shitted on
pick any fucking thread you want, you'll find people bitching all fucking day
XRP, GME, HBAR, ROSE, /SMG/ you fucking name it
if any of you retarded cuckolds bothered to get out of your clearly labeled circlejerking echo chamber threads you'd stop been so surprised every fucking day

[Anonymous No.52896516]

>>52896312
If you used Defi, you paid for Link tokens.

[Anonymous No.52896528]

>>52896498
>FUD
schizo babble by delusional bagholders

Every single crypto community rants about "muh FUD" as if there are anonymous posters trying to steal their bags. He is the prime example of a battered wife defending his husband lmao

[Anonymous No.52896539]

>>52896498
>there is not a single project or asset in this board which doesn't get constantly shitted on
Nothing like Link though.

[Anonymous No.52896554]

>>52896539
because this is a link board according to (You)?
seriously what the fuck did you expect?
you would have a point if an example of a universally liked project in /biz/ existed, but it fucking doesn't

[Anonymous No.52896569]

>>52896539
you dumb fucking retard...Link was shilled on a daily basis since 2018. Most of us have a bag of LINK, the reason why it's "FUDDED" is because it has been underperforming while Chainlink Labs made 2 billion by selling on retail investors and making empty promises about pretty much everything.

I bet you believe Bulgarian transexuals are trying to steal your precious bags. I swear you faggots are beyond braindead,

[Anonymous No.52896578]

>>52896312
>Im since 7 years
These barely intelligible ESL fud threads MUST be a psy-op to make fudders look retarded, right? No way this is what we are up against

[Anonymous No.52896610]

>>52896539
Lol if you do the math, Link gets about 100 times more fud than ETH on here.

[Anonymous No.52896612]

>>52896498
>there is not a single project or asset in this board which doesn't get constantly shitted on
Exactly.There is not a single brand, piece of entertainment media, celebrity, stock, crypto or sports team without its gaggle of dedicated haters. Why is there such a big group of people that seem to be pre-programmed to do nothing but hate and detract? Where is the fulfillment in that? Many would agree that spending so much time, effort and mind space on something that you hate is a waste and ultimately bad for your mental health but hey what do I know.

[Anonymous No.52896629]

>>52896312
People on /hm use it everyday

[Anonymous No.52896637]

>>52896569
>I bet you believe Bulgarian transexuals are trying to steal your precious bags. I swear you faggots are beyond braindead,
Its an in-group method of making sure members don't ask questions. Naming an ethereal enemy that's out to get them.

[Anonymous No.52896640]

>>52896610
it also gets 100 times more shilling than anything else

[Anonymous No.52896661]

>>52896637
gosh I want to punch those disgusting cultists, they're the biggest dick riders of Sergey.

That fat piece of shit is 80% responsible for the abysmal price action Link has had

[Anonymous No.52896667]

>>52896554
>because this is a link board according to (You)?
If people on /biz/ hold more Link than ETH, then logically there should be less fud, not more.

>>52896569
>Chainlink Labs made 2 billion by selling on retail investors and making empty promises about pretty much everything
ETH is holding $18 billion hostage after two years of empty promises.
The vast majority of these ETH stakers are holding a collective ~15 billion in unrealized losses, and so far it looks like they're stuck of another year.

Whichever way you look at this, ETH is many times worse than Chainlink. Yet they get a minute fraction of the fud.

[Anonymous No.52896668]

>>52896612
debating, clashing, harshly criticizing things is the way to go forward and actually determine the value of anything
if it doesn't hold under extreme scrutiny it's not worth it
your post makes zero sense in the context of how truth is determined
also I love how you moved the goalposts from
>why are people fixated on trashing link??
>errr I meant why people in general tend to be negative about shit they don't like?
all over the fucking place lmao

[Anonymous No.52896684]

>>52896640
the FUD:shill ratio is currently about 10:1

[Anonymous No.52896685]

>>52896667
>then logically there should be less fud, not more
according to what fucking logic bro? if people don't hold something they don't care about it as much
literally what the fuck is up with these asinine mental gymnastics

[Anonymous No.52896700]

>>52896312
yeah i bet you've never used tcp/ip before as well

[Anonymous No.52896701]

>>52896684
yes, and it still gets shilled far more than anything else here, what's your point?

[Anonymous No.52896706]

>>52896610
It's insane.

>>52896668
>debating, clashing, harshly criticizing things is the way to go forward and actually determine the value of anything
Not when one single project gets 100 times the hate.

>>52896685
>according to what fucking logic bro?
If you hold something, you don't shit on it until you sell first.
Only a mental case would fud their own bags.

[Anonymous No.52896725]

>>52896706
>Not when one single project gets 100 times the hate.
it doesn't, the simple truth is that LINK is the most popular crypto here, so logically it gets shitted on the hardest
>If you hold something, you don't shit on it until you sell first
I'm assuming these people are trying to determine if they should sell or not
you don't make any fucking sense whatsoever

[Anonymous No.52896729]

>>52896701
That it gets disproportionately fudded on here. Fudders claim their justification is 'linkies shitting up the board' when they now shit up the board 10x as hard

[Anonymous No.52896755]

>>52896729
but it's a /link/ board or so I've been told?
essentially what the other guy says, it's far nore popular than anything else here, so it naturally it gets hated the most

[Anonymous No.52896786]

>>52896755
I accept it should be hated the most because it is the most popular. But I don't see any other project get fudded 10x as hard as it's shilled

[Anonymous No.52896805]

>>52896668
Re-read my posts, I did not mention LINK once. Just find it odd how people fixate on hating specific things like LINK, Star Citizen, Britney Spears (back in the day), Bitcoin (like this Buttcoin guys) to name a few... while most people just shrug and move on when it enters their field of view and they don't particularly care for it. I don't think Star Citizen will ever be completed, and when I catch wind of its existence once or twice a year I take a quick look and move on. Why would I actively seek out Star Citizen cultists and bicker and argue with them day in day out? This is so far removed from "harshly criticizing to determine the value" it's kind of funny you would even try to play it off as that. It's an obsession.

And to be fair, someone having an obsession for something they LIKE is way more logical and respectable to me than someone having an obsession for something they DISLIKE. Beta behavior.

[Anonymous No.52896830]

>>52896786
the general consensus is that most if not all of them are shitcoins, while link is endlessly portrayed as "the most legit, the most important, the golden ticket to the 4IR, so once again, the holders themselves are raising the standards to impossible heights
but still, if it wasn't so aggressively shilled here, none would care

[Anonymous No.52896840]

>>52896312
that's because token not needed.

[Anonymous No.52896847]

>>52896640
>>52896701
It absolutely does not.
Check the catalog right now; there are 9 Link fud threads vs 3 Link shill threads (one of which is actually about how strong the fud is lol)

[Anonymous No.52896869]

>>52896706
I fud my own bags extensively, it's fun as fuck and I don't want other people buying in. I want it to be an exclusive club between me and an elite few

[Anonymous No.52896870]

>>52896725
>the simple truth is that LINK is the most popular crypto here, so logically it gets shitted on the hardest
The most popular gets shit on the hardest?
That makes zero sense.

Also, there's no way ETH is 100x "less popular" on here than ETH.
Odds are /biz/ holds way more value in ETH than they do in Link.

[Anonymous No.52896881]

>>52896847
>right now
1 week ago the board was literally flooded with staking threads, not to even mention that link has been consistently on the top 3 most mentioned cryptos in /biz/ for at least 4 years

[Anonymous No.52896884]

>>52896755
>but it's a /link/ board or so I've been told?
A Link fud board, yes.

See >>52896847

[Anonymous No.52896887]

>>52896830
If 9 out of 10 threads about a project are how it's a scam and is going to 0. Wouldn't you say that opinion is the 'general consensus'?

[Anonymous No.52896898]

>>52896805
>just find it odd to rationalize how the world works
welcome to adulthood I guess?
>>52896870
>The most popular gets shit on the hardest?
bro, that literally applies to EVERYTHING
the most popular sports team is the most hated one, the most popular politician has the most vicious adversaries, and so on
jesus fucking christ this board is filled with teenagers

[Anonymous No.52896909]

>>52896898
>welcome to adulthood I guess?
Nice cop out, good talk.

[Anonymous No.52896915]

>>52896881
Flooded with staking fud threads, yes

[Anonymous No.52896918]

>>52896887
but you all keep telling me the Fud is silly and none of this is true? you keep contradicting yourselves

[Anonymous No.52896933]

>>52896869
>I fud my own bags extensively, it's fun as fuck
Same way cutting off your own dick is.

The point of investing is to make money, not tarnish the reputation of your investments.

>>52896898
>bro, that literally applies to EVERYTHING
If Chainlink were the most popular, it wouldn't have way more fudders than shillers at all times.
Even in 2018-2019-2020 when Link was pumping against the market, there were always way more fudders than shillers.

[Anonymous No.52896934]

>>52896918
The general consensus can't be silly and untrue?

[Anonymous No.52896938]

>>52896918
I do believe the fud is silly and most of it is untrue. My personl opinion is irrelevant to the 'general consensus' of the board

[Anonymous No.52896942]

>>52896915
>Flooded with staking fud threads,
because you're literally a cuckold if you stake your crypto.

Imagine investing in crypto just to earn 4%, that's fucking lower than US bonds

[Anonymous No.52896960]

>>52896881
>1 week ago the board was literally flooded with staking threads
Because that’s when staking came out, you dope.
And the vast majority were staking fud. Fuddies went absolutely ham trying to keep people from staking.

[Anonymous No.52896962]

>>52896942
>4%
If you're rounding then it's 5%

[Anonymous No.52896968]

>>52896934
>>52896938
ok so I guess ada is legit cause biz hates it and link is shit cause biz loves it

[Anonymous No.52896972]

>>52896933
>If Chainlink were the most popular
but it was and still is, objectively speaking, why are you trying to debunk reality bro?

[Anonymous No.52896991]

>>52896933
The quality of my investments speak for themselves, moron. If a lone fudder can bring down an investment then that investment was never high quality in the first place. I will NEVER stop fudding chainlink at every opportunity I see, it is as natural to me as breathing at this point, I know not when I started but all I know now is that I cannot stop.

[Anonymous No.52897000]

>>52896972
It's the most popular among fudders, yes.

>>52896968
>/biz/ loves Link
what
This is the same place that - while Link was pumping against the entire market for years - pawned the entire compendium of fud that is the Zeus Capital report.

[Anonymous No.52897009]

>>52896968
If that is the conclusion you draw from this interaction then I have nothing more to say.

[Anonymous No.52897011]

>>52897000
if anything, the staking threads filled with smug linkies celebrating proves this board is filled with holders
keep coping anon

[Anonymous No.52897026]

>>52896352
LINK has partners with much better utility, kek. Like ALBT

[Anonymous No.52897030]

>>52896991
>The quality of my investments speak for themselves, moron.
That's not how speculation works.

>>52897011
Of course this place has Link holders.
But it has many more Link fudders.

[Anonymous No.52897041]

>>52897009
seriously read the original post I made, general consensus reffered to other shitcoins, not link

[Anonymous No.52897065]

>>52897030
because it has the most holders and the most aggressive shilling, out of every other platform
what's so hard to comprehend?
do you watch football? the most popular teams in Span are Real Madrid and Barcelona, half the country hates the first team and vice versa
that's how the fucking thing works

[Anonymous No.52897080]

>>52897065
>it has the most holders and the most aggressive shilling
It has 3 shill threads right now.
It never has tons of shill threads, but it always has tons of fud threads.

[Anonymous No.52897101]

>>52897080
even so, I'm willing to bet it still has more positive threads than anything else at any given time
count the rest of them for me bro, be scientific

[Anonymous No.52897113]

>>52897101
>I'm willing to bet it still has more positive threads than anything else at any given time
3 shill threads now (one of which is about the fud)
9 fud threads now

It's virtually always like this.

[Anonymous No.52897117]

>>52897113
where are the threads for the rest of the shitcoins on /biz/?

[Anonymous No.52897160]

>>52897117
In the catalog.

Go into the XRP general for instance, it's 99% good vibes with maybe one or two recurring shitposters.
Same with Hex, Algo, Avax, ...

[Anonymous No.52897180]

>>52897160
so no 3+ more threads for XRP or HEX or ALGO or AVAX than LINK, only one? I see, thanks for proving my point

[Anonymous No.52897195]

>>52896960
btw I love how you completely ommited the fact that Link has been in the top 3 most mentioned cryptos on /biz/ for the last 4 years lol

[Anonymous No.52897205]

>>52897041
And the other anon you're arguing with it saying the general consensus for LINK is not positive, as at any given point there are more FUD threads than neutral/shill threads.

[Anonymous No.52897226]

>>52897205
I'm disputing that, and the proof is itt
look how many anons including (You) are vehemently defending Link
you're not going yo convince me that ada or xrp or any other shit has that here

[Anonymous No.52897240]

>>52897180
There are literally two Link shill threads. The catalog is filled with shitcoin shill threads.

[Anonymous No.52897253]

>>52897240
you said 3?
>The catalog is filled with shitcoin shill threads
and I'm saying that LINK still has more positive threads dedicated to it than any other shitcoin getting shilled here, and you just proved it for me
once again, thanks

[Anonymous No.52897275]

>>52897226
>I'm disputing that
Buddy, during 2018-2019-2020 Chainlink BTFO-d the entire market, and /biz/ still managed to spew enough fud for something like Zeus Capital to create a huge collection of it.

>>52897253
>you said 3?
One of the threads is about how much fud there is.

>I'm saying that LINK still has more positive threads dedicated to it than any other shitcoin getting shilled here
How? It has two.

[Anonymous No.52897284]

>>52897275
1 more than any other shitcoin

[Anonymous No.52897309]

>>52897275
buddy I was here and the overwhelming majority of /biz/ was entitely pro-Link
enough with the gaslighting fss
>this is a /link/ board trannies cope seethe and dial8

[Anonymous No.52897313]

Remember Zeus Capital? Does any other project get fudded to that extent? For years now this board has been swarmed with link fud all day everyday.

[Anonymous No.52897329]

>>52897313
yes
https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/

[Anonymous No.52897330]

>>52897284
And 10 more fud threads than any other shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.52897344]

>>52897330
which simply means it remains the most popular project by far
we're going full circle here

[Anonymous No.52897348]

>>52897226
>I'm disputing that, and the proof is itt
Where?
>look how many anons including (You) are vehemently defending Link
I am not defending LINK, read my posts.
>you're not going yo convince me that ada or xrp or any other shit has that here
Take a gander >>52853490. Even shit like dog with bat and other shitcoins have people defending it with everything they got. What a weird statement to make.

[Anonymous No.52897366]

>>52897348
I will never understand people passionately defending blatant scams for free, any insights anon?
kek the fucking irony

[Anonymous No.52897376]

>>52897344
Why is LINK's fud:shill ratio so much larger than any other project?

[Anonymous No.52897386]

>>52897348
bro come on, be honest, you are definitely trying to defend Link, if not why are you even here complaining about fud and shit

[Anonymous No.52897397]

>>52897366
>I will never understand people passionately defending blatant scams for free, any insights anon?
I am not defending LINK, read my posts. Also please refer to >>52896805
>And to be fair, someone having an obsession for something they LIKE is way more logical and respectable to me than someone having an obsession for something they DISLIKE. Beta behavior.

[Anonymous No.52897425]

>>52897376
because the shill ratio is astonishingly higher than for any other project
how many times are you going to make me repeat myself?
>>52897386
then why are you here? People get polarised for all kinds of retarded reasons, I don't understand what point you're trying to make here

[Anonymous No.52897427]

>>52897226
There are literally more id’s ITT arguing against link than for it

[Anonymous No.52897434]

>>52897427
thanks for restoring the balance then

[Anonymous No.52897448]

>>52897284
You're insane. Random shitcoins have two shill threads by mere happenstance.

>>52897309
>the overwhelming majority of /biz/ was entitely pro-Link
lol you're insane, ever since the Google Cloud blog the fud spam completely overwhelmed any positivity.
Zeus Capital made a massive report that was 99% lifted directly from /biz/.
Even Bloomberg was regurgitating the "Google is a fake partnership" fud from /biz/.
Pic related.

[Anonymous No.52897469]

I use bit every day and have never used one link ever.

[Anonymous No.52897481]

>>52897448
bro, just admit that LINK gets shilled here more than anything else, there's no need for all these embarrassing mental gymnastics
>>52897397
>I'm not defending link I just don't understand why people want to criticize the "best"
then you're an immature child, sorry

[Anonymous No.52897487]

>>52897425
LINK shill threads: 2
LINK fud threads: 10

Other shitcoins shill threads: 1
Other shitcoins fud threads: 0

>how many times are you going to make me repeat myself?
As many times as it takes for you to make a convincing argument

[Anonymous No.52897518]

>>52897481
>just admit that LINK gets shilled here more than anything else
You're insane.
There are two (2) Link shill threads in the catalog.

[Anonymous No.52897523]

>>52897434
I’m just stating fact, i didn’t argue one way or another

[Anonymous No.52897590]

>>52896312
How many times a day would you say your grandma's or neighbor's life is affected by the "oracle problem"

[Anonymous No.52897605]

>>52897386
I gave plenty of examples outside the scope of /biz/ and "fud". It seems that trying to start a conversation around the psyche of terminally obsessed detractors doesn't sit well with apparent terminally obsessed detractors.
>if the shoe fits...

>>52897481
>>I'm not defending link I just don't understand why people want to criticize the "best"
>then you're an immature child, sorry
Another cheap cop out. I never said I don't understand why people criticize "the best". I said I don't understand why any popular thing a person can conceive off, spawns people dedicated to tearing it down. And with a passion and dedication that rivals the people championing that same thing. Personally I'd consider that a waste of time and energy, whereas being heavily interested in (or obsessed with) things you do like seems like a much more natural and healthy thing to do.

In other words, do detractors of popular things lack hobbies or interests?

[Anonymous No.52897659]

>>52897605
>I said I don't understand why any popular thing a person can conceive off, spawns people dedicated to tearing it down
and I keep telling you that if you're an adult and you still struggle to understand basic human psychology, you're a moron
also stop being a little pussy ass bitch and own the fact you entered this thread to debunk the fudders

[Anonymous No.52897663]

>>52896539
that whole thing just proved most of the board is in link and not that much into eth
obvious new information releases about the project the board is heavily invested in would bring some discussion
still find it surprising how anything else but unflatering praise for sergey is constructed as fud, the initial blog post was really bad: 2 year lockup and total uncertainty about build
half of those posts in the fud column are justified reactions to this news
this isnt my unfounded opinion but was again proven by cll own response in making the before unknown staking v0.2 to unlock faster

really the fud campaign waged here has mentally destroyed the board and makes real discussion impossible

[Anonymous No.52897687]

>>52896539
STINKIE LINKIE TOKENS! GET YOUR STINKIE LINKIE TOKENS!

[Anonymous No.52897690]

>>52897663
>most of the board is in link and not that much into eth
Horseshit.
You're just too new to know about how deep /biz/ was into ETH in 2015-2016, and too retarded to scan the catalog for ETH threads.

Link had 100x the backlash for its staking than ETH, even though ETH's staking was and is many times more disastrous.
This tells you everything you need to know about Link fud on here.

[Anonymous No.52897717]

>>52897487
>I don't accept your argument
cool, to me it makes perfect sense so let's agree to disagree and move on
repeating the same thing over and over again won't make either of us to change our perspectives

[Anonymous No.52897732]

>>52896312
>OG #10874 has sold
it's over

[Anonymous No.52897747]

>>52897690
key word was
the flooding of staking threads last week clearly proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the majority of /biz/ lurkers are LINK holders
if you disprove that, where are all the ETH threads?

[Anonymous No.52897768]

>>52897747
>the flooding of staking threads last week
9 out of 10 were full-on fud threads.

>where are all the ETH threads?
In the catalog.

[Anonymous No.52897769]

>>52897487
I have to say: link FUD threads are extremely funny

[Anonymous No.52897798]

>>52897768
>9 out of 10 were full-on fud threads
/link/ board, fud4fun etc
>In the catalog.
all I see is LINK threads
sorry anon, it seems you lost (again)

[Anonymous No.52897811]

>>52897798
>all I see is LINK threads
Yes, 9 fud threads.

[Anonymous No.52897837]

>>52897811
yes, double digit LINK threads and zero ETH threads
which begs the question, where are all these ETH holders bro?

[Anonymous No.52897865]

>>52897837
>yes, double digit LINK threads
Anon, there are two Link shill threads. That's about the same as any shitcoin.

The difference lies in the fud threads, all 9 of them.

[Anonymous No.52897893]

>>52897659
>and I keep telling you that if you're an adult and you still struggle to understand basic human psychology, you're a moron
Pack it up boys, if you can't penetrate the deranged obsessions of terminally online chuds you're a moron.
>people hate things because... they just do okay!
Compelling argument.

>also stop being a little pussy ass bitch and own the fact you entered this thread to debunk the fudders
I'm having way to much fun watching you squirm as you can't label me with whatever epithets you have ready to hurl at Linkies. I am not defending LINK and I will not defend LINK. I'm just a simple, immature moron trying to figure out basic human psychology by observing obsessed supporters and detractors of popular things, in this case the cryptocurrency token Chainlink (ticker: LINK).

[Anonymous No.52897915]

>>52897865
no it actually is 1 more than any other shitcoin, and let's be real, the catalogue has usually more than 2 positive threads regardless of the FUD
the difference lies in the fact that you can't demonstrably prove the statement that "there are more ETH holders than LINK holders in this board"
>>52897893
>I'm having way too much fun seething and blogposting
yeah, I can tell
Imagine getting triggered so hard lmao

[Anonymous No.52897929]

>>52897915
>no it actually is 1 more than any other shitcoin
There are a bunch of shitcoins with more than 1 shill thread lol

Only one coin has 9 fud threads though.

[Anonymous No.52897954]

>>52897929
no they aren't bruh, lmao, we're now resorting to blatant lies

[Anonymous No.52897981]

>>52897915
>Imagine getting triggered so hard lmao
>23pbtid
Yeah I'm thinking I hit a little too close to home for your comfort. Catch ya next time anon! Impressive deflection skills.

[Anonymous No.52897998]

>>52897981
>gets btfo
>abandons thread
see ya in the next one bro

[Anonymous No.52898013]

>>52897954
After a quick scan just now I saw at least two shill threads for BSV, AVAX

[Anonymous No.52898077]

>>52898013
>two blatantly obvious bot/jeet threads titled:Hello, I own AVAX!
>a bsv general with 1 reply and one more thread with 3 replies
kek
you're right bro, link has shit compared to this!
the absolute fucking state

[Anonymous No.52898120]

>>52898077
>th-those don't count
Link has two shill threads; that's within the statistical margin of error for literally any shitcoin with one or two threads in the catalog right now.
What Link does have that's unlike any other shitcoin is over 10 fud threads by now.

[Anonymous No.52898257]

>>52898120
they don't though, pretty soon all of them will get pruned, I doubt even one of them will reach 50 posts
>pointless filler
see pic rel and quietly exit thread, you can argue that most of them are fud from paid bulgarians or retarded fud4fun hodlers, nevertheless, the fact remains that link has been the most popular crypto on /biz/ for almost 5 years

[Anonymous No.52898287]

>>52898257
>see pic rel
9/10 of those mentions are fud. How utterly retarded are you.

[Anonymous No.52898304]

>>52898287
kek the irony

[Anonymous No.52898324]

>>52896498
28 posts in 2 hours, if this thread stays alive we might see a new record!

[Anonymous No.52898376]

>>52898304
You're proving my point that Link gets more fud on here than anything else.

[Anonymous No.52898445]

>>52898376
you've been proving my point the entire thread but you're unironically too dense to realize this
I have to stop responding to your low quality bait pilpul posts though cause according to this organic post>>52898324 anons are bothered by my pbtid, sorry

[Anonymous No.52898465]

>>52898445
As proven by the current catalog, Link gets about the same shill threads as any random shitcoin, but gets about 9x the fud.

[Anonymous No.52898476]

>>52897690
no fren i was there, i just shows that the board moved from eth to link
i did i moved all of my eth gains from last bull into link in june
and like the other anon said the past few weeks proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that the board is link heavy and eth light at this moment
constant updates on the link pool and people posting their rewards while eth staked threads are few and far between
for whatever may come /biz/ apparently packed its bags, but again my main point was that non criticism is allowed on link today which is a retarded stance, especially with how the team is behaving in this brutal bear market
again they dropped all this news on the day of the local low

[Anonymous No.52898509]

>>52898476
You're literally insane if you think /biz/ has more money in Link than it does in ETH, especially considering the past two years.

[Anonymous No.52898593]

>>52898509
well not in absolute terms as a few lurking whales could easily upset that number
but the most users here are indeed portfolio heavy into link that has been proven now, you would have to be pretty retarded not to draw that conclusion from the activity here

[Anonymous No.52898641]

yes anon, you are absolutely right, I finally concede and accept my defeat
eth holders on /biz/ clearly outnumber link holders by at least a factor of 10, they're just incredibly patient hence why nobody complaining about their shitty fucked up staking and extremely stoic, they just don't want to talk about it that much!
obviously link is inexplicably and unjustifiably getting fudded by a group of people whom evidently DON'T OWN it, and are probably employed by shady bulgarian conspirators with infinite deep pockets who are perpetually shorting link, because a -87% drop is not enough already for them to make any fucking gains
that's literally the only possible explanation for this mess!

[Anonymous No.52898689]

>>52898593
>but the most users here are indeed portfolio heavy into link that has been proven now,
Buddy, you need ETH to interact with 90% of crypto products.
There's virtually nobody on /biz/ who holds no ETH.

[Anonymous No.52898704]

>>52896516

[Anonymous No.52898737]

Funny how half the thread is fuddies desperately trying to deboonk this pic >>52896539

“Watch how they recoil, ‘I’ve been found out!’”

[Anonymous No.52898824]

>>52897590
SBF himself said "proof of reserve" would have helped mitigate FTX's collapse, word for word. Thats what Chainlink has been shilling recently. You are a gay nostake nolinker

[Anonymous No.52898872]

>>52898689
what is it with these retarded absolute interpretations fren thats peak midwittery
i never said the anons here didnt have eth, i said they are portfolio heavy into link that doesnt mean 100%, it just means their single largest holding is link

[Anonymous No.52899141]

>>52896934
>the general consensus of a tranny discord is a fact
Unironically hang yourself.

[Anonymous No.52899243]

>>52897386
Beacaue genuine conversation is stifled. But you're the logiclet as demonstrated here >>52896968 so try not to think too hard. It's not your strong suit.

[Anonymous No.52901296]

>>52896312
I'm 8 years in crypto and have never used Link but I'm all in it.
Actually, I look at the truflation site which uses Link, so I do use it indirectly.

[Anonymous No.52902061]

>>52898704

[Anonymous No.52902591]

>>52898824
It's all part of the plan. Ftx was fake and gay anyway and setup to fail on purpose so that using chainlink por would become law.

[Anonymous No.52902613]

https://youtu.be/VZP5lIzGNT8

In your fear and uncertainty it will be tempting to put your trust in some person or group who emerges and claims to have a "way out", which will involve sacrificing some of your liberty. You must resist this urge. These self‑proclaimed saviors may appear in many forms, under any number of banners: "intellectuals", "influential people", "progressive thinkers", "billionaires", "the UN", "the EU", "self‑selected multinational coalition", "global leaders", "world governments", "radicals", "revolutionaries" or some combination of these. They may appear charismatic. They may appear to have your best interests at heart. They may stand united, arm‑in‑arm, proclaiming "We know the way forward", advancing some form of "people's revolution" or "Global Reset" where "you will be in charge", hawking various "‑isms" and promises of a better tomorrow. These people are not your friends. They are not to be trusted. They are the same global banking elites using the same fear tactics, shilling the same magic potions and snake oils as always. They want only one thing: power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cieu5nDDssc

[Anonymous No.52902667]

Fud in full swing due to further downtrend. Set orders for support around $5.

Thanks frens.

[Anonymous No.52902710]

>>52896465
you spammed this board for 4 years and now the board is spamming your humiliation back

[Anonymous No.52902741]

>>52902710
You weren't here 4 years ago, though.

[Anonymous No.52903084]

another high quality chainlink thread has radicalized me against the jews!

[Anonymous No.52903217]

>>52902591
>TRUST THE PLAN
>$1000 EO-ACK
>I, I mean anytime now
ok Qturd